SRA Solicitors Regulation Authority Protect lawyers who hit elderly.
I saw my mother slowly murdered and covered up by a team who worked with the LCP (pathway to death), CQC (looked the other way), SRA who protected lawyers who took over Wills and controlled the sale of the elderly’s homes so they could get them cheap and run up bills. I write this as I am very upset…please spread the word to stop this.

To the Court.
I Dr Mark Jones FRSM Freeman of the City of London, parliamentary candidate state the following is true. Due to the Joint Medical witness evidence, we state the following:
There are clear criminal actions that should pause this court case and lead to independent police investigations, as my mother (MB) was one of many who was robbed and killed for her business (which was also her home). There is new significant evidence which was not heard at MB inquest and it clearly shows motives for her murder.
I ASK THE COURT TO  MOVE THIS TO CPS FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1) £100,000 care bill that becomes £800 with no explanation or proof of the original bill & if I had not investigated would have been still used as a bill of 100,000    All Exhibit below to support this in Claim 1 etc
2) Money taken from my mother’s account with no explanation after asking why for over a year to Bartlett!
3) My mother clearly says she was hit by her lawyer Mr Woodside (works for Bartlett & did all my mother’s wills) to force the sale of her business to Mr Bartlett, who buys people’s homes by controlling their Wills & running up costs. This statement is now backed up by the Joint medical expert report for the court.
4) My mother being told she had no money when the Wills (2007 onwards & when I was away) were being done, then later my sister tells the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money after I proved my sister was lying (2013).
4.1) Mr Woodside also told my mother pre 2010, when the Will were being done that my mother had no money to force her to sell her home (on tape).
5) Then after my mother’s death in 2015, £60,000 appears in my mother’s bank account, with no explanation after I start investigations.
6) Bartlett is found out in 2019 to be sending documents which are damaging about me to lawyers who was going to work with me.  These documents from Bartlett were found out by the honest joint medical expert commenting on them in his report.
6.1) The court told (23 October 2019) Bartlett & Green that they should supply these documents and he has ignored this. Now the ICO, SRA etc. say I should have these documents.
Bartlett caused me to have many good lawyers to walk away from helping me when he contacted them with these unknown documents. Bartlett tried to use these unknown documents to influence the expert & others. Green (Bartlett’s lawyer knew this).
7) Police detective MA is found to be stealing (Exhibit 40) & clearly forcing my mother in the past to sell her business. This was also from my mother’s and mine home (Mr Woodside in 2019 shows NEW lists: 2007 MA (sister’s Son in Law) and Clair (MA husband and sister’s daughter) trying to force the mother to sell her business), and I can show I had invested in my mother’s business.  I was building a wet room for my mother which, once I had completed then they would not be able to sell my mother’s home & business (guest house) as I would live there full time. This was also the plan from 2010 for me to look after my mother in Chester & everyone knew this.
7.1.1) Exhibit Claim N1 shows all the investments I made into my mother’s business and home which are greater than the value of my mother’s home.
7.1.2) But by manipulation of Wills by Bartlett & Woodside, my sister gets half of my mother’s home which she never put any money into. Also, MA gains by this as he is my sister son in law.
7.1.3) Bartlett gains by controlling the sale of mother’s business and undervaluing it by 700,000
7.2) You can see every time I was away, they tried to force the sale of my mother’s home & business (Exhibits 039 J Evans & J Tinsley).
7.3) In 2010 Doctor Bland should have sent MB to hospital but he did not, and then he was found to be medically negligent (Exhibit S). All of this was started by my investigation in to my mother’s near death in hospital in 2010 but I did not find out till 2013.
7.4) but sister & MA did not want to sue Dr Bland for a significant amount for medical negligence as he had helped them keep my mother at home in 2010 when she was ill & I was away in London. And by Woodside changing my mother’s Will so sister would get half & force the sale of mother’s home & business.
7.4.1) I did the medical negligence due to mother nearly strangely dying in hospital 2010, (attempt on her life) by hospital-acquired infections when no one else did. But the insurance firm said the real issue they found was Dr Bland who in 2010 did not send my mother in to hospital. Sister would not take action on this event with massive pay out (Exhibit S) as Dr Bland helped her.
7.5) If Dr Bland had sent my mother to the hospital in 2010, they knew I would of come back from London to look after my mother in Chester, stopping their plans to sell my mother’s business and get half of it.
7.6) the dates on the estate agents letter (Exhibits J7) which said my mother’s home was my sister and uses my sister’s home address, show they tried to sell against my mother’s wishes her home, which would lead to mother stroke… which they had tried to do in the past when I was away (see Exhibits 039,038). This repeat the fact in the past they tried to do this before: force the sale of my mother home when she did not want to, see Exhibits 39 Evans
Also they knew if these estate agents (Exhibit J7) letters arrived at my mother’s home, I would have seen them as I was building a wet room and living there (Exhibit builders etc).
7.7) All set up by Woodside & Bartlett so they would gain in the Wills when it was clearly a business I had put money into and was going to be mine.
There actions would cause the sale of my mother’s business which Bartlett would then control as the executor of the Will (reason why it was set up in the Will).
7.8) It can be shown now that in 2010 by new evidence from 2019,  they forced my mother to sell her home & business that Woodside and a doctor tried to make a Will that left half to my sister be legal correct by having a medical expert (see Claim 7 & videos). But it caused my mother stress as she knew I had put money into it and my sister would never look after my mother, so the plan was to put my mother in a nursing home like my sister’s husband did to his mother to get the money out of her home.
8) then in 2010 after my mother’s stroke caused by these events, my sister only wanted my mother to be in the nursing home run by Dr Bland, I did not know any of the evil past plan or clinical negligence at the time. Then my mother was being drugged and trapped in Oakland nursing home. When I found out, my mother was being drugged in 2013, and she wanted to see a lawyer as she recalled her will being altered by force by Woodside & a doctor.
8.1 Then C (who worked for Dr Bland) tried to kill mother by withheld care when my mother had a fit (caused by deliberate bad drug), the only reason my mother lived was I was there and called the ambulance (Exhibit Ambulance). Then when sister, friend C who worked for the nursing home, tried to use a DNR (signed by sister and Dr Bland stopping my mother having her life saved), the ambulance crew ignored it as it was clear that care and medication had been withheld from my mother to kill her.
9) MA stopped the investigation of this by the police see SAR from the police (Exhibit Police SAR)
10) then in 2015 my mother was murdered by morphine for no clinical reason by a Dr N.  Dr Bland said at my mother inquest he did not know Dr N, but this is a lie as they both sign the cremation documents together. Also they did the DOLS report on my mother in 2014!
9.1) How many other elderly were drugged to make them look like they had dementia to then force them to sell their homes?
11) other deaths had occurred: 11.1  Barbra Dunbavand (BD) who was my mother’s accountant who wanted to help me but was listed by the coroner as dying in a strange way (Exhibit 2016 BD wanted to help me, and she dies Exhibits BD, BD1,&2&3&4), . BD husband was a doctor who lived in the same place as MA.
11.2  Bartlett said my sister did not want to talk to me from 2015 but was seen looking for me in panic in 2019, then when she died and Bartlett did not tell me until the day before she was cremated.
11.2.1 We have medical documents that say my mother was being forced to do things against her wishes by Mr Boultbee and my sister! In fact, I sent an email to Mr B 24 May 2019 (Exhibit VBMrB) saying “I want my sister to call me as soon as possible….. as I think she was set up for a fall.” Due to the medical records look like sister (VB) was drugging my mother to change the Wills.  Then she dies on the 28 May, but Mr B tells me the day before her cremation on the 12 June and at no time was I said anything! I put forward her life was hastened to an early death, even if she had cancer. If she had cancer, why did she not contact me as I would have helped her! See also Exhibit VBMrB2  Very strange she did not do ADR, but someone stopped her.
11.3 QC James Bogle has a legal bundle of my mother’s murder but then would not release it when he knew about Dr Bland who was struck off in 2018 for being a pedo and also MA involvement as he was a cop. All the meeting with JB was recorded.
12) On the court hearing of 23 Oct 2019, the judge made it clear to Bartlett, and his lawyer to supply all paperwork including bills See point 1 & 1.5 below, 15 and everything else, but he fails to do this as it incriminates him.
13) the future court hearing can be resolved by the simple fact that the Wills were done wrong and this takes 1 hour not 5 days to do. This is also backed up by the joint medical expert’s report so why is this not being done to save time.
14) Also as my mother was clearly hit by Mr Woodside the lawyer who did all of my mother’s Wills and clearly shows criminal acts by him why is this not being sorted out in a 1-hour court hearing instead of 5-day event on the Wills?
15) Expert medical witnesses were given other documents in 2019 which looks like a crime being covered up see Claim 7 Clear Crime done From past Section C with updates from 2019 point 4.2 Mr Woodside tried to do the Wills with a doctor says my mother against her wishes (see videos).
16) Bartlett looks like he has done many things wrong so why should his will be seen as correct?
17) Mr Bartlett tried to damage medical records and alter them (Exhibits: MyMedDocButBartletts (clearly deliberately darken by photocopy) VS Exhibit 48,49)  He tried to cover up the fact that the case had no chance of winning in court. He went to medical experts with documents that could not be read or give a clear whole picture of MB health. We put forward he removed my mother’s signatures from the Wills that left me my mother’s guest house and others saw signed. Mr B did this by a page over the signatures as they were photocopied and he has a track record of doing such crimes.
18) Mr Bartlett threatened me January 2019  to use legal actions to shut me up due to the website that states Mr Woodside hit my mother and tried to steal her home etc, but then did nothing as the site is based on truth see Exhibits(Exhibit B1, B2, B3, B4). Then again on the 19 Nov 2019 he tried again.
19) Bartlett on the 19 of Nov 2019 said I had not done things for the court but I have witnesses statements from 2013 which are COP24 and are still valid said lawyers. I have done what the court has asked me. But Bartlett’s has not sent me documents as the judge told him or the report by other medical expert.
20) How can a lawyer like Mr Bartlett & Green be involved if there is a massive conflict of interest (New Law Society rules: Rule 16D(2)(a) states that a solicitor ‘must not act if there is a conflict of interests’. Rule 16D(2)(b) describes a conflict. 5)

Claim No E30LV485 Exhibits are in the attached file
Background.
Bartlett buy law firms to control wills and run up costs. By controlling the Will he buys up elderly homes- cheap.
By force and against everyone wishes he became executor of my mother’s estate.

Claim 1 Bartlett Stealing? He cannot show the paper work
1. Bartlett  claimed in the Liverpool probate (case no 2018 ) court that he had to pursue costs against me (Dr Jones) because he falsely claimed my late mother (Mavis Banks) had £100,000 of care bill costs from 2016 after her death (see Exhibit BillS2017to2019). 
1.2 See also page 2 end paragraph ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf and he tries to use this to force the sale of my mother’s family business (building) in the past after she has died.
2. He also wanted to remove the caveat I had put in place so he could take money from my mother’s estate.
3. But Bartlett can’t even release actual care bills for the £100,000 he claimed from my mother’s estate.
4. And paperwork we have from him in all the court files does not show this bill.
4.1 But defendant (Dr Jones) asked the council the true cost of the care bills for his mother and waits for a reply see 7 March 2019 Exhibit Bill7March2019
4.3 Then the Chester council contact Dr Jones on 2 May 2019 with official documents that say it now DEFERRED £XXX See Exhibit Council10847.pdf TRUE NUMBER HIDDEN DUE TO FRAUD
4.4 Then Mr Bartlett went to court on 15 March 2019 and said the care bill was now only £871.00 and not £100,000 ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf on page 9. As he knew he was going to be found out.
4.5 If I had Not investigated this 100,000 bills that became 800 by my actions, then Bartlett would have had this 100,000 as never challenged.
4.5.1 my mother’s bank account was 60,000 plus in it, so why was this bill not paid? As he was the Executor.
5 Therefore Bartlett is clearly stealing as no alternative explanation given!
5.1 Over course it gets worse the very same lawyer took £3522 out of my mother’s £60,000 bank account in 15/2/2016 and refuses to say what it was for, refuses to release any details whatsoever! See in all emails to SRA the following 17 May 2016 onwards.
Mr Bartlett cannot explain where money (see 2nd of August email to him “Please explain the 3522.00 paid from Mavis Banks (my dead mother) Nationwide bank (on the 15/2/2016) without permission. And has nothing to do with my mother’s funeral as can see that and other bills were paid with receipts is going. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7 Note it says by TYPED 2015) it looks like he knew when she was going to die? Why not redo?
5.2 Also, before my mother died, my sister said my mother had no money. I found my mother’s bank book and my sister was forced to say to the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money.
5.3 Then, after my mother’s death, 60,000 appears, and we want to know where this came from?
5.4 this is a serious crime being ignored
5.5 On the website, Bartlett is listed as doing this to others. https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1
6 Bartlett cannot show who is paying for this court case, and we want to know who is paying for this. As my sister & MA gains by these new wills done by Woodside, who works for Bartlett. Bartlett clearly want to run the sale of my mother’s business.  As the past Will was going to leave me my mother’s business as I had put significant money into it Bartlett has tried to do everything to stop this.

Claim 2 Bartlett contacts and then controls my lawyers (many cases)
7. In 2019 I put an N244 to remove Mr Bartlett as executor at the Royal Court of Justice. DATE 5 Feb 2019 RCJ Court Stamp 4 March 2019
7.1 In my N244 I point out he had become executor by force, he had undervalued my mother’s home by 700,000, he had ignored the fact that my mother said his lawyer Mr Woodside had hit her to change her will and force her to sell her home against her wishes. In fact, the N244 listed many other points which the Joint Expert witness appointed by the court (2019) agreed to as being true. Also, my mother is clearly saying that the truth that Woodside hit her to change her will etc. is backed up by this court expert.
7.1.1 But as I had put this into a London court, my new lawyers acted strangely and also put this into the Liverpool court case (3rd of April 2019). Note every time Mr Bartlett talks to my lawyers; they acted strangely. They try and double-bill me etc. Then they stop working with me. The two nice lawyers in this law firm have spoken to me how to help…but want to say more later…They were told not to help me…
7.2 Mr Green (lawyer for Bartlett) said in Court (3 April 2019) it was a duplicate process under the law White book (2019). Under rule 3.4  page 83  Paragraph: 3.4.3.1 Heading Vexatious proceedings. Under half, it is abuse to bring vexatious proceedings.
The Judge said: an abuse to bring two or more cases on the same subject matter, harassment, times and costs.
8. BUT my lawyers added the removal of Bartlett at the last minute knowing I had already put this into the London court. Lawyers say, If it was your lawyers that submitted the request knowing about the one you did, then it’s them that are liable to pay, they should have known better.
9. My lawyers knew what they were doing. They were advising me on the Liverpool court case and knew about the N244 for the Royal Court of Justice to remove Mr Bartlett as executor with damages against him.
10. Then at the same Liverpool court hearing (DATE 3 April 2019) in 2019 Bartlett stepped down as executor of my mother’s Will, as he knew I could get him for damages against him due to my N244.
11. But then he asked the judge to take action against me as I had done duplication of putting in two cases in two different courts over removing him as executor. NOTE: I did not do this; it was my lawyers! They never said this was wrong.
12. Then without a hearing on this case, he put damages to me for 6000 for the N244 to remove him as executor. The judge let this happen! This is very wrong.
13. But then he stepped down as executor. There was also no reading of my N244 in court, so how can he get 6000? For a judgment! There was no trial.
13.1 This was done to show he could control the court to prove I could not get justice.
14. The duplication of court case was done by my lawyers who then dropped me and said they were told not to help me! I recorded this on tape.
14. I complained to the court about this, but they said they could not process it! It is still an issue of showing corruption to damage me. I sent this twice to the court & nothing was done & then sent back saying they could not process it which makes no sense….I put in a SAR (subject Access Request) and still no answers.
15. Bartlett started court actions in 2018 and knew he was  Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

Claim 3 Bartlett sent damaging documents about me to people to damage me.
15. Mr Bartlett was found to be sending documents about me to lawyers, witnesses etc. to discredit me.  This was found out by the court expert witness see Part 2 from Dr Howard (Joint Medical expert who is also a lawyer) report 2019. This also caused NHS staff & lawyers (who were paid) not to work with me…therefore I seek compensation & damages.  This should removes Bartlett  & Green from this case due to RSA rules etc DR HOWARD REPORT Part 2.
BARLETT SAYS THE FOLLOWING  in private to the expert (Dr Howard):
39.  In relation to Order of the Court of Protection, does this information help you understand Mark’s conduct towards his mother? DR HOWARD REPLIES: The Court Order was dated 2nd March 2015, which is over five years after the events in question. I do not feel that it helps to determine the issues in November 2007 and January 2009. I ask where is this report?????

Claim 4 Bartlett ignored the Judge orders
16. Then Bartlett was ordered by Judge Hogworth on the (23 October 2019 ) to hand over and release all said documents which he has yet to fulfil that week. Now 17Nov 2019 still nothing from Bartlett.
16.1 A subject Access request was also done but still no evidence from Bartlett as he knows he has done wrong.
17. So Bartlett, a lawyer, regulated by the SRA, has failed in his duty of care and broken many issues of SRA conduct.
18. This law firm handles thousands of other probates yet took a claimant to court for 100,000 in costs when he now freely admits it was only £800 when he had access to £60,000 held in my mother bank account as cash that could have paid any care bill costs.

Claim 5 Bartlett undervalued my mother’s home
19. Bartlett undervalued my mother family business by 700,000 for self-gain he became Executor to rob my mother estate.
19.1 Mr Bartlett said on 7th September 2015 (Exhibit X) (or Exhibit B7) and 2019 Exhibit Bills 2007to2019 my mother’s family business (building) is worth only 450,000 (undervalued) and this number has not changed. 
19.2 I can now show by other professionals it is worth more. In fact, my mother’s family business (building) on Zoopla is 1,060,000 (Exhibit Value Part 1) and on “Property data” it is 1,150,000 (Exhibit Value Part 2). 
19.3 It has been pointed out that “strange 2 UK property experts can come up with similar valuations but Bartletts somehow manages to miss it by a whopping £700,000 plus. Now some might say ah but if they are doing the probate they might give you the bottom valuation and shift the house to an offshore company so no-one knows who actually bought it and sell later on to make 200% profit, how else can any reasonable person think?” 
19.4 Many who are too scared say they did this to others and the investigation of the Land Registry should be done to find out if this is true? But Mr Bartlett was found out by me.

Claim 5 Bartlett has a history of these types of actions.
20. Therefore he is guilty of running up costs, lying etc. something the Law Society has already ruled against him and fined him £300,000 (Law Society File No 8751-2003 )  See other points…
25. Therefore, Bartlett is found to not only be found for legal fraud.
26. But also for doing wills incorrectly because if they did them correctly, the courts would NOT have to ask for Bartletts to turn over care bill evidence. The care bills are 4 years after probate started.
27. The SRA really has to ask why Bartletts thinks and says the current costs for the case is at £40,000+? when the court case was never ADR. The fact I have a Claim that from 2015 shows I can put debts against my mother’s estate greater than her estate. That the wills are done wrong to let Bartlett get my mother’s home, to force its sale, this is what he does to many. In the past and was trying to do the same to next store when he did it to them when he ran their father’s will, he was after their dad’s home!
28. David Green of Atlantic Chambers knew all about this from 2018! He should have reported this to the court.

Claim 6 Chester Police investigation NOT DONE.
1. By Subject Access Request to Chester Police, it is clear no investigation was done when my mother was nearly murdered in 2013 at Oakland nursing home, and the Ambulance report is clear there are serious issues. The events in 2013 was 1) expert found mother being drugged to stop her talking in nursing home run by Dr Bland and forced to be there by my sister 2) mother wanted to see lawyer and make a statement about being hit by Mr Woodside & her home being sold against her wishes, and will changed to leave half to sister but drugged 3) then mother had fit caused by medical drugs, C (manager of nursing home) told me that an Ambulance & Dr Bland & sister was on the way-LIE 4) mother was left in pain for 2 hours when I was lied to by C that ambulance was on the way. In the end, I called sister who lied, then I called Ambulance, and they arrived to see mother had no medical help. The ambulance crew, then checked and found the nursing home had the medicine to help my mother but did not use it, so the nursing home staff C tried to kill my mother 5) then C tried to use a DNR to stop mother getting help, but Ambulance crew ignored it as nursing home could have helped mother with medicine but did not to cause death (Exhibit Ambulance report). So the Ambulance crew took my mother to hospital and ignored C with the DNR.
1.1 There was no investigation in 2014 & 2015 into my mother near-deaths at Pinetum nursing home by staff, Dr N, who knew Dr Bland.
1.1.1 I reported many issues about my mother’s health which included
1.1.1.1 dehydration which the hospital Doctors said was terrible and my mother should not go back to the nursing home but my sister pushed for this.
1.1.1.2 the poisoning of my mother which I called the police about in 2015 and taped. The coroner ignored it. Also police detective N (knew MA) lied at inquest and can prove it.
1.1.1.3 My mum was being murdered by her being trapped in her bed without food & drink. At the same time as CQC visited & read DOLS report that stated she was on the LCP (remove food & drink as it said she was dying but this was a lie).  But in final CQC report, it said no one was on the LCP at the nursing home & the report was DELAYED UNTIL after her death. The reason why this report was delayed was if they found anyone on the pathway they would have had to by law investigate the LCP was being done right and they would have seen my mother was not dying and should have come off the pathway to death. And as my mother was alive and this was going on the hospital said she was not on the pathway of death (see email on web site).  And as my mother was alive I tried to get the press involved. Then we have a letter from a newspaper editor saying Chester council lied about me to stop the story being run as I tried to get the press to run this horror story. And then Chester council paid for an expensive injunction on my mother to stop the story getting to press and preventing me from saving my mother by getting her off the pathway of death…… Also my ex went to court to sell our flat which I was told not going to happen by the court but it did and this was also done by my ex knowing a lawyer who she could have not known (link to MA, or Bart). At the same time all this was going on, babies & adults were being murdered 4 mins walk away in local hospital (see Newspaper story), and organs were stolen (Barbara Williams)….and good cops told not to investigate any of this. For more evidence see an exhibit on http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/
1.1.14 And now we know my mother was from 2007 being forced by MA to sell her home that made her ill.
1.1.15 And in 2010 sister, MA, Woodside, Bartlett tried again, and it failed etc
1.1.16 My mother was nearly killed in the hospital by hospital acquired infections when no one else was. This was done to kill my mother after there failed attempt to sell her home and the will that left half to my sister. MA sister work in this hospital & Dr Bland did minor surgery there.
1.2 Dr Bland lied about NOT knowing Dr Nicolson (Dr N) saying did not know him but they both signed cremation documents together (law changed so now only one signature), and both did DoLS (trapped her in a nursing home by law based on a lie) on my Mother. Dr Nicolson gave my mother morphine for no clinical reason that leads to her death in 2015, and that is in the paperwork.
1.2.1 Then see Barbra William case of Husband death in 2014
https://soundcloud.com/ukcolumn/ukc-despatches-nhs-barbara-mark-10jan19
And then 15 babies deaths in 2015. It shows massive problems of no investigations in hospitals crimes.
My mother was clearly nearly killed in 2015 to shut her up.
2. Action Fraud RE: (NFRC190302836567) knew about this from 27 March 2019 then sent it to Chester police with no actions taken email: af.contact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
3. But can show Police detective Michael Anklers (MA) gained by this case (sister son in law) and knew Woodside & Dr Bland (Dr struck off in 2018). 
3.1 MA is listed in medical records causing harm to my mother and stealing from her Exhibit 040 1st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore (Exhibit 040) which states my mother said: “her daughter (VB claimant) and son in law (MA) accusing them of trying to steal her money” which was found out to be true in (Exhibit 191 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down).
3.3 Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu lied at mother’s inquest. If you listen to the inquest tape, you hear him lie about events I told him about compared to the recording of the event that I told him about before the inquest. DS knows MA.
3.4 The fact that when I requested my mother’s inquest tape (2015) that shows multiple lies and this tape has been restricted even when it was an Article 2 inquest as my mother died under a DOLS based on a lie.  All done to shut up the case.
3.5 Therefore serious issue of murder to cover up & manipulation of Wills to steal my mother’s home & business. Also this was done to many others. 
3.6 The issues surrounding my mother’s accountant Barbra Dunbavand (BD) who wanted to help me and then, looks like murder and the coroner said this was strange death. 
3.7 After my mother’s murder in 2015, MA then tried and contacted me by twitter (Exhibit MA) to shut me up and after my mother’s inquest and then when I tried to re-start the inquest he went to NZ where my daughter was and made sure I knew it (see Exhibit MA2). Many see this as threatening, and he should have known better, but he gains from my mother’s Will (by my sister VB) and is named in the medical document by my mother as causing her trouble (See Exhibit ).
IMPORTANT: MA Went to NZ to show he could attack my child and shut me up. Clearly, he should not have done this. This can be shown in court.
MA cannot explain why he went to NZ or near my daughter!
4. Police were sent files on MA on  but no response. This is now being pushed.

Claim 7 Clear Crime done From past Section C with updates from 2019
1. There are many videos of my mother saying Mr Woodside, who did her wills, did the following:
1.1. Hit her to control her.
1.2. My mother also states in these videos that she was forced to sell her home against her wishes by him
1.3. and changed her will against her wishes.
1.4. he also told my mother she had no money to force the sale of her business
1.6. This was a lie as my sister had to go back to court and say she forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money when I found out about an account which my sister was hiding.
1.6.1. We can prove mother had money worries pre 2010 (before her stroke) which made no sense as when I was there she had money! When she died with over 60,000 in her bank, and that did not include all the care bills she paid off!
1.6.2 Where did this money come from? David B? MA? Never listed before!
1.6.3 Pre 2007 I started to build a wet room to look after my mother at her business where I also lived. I was also at times away in London due to Flora (Later DK in London said sister talked secretly to flora to keep me in London). The plan was clear to everyone that I would move in and look after my mother and I had put time and money into the business which no one else had done.
1.7. Mr Woodside in 2019 lists: 2007 MA (sister’s Son in Law) and Clair trying to force the mother to sell her business & home after it was clear form 2002 I had put money into the business and
1.8. Woodside knew I had put money into my mother’s business (70,000, 10,000, 15,000 etc. from awards of my research to help children in the hospital too. See Exhibit Awards & Claim N1 for money I put in to business) from 2002 and he was going to do “Deed of Trust” or charge on the business for my mother as I had put money into a business
1.9 Exhibit 040 1st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore (Exhibit 040) which states my mother said: “her daughter (VB claimant) and son in law (MA) accusing them of trying to steal her money” which was found out to be true in (Exhibit 191 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down).  My sister had to say later in court (2013) she has forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money, which I had found out about so she could not hide it.
Before this, from 2010 to 2013, my sister said my mother had no money even to the court and to my mother!
Another video my mother says Mr Woodside told her she had no money, to force her to sell her business & home.
Therefore pre 2010 MA, my sister, Woodside was telling my mother she had to sell her business but later in 2015 when my mother died 60,000 appeared in her account! And still, no explanation where this came from.
Then once again in 2019 we know new evidence as stated in the Joint medical report.
1.9.1 Then in 22.11.07, my sister is in the discussion of my mother living with her so they could sell my mother’s home and buy a joint home. Mr Woodside knew the Law here…and once again removed Dr Jones investments from his mother’s business.
1.9.2 Woodside said Some discussion as to proposals that once 32 Hoole Road sold Mrs Banks would buy a property with Victoria and her husband. Advised generally concerning tenancy in Common but this is a matter which would be looked at in more detail at a later date.  Nevertheless, advised that it should be appreciated when Mrs Banks died if she was a joint owner of a property it may be necessary for her interest to be realised.
Notwithstanding proposal to sell 32 Hoole Road will still retain option whereby Mark may buy out his sister’s interest.
1.9.2 Sister had no interest in the business (which was my mother’s business) as she put no money or time into it.
In fact, in 2002 if I had not put money into my mother’s business, it would have gone bust see Accountant’s report. see also Exhibit Awards & See Claim N1.
1.9.3 From Part 4  There is now Legal actions against Mr Woodside for not doing the Wills correct, and we will win.
Therefore the upcoming court case over mental capacity is solved in another way. Also a waste of the courts time.
As Mr Woodside failed to act with a duty of care for my mother.
2. NOTE: Where is my mother’s contract with him?
2.1 My mother was over 70 years old, Mr Woodside knew I put money and time into the business.
Mr Woodside knew my mother was ill etc. Mr Woodside knew about 2002 brain issues with my mother etc.
2.2 New and was NOT KNOWN AT my mother’s inquest in 2015.
Mr Woodside did the Will on 26.04.10 to give sister (VB) half of my mother’s home & business before they tried to sell my mother’s house. I never knew about this and Woodside tried to hide it in his list of wills. Only came up by Dr Howard’s report in 2019! Was never listed before. Mr Woodside knew I had put money into the business since 2002 (Exhibit Award). I can also show I was building a wet room for my mother in her business for her (see Exhibits and statements) to look after my mother. Also, others support this and the fact that I was going to live and support my mother there until her death. See  26.04.10 Codicil to the Will of 14.01.09
This was a change to the Will of January 2009 which reduced the benefits to be given to Howard Fey from £5,000 to £1,000 and to Trina McHugh from £2,500 to £500.  This is strange as Hini was not here and was there in the past Will. Hindi is Trina daughter and had drugs problems, and MA knew her. BUT also to keep the will that was false in place. As Exhibit D3 Mr Woodside hides wills. He even says things to show past wills that are not listed.
2.3 As Howard Fey saw, with me, a will signed that left me my mother’s business IN CHESTER. So did other (Exhibits)
2.4 Therefore…Mr Woodside did a Will on 26 April 2010
FACT When I WAS AWAY BY MA, sister asking Flora to keep me in LONDON. Also in 2013 Flora went to NZ. I put forward MA told Flora something bad about me. Also in 2015 somehow even thou Flora was in NZ a top lawyer put in to sell our flat in London at the same time my mother was being killed in Chester…all planned to cause upset.
Vicky (sister) tried to sell my mother’s business on 27 April 2010 see Exhibit J7 and 20 May 2010
NOTE Vicky uses her own address to sell this and in her name but it is not her home it is my mother’s business, and I had put money into it-FRAUD.
Mother had a stroke on 18/5/2010 FACT
Exhibits show this was also done in the past by her, MA, Woodside etc.
2.5 Mother said afterwards in the hospital that she was hit by Woodside to change the Will and sell her home…this caused the stroke?
2.6 Then my mother was trapped in a nursing home by a Dr Bland who is now struck off in 2018 and new evidence is about to be presented about him. The doctor knew my sister, MA and Woodside well. My sister only wanted my mother to go to Dr Bland nursing home.
2.7 We can show this trick of trying to sell my mother’s business was done in the past but failed (Exhibits)
2.8 Dr Bland should have sent mother into hospital in April 2010 but did not as helped to sell my mother’s home. Sister, MA etc. knew if the mother became ill, I would come home and finish the wet room.
2.9 Then I would never leave, and they would never sell the guest house.
3.0 The fact that my sister would never sue Dr Bland for clinical negligence (Exhibit S) and this was a considerable sum. Then would only let my mother say in the nursing home run by him, and then when I found out my mother was being drugged in 2013, they tried to kill her (see Exhibit: Ambulance report). This was also the same time when the mother wanted to leave everything to me.
3.1 Then they trapped her in another nursing home (2014) where Dr Bland friend worked, Dr N.
3.2 Then they put a DOLS to stop my mother changing her wills or seeing anyone also see Exhibit T5 where my sister stopped anyone seeing my mother!
3.3 Then Dr Bland friend Dr N killed my mother by morphine for no clinical reasons. (NOTE: it is more complicated as other attempts on my mother’s life)
Both doctors (Dr BLAND & Dr N) said they did not know each other at the inquest, but later on, it was found they sign the cremation forms together.  Dr Bland was struck off as a pedo in 2018, the other links to these crimes.
Dr Howard’s report supports the above facts.  Also now know Dr Bland & Dr N did the DoLS report on MA to trap her in a nursing home from 2014 till her death not allowing her to see a lawyer etc.
4.10. Woodside seems to know the Law here about Wills but ignores the fact I put money into my mother’s business which is also my mother’s home.
4.11. At the time my mother also states to witnesses she did not trust Mr Woodside, who did her will (See COP24).
5 NOW we introduce the following;
Video 2 of 40.  On video my mother says the following
https://youtu.be/fav1xnCD4cQ
5.1 My mother says: “Mr Woodside and doctor  X joined together and “gesture hit.”
but no visual as was just tape.
Mr Woodside did my mother’s Wills.
5.2 Mother says here that her will was changed by force? Was this done to change a will that left me everything, to another Will?
This was done by Woodside and the help of an unknown doctor (Not Bland or Dr N).
5.3 The doctor X would have said my mother had the mental capacity to make the new will that left half to my sister (& MA) valid, but my mother had a stroke in 2010. Was this the Will
5.4 What my mother knew was so big as it was a doctor that Woodside uses to validate wills by force…?
5.5 We need an investigation into the wills done by Woodside and Bartlett to make the will valid by Doctor X
5.6 This was so important that Dr Bland first drugged her and then tried to kill her (see Ambulance report 2013)
6. There are many videos of my mother saying she was hit by Woodside her lawyer who did her Wills to force her against her will to  sell her home, change her wills etc. The joint court expert says these videos are real and of my mother recalling true events.
see https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M

Claim 8 Bartlett sent letters to shut me up
12. For more videos of my mother see the website which was put up at the start of the year
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/  
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartlett-law-fraud-murder-corruption/  
see also
https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M
see also https://youtu.be/fav1xnCD4cQ

Bartlett and Woodside then in January 2019 threatened to use legal actions to shut me up due to the website but then did nothing as the site is based on truth see Exhibits(Exhibit B1, B2, B3, B4)  .
So with all this how are they involved in this case as conflict of interest.
NOTE: On many sites Bartlett’s has issues. And when I complain about him he lies saying he does not know me (Exhibit xx) And in the past same issues with other clients.

On https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1

By Shirley Pickard 8 Aug 2018
Unacceptable experience. Went to Bartletts solicitors, Chester for independent advice against Matthews solicitors when they were operating independently. I found out later that Bartletts knew they would be merging with Matthews, hence they did not give me the sole independent advice which they should have done for me to act on.
They have not concluded the requests of a will satisfactorily and are still holding onto £15,000.00 which was left by the deceased to be shared equally between 3 beneficiaries.  This is since 2008

Claim 9 The Wills were not done right for a reason.
In 2002 Mr Woodside (says he knew my mother for 20 years by doing her Wills. Office 30 Hoole road, my mother home & guest house 32 Hoole road) would have known my mother had gone to hospital. He saw me as I went in and paid bills to the law firm and told them about my mother brain & dropped my London job. He knew I had won an award for my PhD of 70,000 (Exhibit Awards Also one of many) and all of that was going into my mother falling to bits guest house with debts to pay and could have gone under.  For 3 years my Mother was ill from 2002 and he and many others saw me looking after my mother as I dropped my job in London etc and pension and invested in my mother’s business.  My mother appreciated this. Therefore, Mr Woodside said a lie as he said that Howard Faye in 2007 was happy to have sister get half of the business makes no sense as she did nothing or put money into it see Exhibits N1 Claim & 029, 028 etc. Also Exhibits 59, 60, 66 shows many of people saying I was improving my mother’s home.
So why did Mr Woodside not draft a will to reflect this and why not tell me in 2007 onwards!
He knew it would be a dispute. He knew I would take action and he failed in his duty of care so can be sued.
I recall meeting with him, my mother & H. Faye (her partner, BUT he did not live with her, my mother was on her own when I was not in the guest house) and where he went on about sister had half…it was like a broken record. It was pointed out to him it made no sense as I had put more than half investment into the business.  Then after my mother stroke in 2010, My mother said Mr Woodside said she had no money pre 2010…which was lie and can tie into my sister Exhibit 121 telling the court she had forgotten my mother money (Exhibit 121) …all done to make my mother sell her home & business (J7). And Mr Woodside would gain by kick backs as it was sold cheap (can prove this?). Then post 2010, I have had constant problem with lawyer when my mother became ill. They first trapped her in a nursing home run by Dr Bland (struck off in 2018 see Exhibit DrB & knew my sister & MA , 2) Dr Bland drugged my mother 3) sister would not sue Dr Bland (Exhibit S) as in the past he did not send my mother in to hospital when sister was trying to sell home in her name when I was away).  Etc. Dr Bland knew Mr Woodside very well as they live close by and used the same local shops. MA could have blackmailed both of these people.

Summary on Woodside
NOTE. I am studying law. Bartlett brings up Woodside to the court. Woodside was the lawyer who did my mother’s Wills. But this was more than a Will. Everyone knew I had put money, time, dropped a pension to help my mother’s business. If I had not done this, then it would have gone bust. The Will was also about paying me back for the money and time I had put in, which is why Fey and mother asked about Woodside putting a Charge on my mother’s business, but he would not do it. This was strange, but it is obvious he had other plans. He wanted it sold to others at cheap price and to cause a dispute he could gain from. All of this will be proved.
Mr Woodside did the following (more below).
1) he did not keep records of the Wills (Exhibit D3) and then introduced other Wills (2010 not listed but in Burns report 2019). And lost Wills that left the Guest house to me.
2) when he did the Wills, he failed in his “Duty of Care” to take into account the money invested by myself into a business.  Also, others he had Duty of Care to e.g., my sister.
3) as I was an investor in a business which was in listed in a Will he did, and a “charge” was going to be done (Exhibit: lawyers letter) he should have done the Wills differently as he knew about this. He knew If my mother died, I had put money into a business which he was also saying was a business and I had debts. So I can sue over this …big
3) can show he lied in many ways by paperwork
4) In several videos & statements, my mother and others said, my mother was hit by him, and he helped my sister make my mother think she had no money to force the sale of my mother’s business pre 2010.
In 2019 Dr Howard does a medical report for the court, with info in it which we never knew about!
My mother was born 22 June 1929.  (note lives at 32 Hoole road & opposite Dr Bland office)
Mr Woodside said he knew my mother for 20 years (office is 30 Hoole road)
My mother died on 14 March 2015.
So in 2002 my mother was 73 years old and not fit.  My mother was over 73 years old, Mr Woodside knew I put money and time into the business (see Claim N1 & Exhibit Biz).
Mr Woodside knew my mother was ill etc. Mr Woodside knew about 2002 brain issues with my mother etc.
Mr Woodside did the Will on 26.04.10 to give sister (VB) half of my mother’s home & business before they tried to sell my mother’s house. I never knew about this and Woodside tried to hide it in his list of wills. It only came up by Dr Howard’s report in 2019! It was never listed before…
Dr Howard’s report supports the above facts.
1.10. Woodside seems to know the Law here but ignores the fact I put money into my mother’s business which is also my mother’s home.
1.11. At the time my mother also states to witnesses she did not trust Mr Woodside, who did her will (See COP24).
Other issues.
Mr Bartlett knew Mr Woodside who my mother has stated, and Experts say it is a “true memory” in the video where my mother states: Mr Woodside hit her to change her Will from giving me her home and told her she had no money and Dr Bland helped in these crimes. All done to allow Mr Bartlett to get it and run up legal costs. As it stands from 2015, Mr B knew I could put my debts again, my mother estate and by doing this win. He ignores this and does not do ADR until 2019 October 11. The fact that Mr Bartlett and lawyer cannot answer Subject Access Request shows they know they will be found out. I ask for Mr B, and Mr G removed from this case so I can get a lawyer who is not got fear in his voice after talking to Mr B.
And Mr Bartlett has been trying to do this from 2015. I have had good lawyers wanting to help me until Mr Woodside comes up and then they tried to destroy the case or would not help. This include James Bogle QC who said my mother was murdered until Mr Woodside and MA name came up. And now he will not release the legal bungle as it shows murder.
We seek the following actions by the court
1. Mr Bartlett and Woodside, Green to be removed from this case
2. The court to resolve this case by the evident that Mavis Banks was hit to change her Wills and therefore the past will leave me her home and business which Mr Bartlett tried to steal.
3. To leave the guest house to Dr Jones as was his mother’s plan.

Woodside failed in his Duty of Care.
1) MCA 2005 &2007 Capacity of the mind.
2) Woodside failed to plan a clear Will for the Business of Mavis Banks called Capital Guest house which had insurance as a business etc see Exhibit Biz 1
2.1) but when it came to sister buying home for mother and living with them he acted with right advice with the will as share of value (Exhibit 2.2 therefore why not with son significant investment.2.3) as the actions of this advice was similar for the business problem of investment by the son why did the lawyer not do it.  (Exhibit 3) He also failed to plan for the Tax implications which the Son of MB did in 2015
4) As a lawyer he should have known of the following:
The effect of the Finance Act 2006 and subsequent Finance Acts on will drafting. He is accused of the following4) Forgery & fraud- acted for the administrator of an estate with false Will. Told MB she had no money to help in the stealing of her home by her daughter and son in law. We seek  in bringing a claim to set aside all 2007 onwards will on the grounds of forgery & fraud, lack of capacity and other issues.
5)A professionally prepared will should make it clear exactly what the deceased intended and how assets should be distributed if a beneficiary has died. If there is any doubt, take advice. In MB will it say if sister dies it goes to me but as all else is written bad this goes to me.
Addition Heidi was also a witness to the Will but her mother gains by this. He did a will which was not singed he says but others saw it singed and strangely it exist and he says in exhibits that the wills go back to 2004 when half each showing that mother did leave the place to me EX Only one shows studios (Exhibit )
With the number of wills there was also a clear build-up of relationship (20 years says Woodside) so he need to keep her up-to-date.
Bartlett: Became Executor and stood done to Dr Jones Claim therefore compensation is required for failure in 1) not paying Dr Jones Dept (Exhibit N1 Claim 2) 100,000 care bills that became 800 3) undervaluing MB home by 700,0004) goes on… SEE list. Inappropriately used estate funds and claimed remuneration

Full text about mother and Woodside
Even I am studying law & know and checked this with my teachers that Dr Howard did the right thing. I can also point this out in ~Probate Practice” (2019/20) by Editor Peaple MA (Oxon) Solicitor. And it was not the only test Dr Howard used to get to his answer, he used many! Also, Mavis Bank had a tumour that affected her brain from 2002. So, this should have set a flag as she was monitored for a long time. Mr Woodside (who did the Wills) said he knew my mother for 20 years! So, if mother died in 2015 that means Mr Woodside knew her since1995! Mr Woodside office is 30 Hoole road, and my mother’s home and business is 32 Hoole road, both used the local shops as I met Mr Woodside many times. Chester is a small city, Hoole Shops even smaller. My mother’s doctor; Dr Bland (struck off in 2018) surgery was across the way from my mother’s business and he knew Mr Woodside. The fact is Prof Burns then uses evidence from Mr Woodside as some authority, but this is not medical evidence asked by the court. Mr Woodside who my mother said on many videos (Exhibit T1,T4, T2) and statements (Evans etc) that she was hit by him to change her wills and told her she had no money to make her sell  her home. This is backed up by sister and son in law stealing from mother (Exhibit 040 & 037) and then sister when found out had to say in court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money (Exhibit 121). So, in 2010, we can show sister name on the Estate agents letters, saying my mother’s home was hers, home & business LIE (Exhibit J7) which caused mother a stroke (Exhibit J6) as did not want to sell. We can show in the past sister and son in law did this before and tried to sell the place cheap. Dr Bland should have sent mother into hospital when they were trying to sell her home, but did not (Exhibit S). As they knew I would come back from London and look after my mother so stopping them from selling her home and getting the money out of it. Every time my mother was ill, I looked after my mother. Then when my mother had this stroke they trapped and drugged her in a nursing home (was this the plan? As sister would be power of attorney by Woodside (letter) and I then could do nothing to change it). Then when I found out my mother was being drugged in Oakland nursing home (2013), I knew what was going on (Exhibit drug tests). I tried to take my mother to see a lawyer (Exhibit L), BUT then they nearly killed my mother if not for me being there and calling ambulance 2013 (Exhibit Ambulance report) and then my sister trapped my mother in another Pinetum nursing home by DOLS based on a lie (Exhibit T5 J Hurst. See DOLS). Also, in Exhibit S sister could have helped me sue Dr Bland for large amounts of money but did not want to hurt him as he had helped her pre 2010. Then my mother died by many nasty tricks see Exhibit Z. Also, from 2010 to my mother’s death I could not get her to see a lawyer due to all these dirty tricks (trapping her in nursing home, being sick etc). It is clear from 2002 my sister was going to get nothing as my mother business was going to fail due to unpaid bills. When my mother became ill in 2002 I dropped my job and put 70,000 (See Exhibit Award) and paid off other bills to Mr Woodside and asked about builders (Exhibit 60) I also updated my mother’s home with grab rails (Exhibit 064, J5) put in new window (Exhibit 014), Paid bills Exhibit 021, etc See Anfiled 1198.46 on 9 April 2003 etc There are loads of these bills. Including Exhibit 025 for fire alarm 843.88 etc and locals saw this See Exhibit 059 “prior to her stroke in 2010 Mavis was very pleased that mark(me) was …constructing a WET room for help…. RUN the guest house together!!” Backed up by others (Exhibit 60) “I have know Mavis Banks for over 30 years… I built my mother’s business. “ Also see Feys statements too (Exhibits 60, 27, 28, 29, 31,32, 35,36 etc Bill 014 to 26 and statements by 059, 060 & by own sister).  Even Exhibit Biz1 from the insurance will show from 21 March 2017 would show back in their records from 2005 I paid the insurance when my mother was ill many times and from my money. Mr Woodside, sister, MA etc all knew this, and the Will should reflect this see also Exhibit N1.
My sister & her family did nothing. It was obvious I saved the business and put money in it worth half of the business. Then up to 2006 after my hard work the place was worth more money and I was going to look after and live with my mother. Every time I went away my sister, MA etc tried to trick my mother into selling her home (Exhibit 039 statement by two people & see also 38, 39 where mother says did not want to sell). The 2002 onward wills left me my mother’s business and the only way my sister could get half was by trick and the help of Mr Woodside and Bartlett. My sister would gain by half of the sale of the business and the lawyer from the legal costs and getting the property which, they undervalued by 700,000 (See Bartlett list Exhibit B9 etc and Exhibit Value part 1&2) (can show this was also done in the past-same price). All of this backed up by Exhibits. Etc.  Then MA (sister son in law, who is a policeman) never investigate 2013 (Exhibit Ambulance report DNR) and then 2014 and then when hospital said not they did not put MB (mother) on pathway to dearth 2015 see Exhibit Z …etc The inquest of my mother was a joke as Dr Bland (struck off in 2018) said he did not know Dr N who gave my mother morphine for no medical reason but to kill her. Both said they did not know each other at the inquest but later it was found out they signed the cremation documents together and done reports together.

Disbursements. There is £60,000 cash in my mother’s account. All of mother’s Wills state “all debts paid first”; and I never was paid to help my mother or put money into the family business etc. The Court is not doing what all wills state even the contested and non-contested and the correct actions which are first pay bills and debts which Mr B knew.  And Mr B knew I had legitimate debts, but he ignored them to play a game of self-gain which other lawyers joined in on. In fact, we can prove he did start to pay debts but not my debts (Exhibit Bill2015, tax etc.) I put over £70,000 into my mother’s family business (building &; work to be paid) by a medical prize I won in 2002 (Exhibit Award one of many. others £10,000 etc.) then I can show I paid for many things from windows (Exhibit 014 to 016) to new furniture (Exhibit 020).  I have a right to interest on my money of 19%  from 2002 to 2019 which means the estate owes me 1,134,167,86 which my mother agreed to in the past (Exhibit MumDebt)

The Past executor Mr Faye stated he wanted me as Executor (Exhibit 027 & Will2 ) and also for my past bills to be paid (Exhibit 028 & Will 3). He also made it clear that he wished Mr Bartlett to be removed from this case (Exhibit Will2 ), which was also my mother’s wishes.  I am therefore the new executor by law acting from now by Common Law, also by the fact I am the only next of kin of my mother.
He also did not see the changed wills giving half to my sister by Woodside…in fact no one did.

Constructive trust and proprietary estoppels for Dr Jones to be heard.
1. Constructive trusts. The establishment of a beneficial interest in the family home and business (Common intention). Or 2. Proprietary Estoppel (clear assurance, reasonably rely on, substantially to their detriment) 1. Constructive trusts (Common intention) The court of law is Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555 Also Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC    53. Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546 Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17  The common intention was that Dr Jones and Mavis Banks would run the business together etc. Proprietary Estoppel etc.
Suggested Solutions
I have sent the following on the Fri, Sep 6, 2:28 PM to Mr Bartlett to get an ADR to save time but he clearly ignores it. Letter to Lawyer B (updated)
The following has been pointed out to me….you can jump to Part 3 below to save time.
In the last Will of Mavis Banks 2009 it states the following:
Part 1
5a. to pay debts, tax, funeral, testamentary and administrative expense and legacies;
b to pay the residue to such of my children Doctor Mark Jones and VB (sister) as shall …
Now I have debts which I request to be paid. Once again, I win.
See section on my debts. See RCJ letter saying I can do this, See Part 6.
Part 2  Also Once again in the Will, it states:
6 I direct that if upon my death then…
The Will says I can buy the half of the value of 32 Hoole Road..if I pay my sister (VB) share…
But I can show debts against my mother ‘s estate so…even the home is worth a million my debts eats into my sister’s share. Therefore, if my sister half is 500,000
My debts are 800,000+ due to 70,000 etc. put into the estate in the past 2002
See RCJ letter saying I can do this see Part 6
Update:
Part 3  BUT the BIG ONE IS IN THE 2009 Will states on page 2 and 8 lines down
Further, I direct that if my daughter VB has predeceased me, then I would, in any event, give 32 Hoole road Hoole, Chester to my son M R E Jones and the property shall not in those circumstances form part of my Residuary estate.
It shows with all the other evidence that my mother wanted me to have her home and business.
This, with other evidence, helps with my case for constructive trusts and Estoppel. There is clear intent from my mother to let me have her business. As my sister is dead, then the business and home (same building) is mine.
Part 4 Also, the past will state that
My sister’s daughter Clare Ankers only gets 2000.00 ONLY, but this is after all debts paid!
But nothing to her husband…as my mother hated him and he put his mother in a nursing home to rob her, and his mother said that …, and this was the trick that was also attempted several times to my mother every time I was away which is criminal, and we can prove. Also, from Part 3 above, it is clear my mother wanted my sister’s family not to get my mother’s business and home. It is clearly stated in the Will to give it to me.
Part 5  I have a past Charge on the guest house, which was witnessed by a lawyer. I can send this.
Part 6  The RCJ is clear I can put my debts against my mother’s estate, and this is greater than the value of my late mother’s estate. Also, I can show in 2015 the current Executor ignored this, and I can seek damages on this. He had to step down in 2019.
Part 7  As my sister has died (2019), I am Executor under common law. Therefore, by agreement of probate London office 32 Hoole Road Hoole Chester and my mother’s money is mine. Others have told me this.
Part 8  To save cost ADR should be done, but the other sides Lawyer B is known to run up costs for his gain, and he should be removed. Lawyer B was always after my mother’s biz and we can show that.
Part 9  The previous 2007 Will also support my above claims.
And now medical (Doctor medicine) & legal expert (law degree & dementia expert) says these Wills could be invalid due to my mother’s mental capacity. See Dr Howard Report.
This is an issue that the court wanted to know. This leaves my mother’s 2006 Will, which left me my mother’s business, but this has had my mother’s signature removed from it.   The past Executor (HF) say in many statements he saw the 2006 Will signed.
Part 9.2 As the Lawyer B has a history of issues such as 1) put in £100,000 bills into the court in 2018 (from 2015 onward) which then when I investigate he had to tell the court it was only £800 (2019)-Fraud.
2) Undervalued my mother’s business by £700,000 etc
3) list of other bad things
4) He was done by the Law Society for £300,000 and is said to be not honest. etc. (a list that goes on and on)
5) Lawyer B had to stand down as the Executor of my mother’s Will in court (2019) due to my list of his fault, but I should still be able to get him for damages.  Then the lawyer became my sister lawyer which made no sense other than she gained by this, and she ignored all the bad things he had done. (Too many conflicts of interest to list). The history of Lawyer B is that he buys law firms to run and then gets the Wills and runs up bills on them. He became my mother executor by buying the law firm that had my mother’s Will. And also after being told not to be the Executor which he did by force (sue him?). He has taken money out of my mother’s bank accounts without explaining why. I have asked for a Subject Access Request, but he keeps ignoring it, so I have reported him on this too. Also, I am a beneficiary of the Will, so I have a right to have things which he keeps ignoring as it shows his damaging actions.  From all the issues with this lawyer, it is not hard to imagine that he removed the signature off the Will, which left me my mother’s business. The case is more complicated and show other issues about this lawyer…but not sure how complicated to go other than my mother said on video the 2007 and 2009 Wills were done by force against her by a person who knows the lawyer and medical experts support my mother is telling the truth. We have other statements to support this. I can show every time I was away from looking after my mother my sister tried to force my mother to sell her home and failed, but this is listed in the medical records and shows force being done to my mother which also affect her 2007 and 2009 Wills. Add to this that the Lawyer B was after next store home when their dad died, and every time I was away the value that they wanted to sell my mother’s house was what Lawyer B wanted to pay. I could go on, but the point is I can show the 2006 Will is what my mother wanted but signatures were removed by Lawyer B (can show he did this to other documents), but the other side could fight it and costs when other solutions such as my debts or constructive trust could solve this problem more easily. My mother’s death adds to all of this…

ADR is simple
My mother wanted me to have her business as I put money into it. No one else did this. This is a share issue.
I can show by a Claim N1 I put money into it greater than my mother’s business value and lawyers and others ignored this so they could make money out of this situation.
In addition, the Wills were done wrong, and court issues over mental capacity were used instead of the simple fact the Wills were done wrong. This was all done to cover up the crime to steal from my mother.
David Green also sued as he knew this and even played along.

Defendant counterclaims.
1. The Wills purported to have been executed in 2007, and 2009 and afterwards were either obtained by coercion or/and at the time when Mavis Vicky Rebecca Banks (the deceased, my mother) was not of sound mind and suffering from dementia and therefore not in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of the Wills Act 1837.
2. The valid Will dated 23 August 1999 let the Son (Dr Jones) live in the guest house and gain by it and is signed.
3. The Wills shows intent to leave the guest house to the Son.
4. In 2002 the Son put 70,000 into the guest house when Mavis was ill for three years, and he ran the guest house. He also put further work into it as he was promised it (constructive trust).
If the Son had not put money into the business in 2002, it would have gone bust.
5. The Son states from 2004, there was a will that left him the guest house for this reason. This is supported by others.
6. There was a deal done with the Claimants and lawyers to trick the Son out of his mother’s business by changing wills and coercion done to his mother when the Son was away.
7. The Will dated 10th of November 2004 and its codicil of 27th October 2006 comprise the Will and testament of the Deceased. The Will of 10th November 2004 states “divided your residuary estate equally between Mark and Victoria but granted to your Executors a discretion to transfer 32 Hoole Road to Mark if he wished to continue residing there and upon Mark paying to Victoria half the value of the equity of the property.”
However, a Codicil dated 27th October 2006, provided for the Guest House should go to Mark and the Studio apartments to Victoria.
8. If these Wills were used, then there is still the Son to be paid for the money he had put into the business, which is greater than the share of Victoria. Therefore the guest house & all is the sons.
8. There is a 14 March 2006 draft proposal Will that once again left Mark the guest house. This is what others saw in 2003 when the mother came out of hospital
9. There was a Will seen and produced 2006 which left son the guest house which was seen signed by Faye and others but Woodside & Victoria (sister) deliberately destroyed.
10. On 29 May 2007, there is a note of a telephone conversation to the Solicitor from Mrs Banks requesting that “1. The whole of the house and the two studios to Mark (son). Residue to Vicky Jane”

11. Then on 30 May 2007, the intention was for the Capital Guest House and Apartments to go to Mark Jones.
    12. The Claimant’s lawyers deliberately then changed will to disinherit son from his estate so they could buy the mother’s home & business and gain from the dispute.
    13. There is evidence that the lawyers tried to force mother (Mavis) to sell her house and change her will to their and their clients gain.
    14. The Will were not executed correctly from 2003 onwards by the lawyer.
    15. The Claimant’s lawyers list wills from 2010 which were never listed before in their files. This ties into the attempted force to steal from Mavis.
    16. The Claimant’s lawyers tried to cover their mistakes and were part of the coercion done with the Wills for self-gain.
    17. The above supported by the court joint expert Dr Howard.
    And the Defendant claims;
    (1) The court shall pronounce the invalidity of the Wills dated 29 November 2007 and 14 January 2009 onwards.
    (2) The court will make the wills 29.05.07 valid by variation. Which leaves Dr Jones the Son his mother’s business.
    (3) Make Dr Jones the executor of the Will.
    (4) The Claimant’s lawyers did not do the Wills correct from 2007 onwards and as by coercion so crimes
    (5) The Claimant’s lawyers covered up the mistakes they did.
    (6) The claimants knew from 2015 that all Wills stated debts to be paid first and ignored by design the defendant request. The Son has a Claim N1 that is great than the estate.
    (7) Further or other relief.
    (8) Costs.
    (9) Sue Bartlett, Woodside, Burn, Green.

I Dr Mark Jones FRSM Freeman of the City of London, parliamentary candidate state the following is true

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix Recent history
11 Bartlett becomes Executor by force in 2015 and removed in 2019.
In 2015 after my mother’s death Mr Bartlett made out he was the executor (24 June 2015
Exhibit and see also Exhibit A2 25 June 2015; was not until 2016 and after being told not to) all done So Mr Bartlett wanted to steal 1) put in care bills 100,000 which were not, 2) IHT tax which was lie all done to force the sale of my mother’s family business so he could 3) buy it at under-valued price by 700,000!!!! as he knew I was dealing with bereavement & my mother alleged murder…shocking. And he did this to others.
1.14. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7) by sending a document to the court without permission and after I made it clear, my mother, Executor (Mr Fay) &; I did not want him by past emails such as April 24 2015 (Exhibit Letter to B 2015 Exhibit B8) and other actions in 2013 (Show court in private as separate case). Note this email was one of many after my mother’s alleged murder which he ignored. It was clear my mother did not want him or Mr Woodside (See Exhibit T2 Evans, Video, etc.). So from the start, he (and had Dirty hands) knew what was wrong and still did it to run up bills which I rejected as he had no right to do this. He ignored the fact I was telling him my mother was hit by Mr Woodside etc. from the start in 2013. This is what he has done to others. As all of this was done deliberately and done as I was dealing with the trauma of my mother’s murder.
1.15 In Bartlett’s letters and any correspondence from his law firm is there any statements to say to my mother that he has taken over her Will. He sent no letter to my mother, and we heard what was going on by accident. This cannot be the right way to take over Wills.
Therefore no permission or consent was given to Mr Bartlett from anyone.
1.16 When my mother found out in 2013 and wanted to see another lawyer (protected) to change this she then nearly died (see ambulance report 2013) when in a nursing home run by Dr Bland who knew Mr Woodside, VA,MA. This all happened at the same time when it was clear mother was being drugged. An expert can show this to Exhibit XX My mother was nearly murdered, but I was there to stop it by calling the ambulance, and they saw a crime of an elderly lady having a fit, but no medication is given to cause death and me lied to about ambulance on the way for 2 hours. The nursing home had medication as the ambulance crew checked. Then in 2014, in a new nursing home, my mother was put onto DOLS and stopped from seeing anyone to change her will. Then nearly died by the doctor giving her morphine for no clinical reason by Dr N, who knew Dr B and lied at the inquest. Then in 2015 poisoned but can show Mr B was not the executor but he still tried to get my mother cremated, but I stopped it (Exhibit Bills2015)
1.17 Why is MB (mother) Will set up to be given to another law firm? Which is strange as my mother trusted people, not a law firm. And VB kept her mother in a bad nursing home and stopped her seeing any lawyers to change the wills back or remove Mr B (Exhibit T5 COP24 J Hurst 6/07/2014)
1.18. Therefore I am seeking damages from this law firm like many others as from 2015 Bartlett knew they should not be involved and ignored my letters and others.
1.19 I see compensation for eight years when the 2006 Will was altered to help him.

I Dr Mark Jones FRSM Freeman of the City of London, parliamentary candidate state the following is true.

All of this links to

http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/tax-file/

more at

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/introduction