Please also after reading below, read Bent cops who protect Bent lawyers http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/a-bent-police-detective-who-should-investigates-but-does-not-puts-firewall-and-witnesses-shut-up-and-he-asks-for-180k/
1 The main issues in two pages are the following:
All exhibits listed on the following web site:
1.1 Bartlett went to Court in 2018 with a care bill for my mother of 100,000 (Exhibit below)
1.2 which Bartlett & Mr Green his lawyer knew from 2015 was only 10,000 (Exhibit below)
1.3 Therefore Bartlett and his lawyer Mr Green lied to the Court and did fraud. NO DOUBT.
NO OTHER POSSIBLE REASON.
The following letters from Bartlett from 2015 onwards used in the court case.
Letter From Bartlett showing the amount of money in debt by the pen point. Letter below 7 March 2017
The letter Bartlett sent to Death Tax man 2016. See Official Tax Document below. Sent to Tax man as true!!!
The letter Bartlett was forced to send to the court in 2019 Dec. Note he blames my dead sister for the bill being wrong but he was the executor of the will by force. He knew this from 2015 onwards.
MA would of also known this was a lie.
The 2nd part of the letter where Bartlett says a friend of the family found a buyer for my mother’s business but in court MA & his court papers said this was him. See below letter. Note Bartlett also lies saying “you will note what appears to be your writing script that states ‘I am not selling up’
this is another lie by Bartlett and this was seen to be so in the court.
The Stamp on the letter from the company Bartlett owned state bill received on 22 July 2015 for 10,000 and clearly never was 100,000
Letter showing true bill in 2010 which Bartlett and MA knew about. Note Court medical experts said mother was very ill so should not have to pay. Letter Sent to Bartlett in 2015
1.4 The Court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green went to Court with dirty hands. They lied about this and other things.
1.5 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
2 We ask for all Court action to be removed in any court case Mr Bartlett & Green is involved with Me as he used the above lie in all parts of the court case I had with him.
2.1 We seek damages from 2007 on wards when Bartlett first started these actions with his lawyer Mr Woodside help
2.3 They preyed on my mother who had medical issues for gain.
2.4 They failed their duty of care to my mother and me.
2.5 The lawyers said Bartlett and Woodside did the Wills wrong on purpose to cause problems and cause costs.
- In 2019 Bartlett, Green & I went to Liverpool Probate Court.
3.2 The Courts’ medical witness (Exhibit Court Expert Medical report) stated clearly that my mother is saying Mr Woodside hit her and he did the following
3.3.1 tried to sell her home against her wishes
3.3.2 told her she had no money
3.3.3 Also my mother’s states like many others that her final will left me everything and this was tampered with by Woodside
34 Bartlett has always wanted my mother’s guest house.
3.4.1 Mr Bartlett was after next stores home and others.
3.4.2 Mr Bartlett was done by the Law Society in the past for 300,000 fine (Exhibit Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K) Bartlett-8751.03) . And someone else took the fall for him. The person who did this case now helps lawyers get out of jail!
3.4.3 He became executor of my mother’s Will by force
3.4.3 Tried to undervalue my mother’s home by 750,000 (see link http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartletts-solicitors-house-valuations/ )
3.5. From the Court Medical Expert & FRSM who have seen my mother’s new evidence in 2019, my mother’s case should be reopened as it looks like she was murdered for her money and her home and there is no doubt with the new evidence that this is provable in court.
see also http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/
- In the Dec 2019 Liverpool Probate Case we settled out of Court,
4.1 But Bartlett broke the deal with 6k bill to me. The 6k was another example of him trying it on.
4.2 This case once again show corrupt lawyers and court system. I like many others do not trust Liverpool court, Chester court, Northwest courts. I never had any problems with RCJ
- Bartlett did fraud by saying there was for my mother 100,000 care bill (Exhibits above and many more).
5.1 He lied knowing this with his lawyer Mr Green took this issue to Court and should have seen the bill was 10,000, not 100,000. He can be done for damages.
5.1.1 Mr Green should of checked all paper work before going to court.
Report both to SRA etc.
5.2 Then, when I looked into this issue and spoke to the people who did the care bill in late 2018. He was found out. IF I HAD NOT DONE THIS HE WOULD OF NOT BEEN FOUND OUT.
5.2.1 MA knew all of this etc (see Exhibits in court papers)
5.3 Then Bartlett admitted it was 800 in court papers late on in 2018 (Exhibit XX) but still wrong
5.4 Then Bartlett and Green in Manchester court said the 100,000 care bill was reduced to 10,000 by my actions. LIE.
5.5 BUT in December 2019 after threats from ICO Bartlett sent the original paperwork of the Care bill which had a stamp that showed his law firm knew it was 10,000 from 2015!!!!
5.5.1 In fact, the law firms paper works show a stamp and date of this true bill (Exhibit above)
5.6 And then on top in the paperwork to tax man in 2015 (Exhibit above ) Bartlett lists the 100,000 care bill knowing it was 10,000. So save 60,000 Tax if property is also wrong priced at 400,000 (when 1 millions)? On inheritance tax…to pocket it?
5.6 Bartlett created the 100,000 bill to force the sale of my mother’s home so he could get it. Also then pocket it.
5.7 As Mr Bartlett knew Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA), my sister’s son in law who gain by all of this. MA could protect Bartlett by his network of cops.
6.1 MA was in Court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.
MA clearly knew Mr Woodside and Mr Bartlett well. Also Dr Bland who was struck off for being a pedo in 2018 and was my mother’s doctor. And Dr Bland ran the elderly death pathway & nursing homes.
6.2 Some have said: As No one would check Mr Bartlett as he keeps this money as executor and he gives a cut to MA?
6.3 Also, MA, as a police detective, should have investigated this 100.000 from 2014 as he said he read the court papers but did not bring this up as fraud. MA never visited my mother. MA used my mother’s guest house and in 2009 she took the key off him and never wanted to see him again.
? someone died at my mother’s guest house and ….
6.4, In fact, every time my mother nearly died, MA does nothing, and the police do not investigate serious crimes which the 2019 Medical experts said are serious.
6.5 MA knew I had put money into my mother’s guest house and also I was building a wet room which when finished I would permanently live with my mother till she died stopping him from getting half if my mother’s business was sold. In fact all knew I have saved the guest house many times when my mother became ill and put money into it to stop it going bust.
6.6 In court MA showed he tried to force a sale of my mother’s business every time I was away (see main history below). And he knew what he was doing was wrong as he knew she was vulnerable.
- And there is other money missing from my mother’s bank account due to Mr Bartlett and its nothing to do with her funeral, but once again Bartlett will not say. Once again, this is stealing.
7.1 Pre 2010 before my mother’s stroke due to the stress by MA & Bartlett & woodside. My half-sister and Mr Woodside tried to make my mother think she had no money (see below for other related events to the crime). My mother said on tape that Woodside told her she had no money so she had to sell her home and her business.
7.2 Post 2010 My sister said to the court my mother had no money but then had to tell the court she had forgotten 40,000 due to my finding out about this money.
7.3 Once again MA knew about this.
7.4 In fact, in 2007, MA tried to force the sale of my mother’s home when I was away and other dates and he said this in the court.
7.5 When my mother died in 2015 I started to investigate again and then 60,000 plus money appeared with no explanation into my mother’s bank account.
And other things which are listed in the details below.
8 In simple words, Bartlett knew MA would stop him being investigated and would help him get away with this crime
- MA knew Dr Bland, who also in 2013 tried to kill my mother and knew the doctor who murdered my mother in 2015 with morphine for no clinical reason. Full details below.
See also http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-law-fraud-murder-corruption/
9.1 My mother was murdered to shut her up
Many say this could be due to MA trying to force the sale in 2007 and then in 2010. As he knew If I had put money into my mother’s home, he would not get half.
Or and to protect Mr Woodside
Every lawyer I met have tried to protect Mr Woodside (all taped)
Dr Bland who was found to be clinical negligent (see links) to my mother but my sister took no action as he helped her not send my mother into hospital in 2010 and therefore I stayed in London unaware that she was trying to sell my mother’s home in her name with MA. If Dr Bland had sent my mother into hospital in 2010 I would of came back to Chester from London and made sure the wet room was finished at my mother’s home/guest house and live with her until her death so they could not sell her business….
And every time I was away he tried to force the sale of my mother’s home
Then Bartlett would buy it cheap and give him a cut.
As the original will left me my mother’s guest house as I can prove, I put money into it.
And in 2010 when I was away an attempt to force the sale of my mother’s home went wrong, and they nearly killed my mother and were almost found out. Then paper work from estate agents show my sister saying my mother’s home was her place but the estate agents documents list the own as my sister’s address so my mother who was being drugged would not know. MA would of know all about this.
MA would have known my mother’s doctor Bland who was across the way from my mother home and also MA would have known him as a pedo (struck off in 2018) who he could blackmail.
Dr Bland was drugging my mother and trapping her in a nursing home so no one knew.
In 2015 as I investigated 60,000 appeared from no where in my mother’s bank account.
Dr Bland lived across the way from my mother’s home and business and Woodside and Bartlett were 3mins walk down the street.
- Action: injunction on the sale of my mother’s home as the true will left me everything.
The following is more in depth.
Past email sent to all
Eleven letters in one Email.
1 To the Press. Please use as you wish.
2 To Politicians
The following show massive corruptions in the North West.
It shows corruption and dementia fraud.
3 To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm
4 To Laurence Howland <@sra.org.uk>
Thank you for your email 17 Jan 2020 but ignores what I sent on the 10 Jan 2020, please re-read below email.
SRA has a team who protect bent lawyers. Look at your own paper trail and because of this many were hurt by you not taking action.
5 To Fraud investigation.
You can not trust Chester police as many have gained by these crimes.
6 To Chester Police.
Police Detectives Michael Anklers was in court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.
It can be seen in his own witnesses statement to the court that in 2007 he can be seen taking advantage of my mother as he knew she had dementia.
He knew I had put money into my mother’s business and was determined to force the sale of this business so he could get money out of it.
He knew about the several attempts to force the sale of my mother’s home as he says it in his own court papers.
He also says he was in charge of the investigation of people who were vulnerable like my mother. So he could stop investigating these crimes.
He knew I was building a wet room and once that was done, I was going to live with my mother and therefore stop him from getting a chance to sell my mother’s home and get half of it.
He ignored several clear attempts on my mother’s death.
He would have known Dr Bland who drugged my mother and helped in this crime
He would have known Dr Bland was going to be done as a pedo, and later Dr Bland was struck off in 2018 for this crime.
MA used this to get Dr Bland to drug my mother and trap her in a nursing home (2011 to 2015) and stop her saying how Mr Woodside hit her to change her Will (Medical experts say this is true in court Dec 2019) And done to help Mr Bartlett steal my mother’s home.
Then MA tried to shut me up by going to NZ to threaten my daughter and can not explain any other reason for all his actions.
The SAR (Subject Access Request) shows no investigation on all the bad actions of Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside.
The SRA was sent the Videos of my mother who said she was hit by this lawyer to change her Will and ignored it. The medical experts and lawyers were shocked in court …It shows massive corruption.
We settled out of court But Bartlett broke the deal and murder is murder.
ALL ON THE WEBSITE LISTED BELOW.
7 Police complaints
I still have had nothing from Chester Police this now must be independently investigated.
I still have not have the files off Mr Barlett.
He clearly stole 3000 from my mother’s bank account. And he can not explain this
or other money.
I request all correspondence with him and other lawyers. Please force this as this is now a year over due. I want him fined.
9 To: Bartlett law firm and all who are listed part of this law firm.
- Insurance firm for Bartletts you also helped cover up obvious crimes.
Your insurance firm has been contacted about this issue and now new evidence.
I seek damages against your firm.
I state that Barlett destroyed the Will that left my mother’s home to me & stole from the estate etc and seek damages.
- To Mr Bartlett,
Do nothing until you have heard from my lawyers. Others and I say you altered the Will that left me my mother’s guest house so you could steal it.
You took other actions for self gain and these are crimes.
- There is new evidence to reopen my mother’s inquest.
1.1 And this should pause the sale of my mother’s guest house as we can show it was originally going to be left to me and others clearly manipulate the event to financial advantage & my mother’s death
1.2 Also we settled out of court But Bartlett broke the deal with 6k bill to me.
1.2.1 Also Bartlett went to court in 2018 with a clear statement of care bill for my mother of 100,000 which he & his lawyer knew from 2015 was only 10,000
Therefore Bartlett and his lawyer (Mr Green) lied to the court and did fraud.
The court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green went to court with dirty hands and
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
Action: injunction on sale?
- Bartlett clearly did fraud with my mother’s 100,000 care bill which was only 10,000
2.1 He lied knowing from 2015 about this to the court with his lawyer Green (he took this issue to court and should of seen the bill was 10,000 not 100,000).
2.2 Then when I looked into this issue and spoke to the people who did the care bill in late 2018. He was found out.
2.3 Then Bartlett admitted it was 800 in court papers.
2.4 Then Bartlett and Green in Manchester court said the 100,000 care bill was reduced to 10,000 by my actions. LIE.
2.5 BUT in December 2019 after threats from ICO Bartlett sent the original paperwork of the Care bill which had a stamp that showed his law firm knew it was 10,000 from 2015!!!!
2.6 And then on top in the paperwork to tax 2015 (ETC) he lists the 100,000 care bill knowing it was 10,000. So save 60,000? On inheritance tax…to pocket it?
2.7 As Mr Bartlett knew MA…no one would check him as he keeps this money and gives a cut to MA.
- And there is other money missing from my mother’s bank account and it nothing to do with her funeral but once again Bartlett will not say. Once again this is stealing.
- And now by new source we know my mother had shares. Some of the shares are worth over 4k (there are many). Which no one would have known about but if I had not been given this paperwork.
4.1 Mr Woodside should of known about my mother’s shares & it was in past wills but then strangely vanishes. So again add to his failure of Duty of care.
4.2 Mr Bartlett would have known as he states he spoke to my mother accountant (BD) about her money and she listed the shares a long time ago. He should as executor done a search on shares…
4.3 but I thought they had been sold pre 2010 when my sister said my mother to the court had no money.
4.4 Then I found a bank book and confronted my sister. Then my sister lied and then had to tell the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money.
4.5 then when my mother dies 60,000 appears when I start asking questions.
4.6 Bartlett is officer of trust to the court so trusted. He could have said 100,000 but pocketed this money as he was obsessed with being executor when told not to. This was part of his plan with MA and sister to make money out of these actions.
4.7 Also, Bartlett undervalued my mother’s home by 750,000 and also tried to buy next store…he owns lots of Chester by knowing somehow how the elderly are going to die and controls their wills by buying their law firms or doing wills cheap to get them.
4.8 If my mother share were rated by her NI to taxable income then this is more complex case.
4.9 MA knew about my mother share. He talked about this to my mother.
- Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA), my sister’s son in law would of know my sister’s actions. My sister would not have done this alone. MA wanted money always. MA would of known what to do by his own statement in court to make the crimes work.
5.1 MA was in court on Dec 2019, and he asked for 180,000 from the sale of my mother’s home. Therefore he gains by all of this.
5.2 It can be seen in his own witnesses statement to the court that in 2007 he can be seen taking advantage of my mother as he knew she had dementia.
5.3 MA says in his own statement; he deals with the area of people with needs like my mother. He knew the law, he knew Bartlett etc.
5.5 MA knew I had put money into my mother’s business and was determined to force the sale of this business so he could get money out of it.
5.6 MA knew about the several attempts to force the sale of my mother’s home as he says it in his own court papers.
5.8 MA knew I was building a wet room and once that was done, I was going to live with my mother and therefore stop him from getting a chance to sell my mother’s home and get half of it.
5.8.1 so my mother was hit in 2010 and sister was trying to sell mother’s home (in her own name and address when I was away).
5.8.2 In 2010 MA knew about my sister actions:
18.104.22.168 saying my mother’s home was hers in paper work,
22.214.171.124 Dr Bland did not sending my mother in to hospital as if he did I would of come back from London to Chester to look after my mother.
MA knew all of the issues in 2010 as tried in 2007 to sell my mother’s home against her wishes.
126.96.36.199 MA also says he was in charge of the investigation of people who were vulnerable like my mother and knew the other detectives. So he could stop investigating these crimes.
5.9 MA clearly knew police detective N who lied at my mother’s inquest about all the attempts on my mother’s life.
5.9.1 Example In 2013 when I found out my mother was being drugged in Dr Bland’s nursing home. Where my mother had care removed from her as she nearly died and if i had not been there my mother would of died. I called the ambulance crew and they saw medication was deliberly withheld to kill my mother
5.9.2 and then a DNR signed by sister and Dr Bland was attempted by staff to stop the ambulance taking my mother to hospital but they saw it was all wrong.
5.9.3 and that can be proved by the fact that I recorded what I told the police detective N and then he said something else which was not a problem at my mother’s inquest.
5.10 MA ignored several clear attempts on my mother’s death (2010 to 2015). When London police said, my mother, became strangely unlucky when I found out my sister tried to sell my mother’s home when I was in London in 2010. And my sister did this my sister’s name and address so I would not know.
5.11 MA would have known Dr Bland who drugged my mother and helped in this crime.
5.12 MA would have known Dr Bland was going to be done as a pedo, and later Dr Bland was struck off in 2018 for this crime.
5.12.1 MA used this to get Dr Bland to drug my mother and trap her in a nursing home (2011 to 2015) and stop her saying how Mr Woodside hit her to change her Will (Medical experts say this is true in court Dec 2019) And done to help Mr Bartlett steal my mother’s home.
5.13 Then MA tried to shut me up by going to NZ to threaten my daughter and can not explain any other reason for all his actions. He did this at my mother’s first inquest by twitter, and when I was going to open the inquest, he visited NZ and my daughter. And I was told about this.
5.14 The SAR (Subject Access Request) shows no investigation on all the bad actions of Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside and all the other issues I said were happening to kill my mother!
5.15 The SAR shows unknown police detective closed the case on my mother. BUT HOW MANY OTHERS?
5.16 There are dangerous people who tried to kill my mother and the medical experts from the RSM say they should be investigated as they are a risk to the public.
6 The SRA (solicitors regulatory authority) was sent the Videos of my mother who said she was hit by this lawyer to change her Will and ignored it. The medical experts and lawyers were shocked in court …It shows massive corruption.
- Mr Barlettand Woodsidealways changed the Wills around the dates when the above actions were going to happen and this would of been seen.
7.1 It was clear my mother did not have capacity etc when she saw Mr Woodside to do the Wills
7.2 All of Mr Bartlett’s actions are massive tricks as he thought I would take no actions, I would not investigate. Bartlett did all of his actions as he knew he could get away with it all. He knew my mother’s death would be staged to be horrific. He knew in 2015 I would see my mother trapped in her bed, I would be only allowed to see her for 1 hour for three times a week. I watched my mother cried out for food and drink. That no one would help as MA could stop me getting help (see Exhibits) & his sister worked in the hospital saying my mother was ok then not. That the CQC would visit and read the DOLS that state my mother was on the pathway of death, which should be monitored, but this was ignored. In fact, the CQC released the report after my mother’s death so as not to stop the ONE month of my mother being killed by removal of food and water. Even when she cried out for a drink, it was foul-tasting. Which I reported to police detective N but he threatened to do me for wasting police time.
The press being told I was lying and we have the editors letter of a newspaper showing the lies to stop the story getting to the press. Then a court injunction was used to prevent the story getting to the TV as my mother could clearly tell the truth about what happened to her in 2010, she was forced to change her will so other could sell her home and i would not be able to look after her.
Then when my mother died, my sister turned up with Bartlett with a black eye to let the estate agents see my mother’s home and they all undervalued it. My sister had a black eye and looked scared.
I then in 2019 send a letter to Bartlett saying my sister could be proved that she helped drug my mother. Then later, Barlett tells me my sister had died the day before she was cremated.
And before this, she was seen looking in panic for me…
7.4 The undertaker’s say Mr Bartlett and Woodside did this to others….and it is on tape.
7.3 Mr Bartlett said he would take legal action against me one year ago due to what I have said above about him, but he did not as it is true what is being said about him and he knows MA supports him in his crimes.
- With all of this, they have no right to win this court case.
- How many other cases of the tax could be out by millions due to Bartlett actions as he planned to be the executor of my mother’SWILL case pre-2007?
I want to become executor or part executor to investigate my mother’s estate.
I want to become an executor as too much wrong doing…therefore…I want to ask questions.
- We have a buy for the guest house.
10.1 They could pay MA 180,000 but this should be reduced with the new info.
10.2 Bartlett bills of 90k should be dropped and sued his actions and I should compensations.
- It is clear I can also sue Mr Woodsidefor not doing the Wills right,
11.1 Also now the video of my mother being hit by him to a new level by other medical experts saying this is true and shows my mother wanting me to be left the guest house…
11.2 BUT I want it sold now as we have a buyer.
Please see all the rest of the points below. Which include the fact that experts including the court experts say the video of my mother saying she was hit by Mr Woodside who works for Barlettis true and the other fact my mother says the business was going to be mine, but Barlett wanted it. He did this to others and was proved by Chester police.
My mother’s murder is clearly very strange and happened on several attempts which not investigate as Chester police detective MA wanted my mother dead as he gained by this.
These crimes were done to many other elderly and this must be investigated.
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <>
Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM
Subject: To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm. To Fraud & Chester Police. Fraud, Murder and done to many & Bent cops and Bent lawyers
To: Michelle Johnson <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, AF Team <email@example.com>
From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Freeman of the City of London
All correspondences by email,
DATE: 10 Jan 2020
To: Paul Philip – Chief Executive of SRA & Juliet Oliver & Jane Malcolm
To Chester Police.
It could be said you all failed in your duty of care as listed in your own conduct guide. You knew about what was going on.
To: Bartlett law firm and all who are listed part of this law firm.
Your insurance firm has been contacted about this issue and now new evidence.
I seek damages against your firm
Your letter Date 8 Jan 2020 from P. Bartlett.
To Mr Bartlett,
Do nothing until you have heard from my lawyers.
There is no due date on the court case letter for 6,000, and this was in Dec 2019 part of the final settlement.
My lawyers say you have broken the agreement in the court.
Also considering the following:
You went to court in 2018 with a clear statement of care bill for my mother of 100,000 which you knew from 2015 was only 10,000
Therefore you and your lawyer (Mr Green) lied to the court and did fraud.
The cost you seek from the court was unaware of your above actions; therefore, you went to court with dirty hands and
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
I seek damages for this.
Also from the Dec 2019 Court case medical experts said my mother’s care was important and from other discussion this cost of 10,000 should be covered under the NHS care cover. You failed to sort this out.
I can also reclaime other money which was taken by Care homes when it should of been covered by the state.
I should also point out that this 6000 cost against me happened because my then PAST London lawyers (now under investigation) put in the removal of Bartlett as executor to the Liverpool court and they knew I did it in the London court as well.
Therefore I got a fine for the removal of Mr Bartlett as executor case issue twice…
All done by the court from Mr Green who is Mr Bartlett lawyer. And then Mr Bartlett stood down as he knew he was guilty and could be done for damages.
It is not my fault but the London lawyers who acted strangely after talking to you and then dropped the case…to you Bartlett advantage.
A good London lawyer & Judge told me they were told to drop the case but wanted to help, they are helping SRA.
They said Mr Bartlett was not on the level.
Also, this cost for this case for 6k makes no sense as it was not a hearing (you made up a number of 6k as not a trial), and I did not have a lawyer present with me. If the court had a hearing and by HR Article 6 fair trial, I would have known on the day about this court issue and answered it. Therefore the cost would not have happened.
Mr Green did this also in 2018 went to court and then presented a case knowing the other side was not prepared and lied to the court saying he had told me about this but had not.
Then Mr Green said my witness statements which were COP24 were not allowed in court but then had them in his own legal bundle.
Also, I can show I tried to appeal this 6K court action, but Liverpool court had issues until I complained about corruption. But then I was told this by Bartlett would be part of the final case. Another Lie.
Also, Bartlett stood down anyway as executor of my mother estate as I was telling the truth.
The list of Bartlett’s actions are:
1) by force became the executor of my mother’s Will around other nasty events. I state my mother was murdered and now other lawyers seeing the court case of Dec 2019 agree upon this. As my mother tried to remove Mr Bartlett she would nearly die and in the end was murdered by morphine for no clinical reason. My mother’s inquest can be reopened due to new evidence from the Dec 2019 court case. It took one month for my mother to be killed as she was trapped in bed and I was stopped from seeing her based on lies…all done to stop her telling the truth…
See Experts report.
Note The doctor was struck off in 2018 (Dr Bland Chester) involved with my mother and the lawyers.
2) mother said Mr B lawyer Mr Woodside, hit her to change her Will, which is on videos & statements. Now other Experts from Royal Society of Medicine say this is true and should be seen as a crime.
4) Mr Bartlett was removed by the court as executor of my mother’s Will as clearly doing bent things
5) Bartlett stated in court my mother had care cost of 100,000 which after I investigated become 800 to the court. As Bartlett knew from 2015 this was 10,000 FRAUD
6) undervalued my mother’s home of 700,000, etc (does this a lot as people dealing with murder)
Mr B tried to rush all this as my mother was clearly murdered and I was too upset to do anything. He would of gained a cheap house.
Also I was told my mother had no money then 60,000 appeared and no explanation where this came from
7) Bartlett can not explain now where over 3000 and another money has gone..
8) Bartlett was done by the law society and fined for 300,000? (see below)
9) Mr B has done this to many others! Undertakers and web sites say this and have on tape a person in the undertaker saying this but too scared to go to the police. Mr B was after them to shut them up.
The SRA have another person listing him doing the same thing to them.
10) Bartlett & Woodside are clearly in Bed with Chester police (MA) in crimes of robbing the elderly.
11) Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA): Listed in crime paperwork to gain etc After my mother’s murder in 2015, MA then tried and contact me by twitter after my mother’s inquest and then when I tried to re-start my mother’s inquest, he then went to NZ where my daughter was and made sure I knew it (see Files). Many see this as threatening, and he should have known better, but he gains from my mother’s Will (by my half sister VB) and is named in the medical document by my mother as causing her trouble (See Exhibit below). IMPORTANT: MA Went to NZ to show he could attack my child and shut me up. Clearly he should have not done this. This can be shown in court.
In fact in the court case of Dec 2019 MA said he wanted 180,000 out of my mother’s estate when my sister was dead and others said I should have my mother’s guest house.
He can from 2007 been seeing trying to prey on my mother when I was away to get money from her and connected to death in the guest house which must be investigated.
In 2008 my mother took the key from him to my mother’s guest house and never wanted to spend Christmass with him again.
The near murder of my mother in 2013 and final murder in 2015 was prevented from investigation by MA and his friends in Chester Police. In fact more files to support this now sent to Fraud police.
Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu (N): (also works with kids-link to Dr Bland?) lied under oath at my mother’s inquest. Exhibit is the Recording at home before my mother’s death where I talk to him for one hour (taped https://vimeo.com/138461044 ) and then at my mother’s inquest where he say I only told him the chips were wrong at the nursing home which was a lie and he smiled knowing he was getting away with it.
Also in the court hearing 2019 Dec this was part of the settlement and was dropped! Now Bartlett has broken the court agreement.
Therefore I can add this to the fact Bartlett has done many things wrong by design including the Wills etc.
Bartlett tries to shut me up as he did to many others
Do nothing until you heard from my lawyers…
To report this to the SRA firstname.lastname@example.org
To report this as Fraud email@example.com
A solicitor is an officer of the court and cannot be party to the deception – see also note 2.2 to the current SRA Principles (the public interest must come first when there is a conflict principles).
This links to