Prime Minister, Office of the Prime Minister
10 Downing Street. London SW1A 2AA
Home Secretary, Direct Communications Unit
2 Marsham Street. London, SW1P
These are serious crimes which are being protected by tax money.
Please see my letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson below.
To Mr Paul Philip the Chief Executive of the SRA
To Enquiries, <[email protected]legalombudsman.org.
investigated and P. Bartlett (PB).My lawyers support this as fraud and cover-up. As does the Tax office
and Probate centre.
You have spoken about the abuse of the elderly so I have included you in this email.
Please see my letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson below.
To Prime Minister Boris Johnson,
When I won my fellowship award of 70,000 in 2002 I put the money into my mother’s home and planned to look after her in her old age.
New Evidence from a Subject Access Request shows the Bankruptcy petition done by the lawyer Bartlett was done to shut me up as I found out the crimes done to the elderly.
Also, the courts are giving out fines based on misdirection to shut people up by these bent lawyers.
In the 2019 Dec court case we had evidence of my mother being hit by a lawyer who works for Bartlett, but my own Barrister wanted to protect this man.
No wonder UK businesses are failing because of such evil actions.
We have 2001 signatures on my petition to reopen my mother’s inquest.
With all the evidence it is clear my mother was murdered and so were many others. All done to rob the elderly. It took me 5 years to make sure this was true.
I want help with removing these bent lawyers who hurt the elderly.
Also, it looks like we can now show terrorists use these same tricks to rob the elderly to fund their crimes See UK column report.
I am asking for Barletts, BLM and Jolliffes to be investigated in cover-up of these crimes etc.
I hope to hear from you soon.
This has been updated on the 23/11/2020 there is more evidence to be sent.
Objection to Bankruptcy order Form 619 page 2 file
I want the Bankruptcy order by Bartlett No 388 of 2020 struck out for the following reasons:
I Dr Mark Jones state the following is true.
The argument is for debt not owned.
There is outstanding ground this cost from April 2019 was rolled into
the final Settlement of Dec 2019.
Therefore this sum is not due.
The second point is that at the time of April 2019, the original cause of the cost was based on double listing to remove Bartlett as executor of my mother’s will which was not heard and then a change of lawyer complicated it.
The original bill was based on a double listing of the removal of Bartlett (PB) as Executor which was not true.
The court order to remove Bartlett as executor was Moved from London to Liverpool to be heard but not listed with what I saw officially.
Also, I was told this would be resolved by Bartlett in the Dec 2019 court case he also ran. Bartlett was involved and managed all the court cases (2016 to 2020).
Then my sister died in 2019. In Dec 2019 final settlement Bartlett gets paid 70k for starting many issues which he is responsible for ranging from the following:
4) the original will he altered changed my mother’s guest house from leaving it to me due to my investment to where he could buy it.
Therefore my mother’s house (which is also a B&B and Bartlett wanted) had to be sold to pay for these issues caused by him controlling the Will.
Now with Subject Access Request documents, it shows that the Bankruptcy petition was done to “shut Dr Jones up” as I found he (Bartlett) had
done fraud to my mother’s estate etc. and I put this onto a website
1 On the 3rd of April 2019, there was costing for my mother’s probate
case in the Liverpool Courts. See Exhibit 8 Jan 20201.1 Bartlett at the time was the executor of my mother’s Will which
was doing the probate.1.1.1 he became the executor of my mother’s Will by force and in fact, he
was never asked by my mother or me to do this. He does this to many
Wills and buys law firms to control wills. My mother wanted him removed and she was murdered.1.2 In this court case of the 3rd of April 2019, Bartlett stood down
as executor. Due to me and my evidence.1.3 Then Bartlett was awarded costs against me of 6k due to his lawyer
saying I had double listed the removal of him as executor in two
This is shown to be wrong below. See Second Issue.
1.4 From the 3rd of April 2019 Court case, Bartlett wants £6k (now
£7k) BUT it has the following issues:
2 Bartlett was told & agreed to that they would not receive any costs
till my mother’s home was sold.
2.1 My mother’s home has not been sold but is about to be but was
delayed due to COVID.
2.1.1 We now know by SAR that Bartlett stopped the sales of my mother’s home/business many times
Exhibit 20July2020 see 6.4 below
2.2 The fact that he agreed to wait for this sale is supported by
2.2.1 A witness statement by Scots Exhibit Scott
2.2.2 Also by his actions for not asking for any money until 2020!
2.2.3 he waited for the final probate court case in Dec 2019. As this
was going to be the final settlement.
2.2.4 Bartlett was from 2016 to 2019 involved in my sister’s side of the estate.
3. Then in my mother’s probate case in Dec 2019, Bartlett settled all
of the cost into one item as a final settlement. He was involved in
the probate for the other side.
3.1 If not true, why did he wait to get the 7k for nearly two years?
3.3 In the Dec 2019 final probate court case, I was told the final
payment/settlement to the lawyer Bartlett of 70k out of the sale of my
mother’s home would be the end of it all.
See Paragraph 7 of the court order of Dec 2019 See Exhibit: Final
The terms of this settlement are in full and final settlement of call
claims, actions and demands, whether existing or contemplated or otherwise, relating to the
Property or any matters relating to the Deceased or the Deceased estate, whether between or against the Claimants
(Bartlett is listed as a Claimant in all past court documents), the Defendant or the Deceased estate.
3.4 It was clear and we have recordings that show this was all done and over.
The recording out of the court is the wording that this would include the 6k April 2019 costs.
3.5 Exhibits 18Feb2019 & 2April2019 & 5Dec2018 show Bartlett lists
himself as Claimant with my sister as in the Dec 2019 court case.
Bartlett ran all of these from 2015 to the end of the probate case.
Bartlett controlled the Claimants case against me and told the
Barrister what to do….it was always him behind everything.
4. The reason Bartlett is now chasing the 7k court bill from April 3rd
2019 and ignoring the Dec 2019 agreement he was found doing many
things wrong including fraud in Dec 2019 court case.
4.1 He was reported for doing fraud by the Taxman & he went for £7k
out of badness.
4.2 The April 3rd 2019 court case which the 7k is from is invalid as
he went to court based on a lie (dirty hands).
4.2.1 Bartlett told the court there was a 100,000 care bill that did
not exist in my mother’s Tax forms Exhibit 2016 Bartlett Tax and
Exhibit 2016Tax Fraud
22.214.171.124 He tried to hide this fact from 2015 to 2019
126.96.36.199 He knew from 2016 to 2019 the 100,000 bill Exhibit 7 March
2017 was in fact only 10,000 (See Exhibit 22 June 2015 as he had the
paperwork including IHT 404 Exhibit 2016 Bartlett Tax and Exhibit
2016Tax Fraud. He told the TAXman it was all over and paid them off!
188.8.131.52 He was forced to show the 100,000 was in fact 10,000 see
Exhibit 22 June 2015. The date shows he knew this all the time.
I found this out by the Judge in 2019 saying I had a right to this
paperwork. Bartlett should have given me all the paperwork in the past
(2015,2016 etc) but he hides this bill’s true value.
184.108.40.206 then I had to redo the Tax 404 but then the tax man pointed
out this was fraud by Bartlett and other issues they did not like.
4.3 The April 2019 Court case was unaware of these legal frauds
For more see the website https://corruptsolicitors.co.u
therefore, Bartlett & Green his lawyer went to Court with dirty hands
on the 3rd of April 2019, They lied about this and other things to the
court and therefore
4.3.1 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
So ALL his bills are rejected.
4.3.2 UPDATE 28/10/2020 even other lawyers say this is fraud by him
4.2.3 He also damaged my mother’s estate by not doing my mother’s Will
correctly, said the Court-appointed expert for the Dec 2019 probate
case (file available but a long list of faults about Bartlett).
4.2.4 He also said the property was worth only 450,000 (Exhibit XX)
and now we know it is worth a million (Exhibit XX)
See 6.4 where he tries to stop my mother’s home selling for a million to cover up this crime done by him
4.2.4 Also I now have the BPR (Business Property Rates) (Exhibit XX)
for my mother’s Tax which he also did wrong costing 100,000’s
4.2.5 And also in the Dec 2019 court case, it was stated by the
court-appointed expert that Dr Jones’ (my) mother was hit by Woodside,
a lawyer who works for Bartlett.
4.2.6 This came out that Woodside hit Dr Jones’ mother to force her to
sell her home and change her will to the advantage of Bartlett.
(Exhibit available )
5 Dr Jones has now reopened his mother’s inquest to show a group took
advantage of his mother and other elderly and knew doctors (who was
struck-off as a pedo in 2018 Dr Bland ) who helped kill these
witnesses with his friend by using morphine for no clinical reason.
6 Bartlett says he is doing the Bankruptcy order to shut him (Dr
Jones) up to see Exhibit 17 Sep 2020.
by accident to do with the fraud.The SAR shows Bartlett telling the lawyers the following:
He has served him with a Bankruptcy petition but he has done this
through a different firm of solicitors and it is likely to shut him up
for a while. He said its unlikely he’ll (Dr Jones) do anything with the petition and is …He (Bartlett) has requested 150,000 initial compensation but really
this isn’t about compensation he is just hoping to stop the libel
action.See all the letter Bartlett sent me to shut me up when I found out
what he had done wrong. He kept threatening me to hide the fact he got someone to hit my mother to steal her home.https://corruptsolicitors.co.u
6.1 This is also shown in Bartlett’s letter to a law firm
where he is trying to hide the web site that says since 2018 my mother
was hit by his employer Woodside etc
In fact, emails from Bartlett do not talk about this issue anymore as he has no defence for it
6.3 He also says in Exhibit24April2020Bartlett. This is the final settlement
But once the website did not go down he tried to do the 7k all out of hate towards me.6.4 Then Exhibit 20July2020Bartlett shows
telling the new Executor James Beresford (JB) not to sell my mother’s home for a million….
6.4.2 Bartlett says in his letter to JB, if he helps me, then… I would benefit?
It is my mother’s home & also a business and I invested in it.
6.4.3 Therefore Bartlett first went back on his final settlement to shut me up, then stopped me getting my mother’s home sold so I could clear bills.
Also in 2020, the business was deliberately damaged to stop business by a break-in (police report)
6.4.4 therefore, Bartlett gain by all of this, he was found doing fraud of 100,000 care bills when in fact it was only 10,000 and he knew it for 5 years,
he did not do the BPR to save money,
2019 you will see it was for a meeting only on costing of my mother’s
probate court case.8.1 first there was no dealing with removing Bartlett as executor.8.2 My lawyers at the time were told about my listing to have Bartlett
removed as executor of my mother’s estate in London8.2.1 My lawyer’s point out in their letter to Bartlett on 29 March
2019 Exhibit Z1 and Z28.3 My lawyers tell Bartlett That the court case to remove Bartlett as
executor had been moved from London and will be dealt with in
8.3.1 Therefore how was it double listed?? How can Bartlett get 6k? It
was not double listed as moved to Liverpool. This is the cost he
8.3.2 There was no warning, there was no court listing for actions on
double listing issues to be heard, it was sprung onto me which is not
8.3.3 Where is there evidence and order for double listing? Where are
the Exhibits from them etc There was no set up for me to have a hearing.
8.4 Bartlett knew my lawyer was not there on the 3rd of April 2019 and
there was no reason for them to be. It was costing case event only.
8.5 Bartlett knew my lawyers told him Removal order as executor would be heard at
the Liverpool court. See letter 29 March 2019 Exhibit Z1 &Z2
8.5.1 The removal of Bartlett order was therefore only listed once in Liverpool.
8.6 More importantly, if it was double listed, it was my acting
lawyers who then listed it in Liverpool?
So if it was a double listed court case. It is their fault.
They had a duty of care.
They were told about this removal of Bartlett in the London court in
the past letters and the letter from the lawyer show this.
8.6.1 then my lawyers told Bartlett this was moved to Liverpool see
letter by the London Judge before any asking to be heard in Liverpool.
8.6.2 This is confusing as all my documents for the 3rd of April court
case was done by my lawyers and Barrister.
8.7 Also on the 3rd of April 2019 Bartlett removed himself so no need
for a hearing and this is stated in the letter 29 March 2019 Exhibit Z1 &Z2
on no defence from me which I had a right to.
I never knew I was going to be done with a double listing.
I never was given a fair hearing of my side of the augment so not a fair case.8.8 So was this a bill for reading my removal document of Bartlett as
executor which cost £7K for double listing makes no sense.8.9 Bartlett did not have to read the contents of my file as he removed himself.
the case and should get damages I wanted …so no need for the £7k8.10 What is the 7k for? Time for him to read something that showed he
would lose and therefore he removed himself as executor.AS Bartlett removed himself on the day! As he knew he could lose. And
said that in Exhibit Z9. IF and a big if the order of the April 3rd 2019 was to be paid in
14 days so why did Bartlett do nothing other than the fact he waited
until AFTER the Dec 2019 court case. FACT.He then did the final settlement in Dec 2019 but then the Taxman
reported him for fraud so this is all done out of badness.
10 Add we can show from 2019 he has harassed me to try and shut up the
crimes he has done. Exhibits if required. 8 letters saying to sue me etc
10.1 BUT All no good as the FACT is due to the court expert saying my mother was hit by his lawyer and Wills not done right etc
10.2 and the fraud by him 100,000, See Exhibits
10.3 undervaluing my mother’s home by half a million, (Exhibits
available if required)
10.4 doing the wills wrong, when everything was going to be left to
me. (See report by Dec 2019 Court appointed Expert).
10.5 And trying to get my mother’s home cheap which he has done to many others.
11 Therefore the final settlement of 70k which Bartlett was awarded in
the Court case of 2019 is to be rejected due to all the damages
Bartlett did to my mother’s estate and him helping to hit her and her
involvement in her strange death and my sister and others. We seek the
judge make this order.
12 Bartlett’s in Chester has a track record of getting others to do
his dirty work.
Add this Bartlett was done by the law society for £300,000 fine
See March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003
13.1 Shirley XX also had issues with him, Exhibit Pickard 11 Aug 2018
and many others. We have other letters to show people say this law firm has done this to other elderly
see also recordings of elderly…more here.
14 The Sunday Times article of the alleged murders in Cheshire. My mother Mavis Banks is being listed as one of them.
The full story is also covered in the Mirror
14.1 Others and I say my mother was murdered and covered up by
regulators (SRA, CQC) and the government paid bodies (Chester Coroner, Chester police,
Chester Council) not doing their jobs.
These crimes are common and affecting trust in the UK. All of them are
about stolen money and the elderly.
14.2 The Time newspaper (August 22 2020) reported similar cases and showed
similar cover-ups. A new journalist has found more cases see point 6 below.
14.3 This lack of regulation is allowing crimes to grow all over the UK.
It puts not only the elderly at risk but everyone.
In fact the CQC has been said in Parliament not fit for purpose.
The SRA and CQC have bad ratings reviews that list constant failings.
Journalists have said the SRA, CQC etc are helping criminals by not taking actions against these crimes.
It also destroyed my mother’s business which created jobs and this is being done to many others.
14.3.1 there is a recording of another cover-up of a murder by Chester police
& coroner at at
14.4 A news recording of several other people who lost their loved
ones (murder is said by them) in Cheshire has been broadcast on the
3rd of September 2020
14.5. We have 2001 signatures on my petition to reopen my mother’s inquest.
14.6. My mother’s inquest tape has been lost by the Chester coroner as it shows corruption with lawyers, Chester police detectives & Chester
Council care team robbing the elderly.
14.7. There is also new evidence which clearly shows motives to kill my mother as the court-appointed expert (2019) said my mother was hit
by a lawyer to alter her will and rob her. This is listed in the files of the Probate Court case in Liverpool Dec 2019
14.8 The court-appointed expert said my mother is saying she was hit by a lawyer (Woodside works for PB) to change her will and rob her estate.
I did a website (2018) and book on Amazon about this
And if not true they would have removed it.
My mother’s video saying Woodside hit her is on
14.9. Clearly all of this fails SRA standards. And Carolyn Jones of the SRA after years <[email protected]sra.org.uk>, Does nothing but writes letters to cover this up.
I want her removed and this to be investigated
14.10. Also Chester police detective MA (listed on the web site) was also robbing my mother in 2007 (papers in court file 2019) and helping
the lawyers (PB & W).
And then when found out tried to shut me up. This is an abuse of police power.
He wants 180,000 from my mother’s settlement but in the past when I was away he tried to help force the sale of my mother’s home and this was found out and is available at the Dec Court 2019 tapes. He knew from 2007 that my mother left her home and business to me but he wanted a cut.
He tried to shut me up in 2015 by going to threaten my child, see website for more details.
The Police SAR shows the police did not investigate these crimes in Chester. It shows coverup.
The Chester coroner failed many like my mother’s case. The inquest was corrupt, low standard and needs to be investigated.
Others had the same issues with the same coroner see
A news recording of several other people who lost their loved ones (murder is said by them) in Cheshire has been broadcast on the 3rd of September 2020
Then these lawyers are protecting each other from these crimes like JB, SRA etc.I state my mother was murdered and the journalist thinks this is true and that is now supported by others see an update of Mirror and the
Times newspaper TBA.The past link shows murders that now must be investigated in Cheshire.https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/
Another recording will be going up which lists more people who have
had lawyers robbing them (TBA).
All PB and JB did was help us map out this network of bent people who
help in these crimes.
All of this must now be investigated by the CPS and police other than the Northwest as police detectives MA & N work in these groups. And
gain by this.
All of this allows for more corruption and costs more.
It also destroys businesses and jobs.
It also allows the witness to my mother’s case to be murdered such as
14.11 The murder of my mother’s accountant Barbara Dunbavand (BD) (a mother of three) who knew my mother should have had Business Property
Rates (BPR) and JB try and avoid this to help PB.
BD also was murdered as she said my mother’s guest house should have BPR (Business Property Rates and therefore no need for a sale) but
that would stop MA, PB etc robbing it.
14.12 BD contacted me to say she wanted to help me then she died strangely- after PB said she said she could not help me (see his own email)
see newspaper report.
BD husband was a doctor who knew Dr B and Dr N etc
14.13 Also, I never have forgotten after my mother’s murder (2015), how my sister turned up to my mother’s guest house with PB (Bartlett).
My sister had tears in her eyes, and a black eye and looked fearful of PB.
Also with PB was a group of people who said they were estate agents but they undervalued my mother’s property by 500,000?
Then in 2019, my sister was seen in a panic looking for me then next thing PB tells me my sister is going to be cremated the next day.
PB & W are known to the undertakers as being bad (tape).
14.14 And we can show in my mother’s case Dr Bland (struck off as a pedo in 2018) knew MA police detective (my sister’s son in law) who
gains in this.
14.15 And all these people knew Dr Bland who drugged my mother to change her will and trapped her in a nursing home. Dr Bland worked
with all the elderly in Chester.
Dr Bland was struck off in 2018 as pedo and it is clear in the past MA (police detective who gains) and others knew him to control him.
PB and Woodside knew Dr Bland as well. Dr Bland knew BD etc. They all live or work next to each other… NOTE: BD husband is a doctor who
knew Dr Bland, Dr N etc
14.16 Dr Bland and Dr N both lied at my mother’s inquest with another Police detective (N) which is why my mother’s inquest tape has gone
missing…they were found out.
Dr N gave my mother morphine for no clinical reason and this killed my mother and she wanted to live and tell on all the above.
14.17 Then in 2020 the law society appointed JB who did nothing but cover up for Bartlett and his emails see 6. shows this
I want James Edward Beresford (JB) struck off and in jail with the other persons helping in the cover-up of these crimes.
14.18 And It is strange JB was given this job by the Northwest Law Society by Hotmail (see his email)
PhilipMay<philip-may> who appointed JB of the Law Society Liverpool.
Philip May are you aware of the cover-up of fraud and murder?
Did Philip May know P. Bartlett (PB)?
Please see fraud listed on the web site below.
15 Therefore I seek that the request of a bankruptcy order be removed and struck off.
16 I seek costs.
18 If the above is not possible we ask for Bartlett to be paid the 7k on the sale of the guest house
which we can show is going on.
18.1 In the letter of 17 of September (Exhibit 17Sep2020page2) to lawyers Bartlett says
“He explained again that although he has filed the Bankruptcy Petition, this isn’t with intention to hurt him, rather to try and bring an end
to matters. “
If so he should wait for the sale of my mother’s home as he said in April 2019
18.2 It makes no sense with COVID going on doing a Bankruptcy order to a person who is learning law and wanting to become a lawyer when he
can pay this bill soon. The damage seems to be clearly bad.
18.3 I contacted Bartlett May 29, 2020 (Exhibit XXX) and Kerry Davise Sep 1, 2020 (Exhibit XXX) on this issue to save courts time but they did not respond.
They did not want to do ADR which is bad
19 If this fails and I have to pay the 7k I ask for a payment plan to be put in place as bankruptcy order will destroy my ability to do work
as I am self employed and need to set up a business.
20 If I win I seek cost for a considerable amount of upset and time he has cost me.
I state the above is true.