Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Also it is in the public’s interest they know if there is harm that could happen to them (ECHR).
I also see this web site and my expression protected as ART and I have a right to express it.
I should explain I get really upset over my mother’s murder. This page is also authored by many different people.
And I am now getting lawyers to remove people from my mother’s Will who I think are not fit for the reasons I give that are backed up by tons of evidence.
Video link of my mother saying Mr Woodside hit her and more….
Recording of my mother saying
“my mother says Mr Woodside and a doctor joined together against her.”
Recording of problems with Mr P. Bartlett.
Many recordings of fearful clients saying they were bullied over probate of their dead lovedones by lawyers.
More soon on
You need to look at Gosport hospital, Middlesex hospital etc. to see 30 years of a cover-up of murders of the elderly as standard practice. And as they got away with this they started to do it to babies who were just weak, in another word not given a chance and all done to save £ I saw a team of killers I reported protected as many others did. I watched them being protected as they shut me up and got lawyers to cause me problems. I saw several bent judges such as S.
For more check out these talks
And bent lawyers JB who shut people up by being nasty. My mother was murdered (like many witnesses) to shut her up as she knew Dr B across the way was a pedo (done in 2018) and then the Dr helped bent lawyers and police detective MA to rob her (official records list this see link below) which they did to many others.
Tapes can be found on at https://soundcloud.com/ukcolumn/dispatches-from-the-front-the-mechanics-of-modern-murder
Then in 2013 found my mother drugged to look like she had dementia and when I proved that I was shut up.
When my mum was not drugged she knew what was going on and could read a book etc and wanted to name the evil people who hurt her over her money..so they killed her.
Then they tried to kill my mother by not giving her care when she had a fit (that could kill her) and saying an ambulance was on its way at Oakland nursing home in 2013. But this was a lie, so I called the ambulance and they found no correct care given. The good ambulance crew were shocked with no medication given to my mother (was in massive pain) and they wanted to take my mother to the hospital when C stopped them by a DNR (do-not-resuscitate order) which was incorrect and the ambulance crew saw too much was wrong so my mother was taken to the hospital. But the police did nothing! (AS MA knew he would be named).
The DNR had Dr B and my half sister name (MA son in law) on it who gained by my mother’s death. (See also Clincal negligence which was worth signifcant amount of money but half sister did not want to take action againts a Dr who had helped her and MA in a crime. This was pre 2010 before my mother’s stroke (cause by them forcing to sell her home and my mother should have been sent to hospsital but was not as if mother had gone to hospital I would of come back from London and started to care for my mother as I did in the past and I was building a wet room to helpl her. I always dropped everything to care for my mother something my half sister never did).
Then my mother was moved to another highly rated nursing home by the CQC (Care Quality Commission: regulate and inspect health and social care services in England) which was another lie- Pinetum. I saw so many mistakes and I got others to come in to see it and then the council used a DOLS (The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which is part of the MCA 2005 laws) to prevent witnesses to these crimes. A demonstration of DoLS used to hide problems and murders! Then in 2015 CQC was inspecting the nursing home and did report saying no one was on the pathway to death, but it clearly said my mother was on it in the DoLS report which the CQC had to read that. The CQC report was deliberately delayed until my mother was murdered. And this was difficult to ignore as my mother’s case was going to be on TV and papers.
The editor of a newspaper sent me an email to show why he did not run the story as Chester council said other lies about me (they get money to do this!). Then TV got involved but Chester council used an expensive lawyer (who paid for this, and signed this off?) to put an injunction on my mother’s case…and once again the CQC knew this.
Even the judge who did this could not get over the DoLS and the number of them in one year! I was stopped from seeing my mother for only 3 times a week by 2 social workers who checked I was not recording anything (who paid for this? Who made this possible). The fact that the CQC visited a nursing home and a DOLS listed someone was on the pathway to death but they final report says no one was not is very dangerous… this is how you cover up murders.
The people doing this report must be found!) Later on, doctors see no reason for my mother’s death other than trapped in a bed without food and drink. The CQC ignored 3 years of evidence which clearly shows abuse and crimes done by the nursing homes. But the Pinetum nursing home was taking over NHS services, and it can be shown killed off patients who care was too complex (like many other places). It can be shown now that the nursing home was a death trap for many years …but covers up.
Coroner R destroyed evidence (autopsy sample) even when I said in the past my mother was poisoned in police incident record before she died and then he tried to shut me up at the inquest. My mother’s case is Public inquest due to my mother died on a DoLS still not released as it shows massive corruption including elderly being murdered by lawyers for their homes (by bad layers and many suggest people like: Tape Here) and the hospital being taken over by a private firm that kills to save £.
The bent police detective (MA) knowing I was trying to get the inquest reopened went to another country where my child was and made sure he had this on Facebook (never done before or afterwards) and everyone agrees this looks like a threat that he could kill my child. Who paid MA to do this and he knew I had told the police about him, so he should have never done this. As other said that is what he covers up as well as the elderly cover-ups for the people who rob the elderly of their homes and help the pedo vices. Nursing home Staff who killed my mother knew staff/worked at the hospital where the babies died in 2014 onwards.
We can now show that Pinetum had a high death rate and other issues due to special report by experts which is in the public’s interest.
Evil Lawyers who …
In regard to my mother’s Will.
It can be proved that on many occasions Mr. Bartlett was told to do all correspondence by email and he deliberately fails to do this.
Mr. Bartlett is already reported in the March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K).
My lawyers can see no reason why he is allowed to do probate with this and other serious issues. He has already been removed many times by the Liverpool Probate office due to complaints by others.
The Wills of Mavis Banks 2009 and others are invalid because it can be proved it was done by coercion. The doctor involved was struck off in 2018 and there are medical notes that support this claim.
A previous Will is valid and is supported by one of the past named executor of the Will. The same executors have asked on many occasion for Mr. Bartlett the current executor of the Will to be removed for many reasons.
Many people have removed Mr. P Bartlett as an executor of the Will and he is now being removed. Please see Appendix 2 below and attachments. I, Dr Mark Jones can show and have the support of lawyers stating that I have Proprietary Estoppel and Constructive Trust issues with my Mother’s Estate which Mr. P Bartlett ignores.
I would request this issue to be resolved in a London Court as a case to prove my mother was murdered is being done there with the support of XXX and others.
Also, Mr. Bartlett has not ever explored alternative dispute route and has been asked this many times but he is known to run up probate costs.
Also all Wills state the following:
1) See Recording by X
2) See Recordings by people who know MA connections to X
3) Mr Bartlett has in the past wanted my mother’s home and also next store home when their parents died. Mr Bartlett was found not acting in arms reach of the properties and home which he overseas by buying the law firms for their probate.
4) I have on tape & Video & COP24 (type of statement) my mother who can be seen as having mental capacity and was visited by experts to support this. And on this my mother said that Mr Woodside (lawyer who works for Mr Bartlett) hit my mother and was forcing her to sell her home and change her Will. This is supported by others who had the same issues with Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside.
5) Mr Woodside also told my mother had no money which was also a lie and he wanted her to sell her home cheap (got some paperwork) (Case in progress and a documentary being made of this)
6) It can not be right or fair that a person who is Cleary after my mother’s home and looks like he is involved in her murder of her should be the executor of her Will. Others and I state this, and this will go to court.
Appendix Reasons to remove Mr. Bartlett from my Mother’s Will.
The executor Mr Bartlett of my mother’s Will (Mavis Banks) on the 17 March 2017 he said he did letter saying he had issued a “Warning to Caveator” but this is a incorrect document and lawyers letter back this up.
I did not receive this letter until the 23 March 2017 with no date etc on it. And by law I have 8 days from receiving it to put in this letter.
He sent this to the address which was wrong. BUT the letter Mr Bartlett did has many faults and lawyers will point out it has no seal and should be rejected. Mr Bartlett has been told on multiple occasions to contact me by email as I travel a lot and he is able to contact other lawyers by email.
Therefore he chose not to do this with me to lead me to a disadvantage. He was told by my lawyers not to do this and I will therefore seek compensation and removal of him from my Mother’s Will. Note that the Caveat has not been served upon me correctly, as it does not contain the Probate Registry’s Court seal, dates etc which it should do before the Warning is sent to me by way of formal service, and as such it is ineffective. Also there is no Caveat No or Warning number and also not sent to my lawyers MW.
This is serious and shows bad intent. NOTE: Past lawyer comments on Mr B (To Mr Bartlett) relating to the removal of the caveat which they said “believe are misguided and indeed premature in the circumstances.” And other lawyers agree to this, they also agree that the letter on the 9th of January 2017 which states: “We reserve our client’s right to produce this letter to the court on the issue of costs in the future, although we hope that that will not be necessary”
The other executor of the Will XXX (named on all Wills) on many occasions since 2010 has asked for Mr Bartlett to be removed. Therefore Mr Bartlett should be removed. see attachment for most recent letter there are others. IMG_20160908_0003.pdf (442K)
Mr Bartlett failed to give me Wills on many occasions and I had to go to lawyers to get them and did not receive them until 13 Jan 2017. I have emails asking for them from 2011. I can now show other Wills which were not sent and serious issues with MR Bartlett Wills by his company. Other people also say they have had problems with him. The Will he sent to me where my mother did leave everything to me has had her name removed and this was done by photocopying it with my mother signature and witnesses removed. XXX has stated he saw this will signed etc. Note I also only received my mother’s medical records in Dec 2016 and it shows issues with her health and the Wills from other dates. There needs to be time to look at this correctly.
I have on tape & Video & COP24 my mother who can be seen as having mental capacity and was visited by experts to support this. And on this my mother said that Mr Woodside (lawyer who works for Mr Bartlett) hit my mother and was forcing her to sell her home and change her Will.
This is supported by others who had same issues with Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside. Mr Woodside also told my mother had no money which was also a lie and he wanted her to sell her home cheap (got some paperwork) (Case in progress) I can now give evidence to show this has been done to others, all for allegedly Mr Bartlett to steal peoples homes.
Police should investigate this…but See Bent police who gain. http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/a-bent-police-detective-who-should-investigates-but-does-not-puts-firewall-and-witnesses-shut-up-and-he-asks-for-180k/
It can not be right or fair that a person who is Cleary after my mother’s home and looks like he is involved in her murder should be he executor of her Will.
Others and I state this. My mother’s Will should be moved to London probate office. Sixth reason Mr Barlett is already reported for “Badness” in the March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K). He is known to be a bad person by all regular people.
Lawyers say he should not be allowed near any Will due to this report done on him (Tape).
I can now add that MR Bartlett has ignored that my mother’s guest house can have 100% business relief on the IHT400 ! to force the sale of my home! He knew this. This was done to the harm of my mother’s estate and for him to force the sale and buy it cheap. He clearly is not working in my mother’s interests and all of this can be proved.
Mr Bartlett said my mother’s home is worth only XXX when I can now show by other professionals it is worth a lot more XXX plus. My mother’s death is seen by experts as strange and my mother should be alive now. I have had all sorts of threats and I will not put up with bullies. I also need an investigation into my mother’s murder and so was her accountant (already issue with her inquest). It should be noted that inquest.org.uk do not like the fact that the same coroner are involved and he is also known to them for “badness” Mr Bartlett – allegedly is known to XXX and XXX and see List as very bad person! (I have a tape of customers saying Mr B is after their loved one’s home …when trying to deal with their death. Check the Liverpool Probate office for the removable of Mr B). I can submit these to the court.
My mother was MURDER 14 March 2015 for her home. There is too much evidence to show a group of people who are trying to steal her and other person’s homes.
Therefore I Dr Jones FRSM state there is a conspiracy to steal elderly person’s homes and after this was done the same group started to attack me. A QC who retired said my mother’s case needs to be reopened and this is currently being done. There are clearly several attempts on her life (2010, 2013, 2015) to stop her talking. She clearly states someone was trying to force her to sell her home against her wishes and steal money and medical records state this fact. There is now other supporting evidence. This is the reason why they went to so much trouble to kill her as she knew too much.
Mr Pierre Bartlett is the lawyer who has chosen to be the executor of my mother’s Will. He did this by buying the law firm where the Will was held. BUT my mother did not want him and she was murdered before she could remove him. I have on video, tape and COP24 statements that my mother did not want this man to be involved with her Will. I can show also that the other exactors of the Will wants Mr P. Barlett removed as he is know to be full of “badness”.
Mr Bartlett buy probate law firms which he then tries to obtain people homes (have example of others on tapes- allegedly . Mr Bartlett can not explain why he is overseeing my mother’s will (been asked many times) when he runs several law companies and estate agent. He should be investigated for murder and obtaining person homes.
An investigation on cremation documents doctor’s names and links to certain nursing homes should show deceased and disposal of homes. It seems there is a network of bad people doing this for several years. To prove the point the medical records show my mother naming a Police detective MA (full of badness) who gains by my mother’s death and used many lies about me. I wait to hear back from you Mark Appendix 2 Dispute over Wills.
My half sister names is VB (listed in the Will to get half of my mother’s estate. My mother is Mavis Banks (DOB: XXX) died on the 14 March 2015. My mother had my half sister by another man. The person I am having problems with is Mr Bartlett (head of the same firm worth millions, after my mother’s home like next store! ) who is the executor of the Will due to him buying the law firms that drafted the originals Wills. Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K). My mother never asked for him. Best wishes Mark Guest house for the invoice value. IMG_20160908_0004.pdf (171K)
CASE The Claimant (MJ) over his life (40 years) ran the guest house for MB (his mother) and put investment into the business with money and his own time to his disadvantage (statements of other jobs not taken COP24 etc). When MB was ill he gave up his jobs and pensions etc. It was made clear he would obtain the business by MB and many others. This set up a common intention (see Constructive trusts below). There are supporting statements in COP24. MB was doing Wills and a plan to put in place a “Charge” for MJ were performed but foul play was used to remove these. There are now MB’s Wills that show issues. MB’s murder clearly was done to prevent her wishes being performed (doctors supporting statements). All done to stop MJ being left the home and family business. The lawyer who is the executor of MB’s Will is after her home and is known by undertakers as a bad person as well as the Law Society. Add new statements here. Ever way MJ could use Proprietary Estoppel as well (see below) for this case. There is clear example of a conspiracy team (Lawyer Mr B, Det. LCP staff etc allegedly ) against MB to obtain her home and money which lead to her murder.
This conspiracy team moved to MJ once he investigated his mother in Chester. A police incident number has been done outside Chester. For my case the following law cases can be used: 1. Constructive trusts. The establishment of a beneficial interest in the family home and business (Common intention). Or 2. Proprietary Estoppel (clear assurance, reasonably rely on, substantially to their detriment) 1. Constructive trusts (Common intention) The court of law is Geary v Rankine  EWCA Civ 555 Also Jones v Kernott  UKSC 53 Oxley v Hiscock  EWCA Civ 546 Stack v Dowden  UKHL 17
Summary of case of Geary v Rankine  EWCA Civ 555 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geary_v_Rankine 22. What Mrs Geary was saying was that the common intention was that she and Mr Rankine would run the business together, but in my judgment it is an impermissible leap to go from a common intention that the parties would run a business together to a conclusion that it was their common intention that the property in which the business was run, and which was bought entirely with money provided by one of them, would belong to both of them. In addition, Mrs Geary’s own evidence makes it clear to my mind that Mr Rankine had no intention that she should have an interest in the property itself. First, as I have said, her evidence was, as was his, that he would refuse to recognise her unless she got divorced. She did not get divorced until 2002, some six years after the acquisition. That refusal to recognise her is in my judgment inconsistent with an intention on his part that she should have a beneficial interest in the property. I might add that his given reason, namely that he feared that her husband might make a claim on the property, is a perfectly rational reason even if it might not have been given effect. Second, Mrs Geary’s evidence was that as the years went by she asked what security she had for her and her son and that Mr Rankine either said the business should remain in his sole name or was non-committal. Those passages are also, in my judgment, inconsistent with an intention on Mr Rankine’s part that Mrs Geary should have a beneficial interest in the freehold of Castle View. See also related Jones v Kernott  UKSC 53 Oxley v Hiscock  EWCA Civ 546 Stack v Dowden  UKHL 17 2. Proprietary Estoppel Proprietary estoppel transfers rights if, 1) Someone is given a clear assurance that they will acquire a right over property, (MJ was and many statements COP24 to back this up) 2) they reasonably rely on the assurance (can show this with cop24), and, 3) they act substantially to their detriment on the strength of the assurance (see cop24) 3) it would be unconscionable to go back on the assurance. Case law Thorner v Major  UKHL 18 Gillett v Holt  Ch 210 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillett_v_Holt Dillwyn v Llewelyn  EWHC Ch J67 Also looked after my mother’ many times Jennings v Rice  EWCA Civ 159 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennings_v_Rice to improve the house in the belief it was hers created a proprietary estoppel. Pascoe v Turner  1 WLR 431 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascoe_v_Turner
Video link of my mother saying Mr Woodside hit her and more….
Recording of my mother saying
“my mother says Mr Woodside and a doctor joined together against her.”
Video link of Mr B (see above).
Evidence that Police Det MA is listed in medical documents which they tried to hide (See image below).
Then MA assistant had to tell the court they had forgotten £45,000 of my mother’s money after 3 years of telling everyone my mother had no money, something which Mr Woodside also told my mother and is on tape! All done to make my mother sell her home to make ther think she had nothing that also caused her to have a stroke. Mr B wanted my mother’s home as he tried to do this to next store (also on tape).
Also from the Court document from Half-sister, Son in law (MA).
I received email from the CQC on Oct 17, 2018 from the CQC but I put forward that the CQC have avoid answering questions which now lead me to legal actions against you and the company your are responsible for. You could say this is nothing to do with you but this is a CQC example of cover up of murder of many and fraud. The following is from a legal bundle and repeats itself over individual key issues that are parts of other cases. You the CQC have still not answered many important questions: 1.0 Why when you inspected Pinetum nursing home, Chester on Feb 27 of 2015 and onwards to May (Exhibit PN) and my mother (Mavis Banks) was clearly on the LCP: a medical pathway which removes food, drink and medication which causes death and this has to be monitored by the CQC.
1.1.1 And the LCP was officially finished in 2014 but still monitored by you? Why?
1.1.2 In fact, a collection of evidence shows my mother was on LCP. Exhibit Z shows discharge from the hospital and removal of care 6/2/2015 and my emails & calls which was also sent to you at the start of the LCP on 10 of Feb 2015 (see emails below).
1.1.3 And twitters from Andrea Sutcliffe (see Exhibit T) which says she is aware of the problems and there will be a meeting to change this she says.
1.2 And also, my mother had been on multiple DoLS (Exhibit DoLS) for nearly a year, which you had notices about and you must check on them & I still state were based on a lie! Which you never investigated.
1.3 And the last DoLS (2/3/2015) states that my mother was on an LCP (Exhibit DoLS LCP) and your staff had to read this as would have been notified of it.
2.0 Then the following has to be asked:
Why did the final CQC report on Pinetum Nursing home say no one was on the LCP! As over time someone was and it should have been investigated and this was done to many others.
2.1 The CQC report said, “The care plans we looked at confirmed the registered manager’s (WHO?) comments that no-one was receiving end of life care at the time of our visit” But I had sent email saying my mother was on it in the hospital and the LCP was being done by the doctors and staff when the CQC visited.
2.2 And the DoLS 2/3/2015, which the CQC would have read, said, “She (Mavis Banks) is on palliative care. All her medications have been stopped.”
2.2.1 And, on receiving this DoLS you should have taken action to check it out. See 9.2 by law.
2.3 And I told (phone & email) you about issues from my email from the hospital where they said they had not put my mother on the pathway 14 Feb 2015 but in fact Le Calva of Chester Council and he did many of the DoLS, said that my mother was on the LCP on the Monday 9th of Feb, which once again you were told about.
2.4 And I sent to the CQC an email Feb 10 2015 see “Subject: Urgent: Mavis Banks: Palliative Care decision Thursday 5 of Feb 2015 on Ward 44” Full email See below.
2.5 And also sent to the CQC on the 17 Feb an email which states that my mother could eat etc. and I have a secret video to prove this when lies were saying otherwise.
2.6 And also the Email on the Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:57 PM Subject: It is essential that my mother should have full medical support and care NOW (including nutrition and hydration) Full email below.
2.7 And before that when my mother was discharged from the hospital the nursing home managers said my mother was on the pathway see Discharge from the hospital 6/2/2015 and from that moment on I contact the CQC about this issue.
3.0 And all of this is a serious issue that must be investigated, as this is dangerous.
3.1 We can show these issues affected others who look like they were murdered & for criminal gain.
4.0 And, why did the CQC report that started on Feb 27 2015 then get published on May 2015 and was late by 3 months, so it came out after her death (14 March 2015)?
4.1 For if the report had been released in the normal amount of time it would have been seen that my mother was on the LCP for the wrong reason and other faults seen. And this would have been reported on and looked into, and my mother removed from the LCP and she would have lived but she was deliberately let to die by having food and drink removed in a painful death! 4.1.1 A horrible death she knew was being done to her as she wanted food, drink & this was denied and recorded. 4.2 In fact, the report was deliberately done late (expert witness) and done after her death, which makes the report writers an accessory to murder, as this was a deliberate act. 4.3 I want the names of all the people involved in this report, as they are involved in the murder of my mother and others.
5.0 And add to this a court injunction of 2nd March by expensive London lawyers (how much?) was done by Chester Council to stop the story of a healthy person being put onto the LCP going on to TV & press?
5.1 And at the court meeting on the 2nd of March the Judge said the number of DoLS made no sense and was like a joke and as CQC monitor the DoLS why could they not see this as well?
5.2 We have experts pointing out an easy to see faults with the DoLS but ignored by CQC
5.3 You can and will be sued personally and The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
5.4 Conspiracy as set out in the Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977. Also Fraud.
6.0 MCA is clear that it needs to be followed otherwise…legal actions.
6.1 Nowhere does it show my mother consented to these actions or the LCP
6.2 It was made out she had dementia to avoid the issue of her consent but this can be proved that my mother had mental capacity by
6.2.1 Court of Protection visits 2012 Exhibit X
6.2.2 Independent expert visit 2012/3 etc Exhibit X
6.2.3 By an independent expert which was deliberately not allowed to see my mother in 2014 due to the DoLS but others secretly did COP24 and recordings to show she had mental capacity. Exhibit X
6.2.4 By a lawyer who wanted to help my mother and then had to leave Chester just after my mother nearly died due to the DNR 2013 (Lawyer’s Name in Proceedings for protection) Exhibit X
6.2.5 COP24 by people who secretly visited my mother who knew her and knew mental capacity act.
6.3 therefore for not only was my mother’s rights removed but this is murder.
6.4 a DNR in 2013 was used without my mother’s consent to cause murder and with clear motive.
6.4.1 In 2013 when my mother nearly died due to a false DNR being done without my mothers name on it. The DNR was done by my half-sister (VA) who gains by her death and a Dr B who also gains by her death.
6.4.2 The DNR in 2013 was rejected due to my mother not having correct care by the nursing home and the ambulance crew saw this. A nursing home had medicine to stop medical issue that could of caused death but deliberately withheld it and the ambulance crew witnessed this done to my mother as she had a life threatening fit. And this was a deliberate lack of care done in a passed CQC nursing home Oakland by Dr B & manager C& Nurse Y to cause death and that is murder.
6.4.3 The DNR was also rejected as my mother did not have her name on it and it can be proved by the court of protection documents, and other experts my mother had mental capacity (6.2.1, 6.2.2,6.2.3 &6.2.4) and at no time did she want to die.
6.4.4 It is also a fact my mother was a strong Catholic and therefore a sin to kill oneself. She also went to church almost every weekend pre 2014 and the DoLS stopped this.
6.4.5 After the near death in 2013 it was clear my mother wanted to live.
6.4.6 She is in fact on tape saying this several times (Exhibits ).
6.5 And if the CQC had taken action then my mother would be alive now.
6.6 And this was reported to the police. Exhibit.
6.7 In 2015 when my mother was put on to the LCP no court decision was made about this and the 2013 DNR showed she wanted to live as she rejected it!
6.7.1 If someone is put onto the LCP and they do not have mental capacity this has to go to court due to the law at this time being specific about this issue. New law after 2015
6.7.2 The DoLS lists two social workers guarded my mother from any other contact to prevent her from being seen as having mental capacity. In effect she was under arrest and trapped in nursing home with all rights removed.
6.7.3 There is a recording when I saw my mother and I was first told by Le Calva that my mother was dying and could not eat and then unknown to the two social workers I recorded the fact (Exhibit) my mother asked for food and clearly could eat….and had no problem with this.
6.7.3 It can be shown the Swallow expert acted strangely and lied about my mother which she had done to others. And it can be shown this was done to others to allow for AD (Accelerated Death) by removing food and drink from them.
6.7.4 A court injunction in 2015 was used to hide this horror going on as the newspapers investigated these criminal actions.
6.8 When my mother was improving and this can be shown by tape recordings. It can be shown that she was put onto morphine by Dr N for no clinical reason and when I found this out, I complained and it was removed and my mother continued to live for XX weeks. Therefore she was very healthy to keep going.
6.9 Therefore a person was trapped in her bed, had help removed from her by DoLS, two social workers kept this in place and stopped contact with others, food and drink was removed and when offered it was made to be foul to cause rejection (Secretly Exhibition Tape).
6.10 No court decision was made to put my mother onto the LCP. And my mother when she had food clearly had mental capacity. If you removed food and drink from anyone elderly trapped in a bed they will act like they have no mental capacity.
6.11 Therefore this is clearly murder.
6.12 and as there was a network of individuals who did this and it has been stated this has been done to others and this must be investigated to stop it happening again. And criminals have gained by stealing from them.
I can show I reported the fact that my mother was poisoned in the nursing home to the police and the CQC but the coroner destroyed the evidence.
In 2015 all next to each other…
My mother was murdred at Pinetum nursing home and at the same time other deaths occured
(See specail report by http://ukcolumn.org )
One example is where a woman said her husband was murdred by a doctor (paper work shows name on files) who does not exist on the medical records and staff without name badges wanted the womans husband’s organs.
Also at the same time there are reports of babies being murderd.
And as the CQC and Health Watch both failed my mother who was put onto a pathway to kill her to shut her up..then you have to recall…
My mum was being murdered at the same time as CQC visited & read DOLS report that stated she was on the LCP but in final CQC report it said no one was on the LCP & the report was done after her death (the reason done after was if they found anyone on the pathway they would of seen my mother should of come off it but). And the hospital said she was not on the pathway then later did? And we have a letter from a news paper editor saying Chester council lied about me to stop the story being run..so then Chester council paid for an expensive injunction on my mother to stop the story getting to press and saving my mother …… At the same time babies & adults were being murdered and organs stolen….and good cops told not to investigate.
10 Dec 2015 my mother’s accountant who wanted to help me, died strangely and the coroner was Nicholas Rheinberg (who did my mother’s inquest…and will not relase my mother’s inquest tapes and threatened me. Also known to inquest.org.uk).
My issues about the coroner….
My full name is Mark Robert Jones, here is my new review based on facts
More Videos to be put on…
See what other clients are saying are they all wrong?
All of this links to
To contact me please use : email@example.com
Or my twitter @drjonesaa
© Copyright, Corrupt Solicitors all rights reserved 2019.