SRA Part 2

Spread the love
  • Yum

Public office.
There is a common-law offence of misconduct in public office. They have a duty to preserve the Queen’s peace & prevent crime.
Court case Dytham [1979] shows a police constable who deliberately took no action.

 

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones
Date: Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:31 PM
Subject: To Mr. Paul Philip the Chief Executive of the SRA you are involved in TAX FRAUD & murder cover-up  by SRA not taking action & Bent cops
To: Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP Rt Hon Boris Johnson <[email protected]>, CORBYN, Jeremy <[email protected]>, Zac Goldsmith <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Heather Douglas <[email protected]>, AF Team <[email protected]>,

From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM

Parliamentary Candidate

Freeman of the City of London

All correspondences by email,

25/02/2020

To The Rt. Honourable Boris Johnson, MP

Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

To The Rt. Priti Patel, MP

Home Secretary
Direct Communications Unit
2 Marsham Street
London, SW1P

To Police Fraud

To Mr. Paul Philip the Chief Executive of the SRA you are involved in TAX FRAUD & murder cover-up  by SRA not taking action

To Ms Heather,

In response to Ms Heather Complaints Officer of SRA of 25/2/2020

You sent me an email on 24 Jan 2020, and you reference a letter from 10 of January and other dates from me etc (see your own email at the bottom of this page).

You say my email of 10 Jan is the same content, but this is not true. You do not show any investigations or reports from the crimes sent to you.
Please see the email, Feb 6, 2020, at 4:06 PM which I have updated.
I point out new issues you have not looked at – FACT.
Please answer this and the email Feb 6 2020 onwards.

Also Email Date: Fri, Jan 31, 2020  where by using your defined SRA rules of conduct, Bartlett and yourself are failing. And you do not answer these points.

Please answer the following points I list below and back up how you can show you investigated these issues. I request a SAR (Subject Access Request) to check this.

I also asked for this in the email of  Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2020.

We have in Dec 2019 a court case that showed many issues you have not investigated. The new evidence is lawyers hitting the elderly (my mother) who then are murdered, Tax fraud, to stealing etc

First Example
1) Bartlett lied about 100,000 care bills for my mother when it was in fact 10,000 (in fact none), and he did this in the tax files he put to the taxman. This is fraud & you are helping to cover this up.

See this weblink with Bartlett’s own files for the court case in Dec 2019 of his own letters.

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-as-executor-of-my-mothers-will-lied-to-the-court-saying-100000-care-bills-when-in-fact-it-was-10000-he-even-lied-to-the-tax-man/

EMAIL BELOW HAS COPIES OF THESE LETTERS see Tue, Jan 28, 2020.

1.1 Letter From Bartlett showing the amount of money in debt by the pen point. The Letter below 7 March 2017
£101,629.00 (LIE with 100,000 that did not exist) (this was done from 2015 onwards)

1.2 The letter Bartlett sent to Tax HM Revenue & Customs in 2016. See Official Tax Document below. Sent to Tax HM Revenue & Customs as true!!! BUT a lie of 100,000 and repeated in other files Bartlett did.

1.3 Then the letter Bartlett was forced to send to the court in 2019 Dec all files. Note he blames my dead sister for the bill being wrong on the 100,000, but he was the executor of my mother’s will by force.

Bartlett knew this 100,000 was wrong from 2015 onwards.

MA (sister son in law) would have also known this was a lie.  TAX FRAUD.

1.4 The Stamp on the letter from the company Bartlett owned (Matthew Lewis)  state bill received on 22 July 2015 for 10,000 and clearly never was 100,000  And nothing to do with my sister. Bartlett lied!

1.5 This Letter shows the true bill in 2015, which Bartlett and MA knew about. Note Court medical experts said my mother was very ill so should not have to pay. Letter Sent to Bartlett in 2015.

1.6 The Court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green (Bartletts Barrister) went to Court with dirty hands From 2016 ONWARDS. They lied about this and other things.

1.7 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

1.8 We ask for all Court action to be removed in any court case Mr Bartlett & Green is involved with Me as they used the above lie in all parts of the court case I had with them.

1.9 We seek damages from 2007 onwards when Bartlett first started these actions with his lawyer Mr Woodside help IN THIS by damaging my mother’s will for self gain.

1.10 They preyed on my mother, who had medical issues for gain. They did this to others. And they knew the police detective who was in charge of preventing these crimes MA who in 2019 asked for 180,000 in court from my mother’s estate which he knew he should not have and he did other crimes see

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/a-bent-police-detective-who-should-investigates-but-does-not-puts-firewall-and-witnesses-shut-up-and-he-asks-for-180k/

1.11 They failed their duty of care to my mother and me.

1.12 The lawyers said Bartlett and Woodside did the Wills wrong on purpose to cause problems and cause costs.

AND we did not know about this until after the court case Dec 2019, and only in 2020 I was told it was tax fraud by the Tax HM Revenue & Customs

1.13 Also Bartlett was done in the past by the Law Society by 300,000 fine

SEE Mr. Bartlett  reported in the March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003

2) The court medical expert said my mother was hit by Woodside her lawyer to gain from my mother,

The lawyer Woodside who works for Bartlett and you can check all of this by asking the court for the medical expert to talk to you.

He is also a lawyer and says the Wills were done wrong by this law firm to deliberately cause trouble to make money.

You were sent a tape where this was done to others.

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/
3) There is no doubt my mother was nearly killed in 2013 and them murdered in 2015.

3.1) coroner trying to hide my mother’s inquest tape, where Dr Bland lied and was struck off in 2018
4) We can now show from Dec 2019 court case a police detective MA (sister son in law) also gain by this and therefore no investigations occurred. BUT this is about to change due to the other crimes.

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/a-bent-police-detective-who-should-investigates-but-does-not-puts-firewall-and-witnesses-shut-up-and-he-asks-for-180k/

4.1) then when I  said to Barlett that we can prove my sister drugged my mother, Bartlett then says my sister is being cremated.

4.2) when my mother died in 2015 Bartlett turned up to value my mother’s business with my sister with a black eye and she looked scared,

4.3) Bartlett lied about my mother’s business to make sure it would not get business rates on tax form, instead be a home and pay tax not required but to force sale which Bartlett controlled.

And Bartlett rowed with my  mother’s accountant who said it was a business.

Dec 2015 my mother’s accountant   Barbara Dunbavand   who wanted to help me, then died strangely and the coroner was Nicholas Rheinberg (who did my mother’s inquest…and will not release my mother’s inquest tapes and threatened me. Also known to inquest.org.uk).

And now in 2020 accountants and lawyers say

Looking at what you have gathered so far, you do have plenty of evidence to show that the property was a business property and not simply residential,

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

https://www.cheshire-live.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/mystery-chester-accountant-killed-lorry-11320132

5) The wills of my mother were deliberately done wrong to make work for law firms.
6) and you can show no evidence you have investigated any of the above as if you did you would be like the taxman and other saying murder and fraud is going on here done by bent lawyers who has a history of doing this.
7) You say no new evidence, but you are sent the above.

Then you go on about a consent order which you could ask the court for but
1)  my mother was murdered
2) fraud has occurred
3) lawyers did wills wrong to gain out of all of this and done too many others.

4) YOU COVER THIS UP
You deliberately look like you are hiding these crimes.

I also ask for SAR Subject Access Request on all of this now to see what you have done.,

Please answer this & the Feb 6 email below you were sent
Or get your boss to respond to this

I will be naming you in court proceedings at the RCJ.

Dr Mark Jones FRSM
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.

Freeman of the City of London

 

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:06 PM
Subject: To Boris Johnson, SRA, CPS, Head of Police etc SRA & bent cop protects lawyer who medical experts say a hit my mother for gain. Also 100,000 bill was 10,000 & lied to Tax man worth 000,000s lie
To: Heather Douglas <[email protected]>, Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP Rt Hon Boris Johnson <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Greg <[email protected]>, Jeremy <[email protected]>, Chris Matheson <[email protected]>, Zac Goldsmith <[email protected]>, AF Team <[email protected]>, Public Contact <[email protected]>, Attorney General <[email protected]>, !enquiries <[email protected]>, Panarama BBC <[email protected]>

 

 

From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM

Parliamentary Candidate

Freeman of the City of London

All correspondences by email,

6/02/2020

Dear Boris Johnson,

& head of SRA, Head of Police, Head of CPS, etc

Also

Dear Heather,
The Consent Order 12 December 2019 is irrelevant.

There is Tax Fraud of 100,000 bills which are listed in TAX paper done by Bartlett and in his own court documents.
There is further Tax Fraud of undervaluing my mother’s home by 750,000

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartletts-solicitors-house-valuations/

vs 450,000 in Bartlett’s letter

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-as-executor-of-my-mothers-will-lied-to-the-court-saying-100000-care-bills-when-in-fact-it-was-10000-he-even-lied-to-the-tax-man/

Then further Tax Fraud when, in fact, my mother’s home was business, so no death tax, but Bartlett did this to let him steal my mother’s home.

24/2/2020

Accountant

Looking at what you have gathered so far, you do have plenty of evidence to show that the property was a business property and not simply residential, so you should pass this on to the solicitor handling your mothers estate,

I have pointed out serious crimes done by a lawyer backed up by court submitted documents by the same lawyer.
I have updated my email I sent to you on 31 Jan with new issues I want to be answered.

See many points such as

9

I ask a Subject Access Request or Freedom of Information for how many times Bartlett Law, Bartlett, Woodside or Green etc. have had complaints

etc

As my mother was murdered (she said lawyer hit her to change her will against her wishes)

and my mother’s accountant’s death was said by the coroner strange, but she was, in fact, raising the alarms about this lawyer.
My sister’s death occurred after her looking for me in fear and then Bartlett telling me she had died the day before her cremation.

Then in Dec 2019 finding out in court that a Police Detective MA gains so explanation why no investigation into the said lawyers.

You look like you are involved in the possible cover-up of murders & Tax fraud.

The SRA needs to take action otherwise by their own code of conduct they are failing and breaking their duty of care which allows legal actions against them.
This is urgent, as other lives are at risk.
Best wishes
Mark

UPDATED EMAIL

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones
Date: Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:33 AM
Subject: with key LAW Fwd: To Boris Johnson, SRA, CPS, Head of Police etc SRA & bent cop protects lawyer who medical experts say a hit my mother for gain. Also 100,000 bill was 10,000 & lied to Tax man

 

Any suggestions welcome, I have added law

Dear Heather,

Is the SRA, and you are saying the settlement out of court can ignore the following crimes? LIKE MURDER? TAX Lies, Robbing & hitting ill elderly ladies for gain?

Please see https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/decision-making/guidance/general-dishonesty/

which lists that lawyers should be “trusted to the ends of the earth” (Bolton v Law Society [1993] EWCA Civ 32)

1 New evidence from court case in Dec 2019, that shows my mother was murdered and Bartlett used it for gain. Experts say it should reopen my mother’s corrupt first inquest done by a coroner Bartlett knew.
Are you saying ignore this? Is that what the SRA does?

2 Bartlett knew I was upset by my mother’s horrific murder and cover-up and was so damaged by this and other actions he did, he would not be investigated. So he tried it on like he did to others

2.1 There is no doubt that the £100,000 debt for my mother’s care bill which was really £10,000 trick by Bartlett is a serious crime; he even sent £100,000 costs to the death tax which did not exist.

This is Fraud.

Wed Link here with Bartlett’s own court papers showing the above is what he did. Also in email below from 28 Jan 2020

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-as-executor-of-my-mothers-will-lied-to-the-court-saying-100000-care-bills-when-in-fact-it-was-10000-he-even-lied-to-the-tax-man/

2.2 In Nov 2019 Bartlett & Green lied to me saying the drop of £100,000 care bill debts of my mother to £10,000 was by my actions.

And this is on tape but see exhibits his own office stamp shows from 2015 he knew the real cost was £10,000. NOT £100,000

2.2.1 Bartlett undervalued my mother’s guest house by £750,000 and on tapes he says not a problem..

SRA support this…?

  1. without permission Bartlett took money from my mother’s account which was nothing to do with funeral costs etc

And this must be investigated… or do you think he can get away with this?

Over course it gets worse Bartlett took £3522 out of my mother’s £60,000 bank account in 15/2/2016 and refuses to say what it was for, refuses to release any details whatsoever!

See in all emails to SRA the following 17 May 2016 onwards. So SRA support this?

Theft

see Bultitude v Law Society [2004] EWCA Civ 1853

Mr Bartlett cannot explain where money (see 2nd of August email to him “Please explain the £3522.00 paid from Mavis Banks (my dead mother) Nationwide bank (on the 15/2/2016) without permission. And has nothing to do with the funeral as can see that and other bills were paid with receipts) is going. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7 Note it says by TYPED 2015  see other links)

3.2 Also, before my mother died, my sister said my mother had no money. I found my mother’s bank book and my sister was forced to say to the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money.

(this is on web site exhibits and sent to SRA).

3.3 Then, after my mother’s death, £70,000? appears, and we want to know where this came from?

3.4 this is a serious crime being ignored

3.5 On the website, he is listed as doing this to others. https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1

4 Now in 2020 we find Bartlett did not deal with as executor from 2015 my mother’s shares Worth 100,000s~?

which I found out by accident in 2020.

And as executor of my mother’s will Barrett should have known about this but not listed on Tax form etc More Tax Fraud.

Was this going to be put into his pocket?

Does SRA get a cut of these crimes?

4.1 My sister said my mother had no money and then again MA, and Bartlett knew otherwise (see web site)

4.2, in fact, my sister went to court and said she had forgotten £40,000 of my mother’s money (Exhibit court document by Sister 2013 on website).

4.3 and then after my mother’s death and I started to investigate £70,000 appeared in my mother account.

Bartlett as executor knew about these too.

5  Section: Court case…

The court case finished in Dec 2019.

it was settlement out of court in a court that was corrupt due to the following:

I was not allowed, my witnesses or statements …NOT a fair Trial see HRA.

And other things that even the clerk said was very bad ( i am not allowed to tape in court, but it was a set up).

The Manchester judge Nov 2019  said this was a bad case and I do not doubt if he had been the judge this case would have been different outcome.

The Manchester judge took Bartlett on about his strange high costs and introducing his own court witness ignoring the court etc.

The different judge in Liverpool 2019 Dec knew Bartlett and MA and allowed bad stuff to go on.

6 In the Dec 2019 court, my barrister and others saw the video of my mother saying she was hit by Woodside who was her lawyer and works for Bartlett,

My mother said the following;

 that she was forced to change her will, 

that she was told she had no money to force her to sell her home by Woodside and my sister but this is a lie as £70,000 in my mother’s bank but sister hide it? But Woodside knew about this cash.

and the final will left me everything as i put money into my mother’s home.

All of the court agreed this was shocking but Bartlett and Woodside & MA.

The court medical expert said the UNCUT video was authentic and as it showed me walking into the nursing home and then back out and no way it was set up. My mother was telling the truth.

That she was clearly from the court case murdered to shut her up, but this was not looked at in court case and barristers avoid this issue.

Then my barrister said in private, and I recorded it he wasn’t going to use the video in court and he would drop me in mid-court case if I was going to use it.

I would probably lose everything but if i DID a deal then better off.

So the video of my mother being hit was not used….by corruption.

So the whole court case was done to make it look my not so smart dead sister was involved with all the problems…..and was the bad person.

Also the SRA knew about this video and did nothing. The SRA helped protect lawyers who attack the elderly for gain?

Also in 2020 Bartlett sent a letter for 6k which was in Dec 2019 part of the end deal, so he broke his word.

7 And as my barrister said after the court case

7.1.1) I could take legal action on Woodside for hitting my mother

7.1.2) Woodside did wills and changed them when my mother clearly had dementia and Woodside broke every rule in law

Woodside knew what he was doing was wrong

he failed in his Duty of Care, and it was clearly done to help Bartlett & MA (sister son in law) to gain.

And Bartlett and his lawyer Green knew this too.

7.2 The barrister said I should reopen my mother inquest as new evidence shows in 2013 clear attempt of murder and other issues (BUT he did not want to do this).

In 2013 I found out that my mother was being drugged in a nursing home and mom wanted to see an alternative lawyer as Woodside hit her; then she was nearly murdered.

Woodside knew Dr Bland who drugged my mother and ran that nursing home and Dr Bland was struck off in 2018.

It took a month to kill my mother by trapping her in bed in a bad nursing home.

Removing food and drink from her and stopping me seeing her for only 3 times a week for 1 hour with 2 social workers to stop the press seeing this (I was checked that I did not have a camera etc to record this)

Dr Bland knew Dr N who gave my mother morphine for no clinical reason…after I saw her nearly poisoned. Also hit to try to shut her up.

See website for crime

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

8 Finally

Bartlett is a person who lies all the time

see my mother’s care bill of £100,000 that became £10,000

Bartlett with Green said in Nov court that the reduction of 100,000 to 10,000 was due to me and that was a lie, and I record it on tape…he lies over and over again as his own papers show the bill was 10,000

Bartlett and Woodside (Green too as he went to court with this and did other things) are dangerous to people including the elderly and I have that on tape.

This lie is on Bartlett Tax form he did for my mothers estate from 2015 onwards.

8.1 FACTS

Bartlett became the executor of my mother’s Will by force

Bartlett was told not to do this (emails etcc)…but he did it like RAPE, as he planned to do the following
undervalued my mother home by 750,000
then force the sale of my mother’s home
by 100,000 care bill lie which he knew from the start was a lie.
Also by saying my mother had no money (Woodside action on tape)
All done by Bartlett to buy my mother’s home cheap.

8.2 As my mothers home was also a business, Bartlett knew no tax to be applied, but he did it anyway.

8.2.1 Therefore another Tax fraud by undervaluing my mother’s home.

8.3 Then when Mr Bartlett was trying to force the sale of my mother’s home in 2015, he went to Barbra Dunbavand (BD) (my mother’s accountant for her Business) to say it had to death pay tax.

Then BD told me this was not an issue and would help as my mother’s business should not have Death tax on it, then she died strangely (see Coroner report), and she wanted to help me.

see website for court exhibits

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-law-fraud-murder-corruption/

8.4 Then as I investigate, my mother’s money appears with no explanation.

8.4.1 Then when my mother’s money appears the 100,000 lie debt by Bartlett was going to be used to steal this money.

9

I ask a Subject Access Request or Freedom of Information for how many times Bartlett Law, Bartlett, Woodside or Green etc. have had complaints

10 I state my mother like many other elderly were hit and abused by lawyers and murdered. 

The SRA did not remove bad lawyers.

10.1 This is a breach of duty of care by the SRA so damages can be sort.

Also Please explain what is a copy of the December Consent Order? All legal actions has stopped.

11 I want all correspondence between you and Bartlett and related lawyers. Bartlett has been told to do this by ICO but ignores it.

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Spence [2012] EWHC 2977

12 I am using all of these crimes for a change in the law to do with Dementia & Will Fraud.

For more issues see below and the web site

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/

13 And using

Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67

TEST as stated by the SRA.

Bartlett, Woodside & Green are guilty

and should be struck off (Bolton v Law Society [1993] EWCA Civ 32. Law Society v Salsbury [2008] EWCA Civ 1285 and Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2012] EWCA Civ 421).

To protect the public

Bryant v Law Society [2007] EWHC 3043 (Admin); Law Society v Waddingham [2012] EWHC 1519

I hope to hear from you soon

Mark

Dr Mark Jones FRSM

MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.

Freeman of the City of London

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Heather Douglas
Date: Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:21 PM
Subject: FW: CDT/

To: Mark

 

Dear Dr Jones

 

I write further to my previous email and should be grateful to now hear from you in response.

 

It would be helpful if you could email a copy of the December Consent Order by next Monday (3 February).

 

Yours sincerely

 

Heather Douglas

Complaints Officer

 

From: Heather Douglas
Sent: 27 January 2020 17:11
To: mark

Subject: CDT/

 

Dear Dr Jones

 

I write further to your recent emails to us.

 

I note that when my colleague, Ms Pandaal, wrote to you on 29 October 2019, she said she understood there was a trial window between December 2019 to February 2020 in respect of the litigation proceedings concerning your late mother’s Will. We understand matters have progressed since that letter and that the litigation was resolved by consent on 12 December 2019.

 

If this is correct, we should be grateful if you could email us a copy of the December Consent Order for our reference.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Heather Douglas

Complaints Officer

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <[email protected]
Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:42 PM
Subject: To Boris Johnson, SRA, CPS, Head of Police etc SRA & bent cop protects lawyer who medical experts say a hit my mother for gain. Also 100,000 bill was 10,000 & lied to Tax man
To: <[email protected]>, AF Team <[email protected]>, Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP Rt Hon Boris Johnson <[email protected]>, HANDS, Greg <[email protected]>, CORBYN, Jeremy <[email protected]>, Zac Goldsmith <[email protected]>, Chris Matheson <[email protected]>, Public Contact <[email protected]>, !enquiries <[email protected]>, Attorney General <[email protected]>

 

From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM

Parliamentary Candidate

Freeman of the City of London

All correspondences by email,

28/01/2020

Dear Boris Johnson,

& head of SRA, Head of Police, Head of CPS

Also

Reader, please tell the SRA, Fraud, Police the following is going on as my mother is one of many and we can prove that.

SRA & Chester police protects lawyer who medical experts say a hit my mother for gain.

Also 100,000 bill was a lie as it was really 10,000 & lawyers lied to Tax man

Also my mother’s Will were deliberately done wrong to rob me.

A group of lawyers protected these lawyers who hit the elderly and rob them of their homes etc

My lawyer and others have no confidence in Chester police and ask for this now to be investigated outside them. People are at risk 

Exhibits here

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-as-executor-of-my-mothers-will-lied-to-the-court-saying-100000-care-bills-when-in-fact-it-was-10000-he-even-lied-to-the-tax-man/

 

1 The main issues in two pages are the following:

All exhibits listed on the following web site:

1.1 Bartlett went to Court in 2018 with a care bill for my mother of 100,000 (Exhibit below)

1.2 which Bartlett & Mr Green his lawyer knew from 2015 was only 10,000 (Exhibit below)

1.3 Therefore Bartlett and his lawyer Mr Green lied to the Court and did fraud. NO DOUBT.

NO OTHER POSSIBLE REASON.

The following letters from Bartlett from 2015 onwards used in the court case.

Letter From Bartlett showing the amount of money in debt by the pen point. Letter below 7 March 2017

The letter Bartlett sent to Death Tax man 2016. See Official Tax Document below. Sent to Tax man as true!!!

The letter Bartlett was forced to send to the court in 2019 Dec. Note he blames my dead sister for the bill being wrong but he was the executor of the will by force. He knew this from 2015 onwards.
MA would of also known this was a lie.

The 2nd part of the letter where Bartlett says a friend of the family found a buyer for my mother’s business but in court MA & his court papers said this was him. See below letter. Note Bartlett also lies saying “you will note what appears to be your writing script that states ‘I am not selling up’
this is another lie by Bartlett and this was seen to be so in the court.

 

 

 

 

The Stamp on the letter from the company Bartlett owned state bill received on 22 July 2015 for 10,000 and clearly never was 100,000

 

Letter showing true bill in 2010 which Bartlett and MA knew about. Note Court medical experts said mother was very ill so should not have to pay. Letter Sent to Bartlett in 2015

 

 

1.4 The Court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green went to Court with dirty hands. They lied about this and other things.

1.5 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

 

2 We ask for all Court action to be removed in any court case Mr Bartlett & Green is involved with Me as he used the above lie in all parts of the court case I had with him.

2.1 We seek damages from 2007 on wards when Bartlett first started these actions with his lawyer Mr Woodside help

2.3 They preyed on my mother who had medical issues for gain.

2.4 They failed their duty of care to my mother and me.

2.5 The lawyers said Bartlett and Woodside did the Wills wrong on purpose to cause problems and cause costs.

 

History

  1. In 2019 Bartlett, Green & I went to Liverpool Probate Court.

3.2 The Courts’ medical witness (Exhibit Court Expert Medical report) stated clearly that my mother is saying Mr Woodside hit her and he did the following

3.3.1 tried to sell her home against her wishes

3.3.2 told her she had no money

3.3.3 Also my mother’s states like many others that her final will left me everything and this was tampered with by Woodside

34 Bartlett has always wanted my mother’s guest house.

3.4.1 Mr Bartlett was after next stores home and others.

3.4.2 Mr Bartlett was done by the Law Society in the past for 300,000 fine (Exhibit  Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K) Bartlett-8751.03) . And someone else took the fall for him. The person who did this case now helps lawyers get out of jail!

3.4.3 He became executor of my mother’s Will by force

3.4.3 Tried to undervalue my mother’s home by 750,000 (see link https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartletts-solicitors-house-valuations/ )

3.5. From the Court Medical Expert & FRSM who have seen my mother’s new evidence in 2019, my mother’s case should be reopened as it looks like she was murdered for her money and her home and there is no doubt with the new evidence that this is provable in court.
see also https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

 

  1. In the Dec 2019 Liverpool Probate Case we settled out of Court,

4.1 But Bartlett broke the deal with 6k bill to me. The 6k was another example of him trying it on.
4.2 This case once again show corrupt lawyers and court system. I like many others do not trust Liverpool court, Chester court, Northwest courts. I never had any problems with RCJ

 

Evidence.

  1. Bartlett did fraud by saying there was for my mother 100,000 care bill (Exhibits above and many more).

5.1 He lied knowing this with his lawyer Mr Green took this issue to Court and should have seen the bill was 10,000, not 100,000. He can be done for damages.
5.1.1 Mr Green should of checked all paper work before going to court.
Report both to SRA etc.

5.2 Then, when I looked into this issue and spoke to the people who did the care bill in late 2018. He was found out. IF I HAD NOT DONE THIS HE WOULD OF NOT BEEN FOUND OUT.
5.2.1 MA knew all of this etc (see Exhibits in court papers)

5.3 Then Bartlett admitted it was 800 in court papers late on in 2018 (Exhibit  XX) but still wrong

5.4 Then Bartlett and Green in Manchester court said the 100,000 care bill was reduced to 10,000 by my actions. LIE.

5.5 BUT in December 2019 after threats from ICO Bartlett sent the original paperwork of the Care bill which had a stamp that showed his law firm knew it was 10,000 from 2015!!!!

5.5.1 In fact, the law firms paper works show a stamp and date of this true bill (Exhibit above)

5.6 And then on top in the paperwork to tax man in 2015 (Exhibit above ) Bartlett lists the 100,000 care bill knowing it was 10,000. So save 60,000 Tax if property is also wrong priced at 400,000 (when 1 millions)? On inheritance tax…to pocket it?

5.6 Bartlett created the 100,000 bill to force the sale of my mother’s home so he could get it. Also then  pocket it.

5.7 As Mr Bartlett knew Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA), my sister’s son in law who gain by all of this. MA could protect Bartlett by his network of cops.

6.1 MA was in Court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.

MA clearly knew Mr Woodside and Mr Bartlett well. Also Dr Bland who was struck off  for being a pedo in 2018 and was my mother’s doctor. And Dr Bland ran the elderly death pathway & nursing homes.

6.2 Some have said: As No one would check Mr Bartlett as he keeps this money as executor and he gives a cut to MA?

6.3 Also, MA, as a police detective, should have investigated this 100.000 from 2014 as he said he read the court papers but did not bring this up as fraud. MA never visited my mother. MA used my mother’s guest house and in 2009 she took the key off him and never wanted to see him again.
? someone died at my mother’s guest house and ….

6.4, In fact, every time my mother nearly died, MA does nothing, and the police do not investigate serious crimes which the 2019 Medical experts said are serious.

6.5 MA knew I had put money into my mother’s guest house and also I was building a wet room which when finished I would permanently live with my mother till she died stopping him from getting half if my mother’s business was sold. In fact all knew I have saved the guest house many times when my mother became ill and put money into it to stop it going bust.

6.6 In court MA showed he tried to force a sale of my mother’s business every time I was away (see main history below). And he knew what he was doing was wrong as he knew she was vulnerable.

 

 

  1. And there is other money missing from my mother’s bank account due to Mr Bartlett and its nothing to do with her funeral, but once again Bartlett will not say. Once again, this is stealing.

7.1 Pre 2010 before my mother’s stroke due to the stress by MA & Bartlett & woodside. My half-sister and Mr Woodside tried to make my mother think she had no money (see below for other related events to the crime). My mother said on tape that Woodside told her she had no money so she had to sell her home and her business.

7.2 Post 2010 My sister said to the court my mother had no money but then had to tell the court she had forgotten 40,000 due to my finding out about this money.

7.3 Once again MA knew about this.

7.4 In fact, in 2007, MA tried to force the sale of my mother’s home when I was away and other dates and he said this in the court.

7.5 When my mother died in 2015 I started to investigate again and then 60,000 plus money appeared with no explanation into my mother’s bank account.

And other things which are listed in the details below.

 

8 In simple words, Bartlett knew MA would stop him being investigated and would help him get away with this crime

  1. MA knew Dr Bland, who also in 2013 tried to kill my mother and knew the doctor who murdered my mother in 2015 with morphine for no clinical reason. Full details below.
    See also https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-law-fraud-murder-corruption/

9.1 My mother was murdered to shut her up
Many say this could be due to MA trying to force the sale in 2007 and then in 2010. As he knew If I had put money into my mother’s home, he would not get half.
Or and to protect Mr Woodside
Every lawyer I met have tried to protect Mr Woodside (all taped)
Or and?
Dr Bland who was found to be clinical negligent (see links) to my mother but my sister took no action as he helped her not send my mother into hospital in 2010 and therefore I stayed in London unaware that she was trying to sell my mother’s home in her name with MA. If Dr Bland had sent my mother into hospital in 2010 I would of came back to Chester from London and made sure the wet room was finished at my mother’s home/guest house and live with her until her death so they could not sell her business….

And every time I was away he tried to force the sale of my mother’s home

Then Bartlett would buy it cheap and give him a cut.

As the original will left me my mother’s guest house as I can prove, I put money into it.

And in 2010 when I was away an attempt to force the sale of my mother’s home went wrong, and they nearly killed my mother and were almost found out. Then paper work from estate agents show my sister saying my mother’s home was her place but the estate agents documents list the own as my sister’s address so my mother who was being drugged would not know. MA would of know all about this.

MA would have known my mother’s doctor Bland who was across the way from my mother home and also MA would have known him as a pedo (struck off in 2018) who he could blackmail.

Dr Bland was drugging my mother and trapping her in a nursing home so no one knew.

In 2015 as I investigated 60,000 appeared from no where in my mother’s bank account.

Dr Bland lived across the way from my mother’s home and business and Woodside and Bartlett were 3mins walk down the street.

 

  1. Action: injunction on the sale of my mother’s home as the true will left me everything.

END
The following is more in depth.

Past email sent to all

 

Eleven letters in one Email.

1 To the Press. Please use as you wish.

2 To Politicians

The following show massive corruptions in the North West.

It shows corruption and dementia fraud.

3 To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm  

4 To Laurence Howland <@sra.org.uk

Thank you for your email 17 Jan 2020 but ignores what I sent on the 10 Jan 2020, please re-read below email.

SRA has a team who protect bent lawyers. Look at your own paper trail and because of this many were hurt by you not taking action.

5 To Fraud investigation.

You can not trust Chester police as many have gained by these crimes.

6 To Chester Police

Police Detectives Michael Anklers was in court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.

It can be seen in his own witnesses statement to the court that in 2007 he can be seen taking advantage of my mother as he knew she had dementia.

He knew I had put money into my mother’s business and was determined to force the sale of this business so he could get money out of it.

He knew about the several attempts to force the sale of my mother’s home as he says it in his own court papers.

He also says he was in charge of the investigation of people who were vulnerable like my mother. So he could stop investigating these crimes.

He knew I was building a wet room and once that was done, I was going to live with my mother and therefore stop him from getting a chance to sell my mother’s home and get half of it.

He ignored several clear attempts on my mother’s death.

He would have known Dr Bland who drugged my mother and helped in this crime

He would have known Dr Bland was going to be done as a pedo, and later Dr Bland was struck off in 2018 for this crime.

MA used this to get Dr Bland to drug my mother and trap her in a nursing home (2011 to 2015) and stop her saying how Mr Woodside hit her to change her Will (Medical experts say this is true in court Dec 2019) And done to help Mr Bartlett steal my mother’s home.

Then MA tried to shut me up by going to NZ to threaten my daughter and can not explain any other reason for all his actions.

The SAR (Subject Access Request) shows no investigation on all the bad actions of Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside.

The SRA was sent the Videos of my mother who said she was hit by this lawyer to change her Will and ignored it. The medical experts and lawyers were shocked in court …It shows massive corruption.

We settled out of court But Bartlett broke the deal and murder is murder.

ALL ON THE WEBSITE LISTED BELOW.

7 Police complaints 

I still have had nothing from Chester Police this now must be independently investigated. 

8 ICO

I still have not have the files off Mr Bartlett.

He clearly stole 3000 from my mother’s bank account. And he can not explain this

or other money.

I request all correspondence with him and other lawyers. Please force this as this is now a year over due. I want him fined.

9 To: Bartlett law firm and all who are listed part of this law firm.

  1. Insurance firm for Bartletts you also helped cover up obvious crimes.

Your insurance firm has been contacted about this issue and now new evidence.

I seek damages against your firm.

I state that Barlett destroyed the Will that left my mother’s home to me & stole from the estate etc and seek damages.

  1. To Mr Bartlett,

Do nothing until you have heard from my lawyers. Others and I say you altered the Will that left me my mother’s guest house so you could steal it.

You took other actions for self gain and these are crimes.

To ALL

  1. There is new evidence to reopen my mother’s inquest.

1.1 And this should pause the sale of my mother’s guest house as we can show it was originally going to be left to me and others clearly manipulate the event to financial advantage & my mother’s death

1.2 Also we settled out of court But Bartlett broke the deal with 6k bill to me.

1.2.1  Also Bartlett went to court in 2018 with a clear statement of care bill for my mother of 100,000 which he  & his lawyer knew from 2015 was only 10,000
Therefore Bartlett and his lawyer (Mr Green) lied to the court and did fraud.

The court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green went to court with dirty hands and
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

Action: injunction on sale?

Background

  1. Bartlett clearly did fraud with my mother’s 100,000 care bill which was only 10,000

2.1 He lied knowing from 2015 about this to the court with his lawyer Green (he took this issue to court and should of seen the bill was 10,000 not 100,000).

2.2 Then when I looked into this issue and spoke to the people who did the care bill in late 2018. He was found out.

2.3 Then Bartlett admitted it was 800 in court papers.

2.4 Then Bartlett and Green in Manchester court said the 100,000 care bill was reduced to 10,000 by my actions. LIE.

2.5 BUT in December 2019 after threats from ICO Bartlett sent the original paperwork of the Care bill which had a stamp that showed his law firm knew it was 10,000 from 2015!!!!

2.6 And then on top in the paperwork to tax 2015 (ETC) he lists the 100,000 care bill knowing it was 10,000. So save 60,000? On inheritance tax…to pocket it?

2.7 As Mr Bartlett knew MA…no one would check him as he keeps this money and gives a cut to MA.

  1. And there is other money missing from my mother’s bank account and it nothing to do with her funeral but once again Bartlett will not say. Once again this is stealing.
  1. And now by new source we know my mother had shares. Some of the shares are worth over 4k (there are many). Which no one would have known about but if I had not been given this paperwork.

4.1 Mr Woodside should of known about my mother’s shares & it was in past wills but then strangely vanishes. So again add to his failure of Duty of care.

4.2 Mr Bartlett would have known as he states he spoke to my mother accountant (BD) about her money and she listed the shares a long time ago. He should as executor done a search on shares…

4.3 but I thought they had been sold pre 2010 when my sister said my mother to the court had no money.

4.4 Then I found a bank book and confronted my sister. Then my sister lied and then had to tell the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money.

4.5 then when my mother dies 60,000 appears when I start asking questions.

4.6 Bartlett is officer of trust to the court so trusted. He could have said 100,000 but pocketed this money as he was obsessed with being executor when told not to. This was part of his plan with MA and sister to make money out of these actions.

4.7 Also, Bartlett undervalued my mother’s home by 750,000 and also tried to buy next store…he owns lots of Chester by knowing somehow how the elderly are going to die and controls their wills by buying their law firms or doing wills cheap to get them.

4.8 If my mother share were rated by her NI to taxable income then this is more complex case.

4.9 MA knew about my mother share. He talked about this to my mother.

 

  1. Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA), my sister’s son in law would of know my sister’s actions. My sister would not have done this alone. MA wanted money always. MA would of known what to do by his own statement in court to make the crimes work.

5.1 MA was in court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.

5.2 It can be seen in his own witnesses statement to the court that in 2007 he can be seen taking advantage of my mother as he knew she had dementia.

5.3 MA says in his own statement; he deals with the area of people with needs like my mother. He knew the law, he knew Bartlett etc.

5.5 MA knew I had put money into my mother’s business and was determined to force the sale of this business so he could get money out of it.

5.6 MA knew about the several attempts to force the sale of my mother’s home as he says it in his own court papers.

5.8 MA knew I was building a wet room and once that was done, I was going to live with my mother and therefore stop him from getting a chance to sell my mother’s home and get half of it.

5.8.1 so my mother was hit in 2010 and sister was trying to sell mother’s home (in her own name and address when I was away).

5.8.2 In 2010 MA knew about my sister actions:

5.8.2.1 saying my mother’s home was hers in paper work,

5.8.2.2 Dr Bland did not sending my mother in to hospital as if he did I would of come back from London to Chester to look after my mother.

MA knew all of the issues in 2010 as tried in 2007 to  sell my mother’s home against her wishes.

5.8.2.3 MA also says he was in charge of the investigation of people who were vulnerable like my mother and knew the other detectives. So he could stop investigating these crimes.

5.9 MA clearly knew police detective N who lied at my mother’s inquest about all the attempts on my mother’s life.

5.9.1 Example In 2013 when I found out my mother was being drugged in Dr Bland’s nursing home. Where my mother had care removed from her as she nearly died and if i had not been there my mother would of died. I called the ambulance crew and they saw medication was deliberly withheld to kill my mother

5.9.2 and then a DNR signed by sister and Dr Bland was attempted by staff to stop the ambulance taking my mother to hospital but they saw it was all wrong.

5.9.3 and that can be proved by the fact that I recorded what I told the police detective N and then he said something else which was not a problem at my mother’s inquest.

5.10 MA ignored several clear attempts on my mother’s death (2010 to 2015). When London police said, my mother, became strangely unlucky when I found out my sister tried to sell my mother’s home when I was in London in 2010. And my sister did this my sister’s name and address so I would not know.

5.11 MA would have known Dr Bland who drugged my mother and helped in this crime.

5.12 MA would have known Dr Bland was going to be done as a pedo, and later Dr Bland was struck off in 2018 for this crime.

5.12.1 MA used this to get Dr Bland to drug my mother and trap her in a nursing home (2011 to 2015) and stop her saying how Mr Woodside hit her to change her Will (Medical experts say this is true in court Dec 2019) And done to help Mr Bartlett steal my mother’s home.

5.13 Then MA tried to shut me up by going to NZ to threaten my daughter and can not explain any other reason for all his actions. He did this at my mother’s first inquest by twitter, and when I was going to open the inquest, he visited NZ and my daughter. And I was told about this.

5.14 The SAR (Subject Access Request) shows no investigation on all the bad actions of Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside and all the other issues I said were happening to kill my mother!

5.15 The SAR shows unknown police detective closed the case on my mother. BUT HOW MANY OTHERS?

5.16 There are dangerous people who tried to kill my mother and the medical experts from the RSM say they should be investigated as they are a risk to the public.

6 The SRA (solicitors regulatory authority) was sent the Videos of my mother who said she was hit by this lawyer to change her Will and ignored it. The medical experts and lawyers were shocked in court …It shows massive corruption.

  1. Mr Bartlett and Woodside always changed the Wills around the dates when the above actions were going to happen and this would of been seen.

7.1 It was clear my mother did not have capacity etc when she saw Mr Woodside to do the Wills

7.2 All of Mr Bartlett’s actions are massive tricks as he thought I would take no actions, I would not investigate. Bartlett did all of his actions as he knew he could get away with it all. He knew my mother’s death would be staged to be horrific. He knew in 2015 I would see my mother trapped in her bed, I would be only allowed to see her for 1 hour for three times a week. I watched my mother cried out for food and drink. That no one would help as MA could stop me getting help (see Exhibits) & his sister worked in the hospital saying my mother was ok then not. That the CQC would visit and read the DOLS that state my mother was on the pathway of death, which should be monitored, but this was ignored. In fact, the CQC released the report after my mother’s death so as not to stop the ONE month of my mother being killed by removal of food and water. Even when she cried out for a drink, it was foul-tasting.  Which I reported to police detective N but he threatened to do me for wasting police time.
The press being told I was lying and we have the editors letter of a newspaper showing the lies to stop the story getting to the press. Then a court injunction was used to prevent the story getting to the TV as my mother could clearly tell the truth about what happened to her in 2010, she was forced to change her will so other could sell her home and i would not be able to look after her.

Then when my mother died, my sister turned up with Bartlett with a black eye to let the estate agents see my mother’s home and they all undervalued it. My sister had a black eye and looked scared.
I then in 2019 send a letter to Bartlett saying my sister could be proved that she helped drug my mother. Then later, Barlett tells me my sister had died the day before she was cremated.
And before this, she was seen looking in panic for me…

7.4 The undertaker’s say Mr Bartlett and Woodside did this to others….and it is on tape.

7.3 Mr Bartlett said he would take legal action against me one year ago due to what I have said above about him, but he did not as it is true what is being said about him and he knows MA supports him in his crimes.

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/shutting-up-a-witness-to-a-crime-to-pervert-a-court-case-for/

  1. With all of this, they have no right to win this court case.
  1. How many other cases of the tax could be out by millions due to Bartlett actions as he planned to be the executor of my mother’SWILL case pre-2007?

I want to become executor or part executor to investigate my mother’s estate.

I want to become an executor as too much wrong doing…therefore…I want to ask questions.

  1. We have a buy for the guest house.

10.1 They could pay MA 180,000 but this should be reduced with the new info.

10.2  Bartlett bills of 90k should be dropped and sued his actions and I should compensations.

  1. It is clear I can also sue Mr Woodside for not doing the Wills right,

11.1 Also now  the video of my mother being hit by him to a new level by other medical experts saying this is true and shows my mother wanting me to be left the guest house…

11.2 BUT I want it sold now as we have a buyer.

Please see all the rest of the points below. Which include the fact that experts including the court experts say the video of my mother saying she was hit by Mr Woodside who works for Barlettis true and the other fact my mother says the business was going to be mine, but Barlett wanted it. He did this to others and was proved by Chester police.

My mother’s murder is clearly very strange and happened on several attempts which not investigate as Chester police detective MA wanted my mother dead as he gained by this.

These crimes were done to many other elderly and this must be investigated.

Regard

Mark

PAST EMAIL

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <>
Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM
Subject: To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm. To Fraud & Chester Police. Fraud, Murder and done to many & Bent cops and Bent lawyers
To: [email protected]>, <[email protected]>, AF Team <[email protected]>

 

From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM

Parliamentary Candidate

Freeman of the City of London

All correspondences by email,

DATE:  10 Jan 2020

To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm

To Fraud

To Chester Police.

It could be said you all failed in your duty of care as listed in your own conduct guide. You knew about what was going on.

To: Bartlett law firm and all who are listed part of this law firm.

Your insurance firm has been contacted about this issue and now new evidence.

I seek damages against your firm

Your letter Date 8 Jan 2020 from P. Bartlett.

To Mr Bartlett,
Do nothing until you have heard from my lawyers.

There is no due date on the court case letter for 6,000, and this was in Dec 2019 part of the final settlement.

My lawyers say you have broken the agreement in the court.

Also considering the following:

You went to court in 2018 with a clear statement of care bill for my mother of 100,000 which you knew from 2015 was only 10,000
Therefore you and your lawyer (Mr Green) lied to the court and did fraud.

The cost you seek from the court was unaware of your above actions; therefore, you went to court with dirty hands and
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
I seek damages for this.

Also from the Dec 2019 Court case medical experts said my mother’s care was important and from other discussion this cost of 10,000 should be covered under the NHS care cover. You failed to sort this out.

I can also reclaime other money which was taken  by Care homes when it should of been covered by the state.

I should also point out that this 6000 cost against me happened because my then PAST London lawyers (now under investigation) put in the removal of Bartlett as executor to the Liverpool court and they knew I did it in the London court as well.

Therefore I got a fine for the removal of Mr Bartlett as executor case issue twice…

All done by the court from Mr Green who is Mr Bartlett lawyer. And then Mr Bartlett stood down as he knew he was guilty and could be done for damages.

It is not my fault but the London lawyers who acted strangely after talking to you and then dropped the case…to you Bartlett advantage.
A good London lawyer & Judge told me they were told to drop the case but wanted to help, they are helping SRA.

They said Mr Bartlett was not on the level.

Also, this cost for this case for 6k makes no sense as it was not a hearing (you made up a number of 6k as not a trial), and I did not have a lawyer present with me. If the court had a hearing and by HR Article 6 fair trial, I would have known on the day about this court issue and answered it. Therefore the cost would not have happened.

Mr Green did this also in 2018 went to court and then presented a case knowing the other side was not prepared and lied to the court saying he had told me about this but had not.

Then Mr Green said my witness statements which were COP24 were not allowed in court but then had them in his own legal bundle.

Also, I can show I tried to appeal this  6K court action, but Liverpool court had issues until I complained about corruption. But then I was told this by Bartlett would be part of the final case. Another Lie.
Also, Bartlett stood down anyway as executor of my mother estate as I was telling the truth.
The list of Bartlett’s actions are:
1) by force became the executor of my mother’s Will around  other nasty events. I state my mother was murdered and now other lawyers seeing the court case of Dec 2019 agree upon this. As my mother tried to remove Mr Bartlett she would nearly die and in the end was murdered by morphine for no clinical reason. My mother’s inquest can be reopened due to new evidence from the Dec 2019 court case. It took one month for my mother to be killed as she was trapped in bed and I was stopped from seeing her based on lies…all done to stop her telling the truth…

See Experts report.

Note The doctor was struck off in 2018 (Dr Bland Chester) involved with my mother and the lawyers.
2) mother said Mr B lawyer Mr Woodside, hit her to change her Will, which is on videos & statements. Now other Experts from Royal Society of Medicine say this is true and should be seen as a crime.
4) Mr Bartlett was removed by the court as executor of my mother’s Will as clearly doing bent things
5) Bartlett stated in court my mother had care cost of 100,000 which after I investigated become 800 to the court. As Bartlett knew from 2015 this was 10,000 FRAUD
6) undervalued my mother’s home of 700,000, etc (does this a lot as people dealing with murder)

Mr B tried to rush all this as my mother was clearly murdered and I was too upset to do anything. He would of gained a cheap house.

Also I was told my mother had no money then 60,000 appeared and no explanation where this came from

7) Bartlett can not explain now where over 3000 and another money has gone..

8) Bartlett was done by the law society and fined for 300,000? (see below)

9) Mr B has done this to many others! Undertakers and web sites say this and have on tape a person in the undertaker saying this but too scared to go to the police. Mr B was after them to shut them up.
The SRA have another person listing him doing the same thing to them.

10) Bartlett & Woodside are clearly in Bed with Chester police (MA) in crimes of robbing the elderly.

11)  Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA): Listed in crime paperwork to gain etc After my mother’s murder in 2015, MA then tried and contact me by twitter after my mother’s inquest and then when I tried to re-start my mother’s inquest, he then went to NZ where my daughter was and made sure I knew it (see Files). Many see this as threatening, and he should have known better, but he gains from my mother’s Will (by my half sister VB) and is named in the medical document by my mother as causing her trouble (See Exhibit below). IMPORTANT: MA Went to NZ to show he could attack my child and shut me up. Clearly he should have not done this. This can be shown in court.

In fact in the court case of Dec 2019 MA said he wanted 180,000 out of my mother’s estate when my sister was dead and others said I should have my mother’s guest house.

He can from 2007  been seeing trying to prey on my mother when I was away to get money from her and connected to death in the guest house which must be investigated.

In 2008 my mother took the key from him to my mother’s guest house and never wanted to spend Christmass with him again.

The near murder of my mother in 2013 and final murder in 2015 was prevented from investigation by MA and his friends in Chester Police. In fact more files to support this now sent to Fraud police.

Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu (N): (also works with kids-link to Dr Bland?) lied under oath at my mother’s inquest. Exhibit is the Recording at home before my mother’s death where I talk to him for one hour (taped https://vimeo.com/138461044 ) and then at my mother’s inquest where he say I only told him the chips were wrong at the nursing home which was a lie and he smiled knowing he was getting away with it.

Also in the court hearing 2019 Dec this was part of the settlement and was dropped! Now Bartlett has broken the court agreement.
Therefore I can add this to the fact Bartlett has done many things wrong by design including the Wills etc.

Bartlett tries to shut me up as he did to many others

https://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/shutting-up-a-witness-to-a-crime-to-pervert-a-court-case-for/

Do nothing until you heard from my lawyers…
Best wishes
Mark

 

To report this to the SRA [email protected]

To report this as Fraud [email protected]

Dr Mark Jones FRSM
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.

Freeman of the City of London

 

Dear Dr Jones

Thank you for your email.

I am, however, puzzled by your seeming reluctance to provide us with a copy of Consent Order we understand was made on 12 December 2019. That there was such an order seems to be supported by your acknowledgement in your email that “the court case finished in Dec 2019”.

You also write in your email that “in 2020 Bartlett sent a letter for 6k which was in Dec 2019 part of the end deal, so he broke his word”. You will appreciate that we cannot consider this comment further without being provided with a copy of the order or agreement setting out the “end deal”. I, therefore, again request you provide us with a copy of the order and also a copy of the letter to which you are referring.

Your email also suggests you may have some concerns about the barrister who represented you at the December 2019 hearing. If this is the case, you may wish to contact the Bar Standards Board (BSB) in the first instance who will advise you whether this is a matter for them or whether it needs to be referred to the Legal Ombudsman. The BSB’s contact details can be obtained from its website: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

Finally, in your email you write, “The Manchester judge Nov 2019 said this was a bad case…” . You also say the Manchester judge “took Bartlett on about his strange high costs …”. We have previously advised that if the Court makes any criticism of Mr Bartlett at any hearing you can forward evidence of the criticism to us for our attention. The evidence we would need would be a court transcript of the relevant hearing or hearings. If you have a transcript, please forward this. If you do not have the transcript, you will need to obtain it if you wish us to consider this further. I would explain that your comment about what the judge said (without the court transcript) is not sufficient evidence for our purposes.

Yours sincerely

Heather Douglas

Complaints Office

Email on 24.02.2020

Our ref:    CDT/

Your ref:

 

 

 

Dr M Jones

 

 

 

Sent by email only to: [email protected]

 

 

 

 

24 February 2020

 

 

Dear Dr Jones

 

 

The Cube

199 Wharfside Street Birmingham B1 1RN

 

DX: 720293 BIRMINGHAM 47

U

www.sra.org.uk

I write further to my recent email correspondence with you which was prompted following our receipt of your email sent 10 January.

Your report about Mr Pierre Nicholas Bartlett of Bartletts Solicitors Limited (the firm)

 

From my review of your file I note that you previously engaged in our internal complaints process in 2019. Your complaint was that you were unhappy with our response to the concerns you had raised with us about Mr Bartlett and the firm in respect of matters concerning your late mother.

Our view was that we were satisfied we had fully considered your concerns and the information provided and there was nothing to suggest our conclusions were procedurally or materially flawed or that we had missed anything pertinent (our letter dated 7 May 2019).

You referred your complaint about us to the Independent Reviewer who explained, in a letter dated 19 September 2019, that their role was to consider complaints about the quality of service provided by us. The Independent Reviewer noted you had not raised any specific service complaints about us and that what you really disagreed with was our decision to take no action against Mr Bartlett or the firm.

Following the completion of our complaints process, you continued to email us about your concerns. We wrote to you on 29 October 2019 to explain that as the information you had provided was a repeat of the issues previously considered by us, our file would remain closed. We also noted the possible trial dates of the litigation regarding your later mother’s Will and said that should the court criticise the conduct of either Mr Bartlett or the firm, if you provided us with evidence of this criticism, we would consider this further information.

Your 10 January and subsequent emails

 

In your 10 January email, although you raise the same concerns you have previously raised and we have considered, you also refer to a December 2019 court hearing and say, “Now Bartlett has broken the court agreement”.

 

The regulator of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales

Then in your email sent 29 January you write, “In Dec 2019 my mother’s probate case showed new evidence which you have not investigated”. But having made that statement you then refer in your email to previously raised issues and do not provide any new evidence.

In my emails to you (sent 27 and 30 January and 4 February) I invited you to provide me  with a copy of the Consent Order we understand was made in December 2019 due to the litigation having been resolved. I also asked you to provide us with a copy of the court transcript of the relevant hearing or hearings at which you imply, in your email sent 31 January, the Manchester judge in November 2019 was critical of Mr Bartlett e.g. you write that the Manchester judge “took Bartlett on about his strange high costs…”. I explained in my 4 February email my reasons for requesting this specific information from you. However, you have declined to provide this information. In your email sent 6 February you write, [t]he Consent Order 12 December 2019 is irrelevant”.

It is, therefore, my view that your 10 January and subsequent emails do not raise any new concerns for us to consider and provide no new evidence about any of the matters previously considered by us. Neither do your emails raise any service complaints. What you continue to seek is a reversal of our decision to take no action against Mr Bartlett or the firm.

I would remind you that in our 29 October letter we advised that, whilst we would review any further correspondence from you, in the absence of your providing us with any new evidence to support your concerns, we would not formally respond to the correspondence. I confirm this remains the case.

Conclusion

 

Although I do not consider you to have raised any service issues, should you be dissatisfied with this letter, please refer to the paragraphs below for details of what to do next.

Yours sincerely

 

 

Heather Douglas Complaints Officer heather.douglas

Investigation and Supervision Solicitors Regulation Authority www.sra.org.uk

 

If you remain dissatisfied

 

If you are not happy with this response and still have concerns you can contact our central Corporate Complaints Team within 15 working days of the date of this letter. Please explain what you remain concerned about and what you would like to happen as a result of your complaint.

 

It is important to note that decisions we have made about your case cannot be changed through the complaints procedure. We can consider whether our procedures have been

followed, whether your information has been properly considered and whether we have explained things clearly. For more information about our complaints procedure please contact our Corporate Complaints Team.

 

Corporate Complaints Team Solicitors Regulation Authority The Cube

199 Wharfside Street Birmingham

B1 1RN

 

Telephone: 0370 606 2555

Email: [email protected]