———- Forwarded message ———
From: Julien Culham <@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:12 PM
Subject: RE: Incident 875 9 march 2014 Mavis Banks (attempted Murder) is to have full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration). This can be done by drip etc Dr Jones is next of KIN. ~[NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]~
To: Mark Jones <mark@myvibe.net>
Mark
I have forwarded this to Chester Outer as stated I am not in a position to look at this.
Please correspond with them or ring 101.
Regards
Julien
D/Sgt 4006 Culham
From: Mark Jones
Sent: 09 March 2015 22:46
To: Julien Culham
Subject: Incident 875 9 march 2014 Mavis Banks (attempted Murder) is to have full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration). This can be done by drip etc Dr Jones is next of KIN.
Dear Julien,
The following needs to be investigated. My mother is going to die by intent when care could prevent it and medical records clearly are wrong.
On 9 March 2015 at 2pm I went to see Mommy at Pinetum nursing home,
Sally Copper manager of Nursing home? (same person who appeared with altered medical records in the past) said the following
(all of this was Taped)
She said my mother’s drink was prescribed thickener and I am not allowed to taste the thickener.
Then repeats again was prescribed.
I say i know what thickener taste like as I have made such drinks from 2010 to 2014 for my mom. I have used thickener on everything tea, coffee, juice etc.
The thickener is put into any drink and can be tasted. No restriction as stated.
Then social worker started and said i can not taste the drinks. (WHY?)
Or i can not see my mom, social worker tell me i can not taste the drinks again!!!
I say your stopping me from seeing my mom
Manager say no you can not.
Social service woman say i am getting naughty!
Same social worker who said drinks were ok last friday went they tasted foul.
They say they are going to call the police..
I say this is murder
I leave.
I have not seen my mother again!!!
This needs to be investigated.
All taped.
From: Mark Jones <
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:02 AM
Subject: Mavis Banks is to have full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration). This can be done by drip etc Dr Jones is next of KIN.
To:
BCC To others now concerned about the ongoing issues.
Please acknowledge receiving this email.
Send to:
The Chief Executive of the clinical commissioning group that funds Mavis Banks care at the care home – if I understand correctly that she is now receiving NHS funded continuing care
Copied to:
Managers of Pinetum Nursing Home, Chester / CARE UK
Chester social services
Lawyers
Past people who due to Human Rights Act have a need to know what is going on in this case.
Urgent complaint about withdrawal of hydration and nutrition without consent or legal authorisation
It is essential that Mavis Banks should have full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration. This can be done by drip etc)
Dr Jones is next of Kin.
1 There is no medical reason for my mother to be on palliative care and we need to know the conditions for this as medical records do not match.
On 2nd of February 2015 Mavis Banks was admitted to Countess of Chester hospital with pneumonia. This was no surprise as Mavis Banks room at time was shown to be 14c!. She received treatment and was concluded to be ready for discharge. She returned to Pinetum Nursing Home on 9th of February 2015. I was excluded from the discharge planning process. I have subsequently been informed that my mother has discharged on the basis of receiving only palliative care by the Pinetum Nursing home which said this was the hospital decision but conflicted with other evidence. This is completely inappropriate as my mother is not terminally ill, is not in pain, has good functioning, and wishes to live. There is no reason to consider that she cannot live a good life for another 10 or more years and evidence support this. Medical records do not match reality.
2 On 9th of February 2015 Dr Jones was told his mother could not eat and drink and this was. found not to be true.
3 An independently investigation by British Geriatric Society London and Prof P.Pullicino (know for the Liverpool Palliative Path way investigation) to report if there is any reason for this approach which already seem wrong.
4 Letter from lawyers (many) were sent to Care UK & Chester City Council on Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:57 PM pointing out it is illegal to put a person without mental capacity on to Palliative care path and others & I had clearly seen that her condition did not warrant this action.
- And then I was falsely reassured by Mathieu Culverhouse on 20th of February who was lied to as we found out on 23 February 2014 found out to be a lie as my mother is still on palliative care. I was told my mother had not been fed other said she had been. I clearly saw in my mother’s mouth no food between her teeth and her tooth brush was dry. She was desperate for food and drink.
- The miss use of morphine is obvious as her condition never required it and we put forward past patients died in the same nursing home of chest infections caused by lack of thickened fluids which Dr Jones saw happening on many occasion and also witnesses statement (video & tape) to prove this. It will also be in the medical records that the SAME DOCTOR did this to other patients where the patients were NOT prescribed antibiotics to let them live. Their relatives should be allowed to know this and this to be investigated.
- The decisions for palliative care for Mavis Banks was the manager of the nursing home (not legal or medically allowable). And a Doctor who has been removed from Mavis Banks care for prescribing to her Morphine which made no clinical decision. GMC have started an investigation.
As this doctor has been removed from the care of Mavis Banks and his past decision was the Palliative care pathway for Mavis Banks this process must be removed and she must be given every opportunity to live. Therefore full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration. This can be done by drip etc)
- The suspicious activity of giving Mavis Bank foul fluid to condition her to reject them and lead her to dehydration is under investigation. Police incident number 537 on 6 March to Chester Police and CQC ENQ 1-1981 356004
- Mavis Banks has been neglected in Pinetum Nursing Home on multiple occasions resulting in trips to the Emergency Room due to the following:
– 3 times dehydrated
– She wasn’t fed properly
– Improper medication leading to an epileptic fit
– The number of accidents is now too many to be reasonably considered coincidence. (All in one year!)
Three times the hospital doctors have questioned the reason for returning her to the same nursing home when there was obvious abuse. Chester Council made the decision to return her. The CQC and UK politicians are responding to false personal allegations against me designed to discredit any investigation. I’m curious as to why she cannot be moved if it is apparent that this is the correct approach for her health and many people are in agreement to that fact.
The DoLs never talks about this. The DoLs never list the serious incident in the past home or the current one. The DoLs list hearsay and no facts.
- It is completely unlawful to treat Mavis Banks in this way against her wishes. I have made clear that I support my mother’s wish to continue receiving full care and treatment, not just palliative care, but I have been ignored. A decision cannot be taken to withdraw medication, hydration and nutrition from my mother in this way without consent or legal authorisation. It is contrary to her best interests and her expressed wishes which have been witnessed.
- Dr Jones has been prevented from visiting his mother at times, based on false and malicious allegations made against him is preventing her from having the best care. From 2010 to 2014 there were no incidents until his mother moved into Pinetum Nursing home. I believe that this has been concocted to try and prevent me from supporting my mother and raising concerns on her behalf. Past nurse and Managers are not happy with current working of Pinetum nursing home.
- DOLS 6 March 2015 list Mavis Banks is now removed from medication and this is unlawful for reason listed. Medical approach is invalid.
- I have evidence to show my mother wanted me Dr Mark Jones to be next of kin and this should be investigated and I put forward from Dr Jones and all her friends that Mavis Banks would want to live and keep requesting this on all the tapes recording.
Summary
I am now informing you that
Mavis Banks is to have full medical support and care NOW (including medication, nutrition and hydration. This can be done by drip etc)
You are now being privately prosecuted for attempted murder and anyone associated with this act.
New legal case show it is now unlawful to withheld medication, water in anyway from a person who wants to live.
(Why is a billion pound care company being protected by Chester City)
Dr Mark Jones next of Kin of Mavis Banks.
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip. PhD.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
———- Forwarded message ———-
Dear Sir or Madam,
We request the case of Mavis Banks now moves to an public inquiry in LONDON since we have no confidence in Cheshire Council and their ability to act impartially.
Cheshire Council now have been seen to do the following:
Lie to the press (taped and statements) about her son Dr Jones FRSM.
Lied about several DoLs (said son was at meeting and agreed to things when he was not).
Gave false reported police records.
Medical records shown which did not match clinical condition.
And ignoring two prominent lawyers about issue of the law.
This added to the fact other issues in the press about Chester City council and their removing of the son and trying to prevent him from taking action to help his mother live.
The fact is in 2014 I found serious mistakes in a new nursing home (no staff at night, incorrect food-see below) and he was silenced and important investigation were stopped that could of saved lives.
Also there is the ability for the current DOLS to be invested now without a court case to give urgent done as Mavis Banks could die without being with her son and the correct care. Mavis Banks has already been given last rites but says she wants to live. There seem to be no clinical reason why she could not live. This is made worse by the fact her son is being held prevented helping and seeing her based on DOLS which solicitors say is wrong. Also other evidence show in the past and also from 2010 to 2014 no issues with Dr Jones until the new nursing home.
+++
Also the fact is that Mavis Banks in one years at the same nursing home has been 3 times dehydrated, other negligent issues that cause illness, been hit 3 times and had hospital doctors on each occasion question the wisdom of returning her to the same nursing home but Chester City council keep sending her to the same place which makes no senes as any one else would be sued.
As mavis Banks improves new deliberate obstacle are placed in her way to try and stop her receiving care that would let her live.
This is further complication by medical records that do not matching and contradictory videos and tapes.
Finally
Since 2014 (also date 2010, also 2013 see attachment group signatures) Chester City have never answered any questions and we request an Ombudsman as several attempts have revealed Chester City and Cheshire West involved in propagating lies with regard to the particulars of this case. (Tape, Video, Documents). Chester City produced minutes from many meetings which do not correspond to recordings.
We request the case now moves to an public inquiry in LONDON since we have no confidence in Cheshire Council and their ability to act impartially.
Summary
This case is made very difficult for the following reasons.
Chester City council told lies about Dr Jones preventing a series of investigations last year which could of saved lives (see attachments and we have video and tapes to back this up).
These lies have discouraged solicitors, the CQC, Police and have impacted substantially upon the livelihood and reputation of Dr Jones and his mother.
It appears that the DOLS has been flagrantly misused and was based upon fictitious circumstances which have been demonstrated to be false. The DOLS should be removed immediately as it has no legal basis according to legal opinion.
Also please see the points below 1 to 24.
I would like mediation for full compensation to start immediately.
This case is so appalling that I feel confident Chester City will be as anxious as I am to resolve all of these outstanding matters.
Understandably, I want full access to my mother, who was given last rites 3 weeks ago, but upon whose authority I don’t yet know.
I want my mother moved from Pinetum nursing home to Kings court.
Thank you
Mark
Dr M Jones
Section A
Current Example of issue deliberate dehydration of Mavis Banks
I reported the following facts to the CQC ENQ 1-1981 356004
And to the police incident number 537 on 6 March to Chester Police
It was also accidentally recorded on my phone and full transcript in Appendix.
(based on EU & CQC & Human Rights Act)
On the 6 of March 2014 I went to see my mother (Mavis Banks DOB: 22 June 1929) at 2pm Pinetum Nursing Home (full transcript and tape available on request)
I saw my own mother with only one social worker Amanda (normally two).
She was bright, opened her eyes.
She indicated she wanted to drink.
Upon questioning she indicated she wanted to live and to be able go to church.
I have seen her condition improve dramatically over the last 3 weeks since the use of the Morphine she had been prescribed, for no reason, was suspended. Now it appears she is being deliberately dehydrated, through something like soap being added to her fluids.
The Nurse Jenny said my mother had Weetabix for breakfast but I saw nothing on her teeth (in gaps of teeth etc) and her tooth brush was dry and had a hair on it which has been there for 2 or more weeks.
The nurse Jenny said Mother had eaten (1.45pm? why so late?) so wanted to wait for drink to be given in an hour but I pushed for her for 2.45pm (nurse was keen not to let my mother have a drink, possibly because of my presence).
At 2.45pm Jenny the nurse brought her a fruit based drink, my mother rejected it.
Her teeth were clenched in a way which did not make any sense, since she appeared desperate for fluids. She clearly did not want the fluids and it distressed her.
My mother appeared to know that she was going to be given something she would not like.
Her skin appeared dry and she desperately wanted and requested fluid from 2pm.
I took the spoon and tasted it.
The taste was like dishwater.
On reflection I noticed that when I first saw my mother at 2pm there was similar fluid on her lower lip and a foul smell (I put it into my note book).
I asked for a coffee for my mother but my visiting time (3pm) was stopped and I can not see my mother until next Monday due to a falsely obtained DoLs.
At 4.15pm the taste of that drink was still in my mouth and was foul even after drinking many fluids to get rid of the taste.
Full transcript being made.
At 22.27 on 6 march 2015 I phone Adult Social Care Emergency out of hours.
I told them about the above events.
I told them about the issue of dehydration and they said they have been told to do nothing until Monday!
At 12 45 am on the 7 March I could not sleep and phoned Pinetum nursing home.
I spoke to Staff nurse Alison Johnson. The nurse said your mother is rejecting the fluid offered to her by the staff every hour. She said when she is offered the fluid she clenches her teeth.
I say the fluids are being rejected by my mother due to a foul tasting additive, it appears she is being conditioned to reject fluids My mother may become dehydrated for this reason.
The nurse said, if your mother refuses fluids by clenching her teeth we can not do anything. Why would anyone clench their teeth when they clearly want fluids?
Then I phoned the police (same incident number) and they said they would look into this.
My mother is deliberately being dehydrated, this may lead to her death, support is being deliberately removed this would constitute murder.
She should be put on a drip to help her.
I was told she could not swallow 4 weeks ago but she clearly could and once again contradicted the medical records and what is clearly seen.
As soon as she appears to be getting better some new and apparently deliberate obstacle is put in her way (in the recent past Morphine, used for no clinical reason and now stopped when I reported this to the GMC).
Section B History.
Letter from lawyers (many) were sent to Care UK & Chester City Council on Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:57 PM pointing out it is illegal to put a person without mental capacity on to Palliative care path and others & I had clearly seen that her condition did not warrant this action.
And then I was falsely reassured by Mathieu Culverhouse on 20th of February who was lied to as we found out on 23 February 2014 found out to be a lie as my mother is still on palliative care. I was told my mother had not been fed other said she had been. I clearly saw in my mother’s mouth no food between her teeth and her tooth brush was dry. She was desperate for food and drink.
As my mother is still on palliative due to the instruction Lee Calvertand, Trace Simpson and Tracy Mitchell.
And all the private evidence indicate she could now recover and live a longer life.
i am now informing you that you will be done for attempted murder and and anyone associated with this act. The law is moving to this direction.
The miss use of morphine is obvious as her condition never required it and we put forward past patients died in the same nursing home of chest infections caused by thickened fluids. Dr N and Dr B know each other and this is a fact!
I want my mother to have full care (e.g. including antibiotics etc) to enable her to live.
I will be requesting actions to sue you and ask as other cases have done for you to serve the maximum court sentence for murder.
Please reply to this to let me know my mother is getting better care.
Also the removal of the DOLS (based on hearsay & lies) which is preventing me being able to support my mother (help feed her etc) and once again is the withdrawal of care and leads to the proposition of murder on named individuals.
Others and I find the removal of my ability to take basic medical readings, photos and videos, independent witnesses deliberately done to help false and support medical records which we can prove has been going on for years (see point 18)
See other points below
And action i request below.
Section C: Example of Clinical records not matching reality.
I was told my mother could not swallow by a report although she could (taped), she was improving until she was deliberately dehydrated on at least three occasions requiring hospitalisation, and was receiving morphine at levels (2.5mg) ostensibly for pain relief, (although Mavis was not in pain) which could have stopped her breathing and certainly prevented taking on sustenance. The improvement in her condition since the morphine has been stopped, possibly due to my protest, has improved markedly.
As of 04/03/2015, she has improved enough to begin to talk again, also begin to develop an appetite to the degree that she is able to eat a bowl of food at one sitting.
My mother is improving and is becoming stronger, and will live if the correct treatment and support is given and not withdrawn (e.g case of antibiotics removed from a patient etc). Legal precedent has established that withdrawal of necessary treatment will be treated as murder.
Also, preventing me talking about the mistreatment of Mavis Banks is clearly allowing the person/s responsible to hide their actions and infringing my rights with reference to Article 10 etc of Human Rights Act.
I have spoken to many people including the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Ageing and Older People.
Section D:
The following points below have been unanswered since 2014 or later
- The palliative care route which Mavis Banks is currently on is against the law. Lawyers I have discussed this with agree to this, but the nursing home and social services continue to act outside of the law! Both myself and another fellow doctor, Dr. C. Steele, can see no reason as to why she could not continue to live provided with the right care.
- Mavis Banks has clearly stated she wants to live on multiple occasions. In accordance with her religion she is not to be provided palliative care but full health care. She is scared of the nursing home and she needs my support.
- Her medical records state that she was incapable of drinking or eating, but I found this to not be true as I witnessed her eating and drinking myself without difficulty. The nursing home states that palliative care is a hospital based decision, but the hospital states otherwise (see email below).
4.a. Mavis Banks has been neglected in Pinetum Nursing Home on multiple occasions resulting in trips to the Emergency Room due to the following:
– 3 times dehydrated
– She wasn’t fed properly
– Improper medication leading to an epileptic fit
– The number of accidents is now too many to be reasonably considered coincidence. (All in one year!)
4.c Below
4.b Three times the hospital doctors have questioned the reason for returning her to the same nursing home when there was obvious abuse. Chester Council made the decision to return her. The CQC and UK politicians are responding to false personal allegations against me designed to discredit any investigation. I’m curious as to why she cannot be moved if it is apparent that this is the correct approach for her health and many people are in agreement to that fact.
4.d. Also Mavis claimed to have been hit on two occasions, which makes Sarah Sharpe’s report to say the least incorrect, perhaps negligent. This is supported by tape recordings and other evidence.
I request Sarah Sharpe evidence removed as the tapes show it to be false.
- I have been prevented from seeing my mother based on a Deprivation of Liberties Order (DOLs) which was rejected by lawyers due to being invalid and inappropriate in this case. If social services can put forth a fraudulent DOLs and it is proven fraudulent then they should be responsible for legal fees as well as paying damages. The DOLs was put in place due to a meeting that was held where social services falsely claimed that I was present (in front of NHS staff told lies about my conduct!), which I was not. I have proved this to be true. However, I am still being ignored by city council who are failing to uphold the law.
- According to Pinetum Nursing Home it was time for my mother to be given her last rites which did take place. If she is truly at the end of her life then why am I being limited to only seeing her for 1 hour three times a week under the supervision of two social workers (£60,000 cost)? This is a time in her life where she needs me the most and I’m being prevented from doing my duty as a son. This is outrageous to me as I am a law abiding citizen that deserves to be present in my mother’s time of crisis.
- My Mother’s request to go home and desire to live has been ignored repeatedly. Without any prompting, my mother has stated that she hates the nursing home, is scared, and wants to leave and live with me. The social workers present during our visits then told us that we needed to change the subject or they would end our meeting. I have recorded the above on tape. The social workers state that nothing can be recorded, but I find it necessary when they are writing bad reports. As a concerned son I need to be able to prove neglect. EU law states this is the right thing to do.
- The nursing home stopped an independent mental capacity expert from seeing Mavis Banks when other witnesses, for which there are court statements, clearly state that she had capacity on that day (COP 24 from three witnesses). If she had been seen that day she would have been able to sue the nursing home for neglect, but they prevented that chance in order to keep her quiet. Pinetum repeatedly interferes with my mother’s ability to see anyone and even stops her from going to church!
- A DNR was put in place against my mother’s wishes. The DNR was dropped, but there was no investigation into why this came about in the first place. The amount of neglect and abuse in this nursing home is disgusting and they should be shut down. In one case she was in pain for 3 and a half hours until I finally called an ambulance. The paramedics said that if I had not called she could have died. All of this has been ignored by the CQC and the local police when this is clearly wrong.
Once again Chester City council told lies about me.
- I’ve been prevented from recording the faults of Pinetum by a Chester City council when mistakes are clearly being made and these errors can cost people their lives. I’m only trying to help.
- Why should judges only take written evidence and ignore videos that throw out the written evidence? It’s obvious that the written evidence is fraudulent and meant to provide a cover up for the individuals and entities committing these atrocities. This has to end!
- From 2010 to 2014 my mother was held in a different nursing home (Oakland 1st nursing home) where she endured none of the abuses she has been exposed to at Pinetum (2nd nursing home). Since being there I’ve witnessed Pinetum being low on staff at night, had a DOLs put against me due to false claims, as well as other neglect listed above. The nursing home is running services for the local hospital which they say they can offer these services cheaper than NHS. Unfortunately, this is creates a lack of staff at Pinetum.
This is another reason why my mother is having her life removed from her so I will not be able to visit her at night and see the on going lack of staff.
- The council knows that I should get free legal aid in regards to my mother, but it has not been done. I have witnessed free legal aid being given to a person who supports council and the nursing home (Sarah Sharp). Why am I not getting the same treatment? I’ve spoken with a lawyer who says this is also a violation of rights.
- I found out that Chester City Social services and its press office have said lies about me which are very damaging.
We have this taped to show this is bad.
- Chester Social Services have demonstrated a conflict of interests and now bias.
First blocking me from seeing faults in nursing home and my mother now having Chester adult service not being able to talk or do anything.
This is after the 25 of Feb 2015 when the night support (expert in Mental Capacity support) said what was going on was very wrong and very bad (taped). He is now banned from talking to me.
I have evidence to back up all of the above claims. I know that my mother’s life is at risk and I believe that this is due to a lack of action of the CQC and anyone who chooses to ignore what is taking place here. It is my hope that an public investigation will be able to help with maladministration, oversight, unnecessary delay, or the omission of an essential procedure by a Government Department all of which have been described above.
Point+ 16
Nothing significant can be added to support the DOLS. Why then are we waiting three months for the court case when the substance of the DOLS is incorrect and all the evidence supports Dr Jones competence to look after the interests and health of his mother.
I have submitted to the court every thing necessary to prove the DOLS is invalid and being used improperly. Please see attached (Doctorate certificate First Aid certificate. Witness statements.)
I have character witnesses to demonstrate that I have always looked after my mum.
Point+ 17
There is no reason to prevent access to my mother, especially since she may die soon.
Three times a week for one hour is not enough.
point 18
Preventing documentation of my mothers treatment such as video recordings only serves the interests of the current care regime and not the interests of my mother by controlling what is recorded in the official paperwork which has not resembled the true state of health and treatment of my mother. One example mentioned in the court documents is my having taken photographs to document her vomiting, due to inappropriate foods. I called the nurse after which I assisted her and took photographs to document this further lapse. Without having done so, there would have been no mention in the official record. I claim that this was due to her being fed inappropriately. I saw many omissions in the medical records (see photos etc)
Point+ 19
The number of accidents is now too many to be reasonably considered coincidence.
3 times dehydrated (sent back to the same nursing home against concerned doctors)
2 times hit
Miss feed by staff and seen by us and could of been avoided (statements).
Very high temps in her room over summer that cause her to faint and she has a heart condition (video)
Then before she recently got ill i notice her room at night was below 14c etc so forcing her to get a cold
The morphine medication which makes no clinical sense…really obvious murder attempt as she has no reason for such medication and I saw her and she was not in any pain!
And my mother has made it clear someone was buying her home against her wishes and we have
their names.
So how can Sarah Sharp and my half sister want my mother to stay at this nursing home when cheshire if full of nursing homes!
Point+ 20
I keep asking for Freedom of Information about me and my mother (when i had power of attorney) and nothing given which is also breaking the law. This has been requested since 2010!
Point +21
Court papers without correct seals and missing issues.
Point +22
Medical documents which are incorrect and seriously manipulated (data captured).
Point +23
I was not fairly represented on Monday court case -no lawyers, only know 2 days before, and then a weekend, bundle for court case missing papers, Chester Council London lawyer had a understanding with judge? (2 March 2015 monday) and a judge did not know all facts before injunction put in place. Leave of appeal on the injunction as it is not fair. Due to loss of lives and corruption this must go to the supreme court.
Point +24
EF: Case No 12237493: Court Monday 3 March 2pm court 1 Chester Court
Judge Buttler case.
The Hearing was not fair to Dr Jones who did not have a lawyer and therefore reject all of it. It was rushed with no preparation or time for Dr Jones and need a retail
ps not finished but we can prove the facts
4.c. After all these painful and dangerous issues it is strange my half sister would not like my mother to be moved into another nursing home (like the hospital doctors).
Also my half sister pre 2010 gained by the change of my mother’s will when she could not walk and did not have mental capacity. We are officially challenging the Will. It is noticed that in the past meeting it was my half sisters concern that my mother could see a lawyer as my mother had capacity and this was another reason my mother was stopped from going out of the nursing home. We have many people who will support that the past will left the guest house to me as i had put major investments into it. Also we have evidenced to show my mother was going to live there and a wet room was being built there but my half sister on many occasions tried to sell it against my mother wishes when I was away (COP24 etc).
After my half sister being found that she forgot 40,000 bank account after telling the court of protection my mother had no money, we also have a estate against letter that show Vicky was selling my mother home just as she had her stroke with no plan where she would move to and this was important as my mother would of needed grab rails and other infrastructure and my support.
All people who knew my mother (COP24) state it was never her wishes to do anything other than be with me.
Also pre 2010 before my mother was ill we found out that Dr Bland (half sister’s best friend) did not take any actions to help my mother. A clinical negligence claim for considerable sum is possible but my half sister does not want to take this. And once again we find another reason why people do not want my mother to get better. Dr Bland’s name was on the DNR and was at overseeing the 1st nursing home when my mother nearly died but no support arrived for hours.
My half sister has chosen both nursing homes as she knew people there and rejected better nursing homes for this reason.
The court case with Judge Coffee report missing other evidence.
It was very clearly stated to the judge Mark Jones earned extra money from other work.
This is proved by the letter from Lady Jellicoe COP 24
This was ignored to deliberately remove Dr Jones as Power of Attorney from his mother.
I have requested tapes from the court case and still not received them.
This shows the lies and the network of people.
I want full access to my mother
I want my mother in a different nursing home
I want my mother to have full care which is her rights.
I want my mother to be given all medical support (e.g. appropriate antibiotic etc ) to support her to live a long life.
Appendix letters
Mark
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Mathieu Culverhouse <@irwinmitchell.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:07 PM
Subject: MB
To: “Mark Jones >
Dear Mark,
I have received an email from the legal department at the local authority, in which they state:
“Further to our recent discussion I confirm that Mavis Banks is in receipt of nutrition in Pinetum; this is documented within her care records. We have completed a safeguarding investigation in light of the concerns expressed by Mark Jones; which concludes that we are satisfied that nutrition is being provided by Pinetum. The CCG nurse has also been out and reviewed Mavis’ records I believe yesterday. Her GP has also been to see her and is satisfied so far as nutrition is concerned.”
In a telephone conversation with the local authority it was also confirmed to me that although there was some discussion about your mother being in a palliative state when she came out of hospital, she is not currently on the Liverpool care pathway.
I hope that this gives you some measure of reassurance about the current position. I have also received a call from Kate Whittaker this afternoon, who filled me in on your discussions with her. I am pleased to hear that Kate is involved and I understand that she is looking into whether she can apply for legal aid to represent you. As mentioned in my earlier email, I will contact Hogans on Monday in order to clarify the position in respect of your mother’s representation.
Kind regards
Mathieu
Mathieu Culverhouse
Associate Solicitor
Irwin Mitchell LLP
This was the letter sent
Email…………………………………………………..
BCC To others now concerned about the ongoing issues.
Please acknowledge receiving this email.
Send to:
The Chief Executive of the clinical commissioning group that funds Mavis Banks care at the care home – if I understand correctly that she is now receiving NHS funded continuing care
Copied to:
Managers of Pinetum Nursing Home, Chester / CARE UK
Chester social services
Dear Sir/Madam
Urgent complaint about withdrawal of hydration and nutrition without consent or legal authorisation
It is essential that my mother should have full medical support and care NOW (including nutrition and hydration)
My mother Mavis Banks (D.O.B. 22.6.1929) is a resident at Pinetum Nursing Home Chester. She had a stroke in 2010 and after receiving hospital treatment she was discharged to Oakland care home with a support package arranged by Chester Social Services. She made significant progress in recovering speech and other functioning, and was hoping to return home [independent expert Exhibit P]
She moved to Pinetum in 2014 and was making progress, until April 2014 when Dr Mark Jones FRSM was removed from his mother. In 2015 my mother was assessed as eligible for fully NHS funded continuing healthcare.
A DoLS was put in place after a meeting on Dr Jones which stated he was at this meeting and agreed when he was not there. Other allegations have been removed in later DoLS.
On 2nd of February 2015 Mavis was admitted to Countess of Chester hospital with pneumonia. She received treatment and was concluded to be ready for discharge. She returned to Pinetum Nursing Home on 9th of February 2015. I was excluded from the discharge planning process. I have subsequently been informed that my mother has discharged on the basis of receiving only palliative care by the Pinetum Nursing home which said this was the hospital decision but conflicted with other evidence. This is completely inappropriate as my mother is not terminally ill, is not in pain, has good functioning, and wishes to live. There is no reason to consider that she cannot live a good life for another 10 or more years and evidence support this.
Since my mother has been back at Pinetum Nursing home steps have been taken to withhold nutrition and hydration from her. This is outrageous. My mother has communicated (by nodding etc) that she is hungry, that she wants to eat and drink and she wants to live. When I have challenged this withholding of nutrition and hydration I have been told that my mother is physically unable to eat or drink, which is simply not true. Even if it were the case there are other methods that could be explored such as a PEG tube. My mother is being starved against her wishes.
It is completely unlawful to treat my mother in this way against her wishes. I have made clear that I support my mother’s wish to continue receiving full care and treatment, not just palliative care, but I have been ignored. A decision cannot be taken to withdraw hydration and nutrition from my mother in this way without consent or legal authorisation. It is contrary to her best interests and her expressed wishes.
It is not clear who is responsible for the decision about receiving palliative care or withdrawing hydration and nutrition; clearly the home have direct responsibility but they are claiming that it is on the instructions of the hospital. But none of them have authority to do this against my mother’s wishes and best interests. If the home or hospital really are claiming that this is in her best interests then it needs to be referred to the Court of Protection as a matter of the utmost urgency for decisions to be made about her capacity and best interests.
It is essential that my mother should have full medical support and care (including nutrition and hydration) until a decision by the Court of Protection. The withdrawing of nutrition and hydration without consent or lawful authority, in the face of others and my urgent concerns, is a criminal act.
I have also been prevented from visiting my mother at times, based on false and malicious allegations made against me such as that I shook my mother. I believe that this has been concocted to try and prevent me from supporting my mother and raising concerns on her behalf.
Please will you reply as soon as possible and by no later than 12.00 on Thursday 19 February 2015 confirming that the palliative care order will be lifted immediately and my mother will receive hydration, nutrition and full medical support and care forthwith.
Please also confirm that my mother will not be restricted from having visits from me, in breach of her right to a private and family life.
If there is any dispute as to my mother’s best interests in relation to these issues, the please confirm by 12.00 on Thursday 19 February 2015 that an urgent application will be made to the Court of Protection to determine the issues.
If I do not receive this confirmation from you by 12.00 then I will be instructing lawyers on my mother’s behalf to take immediate legal steps to protect her.
If the clinical commissioning group does not consider that it is the relevant body to address these issues and/or apply to the Court of Protection then please advise me immediately who my concerns should be addressed to.
Regards,
Dr Mark Jones
+++
nursing home say it was the hospital but…this shows other wise….for the pallative care.
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Jones Geraint (COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) <@nhs.net>
Date: Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:51 AM
Subject: RE: Urgent: Mavis Banks: Palliative Care decision Thursday 5 of Feb 2015 on ward 44 taken without Family involvement.
To: “Mark Jones (
Cc: “Pals Coch (COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST)” <cochpals@nhs.net>
Dear Mark
Apologies for the delay in responding to you but I am now able to provide you with a response to your questions as discussed with me on 10 February 2015.
- Why was your mother put on the Palliative Care pathway without your involvement, and who was involved in this decision?
I can confirm that no decision was made with regards palliative care whilst your mother was a patient in this hospital.
- How you can change this decision?
I would suggest that you speak with the DOLS team in the community, your mother’s GP, and other family members if you have any concerns about your mother’s care.
I hope that this information is helpful. Please note that I am on annual leave until 23 February and will be unable to respond to any emails until this date.
Yours sincerely
Geraint Jones
Geraint Jones
Head of Complaints and PALS
The Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
++++++
Past email
——– Forwarded message ———-
From: Mark Jones <
Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM
Subject: Urgent: Mavis Banks: Palliative Care decision Thursday 5 of Feb 2015 on ward 44 taken without Family involvement.
To: @nhs.net
I Doctor Mark Jones want an written explanation of why my mother Mavis Banks was put on Palliative Care track without any involvement from me- her son.
I saw my mother on the previous day and she was taking food and had been talking.
I want this decision explaining in writing immediately and changed.
I want a full list of who was involved in this process and how to change it.
I am also troubled that she was sent back to Pinetum nursing home chester where she has had now been sent to hospital 3 times due to being dehydrated and having pneumonia.
This is urgent.
Thank you
Mark
Dr Mark Jones
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Fellow of Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.
Fellow of NESTA.
Time line
Appendix: Time line of events past.
My mother had a stroke (18/5/10) and then had further complications in hospital: Clostridium difficile, E coli and
MRSA. She was in a coma for several months. She then became better.
My mother has been a resident at The Oakland’s Nursing home since 25th October 2011. (early?)
On 25th of November 2013 Monday at Oakland’s nursing home very bad incident and nearly died. Nursing home
tried to bring out DNR which was incorrect. Also mother Catholic.
Care meeting 4th Dec 2013 at Chester City Hospital mother is improving (Exhibit A, B, D)
2014 Jan? Mother moves into Pinetum Care home
Dr jones politely points out to staff the following:
found his mother at night in pain without a call point at the end of a long corridor.
Dr Jones saw other in pain calling out for help! But told staff did not go into room to see if they had a call point
Dr Jones noticed at feeding times 12 00 noon and 4.30pm people given foods which did not make sense.
Some days the a elderly person would get thicken fluids and pureed foods and then different staff would not do this.
Issue is the illness can appear cause the person to be seen of dying of natural causes.
Was told to stop feeding my mother which I did from the 4th of March?
Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:39 PM letter to Social service (Lesley Crossen)
_ about my mother and her diet and issues about this with documents from church saying this is bad.
No respone but even when I find out about the meetings which I have not be invited to.
11 April 2014 wheel chair assessment: 0151 357 1070 spoke to joy urgent”
20 April 2014 SUNDAY saw mother and was ok was improving (Sunday)
I was offered to feed my mother which I declined. I remember the person
21 of April 2014 (21 4 14) MONDAY my mother had a fit.
(did they not give her medicine to prevent fit? blood sample was weak ..said lab like previous case on 25th of November 2013 )
22 April TUESDAY told limited access to my mother at care home. Was told it was hospital statement.
So on 22 Tue April 2014 was told I had limited access to my mom.
My mother is in a room at the end of a long corridor.
I found my mother many times at night in pain without a call point.
Staff said I had to leave without any true reason.
(found out later about nursing home running critical care unit for patient from hospital. Nurse said could not do old people at the same time at night..so..needs more staff)
23 April 2014
I send email again “I am troubled that some one (who) has said I gave my mother solids
when she is on a puree diet. This is a LIE to effect a court case
57Version V4 16 July 2014 Private and confidential.
I have not feed my mother now for over two months or given her any
drinks, so letting the staff do it.
Apr 23, 2014 at 4:55 PM Email to Tracy Simpson of Pinetum Care home ignored.
Email shows mother without a call point.
I was stopped from seeing my mom by nursing home saying it was the doctor.
24 april 2014 spoke to dr scott no reason for not seeling my mother.
Tape and recored.
On Sunday 27 of April 2014. Exhibit W
Pentium Nursing Home. Chester.
I saw Dr Jones ask his mom was well and be affectionate with her.
Dr Jones set up the programmable TV to show his mother nice tv shows
He left notes on how to turn the DVD player on for her.
I saw she was in an isolated room.
His mother said she missed him and was unhappy not to see him.
I understand he has always been there for his mother but was prevents by lies.
Mark then did a mental capacity test on her (see sheet)
It was clear from the question she answered she had mental capacity.
It was clear his mother was relived to see him and it reassured her.
A care meeting took place 29.4.14 (see our Page 11) (But Dr Jones was not at meeting see email to Lesley …BUT later on it says Dr Jones was at meeting. This was used in DOLS. DOLS rejected by lawyers..but Chester social serivces keep putting them in place!!
Crossen 3 April 2014
Apr 30, 2014 at 10:46 AM Email to Andrew Fellows with photographs to support what is going on but ignored.
3rd of July 2014 at 11am Pentium Nursing home Mother prevented from having mental Capacity test (COP24 HURST)
3rd of July 2014 at 3pm Pentium Nursing home Mother found to have mental capacity by friend (COP24 Ian Evans)
9th of July 2014 at 12 noon Pentium Nursing home Mother found to have mental capacity (COP24 M Evens 3rd Statement.
A DOLs was produce (to Dr Jones 9 of July 2014) which is full of mistakes and lies.
Appendix: Background to Mavis Banks
My mother had a stroke (18/5/10) and then had further complications in hospital: Clostridium difficile, E coli and
MRSA. She was in a coma for several months. She then became better.
My mom has had a stroke that effects her right side of her body. She needs a wheel chair and has to have thickener in her drink.
58Version V4 16 July 2014 Private and confidential.
She was considered not to have mental capacity due to the stroke but this is now changing My mother has been a resident at The Oakland’s Nursing home since 25th October 2011.
.
For the last two years she has gone to church nearly every Sunday.
She has gone from not saying anything to singing along to the service.
She talks to people after wards at the social events at the church.
Everyone has agreed she is getting better and has vastly improved.
She starts and holds conversations in a coherent way and remembers topics of the previous week.
On 20th November Melanie Jones BSc (Hons) dipCNM mBANT Nutritionist (in the past was a pharmacist) saw my mom. I wanted to see if there was anything else we could do to improve my mother’s quality of life.
She pointed out the current medicine my mother was on could cause my mom’s mind to be foggy at times. She could see my mom was fine.
She suggested I get the nursing staff to get a urine sample from my mother for a laboratory test.
The laboratory test would indicate what possible supplements we could give to improve my mother’s quality of life subject to approval of her doctor.
Then when I asked for this sample to be taken the nursing staff said this was not possible.
Later on in the hospital they said this was possible.
Then on 25th of November 2013 Monday at Oakland’s nursing home the following happened.
My mother started off fine and seemed very healthy.
see above.
DATE LINE:
Pentum Nursing homes
XXXX
Date line Pallative care 2015:
On Friday the 20 of Feb 2015 two lawyers had contacted the nursing home and council to tell them that palliative care was unlawful and a email from lawyer said this was stopped.
But on Monday the 23rd of Feb 2015 Nurse said the palliative care was still ongoing.
Then on 23 of Feb 2015 2pm
I Dr Jones on saw Mavis Banks for one hour.
Two Social workers present : Marisa Skelt and Jenny Stretton.
The Social worker said no recording could be done.
Mavis Banks clearly opened eyes.
Social workers told Dr Jones not to wake his mother but mother’s eyes were open at time.
Dr Jones asked his mother did she want him to be there and she clearly said yes.
Social works told Dr Jones to stop kissing his mother on head but mother said she wanted this and to have her hand held.
She was very pleased to see her son.
She said she was not in pain.
She clearly said she wanted to live.
She said she wanted to be with her son.
Clearly wanted food and drink.
Also previous week it was said Mavis Banks could not eat or drink but clearly could without any problem with her swallow.
Was told by nurse she had had breakfast.
Was told by nurse had been feed but mouth showed no food. Tooth brush was dry.
At 3pm Social workers said meeting was over.
Mavis Banks clearly said she wanted to be with son and was scared and alone.
Other past email on
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr Mark Jones <
Date: Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Subject: Fwd: Recent photos of mom. Appointment for Wheel Chair tue 4 march 10.30am for Becky Banks Pinetum Care Home in Chester Photos from Son Mark
To: “lesley.crossen” <n@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk>
Dear Lesley,
I have spoke to Joy to day who deals with my mother’ wheel chair.
By looking at the photos they can not see much change.
They can see no reason for me not taking my mother out to church.
There is no risk.
Once again the nursing home is saying one thing which does not match
to the facts and I and other experts are being ignored.
They (wheel chair experts) will be visiting (the nursing home) my
mother and i will be there as I am the only person who takes her out.
Her friends at church are very unhappy about what is said about me.
They will contact your boss if this helps.
Dr Chris Steele thinks this would be worth discussion on TV.
Regards,
Mark
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr Mark Jones <m@drjones.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:29 AM
Subject: Fwd: Recent photos of mom. Appointment for Wheel Chair tue 4
march 10.30am for Becky Banks Pinetum Care Home in Chester Photos from
Son Mark
To: Joy Merryweather <@wirralct.nhs.uk>
Dear Joy,
I hope this email finds you well.
The nursing home thinks my mother has a issue with her wheel chair again!
I think the issue is they do not reposition her when she needs it. The
staff need training?
I have taken photos of my mother in her wheel chair (see attachment)
and i can see no problems.
I am have spoken to others and they can not see any issues.
I don’t want my mother to be in bed all day as she seem to have
digestion issues.
I also want to take her out more as the sun is out.
Can you please help ?
Best wishes,
Mark
Dr M Jones
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr Mark Jones <
Date: Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM
Subject: Recent photos of mom. Appointment for Wheel Chair tue 4 march
10.30am for Becky Banks Pinetum Care Home in Chester Photos from Son
Mark
To: @wirralct.nhs.uk
Dear Joy,
Thank you for talking to me today.
I can see no change in my mother when it comes to her position in her chair.
When she was in hospital they also saw no problem when she was in the
chair as she got better.
She does lie to the left side but her CofG is not out side the chair
so she can not fall over.
Also i can reposition her as i told you on the phone.
Could anyone just see her quickly and say this is ok?
Best wishes,
Mark
(Photos of wheel chair and tapes)
Attachement:
1 Proof I am a Doctor and RSM
2 First Aid trained etc.
3 Chester City lied to the press about me and others (tapes etc)
4 medicals records dont match
Dr Mark Jones
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip. PhD.