The following Police should not be involved, as there would be a conflict of interest in this case. Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA): Listed in crime paperwork to gain etc After my mother’s murder in 2015, MA then tried and contact me by twitter after my mother’s inquest and then when I tried to re-start the inquest he went to NZ where my daughter was and made sure I knew it (see Files). Many see this as threatening, and he should have known better, but he gains from my mother’s Will (by my half sister VB) and is named in the medical document by my mother as causing her trouble (See Exhibit below). IMPORTANT: MA Went to NZ to show he could attack my child and shut me up. Clearly he should have not done this. This can be shown in court.

Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu (N): (also works with kids-link to Dr Bland?) lied under oath at my mother’s inquest. Exhibit is the Recording at home before my mother’s death where I talk to him for one hour (taped https://vimeo.com/138461044 ) and then at my mother’s inquest where he say I only told him the chips were wrong at the nursing home which was a lie and he smiled knowing he was getting away with it.

 

From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM

Freeman of the City of London

Parliamentary Candidate MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.

Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.

I won many awards for research…so these crimes I found were easy…so why did not the police do this?

All correspondences by email as I am travelling and the only way to reach me is email.

Main Exhibits click:

20MayCourtNOTRCJdoc2

 

Summary: (Time line 2005 to 2019. Location Chester, North West, Repeated crimes done to many others).
My mother Mavis Banks (MB) was killed without her consent by the LCP (pathway to death, which consists of removing food & drink when a person is trapped in bed and or on morphine- See also Gosport Hospital deaths). MB was put onto the LCP in a deliberate way for financial gain and destroy a witness to a crime. State money was used to cover it up by DOLS (a law to restrict people’s rights), Injunction (to stop the story going to press when MB was alive) by Chester council. There is CLEAR FRAUD by lawyers known as bad to the undertakers: Mr Bartlett (Mr B) who was also done by the Law Society for a fine of 300,000? In the past (see below). He buys law firms to obtain probate and Wills to control the homes etc. of the dead & makes money out of them. It is all planned, and undertakers & others say this. He became my mother’s lawyer by force, became executor after her death by force. My mother never wanted him. As my mother tried to remove him, she nearly died several times (2013 onwards). He undervalued my mother’s home by 700,000 (my mother’s house is worth 1million plus-see Exhibits). He said in court (2018) there were 100,000 of care bills but recently when I investigated it he said 800.00 in court (2019),when I had found him out. He did all these tricks as he knew I was dealing with my mother’s brutal murder and thought he could get away with it. He has done this to many others (on tape)…so he owns many properties in Chester from elderly ladies who died or relatives were too scared to come to the police (on tape). Politicians like him! My mother clearly said as I got her off the drugs (deliberately done by Dr Bland) to make her look like she had dementia and make her forget that she was hit by Mr Bartlett’s lawyer, Mr Woodside (Mr W) (see video) to sell her home & change her Will to their gain. And once again this is done to many. Dr Bland (Dr B) (worked with the elderly to help with their end of life, death & minor surgery at Countess of Chester Hospital) who helped Mr B & Mr W (was close to him). Dr B was struck off in 2018 (as a pedo) and he drugged many and he ran the LCP. As my mother was killed by the LCP the hospital said they never put her on it (email) and CQC visited said no one was on the LCP but it was listed in the DOLS they had to read. This is dangerous as if anyone is on the LCP then the CQC have to monitor it but they did not. Add to the fact I was trying to get the press to know this and the Chester council used injunction to stop anyone knowing about this. The council lied to the press about MJ (see email). Then when people want to help MJ about Mr B, they die like Barbara Dunbavand (BD) (strange death stated by the coroner-see below emails) and now my half sister’s death (VB) who Mr Bartlett said did not want to talk to me but a week before she died she was looking for me with two friends to protect her. My half-sister’s death is really strange as …see below. Many would come forward if they knew they were safe but police also gain by these crimes (MA). Also how did VB pay for Mr B costs? How did FC pay for lawyers to put a court order to remove MJ from his paid flat by a lie just at the same time his mother was dying…and did not collect any payment! All actions done by lawyers at their own costs! Other law firms did things to MJ but once again made no sense as can show bills were paid. It shows a network of lawyers who do crimes together trying to shut up MJ.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

You need to know Jeremy CORBYN and other MPs know about this case but said when they are in power they will help! I am upset as there are clearly bad things going on and too much corruption. I am sorry the grammer is not correct etc. Also this document repeats itself in places where the Exhibits are done and I wanted to give a clear picture of all the parts.

 

There are now too many coincidences in my mother’s case (Mavis Banks DOB 22 JUNE 1929, DoD 14 May 2015, Pinetum Nursing home) which you should know about.

I am now asking for an investigation into Vicky Boultbee (VB), My half-sister death. Mr Bartlett (lawyer aka Mr B) only told me by email 12 of June saying my half sister was dead on the 28 May 2019. I was seeking ADR with her and she tried to contact me in distress in Chester but I was in London. Then she dies but Mr B said my half-sister did not want to contact me but these event prove otherwise. Mr B became my half –sister lawyer which makes no sense due to all the bad things he has done & there is a conflict of interest (see list).

I want this to be investigated as murder as involved in a court case worth million by Mr Barlett who did the following (all can be proved by paperwork by the lawyer court papers etc)

1) by force became the executor of my mother’s Will.

2) mother said Mr B lawyer Mr W, hit her to change her Will, which is on videos & statements.

3) my mother died strangely when wanting to talk about this (see exhibits)

4) Mr Bartlett was removed by the court as executor of my mother’s Will as clearly doing bent things

5) Bartlett stated in court my mother had care cost of 100,000 which after I investigated become 800 to the court= FRAUD

6) undervalued my mother’s home of 700,000, etc (does this a lot as people dealing with murder)

Mr B tried to rush all this as my mother was clearly murdered and I was too upset to do anything.

7) Bartlett was done by the law society and fined for 300,000? (see below)

I request a postmortem on my half sister as I suspect she was murdered. As my mother was poisoned in 2015 (see the police report). Her son in law is MA a police detective so complicated.

8) Mr B has done this to many others! Undertakers and web sites say this and have on tape a person in the undertaker saying this but too scared to go to the police. Mr B was after them to shut them up

You can see them on this web site which he tried to shut down.

Bartletts Solicitors Chester.

I am based in London or France.

Can you please contact me by email.

Thank you

Mark

 

Background

I think several crimes are going on but might not be connected or very connected by vices.

1) lawyer who steal from the elderly which also used doctors to cause dementia (UTI or drugs) to alter wills by force and then early deaths.

2) a nursing home trying to take NHS services but not able to cope and covering up.

3) nursing home saving money by killing off complex care patients (Pinetum nursing (PH) home did this)

 

I came into all of this in 2010 when I thought my mother had a stroke, but this was clearly not true.

Then my mother was murdered in 2015 and this is clear if you look at all the facts around it….it too strange and too unlucky and started in 2013 when I found out my mother was drugged and she clearly said Mr Woodside a lawyer known to the undertakers had hit her and works for Mr Bartlett .

 

I went around the undertakers due to my past training to find out more, I found the fact there was dehydrated babies which the undertakers were not reporting (see 15 babies deaths in Chester Hospital in 2015&2016). The undertakers were more scared of Mr Bartlett as he was a bully and clearly obtaining wills and probates from law firms he was buying. So not connected I think but was enough to shut people up. The undertakers said Dr Bland (struck off in 2018) and Dr Nicolson came in and did the cremation documents on bodies which did not seem right or had been abused- done to cover it up.

As I investigated things, I found Strange thing was going on (young girls being drugged by doctors etc. and used for black mail of Chester Law students, so I left Chester for safety.

In 2018 I found out about Barbra William (BW) case and made sure her statement was recorded.

See https://soundcloud.com/ukcolumn/ukc-despatches-nhs-barbara-mark-10jan19

BW shows that in 2014 bad staff were running around the Countess of Chester hospital causing deaths which the CQC failed to do anything about…this lead to my mother’s case being covered up.

What I know is Dr Bland who was struck off in 2018 as pedo lied under oath at my mother’s inquest in 2015. He said he did not know Dr Nicolson.

This is a lie as we know they both sign the cremation document back then. Both are on the 2014 DOLS report done by them to stop me taking my mother out of the nursing home or seeing experts (see evidence below).

Then when Mr Bartlett was trying to force the sale of my mother’s home in 2015 he when to Barbra Dunbavand (BD) to say it had to death pay tax. Then BD told me this was not a issue and would help, then she died strangely (see Coroner report), and she wanted to help me. Her husband is a doctor and knew (Dr B & DrN) and live in the same place (MA home) or visited local friends there.

 

Also Barbra William (BW) & me had the same problem with the coroner Reinberg (RN).

Her case is here:

RN will not release my mother inquest tapes which show cover up as it was a public inquest due to my mother dying under DOLS and therefore Article 2 inquest-so public.

Inquest.org.uk also had problem with Reinberg (RN) and said he was corrupt.

also, he did the investigation on barber Barbra Dunbavand (BD).

and the death of a man in the nursing home (Pinetum home) which is where later my mother was murdered (see below).

 

Updated Claims. These claims already listed in many past emails to Bartlett and ignored due to self-interest.

Point 1) Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7 Note it says by TYPED 2015, when my mother was going to die but lined out-was this planned) by sending a document to court without permission and after I made it clear, my mother, Executor (Mr Fay) & I did not want him by past emails such as April 24 2015 (Exhibit Letter to B 2015 Exhibit B8).

Point 1.1) Mr Bartlett steps down on 3^rd April 2019 as executor due to my N244 to remove him as he knew he could be done for damages. He now becomes half-sister’s solicitor, which is a conflict of interest as both are involved in crimes in this court case.

Point 2) Mr Bartlett need to be investigated for fraud for the following: see Claim 1: care bills for my mother was a cost by Mr Bartlett of £100,000 but as I ask questions on this it becomes £847 by him in court, Claim 2 Mr Bartlett’s value of mother’s family business property £700,000 short of true value, Claim 3 Mr Bartlett has ignored that my mother’s residence is a Family business which is a guest house and therefore it can have 100% business relief on the IHT400! BUT Mr Bartlett is trying to force the sale of my mother’s family business and damage the estate! Exhibit B10 by me to stop this BUT was he trying to do another FRAUD by telling me one thing and doing something else? And Mr Bartlett office is (31 Hoole Road) near to my mother family business (Signpost outside saying Guest house in front garden of 32 Hoole Road so it would have been seen) and his letters to me are started with “To Mark Jones Guest House 32 Hoole road Etc” e.g. he clearly knew it was a business! See Exhibit A2 on the 25 June 2015. He also goes to court in 2018 saying 100,000 of debts as problem Exhibit BillS2017to2019. So Mr Bartlett went to court with a lie.

Claim 9, In addition, all my mother’s Wills state all debts to be paid first and I put into Mr Bartlett in 2015 (Thu, Sep 10, 2015 & Sun, Sep 27, 2015) my debts due to money I paid in and past work is done of value of 800,000 into the business. This number was in 2015 greater than the value of my mother’s family business. And this information was not even in Mr Bartlett court files which should be listed. This claim was supported by Barber Dunbavand who died strangely 2016 see17 A. Mr Bartlett ignored Claim 10 Constructive trust and proprietary estoppels for Dr Jones to be heard. Claim 12 In 2015 after my mother’s death Mr Bartlett made out he was the executor (24 June 2015 Exhibit and see also Exhibit A2 25 June 2015 & was not until 2016 and after being told not to for Claim 12) all done So Mr Bartlett wanted to steal by 1) put in care bills £100,000 which were not true, 2) IHT400 tax which was lie etc And all done to force the sale of my mother’s family business so he could 3) buy it at under-valued price BY HIM as he knew I was dealing with bereavement & my mother alleged murder…shocking. And he did this to others on tape.

Claim 11 Manipulation of Wills. From all the above and his past see Claim 14 where he was done by the Law Society for £300,000?, then Mr Bartlett is saying to people I was not a client see 11.6 and doing this to many others see 14.2 I put this all on a web site See 11.8 And Mr Bartlett sent many threatening letters to me on 16, 17, 18 and 21 Jan 2019 (Exhibit B1, B2, B3, B4) to remove these statements from this web site but as they are true it will not be removed. And they have taken no actions. From all of this it is clear that he removed the signature from the Wills of 2006 that left my mother’s business to me. Others saw these wills signed (multiple Exhibits).

This is further supported by the medical witness court case, Mr Bartlett sent a document which could not be read to these doctors. See Letter from Bartlett 17 April 2019 to Dr C Durin (Exhibit MyMedDocByBartlett) which is a medical document from us see Exhibit as both have same marks on them by me but my exhibit can be read see Exhibit ( Exhibit 048 ). And the only way that could look that way is by deliberate action to destroy evidence. It states: Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 and it clearly states “I have explained to her (mum) that she has significant memory problems” and “she has made a decision not to take the risk of worsening her seizures by taking any of her anit DEMENTIA medication! (NOT LISTED). A letter I never saw as Half-sister did not want me to see (obtained by experts) and we put forward that Dr Bland (who was struck off in 2018) who my sister protected not to take action against in 2012 (Exhibit S) was drugging my mother to make her forget her son to change the Will by force. And in 2013 when they were found out drugging my mother they tried to kill her to stop her recalling all the lies. All of this shows Mr B will manipulate Will which includes the 2006 which many saws signed see (Claim 11). He also does not include the medical notes Exhibit 040 1^st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore (Exhibit 040) which states my mother said: “her daughter (VB claimant) and son in law (MA) accusing them of trying to steal her money” which was found out to be true in (Exhibit 191 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down). Also, the report shows Mavis Banks was being drugged by her behaviour (see “2-3 days volatile” “marked pressure of speech” but this was never seen when the son (& others) was there as she was not being drugged then as VB was away). Mother was on a cocktail of drugs including 2.5 Olanzapine which would have caused memory issues.

We seek damages. All of this shows a conflict of interests and under ACT 1977 conspiracy of Fraud. Also Fraud Act 2006 (Fraud Act) and the Theft Act 1968 (Theft Act).  And Bartlett the law firm Liverpool Head & head staff knew about this.

Point 3) Mr Bartlett & his associates (Mr David Green) to be removed from this case as a lawyer for reasons listed as a conflict of interest and corruption. As mother said, she was hit by Mr Woodside lawyer (who works for Mr Bartlett) to alter her Will and force her. SRA have seen this video and being asked to investigate, they say police should be involved.

Point 4) The doctor Mr Bartlett suggested is rejected as others including his lawyer David Green of Atlantic Chambers Liverpool and I do not trust them. We need a new date if this is to be investigated but the issue is the fact that Mr Bartlett is moving the case to dementia issue when the main reason listed in the Caveat is the actions of my half sister and what she did and with the help of Mr Bartlett to alter the 2007 Wills onward by force that is more damaging. And clearly my mother did not have mental capacity for and was doing against her wishes.

Point 5) I would have done this early but Mr Bartlett said in court on the 3rd of April 2019 we were doing an ADR. This was misdirection. Mr Bartlett cannot be trusted.

Point 6) With all of Mr Bartlett actions, the 2007 Will onwards is rejected as he is capable of being corrupt with Mr Woodside who works with him. We state he did this to others. By altering the Will so my mother’s family business is not left to me but half to my half-sister, to force my mother’s family business (where mum lived & me) to be sold and he was after it. Therefore it is obvious with this and other issues that Mr Bartlett would have altered the Will to make the 2006 Will not usable, the reason he bought the law firm was to obtain the Wills and he still here after all these years? Also after threatening me see below 11.9

Point 7) We have support from the past executor that the true will was 2006 that leave me the family business (building) and this is not just a dementia issue that Mr Bartlett makes out.

Point 8) We seek a new autopsy as my mother was reported to the police as poisoned. But in the past autopsy, the samples were destroyed. We are seeking for her inquest to be reopened as new evidence show that my half sister did not want my mother to see a lawyer to change the Will back and Mr Bartlett had the same wishes, so trapped her in a nursing home (Exhibit COP2014 6/7/2014 Jason Hurst). So in 2010, 2013 and 2015 etc my mother was attacked and nearly murdered and we ask for all medical records by court order.

Point 9) With the removal of Mr Bartlett we seek to have an ADR with my half-sister.

Point 10) Seek damages against Mr Bartlett for taking on the Wills to cause damages.

Point 11) Final Claim FRAUD due to all of the above. The main fraud offences are contained in the Fraud Act 2006 (Fraud Act) and the Theft Act 1968 (Theft Act). Additional offences exist in specific statutes such as companies and tax legislation. Offences 2. What are the specific offences that can be used to prosecute corporate fraud? Fraud Act offences. The Fraud Act contains three main fraud offences: Fraud by false representation (section 2). A representation may be express or implied. It is false if it is untrue or misleading and the person making it knows that this is, or might be, the case. Fraud by failing to disclose information where there is a legal duty to disclose it (section 3). Fraud by abuse of position (section 4). Abuse of position applies where a person occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard (Mr B), or not to act against, the financial interests of another person (seen). A person may abuse that position through an act or omission.

Common to all three Fraud Act offences is the requirement that the person act dishonestly, intending to make a gain for himself or another or to cause loss to another (or expose another to a risk of loss).

Claim 1 Mr Bartlett (removed executor) went to court under a lie to remove the probate caveat put in place by Dr Jones.

1 Mr Bartlett went to court on 2018 to remove probate caveat saying care bills were £1000,000 to the court and had to be paid. Mr Bartlett said it was £100,000 from 2016! (see Exhibit BillS2017to2019) See also page 2 end paragraph ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf and he tries to use this to force the sale of my mother’s family business (building) in the past after she has died. After being found to undervalue her family business (building)! Note: my mother also left £60,000 cash in the bank.

1.1 But defendant (Dr Jones) asked the council the true cost of the care bills for his mother and waits for a reply see 7 March 2019 Exhibit Bill7March2019

1.2 Then Mr Bartlett went to court on 15 March 2019 and said the care bill was now only £871.00 and not £100,000 ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf on page 9. As he knew he was going to be found out.

1.2.1 Mr Bartlett should have pointed this out to the court but hide it from the court.

1.3 Then the Chester council contact Dr Jones on 2 May 2019 with official documents that say it now DEFERRED £XXX See Exhibit Council10847.pdf TRUE NUMBER HIDEN DUE TO FRAUD. And clearly not what Mr Bartlett said…FRAUD.

1.3.1 We want an investigation into this and how this can happen.

1.3.2 We want to know when & who Bartlett contacts in Chester council and all FOI costs, who etc

1.4 Mr Bartlett should have protected the estate and this bill from 2016 onwards. He could have been by agreement to be paid but was not suggested. He was trying to damage the Estate.

1.5 it is now clear that these care bills can be rejected which he should have known as MB (Dr Jones’s mother) care was significant, and under the law, it would have been covered.

1.6 Mr Bartlett from 2016 could have queried these bills but once again does not.

1.7 Mr Bartell did FRAUD over the cost of £100,000 which are not valid as he thought he would not be found out. When in 2016,2017,2018 other firms asked him this information he never gave this as he did not want to be found out.

Add this to the fact that he undervalue of MB (mother) family business by £700,000 and history of him having to pay a fine of £300,000 to the law society (see Corrupt solicitors Section) for issues in the past that seem the same. See below for full break down of events

1.8 I not only dispute ALL the bills but state that my mother was trapped in a nursing home by force by a doctor Bland who is now struck off in 2018. This was done to stop her from going to court about a Lawyer Woodside (who works for Mr Bartlett) who hit my mother to change her Will and sell her family business (building) against her wishes. Dr Bland also drugged my mother and nearly killed her in 2010 and 2013. And it can be shown that Dr Bland knew the doctor N who put my mother onto morphine for no clinical reason which should be investigated. But both lied under oath at the inquest saying they did not know each other but both signed cremation documents together. This is with other statements and also on video at

http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

The SRA says this should go to the police.

Claim 2 Bartlett unvalued my mother family business by 700,000 for self gain

2. Also, Mr Bartlett said on 7th September 2015 (Exhibit X) (or Exhibit B7) and 2019 Exhibit Bills 2007to2019) my mother’s family business (building) is worth only 450,000 (undervalued) and this number has not changed. I can now show by other professionals it is worth more. In fact, my mother’s family business (building) on Zoopla is 1,060,000 (Exhibit Value Part 1) and on “Property data” it is 1,150,000 (Exhibit Value Part 2). It has been pointed out that “strange 2 UK property experts can come up with similar valuations but Bartletts somehow manages to miss it by a whopping £700,000 plus. Now some might say ah but if they are doing the probate they might give you the bottom valuation and shift the house to an offshore company so no-one knows who actually bought it and sell later on to make 200% profit, how else can any reasonable person think?” Many who are too scared say they did this to others and the investigation of the land reg should be done to find out if this is true? But Mr Bartlett was found out by me.

2.1 Who does Mr Bartlett use for Evaluations? As I recall 5 persons turned up with my half-sister who had a black eye and looks troubled. They all knew something bad was going on with Mr Bartlett. Other Estate agents do not like Mr Bartlett but once again too scared to come forward.

20. From all of this, it is easy to see why I put a permanent caveat which was granted (See Exhibit Caveat1). And why I request a permanent removal of Bartlett and law firm and associates MrGreen

Claim 3 Bartlett tried to force the sale of my mother’s family business by saying it had to pay death tax but it was listed as guest house and his office is near to it.

3. Mr Bartlett has ignored that my mother’s family business is a guest house and therefore it can have 100% business relief on the IHT400 ! BUT Mr Bartlett is trying to force the sale of family business Exhibit B9.  See also Date: 24 th June 2015 from Mr Bartlett.

3.1 Bartlett did this to damage my mother’s estate as he knew this over and over again (Exhibit B9) to force a sale. AND it is strange how half-sister does not also fight this as it causes her massive losses. Also the accountant BD listed died strangely see below.

3.2 In fact, Mr Bartlett was told in many emails that my mother’s guest house was insured as a guest house in 2017 (Exhibit Biz1 & Biz2) and people stayed there and this was sent to the tax team and they were happy with this (Exhibit IHT).

3.3 In fact, an email was sent to Mr Bartlett on Fri, Mar 10, 2017, at 3:05 PM with

Exhibit Biz 1 which shows the guest house is insured as business which is what the IHT wanted. Mr Bartlett ignores this (Exhibit B9) over and over again even in 2019!

3.4 And Mr Bartlett own other building near to my mother family business (building) and his letter to me is to the Guest House e.g. he clearly knew it was a business! see Exhibit A2 on the 25 June 2015. Mr Bartlett office is 31 Hoole Road Chester etc near family business 32 Hoole Road.

3.5 Mr Bartlett did this to harm my mother’s estate and for him to force the sale and buy it cheaply. He clearly is not working in my mother’s interests and all of this can be proved.

3.6 Request when did Mr Bartlett contact IHT?

3.7 NEW: See BD death as emails by Mr Bartlett say she will help him then I talk to her and she tells me mother’s business is excluded from the IHT, then she wants to tell me more but dies and the coroner says its strange but it is NR.

Claim 4 Mr Bartlett Never attempted to do an ADR due to self-gain.

4 The issue is between half-sister and defended listed in the Wills, but both were not allowed to meet by Mr Bartlett.

4.1 Dr Jones asked for an ADR from the start to save court time. Then in court 2019 3^rd of April Mr Bartlett agreed Exhibit but then did not do this as we would not be here. An ADR lawyer said he was told Mr Bartlett would not do it. I asked him email Exhibit but no answer and nothing in writing from half sister. Note Half-sister never been at any of these court hearings and that is because she is involved in my mother’s alleged murder.
4.1.1 This is contempt of court.

4.2 Mr Bartlett bought the law firm that had my mother’s Will in it and then he became executor without asking. He did this to others to run up bills and steal homes.

4.2 Mr Bartlett clearly wants to self gain out of controlling this issue for the following reason 4.2.1 ) Mr Bartlett wanted MB (mother’s) family business (building) 4.2.2) he undervalue the family business (building) by 700,000 4.2.3) he is known to run up bills by manipulation of Wills see Claim XX 4.2.4) tried to force the sale of the family business (building) by death Tax but stopped by Dr Jones by proving it was a guest house which Mr Barletta knew anyway as he passes it to visit his law firm & many other properties he owns which is based on the same road!

4.3 Mr Bartlett never did ADR and from the start never did this so went to court to cause bills and costs to gain. He does this to others to run up costs.

4.4 The last time Dr Jones saw his half-sister was in 2015 when Mr Bartlett came to the guest house to value mother’s family business (building) by five estate agents. Mr Bartlett knew these people, and we want them named as other Estate agents don’t know who they were as they did the price wrong. Also, half-sister had a black eye and look scared of Mr Bartlett. It was clear she was there to let him in as at the time Mr Bartlett became the executor in 2016 after 2015 Dr Jones told him not to for reasons listed ranging from 1) his mother was hit by Mr Bartlett lawyer Mr Woodside.

4.5 The SRA says about the video where my mother says she was hit by Mr Woodside that “we have seen the video and this is a police matter”

4.6 My mother was going to see lawyer and police about this and twice (2013,2014) nearly died trying to do this & we can prove this to the CPS. Then in 2014 mother was trapped by a DOLS in a nursing home that my half sister said would stop her seeing anyone. Then half-sister stopped anyone visiting her in a very bad & dangerous nursing home. See Exhibit COP2014 6/7/2014 Jason Hurst

4.7 If the mother had not allegedly been murdered, then she would of removed Mr B from her estate and put the Wills back to Dr Jones being left her family business (building) as he put money into it and left work to help his mother etc See below for full claim.

4.8 Also Dr Bland surgery was sold in 7 sep 2018 and this went for 499,000 (1/8 the size of biz) and was more than MB (mother’s) family business (building), and half-sister and Mr Bartlett know this. This shows the value of MB family business (building) was deliberately made small for the gain of Mr Bartlett.

4.9 This is a Missus of Court and deliberate Fraud. Request police investigation CSP action.

4.10 For me to do the probate and talk by ADR to my half sister to settle this issue.

4.11 I have requested to Bartlett their companies Personal & public Indemnity many times and this has been ignored since 2017 Exhibit ADR+ Public Liability Insurance.

Claim 5 Mr Bartlett was removed as Executor by the evidence submitted by Dr Jones

5.1 Dr Jones put an N244 to remove Mr Bartlett of Executor into court XXX to remove Mr Bartlett

5.2 then his lawyers added it to his claim which was put into the court XXX BUT

5.3 On XX in court Bartlett lawyers said it was duplication, but it had evidence which was not heard.

5.4 If the case was not heard then how could Mr B charge for cost in this as he was going to ask for it to be removed as duplication?

5.5 The duplication was by lawyers after Dr Jones put in his N244 BUT Dr Jones was fined £6k

5.6 If Dr Jones had not summited the N244 this then Mr Bartlett standing down as knew he could be done on this and we still seek damages from Mr Bartlett

Claim 6 Mr Bartlett became half-sister Lawyer when he stood down as Executor.

6.1 This is a conflict of interest, as Half-sister knew lawyers who hit Mother to change Will. ETC

6.2 Half-sister kept MB (mother) in a nursing home so she could not change the will back or get help Exhibit COP2014 6/7/2014 Jason Hurst. A trick also used to remove mum wheelchair.

6.3 Half sister took no actions on Claim Mr Bartlett became executor for self-gain even when he damages the value this whole thing.

Claim 7 Half sister helped Mr Bartlett to gain mother’s family business (building) as she would gain in this. Bartlett damages are 100,000 (carebills)+40,000 (IHT)+ 700,000 (cheap biz)+Bills

Claim 8 The Wills manipulated by Mr Bartlett & Mr Woodside & Claimant and MA.

8. People saw a past Will signed in 2006 where my mother left me the family business (building) and other issues. But the signature now removed which we put down to Mr Woodside and Mr Bartlett putting a page over the position of the signature to remove them when copying. Exhibit B30 Note a full-colour image show this issue. Mr Bartlett can be seen doing the same trick with Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 letter Exhibit: MedDocButBartlett where he darkens the image to hide evidence that damages his claimants case.

8.1 The past Will (2006) had Howard Fay (past executor of Wills before Mr Bartlett) Signature and others on it, but it can be shown the will had this removed. This Will gave Mark Jones the Guest House. Howard Fay (listed Executor) has already on many occasions (on tape, video) with me present and absent the following:

8.1.1 Mother’s Will 2006 with Mr Fay signature on it saying he saw it signed but it was removed by Bartlett?/Woodside   Exhibit Will 1

8.1.2 Letter from the lawyer about Mother’s 2006 Will with Mr Fay signature on it.

Exhibit D3 Also called Exhibit Faysaw2006Willsigned

8.1.3 Mr Fey Letter saying Mark Jones to be Executor of Will and Mr B removed.

Exhibit Will 2

8.1.4 Mr Fey Guesthouse for the invoice value. Exhibit Will 4

8.2. Finally, Exhibit M1 Medical records show force was used on my mother when the Will was done. This shows my mother’s Wills from this date (November 2007) had issues with them.

8.3 When I was given Mr Bartlett’s Legal pack by accident one of the Will signature looks bad see Exhibit B30 and this with all the other issues cast doubt on the validity of this Will of 29 Nov 2007 see page 29 to 30.

8.4. Bartlett says Mr Fay is removed but there is nothing in his Legal bundle which I was given or any other paperwork.

8.5. Mr Fay is still active and he says for me and gives direction in letter 11/2/2013 Exhibit Will 4 : “The guest house for consideration of past work.” To be given to me.

8.6 No paperwork to show Mr Fay stood down from these duties so his directions in

Exhibit Will 2 & Exhibit Will 3 on 2/9/2016 : Give Mark Jones the guest house for his debts.

8.7 As Mr Fay said he wanted Mr Bartlett removed see Exhibit Will 2 (2/9/2016) and was still executor at the time as no paperwork to show otherwise. So Mr Bartlett removed!

8.8 Everyway Exhibit Will 2 shows another person who does not want Mr Bartlett involve or as an executor of this Will.

8.9 Mr Bartlett has ignored my claims (many emails) but gives no reason as it stops him gaining the house. He is listed as doing this to others (Tape).

8.10 I have had many supporting lawyers until Bartlett contacts them and then things go strange. I was told by a lawyer to include the fact that I have a clean police record (Exhibit P1) and point out I was asked to become a Freeman of the City of London and other groups who share the dislike of Bartlett.

8.11. There is nowhere my mother says she wants Mr Bartlett and every way it is now clear no one wants him for the reasons listed. Sadly my half sister did everything she could from 2010 to my mother’s death to prevent her from seeing a independent lawyer which my mother wanted to do to remove Mr Bartlett’s, make a statement about the bad nursing homes, and change the Will back to the one that supported my claims that the family business (building) of my mother should be mine. My half-sister never looked after my mother over 40 years and it was me who dropped my jobs and pension to help my mother and her guesthouse which is in another claim. I could list Dr Bland and my half-sister name on a DNR (2013) (Exhibit Ambulance NEW evidence which was not heard at the inquest) which was used when my mother had a fit for 2 hours without any medical care and I was told an ambulance and Dr Bland was on the way which was all a lie. And if I had not been there the ambulance crew stated my mother would be dead. But my half sister protected Dr Bland who is a friend of Mr W& Mr B.

8.12 I ask for this case to go to a London court as I have had threats and nasty things done to me and I hold Bartlett and his gang responsible and now have told the police and have an incident number.

8.13. MB (mother) says on the tape ( Z00004.mp3) that she does not like Mr B and VB (half-sister) and MB stopped her changing her Will back to the 2006 Will

8.14. MB says on tape 131229_002.MP3 says she does not want the Will of 2007 onwards but Mr W stopped her. Also see other Exhibits.

Claim 9 Disbursements. There is £60,000 cash in my mother’s account.

All of mother’s Wills state “all debts paid first” and I never was paid to help my mother or put money into the family business etc but see Claim 10
I put over £70,000 into my mother’s family business (building & work to be paid) by a medical prize I won in 2002 (Exhibit Award one of many. others £10,000 etc) then I can show I paid for many things from windows (Exhibit 014 to 016) to new furniture (Exhibit 020). And Fire alarms.

This money can have interests add to it which my mother has singed off to.

Also I was building a wet room pre 2009 Exhibits 59&60. Therefore why would mother plan to sell home See Exhibit J7 (see date of stroke caused by force sale Exhibit 058) When need this and any where else this would be planned. See grab rails etc Exhibit J5.

I want this and Mr Bartlett was given this bill on Date: Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:19 PM

Date: Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:13 PM etc which showed bills over £803,551 to pay me based on money put in and work not paid. Subject: Fwd: Part 1 of 4. Invoices (Exhibit Many) ignored it. I want to present this to the courts. 70,000 was put into the business in 2002 so 17 years! Mum said she would pay

Claim 10 Constructive trust and proprietary estoppels for Dr Jones to be heard.

A thing that Mr Bartlett ignore due to self interests. See Claim 9 above.

1. Constructive trusts. The establishment of a beneficial interest in the family home and business (Common intention). Or 2. Proprietary Estoppel (clear assurance, reasonably rely on,

substantially to their detriment) 1. Constructive trusts (Common intention)

The court of law is Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555 Also Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53

Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546 Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17

The common intention was that Dr Jones and Mavis Banks would run the business together etc.

Proprietary Estoppel: Proprietary estoppel transfers rights if,

1) Someone is given a clear assurance that they will acquire a right over property, (MJ was and many statements COP24 to back this up) 2) they reasonably rely on the assurance (can show this with cop24),and,3) they act substantially to their detriment on the strength of the

assurance (see cop24) 3) it would be unconscionable to go back on the assurance.

I was promised from child hood, that If I worked, which I did etc I would have the family business and also turned down better jobs (Exhibit 005-010). Bartlett was told about Claim 9 & 10 and he ignored this (Exhibit many) to cause me loss which is another damage against him.

This can be put in and we have a right to hold the caveat until this has been heard. A thing that Mr Bartlett ignore due to self interests. Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18. Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210 Dillwyn v Llewelyn [1862] EWHC Ch J67 Also looked after my mother’ many times : Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159 to improve the house in the belief it was hers created a proprietary estoppel: Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431

NEW: Good lawyers would tell me this point but others did not as they wanted a more complex case.

Claim 11 Will manipulations Also see Claim 13.

11. My mother died in 2015 (Exhibit D2 Death Certificate). I am reopening my mother’s inquest as she was murdered for her family business a building due to new Evidence.

11.1. It is on tape/video/ statements COP24 etc that my mother said Mr Woodside, a lawyer who did her Will (Exhibit D3), who works for Mr Bartlett (Exhibit DQ) hit her (assaulted her) and changed her Will by force against her wishes (Exhibit D4) See Exhibit T 1: Transcript from Mavis Banks 2/7/2014 and also COP24 (Exhibit T2 page 3 mother not happy with him).

11.2 my mother’s stroke in 2010 caused by half sister, MA and Woodside telling my mother she had no money. &seems to be part of this crime against her and the changing of her Wills and the forced selling of her family business (building) against her wishes when I was away.

11.3 My mother was clear that she was hit to change her Will to stop me having her family business (building) and for others to steal from her (See videos and statements).

11.4. The video of MB (mother) saying this is on twitter and youtube and clearly shows this issue that shows the Wills are disputed that the claimant wants to use.

See https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M and the transcript is Exhibit T1

11.5 Bartlett’s were listed on a highly respected Review web site with other serious problems by me See Exhibit T4

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1&stars=2

11.6 Bartlett’s then tried to stop the bad reviews by saying I was not a customer to the firm. Exhibit Bare2t part 1 and see Exhibit Bare2t part 2

What Bartlett’s is doing here is another lie to the web site who contacted me about this.

And once again how can you trust this law firm who deals in lies. He should not be allowed near my mother (MB) case.

11.7. With this web site review of the law firm Bartlett, the law firm has taken no action since 16 Jan 2018 to disputed the truth of the statements, that is my mother states she was hit by her lawyer to change her Will by force & fear against her wishes. And Mr Woodside told her she had no money to make her sell her family business (building) when in fact she did. And Mr Woodside told my mother she had no money when she had over £60,000. It can be shown the claimant (half-sister who gains) did the same trick to my mother at the same time (Exhibit 119 &121). All done to an elderly person who was also being drugged (see Exhibit DB2). And this would have caused the stroke in 2010 and can show this was done in the past (Exhibit can be shown with other crime but is another case).

11.8. Also, another web site lists all of these events http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

11.9. Bartlett’s were told about this and have sent many threatening letters to me on 16, 17, 18 and 21 Jan 2019 (Exhibit B1, B2, B3, B4) to remove these statements from this web site but as they are true it will not be removed. And they have taken no actions.

11.10. By doing this there is now a Conflict of interest of Bartlett law being involved and running anything to do with my mother’s Will as 4 emails from them next to each other, each day is harassment (Exhibit B5). Therefore another conflict of interest and should not be half-sister’s lawyer.

11.11. Also, Exhibit T2 about the web site video shows my mother says as a fact they hit my mother to change her will (and did it to others) but then took no action about removing this video which is true.

11.12. An email was sent on 18 Feb 2019 to ask them what was specifically wrong with the web site and still no response from them. Exhibit B6

11.13. How can this law firm and Bartlett is named in these emails be the executor of the Will or involved in any way, therefore, an Injunction on him and his associates. If Mr Bartlett acts this way to hide evidence of manipulation of a Will to gain. The law firm has too many mixed interests in this case and under the law should not be involved. These issues are now public, and Journalists are involved.
Claim 12 Bartlett becomes Executor by force in 2015 and removed in 2019.

In 2015 after my mother’s death Mr Bartlett made out he was the executor (24 June 2015 Exhibit and see also Exhibit A2 25 June 2015 & was not until 2016 and after being told not to for Claim DD) all done So Mr Bartlett wanted to steal 1) put in care bills 100,000 which were not, 2) IHT tax which was lie all done to force the sale of my mother’s family business so he could 3) buy it at under-valued price as he knew I was dealing with bereavement & my mother alleged murder…shocking. And he did this to others.

12.14. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7) by sending a document to court without permission and after I made it clear, my mother, Executor (Mr Fay) & I did not want him by past emails such as April 24 2015 (Exhibit Letter to B 2015 Exhibit B8) and other actions in 2013 (Show court in private as separate case). Note this email was one of many after my mother’s alleged murder which he ignored. It was clear my mother did not want him or Mr Woodside (See Exhibit T2 Evans, Video, etc.). So from the start, he (and had Dirty hands) knew what was wrong and still did it to run up bills which I rejected as he had no right to do this. He ignored the fact I was telling him my mother was hit by Mr Woodside etc. from the start in 2013. This is what he has done to others. As all of this was done deliberately and done as I was dealing with the trauma of my mother’s murder.

12.15 In Bartlett’s letters and any correspondence from his law firm is there any statements to say to my mother that he has taken over her Will. He sent no letter to my mother and we heard what was going on by accident. This cannot be the right way to take over Wills. Therefore no permission or consent was given to Mr Bartlett.

12.16 When my mother found out in 2013 and wanted to see another lawyer (protected) to change this she then nearly died (see ambulance report 2013) when in a nursing home run by Dr Bland who knew Mr Woodside. This all happened at the same time when it was clear mother was being drugged. Expert can show this too Exhibit XX

12.17 Why is MB (mother) Will set up to be given to another law firm? Which is strange as my mother trusted people, not a law firm.

12.18. Therefore I am seeking damages from this law firm like many others as from 2015 Bartlett knew they should not be involved and ignored my letters and others.

12.19 I see compensation for 8 years when the 2006 Will was altered to help him.

Claim 13 Mr Bartlett goes to court over the medical issue of Wills but ignore coercion

Mr Bartlett states: “The Defendant allegation that Mavis Banks (deceased ) lacked sufficient testamentary capacity to make the will dated 29th of Nov 2007 and the 19 of June 2009 respectively with alliteration are contained deference and counter claim”

13.1 BUT My mother was being drugged and appear to have symptom of dementia due to the drugs. What is clear was Mr B wanted my mother’s family business (building) and he helped VB to get half of something she would not of had.

13.2 Mr Bartlett was involved in the force to 1) force mum to sell her Family Business (Building & residence) by making her think she had no money a) half sister 40k and b) Mr Woodside told mum had no money on tape. Also see death of Accountant who wanted to help but died strangely.

It is clear When I was away half sister tried to sell the family business (Building) and need the Will changed to let her have a cut.

13.3 After all of this it is clear that Mr Barlett is the person who would alter wills for self gain and others state that the 2006 will is valid and was signed and there is evidence that the 2007 will was done by forces so rejected.

13.4 When in court 3^rd of April an ADR was suggested. Mr Bartlett agrees to this but should have done this to save cost in the first place.

Then ADR is not done due to Mr Bartlett and Clements who is the half-sister.

13.5 Then Mr Bartlett who cannot be trusted finds a doctor he wants to use and ignore the other side about the Will were manipulated by him and by force against Dr Jones mother.

Claim 14 In the past Mr Bartlett did this before.

Mr Bartlett is already reported for “Badness” in the March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K). See Exhibit P1 & P2 Only when you read the file do you see the problems this person is and therefore he should not be an Executor of a Will. Start of Law Society File section 167.

The admitted allegations found substantiated against him were at the serious end of the scale. He had been found to have been guilty of conduct unbefitting in that he had compromised or impaired his integrity by making materially false and misleading statements to The Law Society, and had wholly failed to comply with his duties to handle clients’ complaints, ensure that clients were informed of the need for them to seek independent advice and bring conflicts to an end. His derelictions of duty as a solicitor had been so great as to play a principal part in the matters escalating and having to be placed before the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered it right to demonstrate to the solicitors’ profession and to the public that such behaviour on the part of a senior member of that profession would not be tolerated. The Tribunal ordered Bartlett to pay a financial penalty of £28,000.

180 It was right and proper that the matter should have been referred to the Tribunal not as an isolated matter but as part and parcel of the other allegations made against Bartlett. It was not the main and only matter alleged against Bartlett. Other extremely serious failings had been alleged against him and, indeed, Bartlett had come to admit them.

181 At the end of the first day, on the basis of the only evidence to be presented by The Law Society on that topic, the Tribunal had found the allegation of dishonesty against Bartlett concerning allegation 3 not proved to the requisite standard. The Tribunal made it clear however that the issue of dishonesty had been properly raised, fairly brought and that the case remained a serious one. Bartlett’s representatives had asked for time to discuss the residual allegations with each other and with the Law Society and the Tribunal agreed to adjourn. The parties reported back to the Tribunal on the second day

182. On the second day amended allegations were presented to the Tribunal by consent. Mr Bartlett admitted all of them. Then, in addition to the Solicitors Accounts Rules breaches and conduct unbefitting relating to his failures under allegations 4 to 8, Mr Bartlett admitted conducted unbefitting in that he had:

“compromised or impaired his integrity, good repute and that of the solicitors’ profession by making to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors in the course of an enquiry that were materially false and misleading.”

This was the same allegation as that initially made absent the allegation that such

behaviour had been dishonest

187. Conduct which involves admitted compromise and impairment of integrity, and making statements to the Law Society that were materially false and misleading is clearly conduct that could have resulted in a striking off order. The fact that it did not for the reasons given by the Tribunal in its findings did not convert the case into a success for Bartlett such as to justify his being awarded his costs, or avoiding payment of the Law Society’s costs.
188. In answer to Bartlett’s assertion that if the matter had been put essentially as a failure to operate the complaints procedure correctly without the accusation of dishonesty the case would have been admitted much earlier and costs would have been avoided, the Tribunal found that the dishonesty allegation had been properly raised for adjudication. It was relevant that the same conduct that involved “compromise and impairment of integrity” and “making statements to the Law Society that were materially false and misleading” (most serious matters) was not admitted until the second day of the hearing, nor was its seriousness decided until the conclusion of the hearing. It was because of his reprehensible behaviour that Bartlett was the author of his own misfortune.
189. Even though the Tribunal found Bartlett not to have been guilty of dishonesty, he had admitted that the conduct leading to the allegation of dishonesty did amount to conduct unbefitting a solicitor in that he compromised or impaired his integrity, good repute and that of the solicitor’s profession by making statements to the Law Society in the course of an enquiry that were materially false and misleading. That admitted allegation was based on precisely the same conduct upon which the allegation of dishonesty had been founded. It was an extremely serious matter for that allegation to have been substantiated against Bartlett. It was because of this that the Tribunal considered that Bartlett case was very far from being on all fours with that of the successful solicitor appellant from an order of the Tribunal that he should be required to pay the Law Society’s costs, Mr Hayes.
190. In its Reasons the Tribunal had made it plain that it considered that Mr Bartlett had abdicated his clear responsibilities. …culpability for what occurred was in no small measure that of Mr Bartlett. 192. The Tribunal made no order that the Law Society should make any contribution towards the costs of Bartlett defence. 193. Tribunal concluded that it would be right that Bartlett pay 80% of the main costs and that Ms Entwisle pay 20% of the main costs,

NOTE 168 of the Law Society document says “Bartlett sought an order for costs against the Law Society as to some 90% of a total which was put at some £300,000.”

So did Bartlett pay 80% of this? Therefore Lawyers say he should not be allowed near any Will or be an executor due to this report done on him. In fact this was used by someone to remove him in 2016 by the Liverpool probate office.

14.2. On the web site Trustpilot there are other bad reviews of him and his law firm.

These reviews are only used after the company Trustpilot have checked them and they can be used as Evidence in law.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1

And the case of Shirley Pickard in Aug 2018 who states:

“Unacceptable experience. Went to Bartlett’s solicitors, Chester for independent advice against Matthews solicitors when they were operating independently. I found out later that Bartletts knew they would be merging with Matthews, hence they did not give me the sole independent advice which they should have done for me to act on. They have not concluded the requests of a will satisfactorily and are still holding onto £15000.00 which was left by the deceased to be shared equally between 3 beneficiaries. This is since 2008” From this and many others, I see no reason why Mr Bartlett or the law firm should continue to be the executor of the Will. Exhibit B20. And the reason to remove Mr Bartlett and his associates Mr Green.

Final Claim 15 Bartlett and his law firm & associated from all the above did Fraud.

History

1.2A) In the past (2010) when I was away, my half-sister (VB) was involved in fraud by saying my mother (MB) had no money but then, later on, told the court she forgotten £40,000 of my mother’s money (Exhibit 191 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down). At the same time, my mother was told by half-sister she had no money, Mr Woodside (Mr W) (a lawyer who works for Mr Bartlett) also told her she had no money (on video see below and Part 2 point 3. There is also the fact mother said she told her she had no money on TAPE). This was all done to my mother to force her to sell her family business (building) against her wishes (Exhibit 039 & many others) but after her death (See Exhibits below), there was over £60,000 in her bank account. My mother clearly had money, and all of this was done to cause her stress and in 2010 this nearly killed MB as they (VB, Mr W & Mr B) tried to force her to sell her family business (building) against her wishes (Exhibits are below with dates) when I was away.

1.3A) Also my half-sister looks like she helped in the murder of her own mother by forcing & keeping her in two bad nursing homes (separate case), putting a DNR on mother when she wanted to live in 2013 (separate case), stopping her getting care that could have saved her from death etc and with Mr Bartlett to gain from my mother her family business (building) and money. The fact that Mr Bartlett (Mr B) and Mr Woodside (Mr W) were lawyers in my mother’s disputed Will also means my half-sister (VB) should not be using them as she is too close to them and they were my mother’s (MB) lawyers.

1.4A) Also Mr Bartlett and Mr Woodside were going to be removed by my mother as her lawyers in the past but each time she nearly died trying to do this, and we have lawyers who will state this.

The lawyer wants to make a statement once Mr Bartlett has been removed.

1.5A) At the same time as this my mother wanted to remove half-sister in the Will but she nearly died an example is in 2013 (Example below. Separate case).

All of this shows a conflict of interests and under ACT 1977 conspiracy of Fraud.

1.6A) Then I put all of this on to a web site (Listed below Part 2 Point 8) and Bartlett’s law firm has sent many threatening letters to me (Exhibits) about the fact I have a website that shows videos, statements etc. that they hit (assaulted) my mother to change her will by force but then they took no action to remove this web site as it is true (See below for Exhibits Part 2 point 12).

1.7A) How can P. Bartlett & Mr Woodside who works for him and Bartlett’s Law firm be the executor of the Will or involved with my half-sister for gain if they acts this way and has a conflict of interests.

1.8A) Mr Bartlett (Mr B) became the Executor of MB Will by buying the law firm where my mother’s Will was and at no time did Mavis Banks (my mother) want him and said so (see Section 2 point 14). I can show others have had similar problems with these lawyers (See Exhibits below).

1.9A) In fact the past Executor (Mr Faye) is clear he too does not want Mr Bartlett involved in any way to this issue (See below Part 2 Point 25.3 Exhibits Will 2).

1.9.1A) Mr Bartlett is not listed in any Wills as Executor but did this by buying the law firm (Exhibit B7 section 4). In fact, when my mother found out he was involved, she wanted him removed, and her life became strangely unlucky in two nursing homes before she could see a lawyer to change this. And the events leading up to her death are said by others and me as murder. New evidence showing murder is now going to be presented to the court. New evidence has been found and I have now a barrister who will help with this unpleasant work.

1.10A) Bartlett’s were told this from the start and still became executors of my mother’s Will, when my mother and others did not want them. This only adds to the trauma I was put into by my mother’s murder and therefore I am suing them for damages. I get very upset so please forgive the fact I repeat myself.

1.11A) Any normal law firm would have removed themselves but Bartlett’s are known to chase probates of the elderly and cause problems to make money out of them (on tape are elderly who are scared of Mr Bartlett). The owners of next store home to my mother said Mr Bartlett was after their home when their father died by a Will and on tape, others say Mr Bartlett is after the deceased Family business by running up bills.

1.12A) In my mother’s case, due to my past work and support I was going to be left my mother’s family business (building) see Will 2006 (Exhibit D3 & more below Part 2 Points 24 onwards) but from 2007 onwards my mother’s Will was altered without the past executor knowing about it for the gain of Mr Bartlett and half-sister (VB). So once again conflict of interests.

1.13A) There are no urgent bills to pay after my mother’s death, and in fact the nursing homes bills needs to be removed as it can be shown now they were not fit in their job.

1.13.1A) Mr Bartlett in 2015 said that the care bills were according to him £100,000 see Exhibit CAREBILLS. BUT in now in 2019 become £871 page 9. See ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf

I challenged these bills due to the way my mother was nearly killed 8 times every time she wanted to see a lawyer to remove Mr Bartlett and make the Will back to me.

2A) There is now new evidence that looks like my mother was murdered so Police Incident on 29/3/19 No:IM360111

3A) Fraud investigation (Exhibit Z2) is now going ahead.

4A) There is now a conflict of interest for the executor (MR B) who is removing himself and the other person my half-sinister (VB) who has a claim on my mother estate in a Will which is disputed, as she (VB) looks involved in this murder and working with people who might know Mr Bartlett. So why is VB using Mr B to be her lawyer to fight for a Will they both want to win!

6A) I state there is another Will from 2006 (supported by past executor) which is correct but Bartlett does not gain from it or my half sister VB, so they do not use it. Mr B uses a Will in 2007 when forced sale of family business (building) occurred and Exhibit 040 shows VB& MA forcing mother to sell her family business (building) and stealing money. It also shows mother was on drugs to control her (separate case).

7A) It looks like Bartlett are doing this court case for VB to just run up bills which they did to others.

9A) Mr Bartlett keeps listing my mother’s family business (building) as the value of £450,000 (Exhibit B9) but clearly by Exhibit: Value part 1 and Value 2 it is worth over Million. Also, web sites are estimates, but close see Exhibit Value 11. The value of my mother’s family business (building) is strange as before my mother stroke we see in Oct 2007 Exhibit Value 10 shows it was worth £600,000. Then on the 27 April 2010 it was £550,000 (Exhibit J7). A potential sale which was nearly done when the son was away and by force (Exhibit 039). As this was done by force Exhibit 037 and Exhibit 040. Also if you look at my mother’s family business (building) evaluation it makes no sense. If you look at Exhibit Value 7 it compares 38 Hoole road (Exhibit Value 4) which is half the size of my mother’s family business (building) 32 Hoole road. Then 71 Hoole road (Exhibit Value 3) which is really small (4th) but worth £490,000 on the 7th Sep2018 and in the past would have been big in value compared to mother’s family business (building) 32 Hoole road. Exhibit Value6 show them all in scale with the number of rooms. Also, my mother did not want to sell in 2007 & 2010 when the son was there but when he went to London, they (VB, MA, Mr B & Mr W) clearly tried to force her to sell it. The price also makes no sense as sold cheap! And Exhibit 058 shows mother had a stroke on 18/05/10 and if you look at bottom Exhibit J7, the sale was being forced on 20/5/10 done by half-sister (VB) who tried to sell mum’s family business (building) when I was away. Both Exhibit J7 state this property to belong to the half-sister as if she is the owner and it uses half sister’s home address which makes no sense as the mother had her son (Dr Jones aka MJ) building wet rooms for her etc. to support her Exhibit 059,060,066. Therefore this is fraud again. Also there were no plans were mother was going if her family business (building) was sold as she needed grab rails and other support that VB home could not supply. Also MB was clear she never wanted to go to a nursing home due to what she saw with her mother, so the plan was always for her son (MJ-Dr Jones) to look after her.

MB then in 2006 made the Will to recognize this fact that MJ was going to run the mother’s guest house Exhibit 028 and much more. Therefore the son was going to get the guest house and by Trust. BUT VA & Mr B wanted otherwise See Exhibit 40 which also state VB son in law Michael Ankle (MA listed in EXHIBIT 040) was involved in helping half-sister (VB) take advantage of the mother when her son was away. And if you look at the Exhibit S, it is clear half-sister took NO actions against Dr Bland who was found clinically negligent for a considerable sum (See Exhibit S). Dr Bland should have sent my mother to hospital on 20/5/10 but knew MJ (SON) would come back and stop the sale of her family business (building) and then the MJ (son) would look after his mother (MB) with the Wet room he was building. In 2015 Dr Bland lied under oath at my mother’s inquest as he knew the Dr Nicholson who helped kill MB with morphine for no clinical reason in 2015 (I can add to this but this is another Court case.). Also Dr Bland struck off in 2018. Dr Bland tried to help kill the mother (MB) in 2013 (Exhibit Amb). In 2010 Mr Woodside (Mr B lawyer) and half-sister (VB) both told the mother she had no money which was a lie and with the Dr Bland drugging her this must have been a hell that caused her stroke in 2010. See point 1.2 above.

10A) No one wanted Bartlett or his law firm to be involved, and he was told in past email such as April 24 2015 (Exhibit Letter to B 2015 Exhibit B8), I ask him to refute ALL his fees and pay all costs, and lodge this.

12A) After MB’s death, Mr Bartlett was given the debt of all MJ work, the money put into and time into (MB) mother’s guest house and this is greater than its value. Mr Bartlett ignored this many times when it was seen as fair by my barrister (Exhibit sent). All of my mother’s Wills says pay debts first and this is the money I put into it of over 70,000 plus interest and time etc in the past (Exhibit 011).

It can be shown that there is a massive conflict of interests by the following.

13A) In 2007 MB’s Will was changed by force so VB could have half of MB family business (building) and by doing this VB had an interest in MB selling her family business (building). MJ was going to look after MB and by his money was building a wet room (Exhibits below), MJ gave up his job & pensions (Exhibits), and put money into MB’s family business (building). MJ had won awards 25 April 2002 (Exhibit 011 award won of over 70,000 for hospital system to help dying children) and had jobs offers but looked after his mother MB. There are over 8 events (2010 to 2015) showing MB being stopped trying to change her Will back for MJ advantage & each time it nearly killed MB. The Will changes was done by Mr Woodside (Mr W) a lawyer who works for Mr Bartlett (Mr B).

14A) MB was drugged (2007, 2010 onwards to 2013, then 2014 to her death) and this was done to stop MB removing lawyers Mr B and Mr W who wanted MB’s family business (building). Note: it can be shown they did this to others. Also, Mr Woodside never told MJ (son) or Mr Fey Executor of the Will (at the time) about these changes to help VB and Mr B (see Exhibits below). But he told VB which makes no sense.

15A) MB (who was in a Wheelchair & trapped in nursing home by VB) was stopped seeing a lawyer to prevent her saying “Mr W hit me and forced me to sell my family business (building) and change my Will against my wishes to leave half of it to VB etc.” MB was drugged by Dr Bland (Exhibit). But MB said this on videos and other statements. All of this was done so when MB sold her family business (building), Mr B could have her family business (building). Also MB stopped from seeing lawyers in nursing home by VB see Exhibit COP2014 6/7/2014 Jason Hurst) and others statements.

16A) To keep the price of MB’s family business (building) down and by controlling the Wills probate Mr B became executor in 2016 after being told NOT to by MJ & past executor (Mr Faye). Also, Mr B knew about the video of Mr W hitting MB and force change of the Will. Mr B & Mr W were known to others to do this. The fact is MB’s family business (building) was always undervalued at the same price as Mr B wanted from 2007,2010 & 2015 by a group who did this to many elderly ladies.

17A) FRAUD & Murder: it is clear that at times my mother’s family business was deliberately sabotaged by people. And Barber Dunbavand (who’s husband is a Doctor & knew Dr Bland) my mother’s accountant who wanted to help and was strangely killed after she spoke to Bartlett and want to help me. See “Mystery of why Chester accountant was killed by lorry on A55” 11 MAY 2016. So we want a loss of earnings. MJ had won awards 25 April 2002 (Exhibit 011 award won of over 70,000 for the hospital system to help dying children) that went into the Family Business. My half-sister never put any money in. MJ went away trying to do free medical research to help children. But half-sister was found hiding money from the business when MJ was away.

Half-sister told the court she forgotten £40,000 of my mother’s money (Exhibit 191 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down). But this was one of many accounts that need to be investigated that were lost.

At the time I was trying to protect my half-sister till her MA went to NZ to try and shut me up by threatening my daughter as seen by UK COLUMN and other press. Look at the issue of my mother trapped in a nursing home as the CQC says no one was on the pathway of death.

Order

That Mr Bartlett is removed from this case and anything else and pay for trouble to Dr Jones and give him from 2015 to 2019 damages. Dr Jones wants millions plus additional costs to be added due to disruption and distress over his mother’s alleged murderer caused by Mr Bartlett’s deliberate actions.

The issue is to be looked at the fact MA, Woodside, half-sister, MA clearly forced the 2007 Will against mother’s wishes of 2006.

Also request a disbursement of money as I put 70,000 (2002+intrest) plus and it is clear all Will say debts must be paid. I want this money now. And doing this does not effect any other debts to be paid.

I put forward all my debts (money in & work) are greater than claimants share in the said property and therefore I request to be given the whole property in 28 days from this order.

Damages from Mr Bartlett and associates as this payment was ignore in 2017 etc. He made the case complex and done to make money out of our bereavement. This case to be moved to London as I am the defendant.

I state the following is true and will be used in all media to get justice for my mother.

 

 

WILLS:

Experts have seen my mother’s medical records (report shows) and it is clear the 2007 & 2009 Wills are not valid as mother showed symptoms of dementia and cognitive impairment. Add to that there is a clear sign of fraud by force and tricks being used on an ill elderly woman. Therefore they are rejected. The 29th day of Nov 2007 & 2009 Wills are clearly obtained by coercion and at a time when Mavis Banks (the deceased) was not sound mind and suffering dementia and therefore not in accordance with the provision of Section 9 of the Will Act 1837. Also, both Wills was done after the Mental Capacity Act 2005 which came into force on 1 October 2007 so these Wills fail other clear tests as first one was done 29^th day of Nov 2007.

Background. When MJ asked for his mother’s medical records (2017?) it was found Exhibits 037, 040, and E48 etc. were missing. We obtained them by a protected source of the originals. A clear demonstration to cover up a crime to steal my mother’s Family business by changing the 2007& 2009 Wills to the advantage of my half-sister to then let Mr Bartlett buy my mother’s Family business (home) at a cheap price. I put forward that every time I was away people tried to force the sale of my mother’s Family business by force (2007 Exhibit 38 &38 and 2010 Exhibit J7 regardless of Wet room being build and me going to live at the Family business as long as my mother lived Exhibit 059&60 and need for support Exhibit J5).

We can see in the medical reports from 2007 onwards the effects of dyspraxia (uneasy on her feet etc.) which was not so there when I was back in Chester with my mother as she was not being drugged by my half-sister then. There were walking sticks, which my mother never used when I was present. You need to understand MJ lived and looked after his mother in our guesthouse business but he had a partner in London who never wanted to visit Chester and this was due to half-sister (VB). And we know by the lodger in London VB would talk for hours to my ex-partner FC. When in 2010, before my mother had a stroke, I was in London being told by my half sister not to come back. But we can see by Exhibit J7 (Note: DATE: 20 May 2010 but started on 27 April and sent to half-sister address so I would not find out as I was building the wet rooms (Exhibit 059&060) at the Family business for mother, then the plan was to move in permanently there as she needed help Exhibit J5) my half-sister was trying to force the sale of my mother’s business and this causing my mother stress and hiding my mother’s money (£40,000 Exhibit 0121) that caused the stroke Exhibit J6 (NOTE: DATE: 18 May 2010 which is 2 days after the forced sale of the business Exhibit J7). Also, half-sister did this to my mother in the past (Exhibit 038 &0390). Then add to this my mother said she was hit by Mr Woodside (lawyer for Mr Bartlett) and the SRA says this is a police matter (Exhibit T4, T1 & T2). My mother also says she does not trust him see Cop24 video and so do many others etc. So no trust in the law firm Bartlett. And why after being removed as Executor for causing damage to the Estate by 1) undervalue of business (house) by 700,000(Exhibit Bills2017to2019, then Exhibit Value1&2), 2) Care bills 100,000 then become 800(ExhibitBartCareCost15March2019 after I asked care company!) etc Also why does my half-sister use Mr Bartlett after this? When I came back from London to Chester after my mother’s stroke, I found half-sister took all my mother’s karms pills and Will etc out of the house to hide what she was doing which was drugging her, telling her she had no money, forcing her to change her will against her wishes. Then sending her to a Dr Bland nursing home who helped VB.

Dr Bland (struck off in 2018) in 2011 could have been sued by VB for a considerable sum for not sending MB to hospital when VB was trying to sell MB home. But VB did not want to sue Dr Bland even when she kept lying to the court that MB had no money! This was due to Dr Bland helped her.

Then in 2013 my mother was found to been drugged, trapped in a nursing home and wanted to see lawyer to change will and take action on lawyers who hit her but attempts were made on her life to stop this and talking about the crimes done to her. From that moment on my mother’s life became “unlucky” in her health.

The case law for Wills only requires the challenge to raise a ‘real doubt’, at which point the burden of proof switches to those who claim the testator had the capacity.

The medical records done by past experts shows the following issues for MB:

1) MB did not have the capacity from 2007 onwards and this effect these Wills

2) MB did not know how to deal with money (many times) so lacked understanding.

3) MB showed confusion (many times).

4) MB 2007 onwards Wills was not done to the new standards of the mental capacity act 2005 came in 2007. Therefore it can be shown my mother had real problems with understanding and make decisions, in fact, LOST MONEY. SLUGGED SPEECH, FORGETFUL, LACKS UNDERSTANDING, ROWING OVER MONEY. ETC so 2007 and 2009 Wills fail. In fact it fails the mental capacity tests rules 4.1) can the person understand the information to make the decision: NO MB shows Confusion.

4.2) is the person able to retain the information to the decision: NO Reports show this.
4.3) Is the person able to able to use or weight that information: NO

4.4) clear demonstration of force on MB and other tricks to change 2007 onwards Wills.

4.5) VB knew MB had dementia or capacity issue (See 19 July 2007 Dr King Exhibit X & Dr Bland 16 Oct2007 Exhibit , 1^st of Nov   Exhibit etc) and there are letters to her from the lawyer Mr Woodside who did the Wills, saying the 2007 Will was changed (to VA advantage). Mr Woodside would have seen MB mental health problems (could not walk, confusion etc) and he should of made sure an expert mental Capacity test was done to make them valid. Also Will’s changed effected MJ but Mr Woodside did not tell MJ and Mr Woodside knew MJ had done constructive trust and was told to put a Charge on MB guest house due to his money and work into it. BUT no one told MJ that the Will was change but everyone knew MJ was building the wet room or had put money into the guesthouse and left his pension to work for MB. Even the executor (HF) did not know about this change. VA knew when she was going to get Power of Attorney (see medical records) that she should have had to have the Will done and proved that MB had mental capacity but failed to do so as not to alert her brother. Also if MB had not been drugged till 2013 MJ would have never found out as even his mother MB said their future was living in the guest house see Court of Protection expert interview. It is clear the drugs/dementia stopped MB recalling all the past work and money MJ had put into her business.

4.5 Dr comments on MCA

4.6 Dr Bland was struck off so more doubt on drugs given to MB (high dose of see Table)

5) We can show the law firm Bartlett had a history of problems with probate and Fraud

6) All of these medical records were done when the son was away and were never told to him which is clearly bad as they show plans which contradict what his mother had told others (See COP24 etc)

7) Mum says clearly on video and other statements that the lawyer (Mr Woodside) who did her 2007 & 2009 Will, which we dispute, hit her and told her she had no money. Also other statements by MB on not trusting Mr Woodside. This should be in court as clear DOUBT on the 2007 onwards Wills. As past the 2006 past Will was supported by the executor HF & events.

 

Medical statements;

See Exhibit TBA 19 JULY 2007 Dr D. King (NOTE disputed Will 29th day of Nov 2007)“makes her somewhat querulous, and not particularly good at absorbing information which is conveyed to her”

See EXHIBIT 037 16 OCT 2007 Dr Bland (NOTE disputed Will 29th day of Nov 2007)

Mother had the following: “difficulty managing her day to day personal and business affairs. and unaware of what needs to be done in running her b and b”. “goes to do thing but forgets.” “Her daughter says her short term memory is severely impaired” “Serious as can not hold information” in her head and this effects the Wills”. “who is suffering from some loss of memory, and form of confusion. She first presented in September this year (2007)”

Then see Exhibit 040 1st Nov 2007

Says my mother’s conditions was listed as: “rather volatile, very disorganized and chaotic her living condition are”. “kept multiple entrees in her diary in an attempt to keep track of the recent event. She kept making the sign of the cross (Scared). The partner (?) said she recent months had been worsened by event within the bed and breakfast (kicked MA out ?) He told me she is unable to manage her finances and has been hiding money”. “Irresponsible with money.” “Mildly persecutory ideas regarding her monetary situation” BUT later after mother’s death she had over 60,000 in the bank. Mother said son in law (MA) and daughter stealing money (Exhibit 0121). (NOTE half-sister found hiding 40,000 of her mother’s money and trying to force her to sell her home so she would not have her brother living there running the guest house for his mother and never leave as he put money into it (Exhibit Award £70,000), so VB never going to gain unless they sold it and the Wills gave them half. Add to this Mr Bartlett’s lawyer Woodside also told her she had no money (on tape Exhibit)

“Her score on the mini-mental state examination was 26/30”

BUT “she could not recall 3 items after 5 mins” which means not able to do Will.

“had dyspraxia” (movement walking issues caused by drugs? As when I was there I did not see this But this is painful to recall as I was away and I can now see the crime).

Report says: “Difficulty in retaining and learning new information and on cursory testing I did wonder whether she had some difficulty with her frontal lobe function.”

Expert states “If issues with Frontal lobe of the brain”…then problem with solving, memory, judgment etc. and therefore no good for Wills. Also, say “self-harm” (drug effect and or making her life hell?) Then 2.5 mg of Olazpine (effect mind) and on other medications.

Says “I want neurosurgical review brought forwards as urgency…” This effect the Will 29th day of Nov 2007 as this is done only 28 days after and the next report done in Feb 2009 shows no improvement.

Then Exhibit 048 12 Feb 2009

It says “half-sister not bothered about her mum now” but we now know the Will was changed to her advantage. Not selling her home and say “I think this is regrettable as she clearly has a memory problem and sees difficulties of her managing her property and business” “Needs help every day”. ”Misplacing money. And say Howard (Fey) appointed a power of attorney (Where is that paperwork? As Half-sister tried to do this, but found out and was stopped. The report says “now 20/30 in the min mental test.” The test shows serious cognitive implement but other issues need to be used to understand the condition. “she has significant memory problems and as result should retire”

“made a decision not to take anit dementia medication” What is this this medication as not listed? From this the following: The medical notes of 1st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore is next to the Will of 29th day of Nov 2007 And the medical notes of Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 effects the Will 19th day of June 2009 And add Dr Bland in 2007 Oct who says this started in September 2007 (Exhibit 037) The 2006 Will is valid as others saw this done and was sabotaged by a Bartlett who has a history of this. He took the signatures off it by using the photocopier and a page over them. He did the same trick with other letters.
Order: 1) CPS investigates murder 2) To save cost all Wills say debts have to be first paid and I can show my debts are greater than the value of my mother’s business or 3) I can do constructive trust as I was clearly doing business with my mother which I put my time and money into it from childhood. My half-sister did nothing for the business and paid no money or time into it. 4) 2006 Will valid 5) Mr Bartlett was sent email in 2016 etc but did not do this so sue 6) Mr Bartlett & Green removed as massive conflict of interest (New Law Society rules :Rule 16D(2)(a) states that a solicitor ‘must not act if there is a conflict of interests’. Rule 16D(2)(b) describes a conflict. 5)

 

Chronological date of events for MB’s medical records

MB is the mother of VB from first marriage and 18 years later a son MJ from another farther.

All live in Chester. 2005 MJ meet’s partner FC (who he plans to marry) in London and starts to spend time in London for days. VJ takes actions in Chester which she never tells MJ about.

DATE:                                      EVENT and Exhibits

2002      DD                             MJ puts his prize money (70,000+) and work into MB Business. VB never does                                                      anything. MJ drops pension and work to run MB Business when MB can not                                                              work. MB Business is also MJ & MB home. Medical records show MJ with MB                                                         until 2007.

2002      13 Aug                    MB Admitted to hospital due to Epilepsy. Business run by MJ.

2002     21 Aug                    Cerebral meningioma (stable)

2002      19 Dec                     MB Hospital until 16/2/2003 MJ runs business and drops pension etc.

2004     15 April                 No sign of neurological deficit. GCS 14: indicates a fully awake patient

2006      14 March              Draft Will leaving MJ MB’s Business. Executor HF said saw Will signed & others                                                     say this.

2006      12 June                   Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (32 pages) – Mr. Bartlett, the tribunal                                                                          confirmed dishonesty as compromised and impaired his integrity, good                                                                         repute and that of the solicitor’s profession by making false and misleading                                                              statements to the Law Society.

2006      July                           1day Hospital visit due to confusion and drinking (see 2006 24 Aug letter)

2006     24 Aug                    Check up by neurology surgeon. Fine.

2006      31 Aug                    Epilepsy: 23/08/06 laotrigine tablets 50 mg take one, twice daily

22/08/06 Epanutin capsules 300mg one daily

2006      7 Dec                        Enzira vaccine

2007      9 Jan                        Epanutin 50mg daily effects. Also say 300mg?

Lercanidipine hydrochloride tablets 10mg side effects: SEE MIX.

10 Jan                      Bendroflumethiazide tablets 2.5mg each morning

2007      4 April                    Forceval capsules (son not there to feed MB?)

2007      10 May                  Draft Will leaving again MJ MB’s Business. Seen signed.

2007      18 June                   Senna tablets 7.5mg

2007     18 June                   Co-codamol tablets 30mg effects Dizziness, light-headedness, drowsiness,                                                                confusion. (WHO DID THIS? Dr Bland )

2007      19 July                    Dr King lists: “makes her somewhat querulous, and not particularly good at absorbing information which is conveyed to her”

2007      10 Oct                     Co-codamol tablets 30mg +500mg take 1 or 2 at bed time effects (BIG EFFECT)

Neal Patel, pharmacist at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said: “Patients who may have taken a larger dose of codeine than anticipated may feel more drowsy so should not drive. “Other possible side effects include confusion, headaches, nausea and vomiting BBC 23 March 2012

2007      16 Oct                     Dr Bland (Exhibit x ) lists: “seventy-eight year old lady, who is suffering from some loss of memory, and from confusion. She first presented this in September of this year, accompanied by her daughter and partner” (never did this before as MJ away) “Concerned at the lapses in her memory” “difficulty in managing her day-to-day personal and business affairs and appears to be unaware of what needs to be done in running her Bed and Breakfast business.” “but then forgetting why she has gone out. Her daughter states that Mrs MB short term memory is severely impaired” “mild paranoia relating to to …small items that she has n fact mislaid have been stolen” “daughter is trying to take control of her finances”

2007      24 Oct                     MB was going to sell her Business then says no. Can show VB forced her                                                                     into this.

2007      26 Oct                     Dr G (Exhibit) lists: “she had thought she may be better off dead” MJ was not there. She frequently sat with her eyes closed and throughout a lot of the interview she was quite distressed. Her speech was loud in volume and at time would escalate to point of shouting. At time it was difficult to follow her train of thought and her speech was rambling and incoherent and often rather irrelevant to the topics under discussion. She hopes to spend time with her son. She is currently estranged from her daughter and quite clearly believes that her daughter is trying to encourage Mr Banks to sell her house so that she can get her hand on her mother’s money.

Her son who is her main support appears to currently be abroad at a conference.

Prescribe Diazepam 2mgsor to be taken up to 3 times a day (BUT on chart?)

2007     1 Oct                        2005 MCA on Wills comes into force.

2007      1^st Nov                    Dr G (Exhibit) lists: “I am pleased to say that MB anxiety and agitation has lessened in the last 2-3 days but she remains loud, garrulous and rather volatile” “ I was struck by how disorganized chaotic her living condition are. She made multiple eateries in her diary in an attempt to keep track of her recent events and I found her sill to be rather religious making frequent sign of the cross. MB not with me. H said ”unable to manage her finances and has been hiding money ..” “she is increasingly irritable and anger and he described her as being irresponsible with money. “ “subsequently been quite abusive to her daughter and son in Law accusing them of trying to steal her money’ “she was still volatile” “she continues to be grandiose and a little disinhibited with marked pressure of speech. She has also mildly persecutory ideas regarding her monetary situation.” (NOTE: Shows abuse on MB to change Wills by VB)

“26/30 “ on mini mental state examination BUT “was unable to recall three items after five minutes and showed evidence of quiet severe dyspraxia. She had difficulty in retaining and learning new information and on cursory testing I did wonder whether she had some difficulty with her frontal lobe functions” (e.g. understanding) (FAIL on mental capacity test to decide for herself)
“no longer voicing ideas of self harm” “diagnose her with an organic manic disorder”

“prescribe anti psychotic” “I would be grateful if you could prescribe Olanzapine 2.5mg in the morning’

2007     26 Nov                    Dr G (Exhibit ) lists: “Unfortunately, Mrs MB was not expecting me despite having received a written appointment.” “She was still however very repetitive in conversation with marked short term memory difficulties apparent.” “she now decided she will sell her B&B and move to Tavin with her daughter (NOTE MA home is Tavin! Son in law to VB. VB listed elsewhere as home)

2007    29 Nov                                     Will changed to leave half to VB of MB Business. No one knows about                                                                this including the exactor of the Will (HF see statement).
Letter from Woodside only to VB about this!

2008      24 Jan                      Dr D lists: ICD 10 Diagnosis Dementia Unspecified (F03.3) “she has ongoing memory problems but at my last visit she made it quite clear to me she would not consider taking any medication for her memory. (Stopped taking drugs to change Will)

2008     23 Oct                     Dr Gilmore: Possible Alzheimer’s Disease, late onset (F00.1)

“Her daughter confirmed however that Mrs Banks is having increased difficulty in managing her affairs. She often double books her residents, is unable to manage her finances appropriately and is requiring high levels of input to continue her business” “Her daughter and son in law are planning to move into the property some time within the next few months. ““her medication is dispensed in a blister pack. She takes Olanzapine 2.5mg in the morning. Lercanidipine 5mg once daily, Epanutin 350mg once daily, Bendrofluazide 2.5 mg daily” (?? NOTE But codeine seen but not listed).

“Her memory problems have been apparent for approximately two years but appear to be gradually worsening. Both she and her daughter confirm that she has particular difficulty with her short term memory. She often forgets to take her medication or takes her medication on the wrong days and will often make repetitive call to her daughter seeking reassurance. “ “Mrs Banks lives alone but her daughter Vicky is planning move into the bed and breakfast accommodation in November in order to assist her mother” “Last time I met Mrs Banks she told me that her daughter held Power of Attorney. This appears to be incorrect and her daughter said today that a solicitor has previously advised her against the setting up of a Power of Attorney.” “she has and she would trust her entirely with her financial arrangements (note later daughter found hiding 40,000 of mother’s money and told the court she forgotten it but only due to son finding this out). “her son in London may be upset but as he is very distant and only visits infrequently he would not be practically useful”

“She accepts that she has been changeable in her views n the past but she is quite clear that she would like her daughter to accompany her to a solicitor in order to begin setting up a Last Power of Attorney” (NOTE: the power of Attorney and living with her mother never happened for VB and mother said she did not want to live with daughter BUT Will was changed so if Guest house was sold daughter would get half and son would not move back and look after mother… or did the daughter do the power of attorney then tried to sell the home/business and then it went wrong and mother had stroke and then daughter had to hide this plan from her son who had put investment into the business and was building a wet room. FIND the VB POA doc! Done by Mr Woodside)

“her appetite does not appear to be good” “she had lost weight”

(NOTE: Drugs: The side effects of nausea and vomiting often decrease the user’s appetite)

Heidi listed as feeding mother everyday with food. Heidi was done for drugs in the past which daughter knew about (Exhibit and fears of Heidi’s mother COP24 2019). Also says “Her friend Heidi now does most of the shopping for her and she is now mostly microwaving meals rather than cooking” “she has no suicidal ideas” “There was no evidence of any delusion or hallucinations. She score 20/30 on the Mental State Examination. She was poorly orientated in time, showed evidence of impaired concentration and dyscalculia she was able to recall 2 of 3 items but after five minutes but show evidence of dyspraxia. “The lady probably has Alzheimer’s Disease of late onset”

2008      31 Oct                     PMH: Alzheimer diseases with late onset.

2008      6 & 7/ 11/08 – Ex M – Countess of Chester Hospital 1 page by SHO – Admitted for seizure 2                                            hours, phenytoin levels 22-3 (reference range is between 10 and 20                                                                                  µg/mL), and TROP I – <0.07 Sign of DRUGS Exhibit N Note: Clearly shows

2008      06 Dec                     Hospital over night. Discharge Date 07/11/08 Son never told about this.

Muddled and poor memory. AMT 6/10

2009      29 Jan                      Dr G (Exhibit) lists: “clearly has memory problems and I can envisage there will be increased difficulties “ “habit of misplacing money, Says Howard appointed Power of Attorney but did not know about the Will change “and she once again scored 20/30 on the mini mental state examination. I have explained to her that she has significant memory problems”

“made a decision not to take the risk of worsening her seizures by taking any of my anti dementia medication “ (NOTE: which drugs?)

2009     19 June                   Will changed again.

2009      9 July                       Dr Gilmore (Exhibit ) Lists: “at outpatient clinic with her daughter”. “Mrs Banks has not been persuade to put her B&B for sale” “There has been no demonstrable decline in her memory since I last saw her.” “Mrs Banks is very concerned ….she is on her own a lot of the time, she feel the risk “ “she is happy for the property to be put up for sale” “Mrs Banks and her daughter are currently quite happy with the situation” (NOTE: SO where was her son…we know daughter secretly talked to his partner and kept him in London. This was told by the lodger in London”

2009      Dec                            Son see mother is fine. No problems and MB looks forward to wet room and                                                            son living with her. FC also knows this but acts strange. MB does not want to                                                                 see half sister at Christmas or MA as she took keys off them as she found him                                        doing something very bad. Related to death of man in Guest house?

2010      Jan                             Wet room being made so MJ can look after MB. MJ thinks MB business to be                                                              left to him (COP24 statements and bills). MJ then goes back to London with FC.

2010      29 Jan                      Dr Bland. “matter of urgency. She is suffering breathlessness on exertion on a daily basis and …her pulse measured 40bpm etc.

31/03/10 Citalopram tablets 20mg daily mid-morning (effects: problems with memory or concentration)

2010   28/4/10                  Son (MJ) comes home & finds at MB guest house a letter to VB (not her home)                                                        from Mr Woodside (later issues with) the lawyer making VB her sole POA for                                         mother. Even mother does not know about this when asked. So then                                                                            MB appointed VB & MJ to be joint LPoA for “property and affairs”

2010      27 April                 Daughter list guest house as her own home to estate agents. Contact details                                                              given to Estate agents as daughter’s address in Broughton and not Tavin                                                             where her son in law is. Done so Son (MJ) would not discover as he is                                                          building wet room and is away, that half sister is going to sell home for only                                                             550,000 when   it is worth in the past on the 24 Oct 2007 £600,000 and then                                                                      should have been £800,000 (Exhibits). MB needs support (grab rails etc) but                                         no plan where she is going to live if VB. VB plans to sell MB business

2010      20 May                   Estate agents letter to daughter home address to move sale forward.                                                                             Leading to mother stroke as even in past MB said no to this (Exhibit XD)

2010      18 May                   Hospital Emergency. MB had a stroke that affected her physical health but she                                                       had full capacity with intermittent episodes of short-term confusion? Caused                                               by brain tumor/ UTI? Stress of trying to sell home against her wishes by VB

2010      18 Oct                     Dr Bland (Exhibit) : “A decision has yet to be made as to whether MB to resides at Oakland’s nursing home (45 mins away) or at Kings court Nursing home (next to MB home!) I can confirm that as things now stand if MB becomes a resident at Oakland, she will remain of my patients for the duration of her care” “I believe (found later to nearly killed MB in 2010) that MB has valued the continuing care she has received from this practice and without prejudice to the care by Kings Court and Park Medical, I believe she (MB) would continue to benefit from the continuity of care made available thought the Oakland option.” (NOTE: all done so Dr Bland could drug MB. No other doctor saw MB at Oakland).

2011                                          Looks like VB told MB she had no money

VB will only let MB stay at Oalkland nursing home run by Dr Bland and not                                                              Kingscourt nursing home which is near to MB home.

2011                                          MB says her lawyer Mr Woodside hit her on video

MB says Mr W said she had no money

VB then found out and has to tell court she forgotten 40,000 of her                                                                                  mother’s money

2011                                          MJ goes to lawyers to sue hospital for MB hospital acquire injections.

BUT lawyers say that MB should have been sent to hospital sooner by Dr B.
But VB will not sue Dr B as he kept MB from going into hospital and then MJ                                                             would of come to Chester and stopped sale of MB business.

2012      12 Dec                     Insurance company (Exhibit S) say Dr B could be sued for not sending mother                                                        into hospital as VB tried to sell her home and VB will not sue Dr B for a                                                               considerable sum.

2013                                          FC goes to New Zealand and does not come back. Wants MJ to go as not safe.

2013     23 April                 VB says to the court she forgotten 40,000 of her mother’s money.

2013                                          FC ignores Court order to come back with baby. Tells relatives not safe in UK

2013                                          MJ starts to takes MB to church. Many see MB has not got dementia.

The more time with MJ it is clear that drugs less effect. MB wants to see lawyer (Exhibits and Vids) and says Mr Woodside hit her and told her she had no money (on tape) and wills changed by force and never wanted to sell business (see COP 2019 records)

2013                                        MJ gets MB DNA tested but shows no Dementia or memory issues. So must be drugged. See Expert Exhibit.

2013                                          Expert says MB medication looks like drugs. MB wants to see lawyer as not                                                             happy    about new Will etc

Medication on date (Note This was changed when found out in Nov 2013):

Medication	Purpose	Effects on nutrients	Other main Side effects
Warfarin	Anti-coagulant	Reduces the effectiveness of CO Q10	Upper GI bleed,
Prednisolone	Corticosteroid for anti-inflammatory.	Depletes Vitamin B6 & D & K, calcium, chromium, potassium, selenium, zinc & melatonin	Increases appetite, visual problems, thinness of skin & easily bruised,
Citalopram	SSRI antidepressant	–
Lamotrigine	Anti-epileptic	–
Furosemide	Loop diuretic	Depletes calcium, magnesium, potassium, & folic acid.
Lansoprazole	Proton pump inhibitor (reducesstomach acid)	Depletes folic acid, vitamin B 12 & beta carotene magnesium

2013                                          MB nearly dies due to removal of care and possible drug effect

VB and Dr B have DNR on MB but MJ was there and calls ambulance who                                                                    find MB with out any medication for over 2 hours of dangerous fit.                                                                            Ambulance crew see it is strange and take MB to hospital. Exhibit Ambulance.

2014                                          VB has DOLS put on MB to stop MB seeing lawyers. Also stop anyone                                                                            visiting MB in nursing home.

2014      6/7                            VB stops mother seeing independent doctor to see if she has capacity to get out                                                    of nursing home and report lawyer who hit her

2015                                          MB put on to pathway for one whole month, where trapped in her bed, only allowed to see her son 2 times a week for 1 hour. At first MB clearly gets better.

2015                                          Email by hospital says they did not put MB on to pathway of death

2015                                          CQC visit Pinetum nursing home and later say no was on the pathway of death but it is clearly listed in the DOLS which the CQC must read. Also CQC must monitor anyone on the pathway of death but they dd not as otherwise they would of found MB was fit but just trapped in bed.

Then MB put onto morphine by Dr N for no clinical reason and removed off it by MJ. Then MJ found wanting a drink but given foul tasting substance by son. In a stage trick to make MB look like she was rejecting her drink.

2015                                          MJ about to be in the press but email from Editor of paper (email Exhibit ) shows Chester council lied to the press about MJ to stop him being taken serious.

2015                                          MJ about to appear on Television about his mother.

2015                                          Chester council put an injunction by expensive London lawyer on to the story to stop the truth coming out and helping MB being killed.

2015                                          MB murdered. See Case history of DOLS, CQC etc.

2015                                          At same time as MB being murdered FC’s lawyers goes to Birmingham court to                                                     sell flat in London which makes no sense as FC and Flat are in London. All                                                         lawyers are top lawyers in the law firm and looks like a trick to distract MJ                                                              from helping his mother out of the nursing home killing MB.

2015                                          Inquest but tapes stopped from public as shows corruption. JC QC says will                                                             help but recorded wasting time and misdirecting over 2 years. Also now                                                             known to be corrupt. MA goes on twitter. MA listed to gain out of murder of                                                            MB. MA knows bent cops and coroner! Coroner listed as bad by inquest.org

2016                                          MA goes to NZ to have photos near MJ child (3 years old) all done to threaten                                        MJ from trying to reopening his mother’s murder.

 

2018                                          Mr B goes to court saying there are 100,000 care bills to be paid

2019                                          Mr B after MJ investigate say to the court there are only 800.00 to pay in care                                       bills. He is removed as executor

 

People involved LIST

Lawyers.

1 Mr Bartlett (lawyer Mr B)

Done by the law society for 300,000 fine see March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003 the other person in the law society case took the fall for Mr Bartlett (said by experts)

Known to buy law firms for probate and Wills.

Known to run up false bills and by force be nasty to people by law system abuse.

The problem with Mr Bartlett is he said the care bills were £1000,000 to the court and had to be paid. Mr Bartlett said it was £100,000 from 2016! (see Exhibit BillS2017to2019) See also page 2 end paragraph ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf and he tries to use this to force the sale of my mother’s family business (building) in the past after she has died. 1.1 But Dr Jones) asked the council the true cost of the care bills for his mother and waits for a reply see 7 March 2019 Exhibit Bill7March2019 1.2 Then Mr Bartlett went to court on 15 March 2019 and said the care bill was now only £871.00 and not £100,000 ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf on page 9. As he knew he was going to be found out FRAUD.

This lawyer undervalued my mother family business by 700,000 (Exhibit 2017to2019) says 450,000 for family business but See Exhibit Valu1 Exhibit Value (FRAUD) 2.And he tried to rush the sale by saying the business had to pay IHT(Exhibit A2+B9), which was a lie as it was insured as a business (Exhibit Biz2 &Biz1). Other crimes listed at

Bartletts Solicitors Chester.

Mr Bartlett is known all the way to Scotland as a bad bit of work and to other Bros.

Mr Bartlett is nasty as demonstrated by him following an elderly person who had lost their mother in the car who he was forced to give her Will back to her by force of Liverpool probate office) (on tape)

Mr Bartlett after my mother’s death came to my mother’s guest house with my half-sister (VB) who had a massive black eye and looked shadow of herself. The evaluation was done by 5 estate agents who we request the names of as the values given are clearly FRAUD.

Then Mr B did many other things saying my half sister (VB) did not want to talk to me, but she went looking for me before her death with 2 friends to support her, but I was in London and she was in Chester. It is clear from the new evidence she pushed my mother to sell her home. Then she dies say MrB 16 days after her death. And VB is a clear witness in this case.

2 Mr Woodside (lawyer Mr W) works for Mr Bartlett. (Exhibits below)

Mr Woodside seems to make other lawyer scared of him in the Northwest. When I wanted help with my mother I would have nice lawyers wanting to help me until I said Mr W name then they would drop the case. Mr Woodside (my mother on the video say hit her and told her she had no money on several occasions and was scared of him). We can show my half sister also told my mother had no money and later after I found the bank account, my half sister had to tell the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money. We suspect there is more money out there. Mr W & my half sister also tried to make her sole power of attorney for my mother etc all at no cost.

 

Doctors

1 Dr A. K. Bland (AKA Dr B) GMC 2490241

Doctor Bland (struck off in 2018 for pedo, porn images and grooming) (knew girls who went to Law school to blackmail) Other good medical staff said he buried is failures.

Also did minor surgery at the Countess of Chester. Had some power in the Countess of Chester in 2014, 2015 also 2010 but group not known. Would use a locum to do work in his GP but would charge full rate etc

2 Dr D G Nicholson (Dr N) GMC 3341771

Also, with Dr B lied under oath at 2015 Mavis Bank inquest and said do not know each other but in the past signed cremation documents together. Would also cremate elderly who were brought to the undertakers to cremate them to hide the abuse. In 2015 used Morphine on my mother for no clinical reason and nearly killed her but I got my mother off it..

2008 to 2013? (minor)

3 Dr. Koenraad Van den Abbeele (GMC 4580490) knew him in London, was ok, and he came to Chester, saw what was going on then dropped me in 2013. Strange and must of known more.

 

Coroner Nicholas Rheinberg (NR)

2014 Barbra William (BW) listed him as not helping her investigation into her husband murder at Countess of Chester.

Listen to it here https://soundcloud.com/ukcolumn/ukc-despatches-nhs-barbara-mark-10jan19

2015 at Mavis Bank NR inquest shut me up and would not let me have medical records. Will not let the Article 2 inquest (due to DOLS) be public as shows corruption.

2016 NR, oversaw Barbara Dunbavand (BD) strange death. BD wanted to help me. Mr Bartlett was saying BD said things which she did not say to me and BD wanted to help me. BD husband was also a doctor who lived in Christon which is where they have a common link by homes?

 

Police Detectives

1 Michael Anklers (MA): gains from my mother’s death by VB (half-sister). Knew about issues from 2010 and did nothing. Never visited my mother from 2011 onwards. Mother took keys off MA in 2009 due to finding him doing things in her guest house she did not like and troubled her greatly.

Mother never then went to see them at Xmas from that date which was strange. As all past Xmas we spent 1 day at half-sister. Also a connection with the person who died at Mother guest house in 2008?

2 DS Nomdedeu (N): Knew MA. Works with Children. Lied under Oath at the inquest. This can be proved that we have a recording of him told everything then at inquest said the opposite.

3 Other police who tried to shut me up.

 

Undertakers

Undertakers (many) said Lawyers seem to upset the elderly and undertakers. All undertakers dont like Mr Bartlett and Woodside. Knew Dr B & Dr N as bad.

 

Oakland Nursing home 2011 to 2013.

VB would not let the mother go to any other nursing home but this one which Dr Bland would visit. There were other nursing home near to mother’s house. I did not know Dr Bland had helped VB to drug mother at the time etc.

When expert said mother was being drugged then mother nearly died in 2013

Charmaine Manager who knew Dr Bland very well. In 2013 said mother was on medical care when not and was having a fit. Told son ambulance was on the way and also Dr Bland, but this was a lie for 2 hours.

The ambulance arrived and could not believe that the mother had not been given any medication and checked the medical supply of the nursing home. Then would was about to take her to the hospital when Charmain showed a DNR by Dr Bland and VB (Half-sister) but due to the events, the ambulance crew rejected it and took mother to the hospital. This is murder by removal of care. Mother was fitting for 2 hours without any medication. Later a doctor said the fit was done by medication on mother by Charmaine and Oakland’s nursing home staff. When in the countess of Chester hospital, there was a meeting where staff (?) tried to help Dr Bland and VB take mother back to Charmaine & Oalkland nursing home but I blocked it.

 

Pinetume nursing home 2014 to 2015.

CQC rate this as high and good but Prof Brian Jarman shows more deaths.

People to investigate at Pinetum nursing home

68220/2018 (Ms J. P AKA Nurse Jennifer Peter ) (JP) &

> 68221/2018 (Ms T. S AKA Tracy Simpson Manager (TS).

Also a Indian nurse (name?) who helped Jennifer Peter to kill patients but hard to prove.

Other 2 staff nurses also worked with JP.

2 minor staff also helped in bumping off patients but again hard to prove.
I saw JP give wrong food to the elderly that could of caused chest infections.
JP and TS ignored that the nursing home was temp was over 30 in the summer and the drinks were foul tasting. All on video.

 

CHESTER COUNCIL.

DOLS. Four DOLS were used to trap Mavis Banks in a nursing home and stop her from seeing people all based on lies. Dr Bland and Dr N did a report on MJ (me ) which we still do not have that was used in the DOLS.

1. Gavin Butler (GB) (Chester Council) : did DOLS and when I asked for an answer he tried to shut me up..see his letter 28 March 2018 done to shut me up
2. Le Calva (LC) (Chester council), saw my mother did not have dementia but was being drugged but still did DOLS.

 

In 2014 the DOLS had at first one social worker to be with me to stop me capturing evidence. Three of them could see it was wrong and I met them in the street and they said it was bad.

In 2015 two new social workers due to the DOLS met me outside the nursing home and checked I did not record or take any photos etc.

I was only allowed to see my mother 3 times a week for 1 hour. (MB clearly was having no food & drink)

The Social workers were

3 Jenny Stretton (JS) & 4 Mandy Buckly (MS).

One event I went into see my mother and she was very dehydrated as she was trapped in her bed. She begged for a drink. Then when Jenny Peter (JP) offered it to my mother she rejected it which made no sense. My mother clenches her teeth and pulled her head away knowing something I did not.

Both of these social workers (JS &MS) with Jenny Peter (nurse) (JP) set up the drink which was poison in front of me to make it look like my mother was rejecting drinks, but I grabbed it off the nurse and tasted it, and I was then rushed out of the building and then was very ill. They knew what I had found. See also RSM report 2015. The drink was like cleaning fluid. This is a common trick which is done to many in nursing homes. The coroner (RN) destroyed this evidence.

 

SRA: deliberately ignored case.

1 <Georgina.Smith@sra.org.uk> tried to ignore clear fraud

2 Sarbjit Klair <Sarbjit.Klair@sra.org. did things that looked connected to Mr Bartlett’s actions (see date and times) to help Mr Bartlett. Tried to ignore fraud.

 

CQC

Must find the Two people who visited the nursing home in 2015 and said no one was on the pathway of death, but it was listed in the DOLS (which the CQC has to read) that my mother was. This is dangerous as the pathway is monitored in use, but clearly was not in my mother’s case. Also I told them the hospital said (see email) that my mother was not put onto the pathway of death by the hospital. Inspectors in 2014 who were told I kept seeing serious mistakes that could cause death but instead I was limited access to my mother by a DOLS.

 

More Lawyers

Barrister: James Boggle (LONDON) nast bit of work. Taped and was trying to shut me up. Somehow knew about Dr Bland and wanted me to be shut up. Would not release my legal bundle on my mother’s case. Did not send papers to court to stop eviction from flat. Tapped being nasty. Said all work for free but done to waste my time. He looked like he was using NLP etc on me.

Lawyers: DD

Help in the eviction of Flat based on a lie. How would of Flora Crosland (FC) paid for them. Why do the go to court as my mother was on the pathway of death at the same time. Judge Salomon should of waited for me and was said he would but in 2015 as mother was dying put order to sell flat.

Reoccurring lawyer who clearly knew what he was doing to cause trouble.

Lawyers Chester H&L

1) tried to make me sign a statement that was not true to say sister was ok with hiding 40,000 which she then told the court she had forgotten of my mother’s money

2) other things not getting my mother out of nursing home …in fact tried to trap her there

3) put a ccj on me when under 500, and no discussion and can show I had overpaid them!!!!

Then lawyer Sarah was going to help me remove this, said she knew my mother was murder and then did not help; and other things…very strange..but think she was pushed on

Peter Edward Liverpool.

The strange lawyer does dementia tests etc., nasty bit of work.

I had to sack them in the court as clearly trying not to let me get the mother out of nursing home

Then other law firms who should have done helped me with my mother will and Mr Berlet and then acted strange and caused me trouble but as i tapped them the bill they tried to double were always dropped…massive correction…

 

Simon Randle was a friend who hosted my computer system animalagentz to help children. He started to act strange as my mother had issues in Chester

He, like others said they had been approached by people.

He stopped helping me. He said” you don’t understand mark, they have so many business cards”

 

Then there are the nasty people who visited the guest house who all had links to the same name lawyers.

OTHER DOCUMENT
Vicky Boultbee. VB my half-sister. Her daughter married MA. Died in 2019.

Mr Woodside who works for Mr Bartlett, who is involved in this case did the 2007 and 2009 Wills. My mother MB said she was hit by Mr Woodside (lawyer for Mr Bartlett on video etc) and the SRA says this is a police matter (Exhibit T4, T1 & T2). My mother also said she does not trust him see Cop24 video and so do many others etc. The court is not to ignore evidence to protect bent lawyers which is what it looks like to journalists. And why after being removed as Executor- Mr Bartlett for causing damage to the Estate by 1) undervalue of business (house) by 700,000(Exhibit Bills2017to2019, then Exhibit Value1&2), 2) stating Care bills were 100,000 which then become 800(ExhibitBartCareCost15March2019 after I investigated this. Otherwise would still be 100,000 so he could pocket it. 3.2 And Mr Bartlett ignores Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 (Exhibit 048-049) and it clearly states “I have explained to her (Mavis Banks) that she has significant memory problems” and “she has made a decision not to take the risk of worsening her seizures by taking any of her anit DEMENTIA medication! (on page Exhibit 049) (So shows dementia effects Wills). Mr Bartlett deliberately does not include the medical notes Exhibit 040 1st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore which states my mother said: “her daughter (VB claimant) and son in law (MA) accusing them of trying to steal her money” which was found out to be true in (Exhibit 120 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down. It can be shown in 2010 when son was away they tried to sell mother’s home to the advantage of the changed Wills). Also, the report shows Mavis Banks was being drugged by her behavior (see “2-3 days volatile” “marked pressure of speech” but this was never seen when the son (& others see COP24) as she was not being drugged then as VB was away). Mother was on a cocktail of drugs including 2.5 Olanzapine & Co-codamol tablets 30mg +500mg etc which would have caused memory issues and effected the Wills. And the Claimant was controlling these drugs (Exhibit 15/10/08VB) and knew Dr Bland who she then did not take any actions against for a considerable sum (Exhibit S) when he nearly killed our mother by not sending her to hospital at the same time my half sister (VB) was trying to force the sale of my mother’s home (Exhibit 056 or J7 then stroke at Exhibit J6) As she lists my mother home in her name and address and ignore the fact I was building a wet room for my mother and going to live with my mother therefore preventing the sale of her home which they wanted. All the pre 2007 past will left me my mother home as 1) I had put money into it (see Exhibit Award of 70,000 in 2002) 2) dropped jobs to work there (constructive trust) 3) past executor saw these wills signed and was then not involved in the new ones to the advantage of Mr Bartlett (was after next stores home) and VB. The medical notes of 1st Nov 2007 By Dr C Gilmore is next to the Will of 29th day of Nov 2007

And the medical notes of Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 effects the Will 19th day of June 2009

And add Dr Bland in 2007 Oct who says this started in September (Exhibit 037)

“who is suffering from some loss of memory, and form of confusion. She first presented in September this year (2007) And the first contested will starts in 29th day of Nov 2007 when I (the defendant) was away!

3.3 Also, these Wills were done by force I can show this with Exhibits below. No medical Expert can provide any expert evidence as to the testamentary capacity of Mavis Rebecca Banks (Deceased ) on 29 Nov 2007 and 14 Jan 2009 the respective two dates of the last two wills. As he was not there to see her and there is evidence to show these wills was done by force and by drugs and this is shown up by my mother’s actions listed (speech not clear, etc. But clear speech when I was back at home). All of this done to force the change of the wills and sell my mother’s home. Also this was done in the past See Exhibit 038, 039 when mum’s business was attempted sold when son away for 600,000 which makes no sense as it was worth more by VB again. Every time the son went away for a few weeks things clearly happened. What we do have is my mother saying force done to her listed in the Claims below

4 Also why does my half-sister (claimant) uses Mr Bartlett after this? After my mother states she was hit by Mr Woodside, and told to her. Also uses a lawyer who tried to put 100,000 of bills onto her inheritance (her loss)? And also tried to sell it cheap at a price he also keep choosing. And also tried to damage the estate by inheritance tax when it was a business and he knew this was a trick all done to force a sale when the son was dealing with the murder of his mother in a cruel way. In the past when I came back from London to Chester after my mother’s stroke (2010), I found half-sister took all my mother’s karms pills and Will etc out of the house to hide what she was doing which was drugging her, telling her she had no money (In court Exhibit she said she forgotten 40,000 of mother’s money and Mr Woodside (30 Hoole Road, my mother home is 32 Hoole road, and Dr Bland is across the way) told mother she had no money to try and trick her to selling it but after mother’s death it she had over 60,000 in the bank), forcing her to change her will against her wishes. Then VB sending her to a Dr Bland (struck off in 2018) nursing home who helped her. Then in 2013 my mother was found to been drugged (by Dr Bland), trapped in a nursing home and wanted to see lawyer to change will and take action on lawyers who hit her but attempts were made on her life to stop this and talking about the crimes done to her. From that moment on my mother’s life became “unlucky” in her health. MB also nearly died in 2013 when her son found she was being drugged to stop her saying or giving evidence against this lawyer (Mr Woodside) or changing her lawyer back. Then in 2014 MB was trapped in a nursing home in her wheel chair and once again could not see expert to help her make these statements.

5) MB death was related to the fact that when she was not being drugged she wanted to change the wills back to leave the home to her son and also remove the lawyers who hit her and other things see list below.

5.1) We ask for the expert to also look at the strange case of MB with new evidence in the following:

5.2) in 2010 when it is clear VB tried to force the sale of her business & home against her wishes by drugs.

5.3) in 2013 when care was deliberately removed to cause death by the claimant. This was done as it was found that MB was being drugged by Dr Bland. Also VB put a DNR on mum.

5.4) where the claimant in 2014 trapped MB in a nursing home. Stopped independent Experts (Exhibit T5) trapped in her bed and forced her to be on a pathway where food and drink was removed causing her strange death in 2015

6 Claim 1 Mr Bartlett (removed executor) went to court under a lie to remove the probate caveat to pay Care bills of 100,000 but then care bills became only 871 after the defendant investigated. Mr Bartlett should be removed from the case for this.

1 Mr Bartlett went to court on 2018 to remove probate caveat saying care bills were £1000,000 to the court and had to be paid. Mr Bartlett said it was £100,000 from 2016! (see Exhibit BillS2017to2019) See also page 2 end paragraph ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf and he tries to use this to force the sale of my mother’s family business (building) in the past after she has died and I am upset. After being found to undervalue her family business (building)! Note: my mother also left £60,000 cash in the bank.

1.1 But defendant (Dr Jones) asked the council the true cost of the care bills (2019) for his mother and waits for a reply see 7 March 2019 Exhibit Bill7March2019

1.2 Then Mr Bartlett went to court on 15 March 2019 and said the care bill was now only £871.00 and not £100,000 ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf on page 9. As he knew he was going to be found out. FRAUD.

1.2.1 Mr Bartlett should have pointed this out to the court but hide it from the court.

1.3 Then the Chester council contact Dr Jones on 2 May 2019 with official documents that say it now DEFERRED £XXX See Exhibit Council10847.pdf TRUE NUMBER HIDEN DUE TO FRAUD. And clearly not what Mr Bartlett said…FRAUD.

1.3.1 We want an investigation into this and how this can happen.

1.3.2 We want to know when & who Bartlett contacts in Chester council and all FOI costs, who etc 1.4 Mr Bartlett should have protected the estate and this bill from 2016 onwards. He could have been by agreement to be paid but was not suggested. He was trying to damage the Estate. 1.5 it is now clear that these care bills can be rejected which he should have known as MB (Dr Jones’s mother) care was significant, and under the law, it would have been covered.

1.6 Mr Bartlett from 2016 could have queried these bills but once again does not.

1.7 Mr Bartell did FRAUD over the cost of £100,000 which are not valid as he thought he would not be found out. When in 2016,2017,2018 other firms asked him this information he never gave this as he did not want to be found out. Add this to the fact that he undervalue of MB (mother) family business by £700,000 and history of him having to pay a fine of £300,000 to the law society (see Corrupt solicitors Section) for issues in the past that seem the same. See below for full break down of events 1.8 I not only dispute ALL the bills but state that my mother was trapped in a nursing home by force by a doctor Bland who is now struck off in 2018. This was done to stop her from going to court about a Lawyer Woodside (who works for Mr Bartlett) who hit my mother to change her Will and sell her family business (building) against her wishes. Dr Bland also drugged my mother and nearly killed her in 2010 and 2013. And it can be shown that Dr Bland knew the doctor N who put my mother onto morphine for no clinical reason which should be investigated that played a roll in killing her. But both doctors lied under oath at the inquest saying they did not know each other but both signed cremation documents together. This is with other statements and also on video at

Bartletts Solicitors Chester.

The SRA says this should go to the police so this is now in process.

7 Claim 2 Bartlett under valued my mother family business by 700,000 for self gain

2. Also, Mr Bartlett said on 7th September 2015 (Exhibit X) (or Exhibit B7) and 2019 Exhibit Bills 2007to2019) my mother’s family business (building) is worth only 450,000 (undervalued) and this number has not changed. I can now show by other professionals it is worth more. In fact, my mother’s family business (building) on Zoopla is 1,060,000 (Exhibit Value Part 1) and on “Property data” it is 1,150,000 (Exhibit Value Part 2). It has been pointed out that “strange 2 UK property experts can come up with similar valuations but Bartletts somehow manages to miss it by a whopping £700,000 plus. Now some might say ah but if they are doing the probate they might give you the bottom valuation and shift the house to an offshore company so no-one knows who actually bought it and sell later on to make 200% profit, how else can any reasonable person think?” Many who are too scared say they did this to others and the investigation of the land reg should be done to find out if this is true? But Mr Bartlett was found out by me. 2.1 Who does Mr Bartlett use for Evaluations? As I recall 5 persons turned up (2015) with my half-sister who had a black eye and looks troubled. They all knew something bad was going on with Mr Bartlett. Other Estate agents do not like Mr Bartlett but once again too scared to come forward. 20. From all of this, it is easy to see why I put a permanent caveat which was granted (See Exhibit Caveat1). And why I request a permanent removal of Bartlett and law firm and associates MrGreen

8 Claim 3 Bartlett tried to force the sale of my mother’s family business by saying it had to pay death tax but it was listed as guest house and his office is near to it.

1. Mr Bartlett has ignored that my mother’s family business is a guest house and therefore it can have 100% business relief on the IHT400 ! BUT Mr Bartlett is trying to force the sale of family business Exhibit B9.   See also Date: 24 th June 2015 from Mr Bartlett.

1.1 Bartlett did this to damage my mother’s estate as he knew this over and over again (Exhibit B9) to force a sale. AND it is strange how half-sister does not also fight this as it causes her massive losses. Also the accountant BD listed died strangely see below.

1.2 In fact, Mr Bartlett was told in many emails that my mother’s guest house was insured as a guest house in 2017 (Exhibit Biz1 & Biz2) and people stayed there and this was sent to the tax team and they were happy with this (Exhibit IHT). Also a B&B sign outside the guest house.

1.3 In fact, an email was sent to Mr Bartlett on Fri, Mar 10, 2017, at 3:05 PM with

Exhibit Biz 1 which shows the guest house is insured as business which is what the IHT wanted. Mr Bartlett ignores this (Exhibit B9) over and over again even in 2019!

1.4 And Mr Bartlett own other building near to my mother family business (building) and his letter to me is to the Guest House e.g. he clearly knew it was a business! see Exhibit A2 on the 25 June 2015. Mr Bartlett office is 31 Hoole Road Chester etc near family business 32 Hoole Road. 3.5 Mr Bartlett did this to harm my mother’s estate and for him to force the sale and buy it cheaply. He clearly is not working in my mother’s interests and all of this can be proved.

1.6 Request when did Mr Bartlett contact IHT?

Claim 9 The Wills manipulated by Mr Bartlett & Mr Woodside & Claimant and MA.

People saw a past Will signed in 2006 where my mother left me the family business (building) and other issues. But the signature now removed which we put down to Mr Woodside and Mr Bartlett putting a page over the position of the signature to remove them when copying. Exhibit B30 Note a full-colour image show this issue. Mr Bartlett can be seen doing the same trick with Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 letter Exhibit: MedDocButBartlett where he darkens the image to hide evidence that damages his claimant’s case.

1.1 The past Will (2006) had Howard Fay (past executor of Wills before Mr Bartlett) Signature and others on it, but it can be shown the will had this removed. This Will gave Mark Jones the Guest House. Howard Fay (listed Executor) has already on many occasions (on tape, video) with me present and absent to support this (Exhibit XX)

1.13. MB (mother) says on the tape ( Z00004.mp3) that she does not like Mr B and VB (half-sister) and MB stopped her changing her Will back to the 2006 Will.

1.14. MB says on tape 131229_002.MP3 says she does not want the Will of 2007 onwards but Mr W stopped her. Also see other Exhibits.

Claim 10 Disbursements. There is £60,000 cash in my mother’s account.

All of mother’s Wills state “all debts paid first” and I never was paid to help my mother or put money into the family business etc but see Claim 10

I put over £70,000 into my mother’s family business (building & work to be paid) by a medical prize I won in 2002 (Exhibit Award one of many. others £10,000 etc) then I can show I paid for many things from windows (Exhibit 014 to 016) to new furniture (Exhibit 020).

Claim 11 Constructive trust and proprietary estoppels for Dr Jones to be heard.

A thing that Mr Bartlett ignore due to self interests. See Claim 9 above.

1. Constructive trusts. The establishment of a beneficial interest in the family home and business (Common intention). Or 2. Proprietary Estoppel (clear assurance, reasonably rely on,

substantially to their detriment) 1. Constructive trusts (Common intention)

The court of law is Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555 Also Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546 Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17

The common intention was that Dr Jones and Mavis Banks would run the business together etc. Proprietary Estoppel: Proprietary estoppel transfers rights if,

1) Someone is given a clear assurance that they will acquire a right over property, (MJ was and many statements COP24 to back this up) 2) they reasonably rely on the assurance (can show this with cop24),and,3) they act substantially to their detriment on the strength of the

assurance (see cop24) 3) it would be unconscionable to go back on the assurance.

I was promised from child hood, that If I worked, which I did etc I would have the family business and also turned down better jobs (Exhibit 005-010). Bartlett was told about Claim 9 & 10 and he ignored this (Exhibit many) to cause me loss which is another damage against him. This can be put in and we have a right to hold the caveat until this has been heard. A thing that Mr Bartlett ignore due to self interests. Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18. Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210 Dillwyn v Llewelyn [1862] EWHC Ch J67 Also looked after my mother’ many times : Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159 to improve the house in the belief it was hers created a proprietary estoppel: Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431

Claim 12 Will manipulations

1. My mother died in 2015 (Exhibit D2 Death Certificate). I am reopening my mother’s inquest as she was murdered for her family business a building due to new Evidence.

1.1. It is on tape/video/ statements COP24 etc that my mother said Mr Woodside, a lawyer who did her Will (Exhibit D3), who works for Mr Bartlett (Exhibit DQ) hit her (assaulted her) and changed her Will by force against her wishes (Exhibit D4) See Exhibit T 1: Transcript from Mavis Banks 2/7/2014 and also COP24 (Exhibit T2 page 3 mother not happy with him).

1.2 my mother’s stroke in 2010 caused by half sister, MA and Woodside telling my mother she had no money. &seems to be part of this crime against her and the changing of her Wills and the forced selling of her family business (building) against her wishes when I was away.

1.3 My mother was clear that she was hit to change her Will to stop me having her family business (building) and for others to steal from her (See videos and statements).

1.4. The video of MB (mother) saying this is on twitter and youtube and clearly shows this issue that shows the Wills are disputed that the claimant wants to use.

See https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M and the transcript is Exhibit T1

1.5 Bartlett’s were listed on a highly respected Review web site with other serious problems by me See Exhibit T4

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1&stars=2

1.6 Bartlett’s then tried to stop the bad reviews by saying I was not a customer to the firm. Exhibit Bare2t part 1 and see Exhibit Bare2t part 2

What Bartlett’s is doing here is another lie to the web site who contacted me about this.

And once again how can you trust this law firm who deals in lies. He should not be allowed near my mother (MB) case.

1.7. With this web site review of the law firm Bartlett, the law firm has taken no action since 16 Jan 2018 to disputed the truth of the statements, that is my mother states she was hit by her lawyer to change her Will by force & fear against her wishes. And Mr Woodside told her she had no money to make her sell her family business (building) when in fact she did. And Mr Woodside told my mother she had no money when she had over £60,000. It can be shown the claimant (half-sister who gains) did the same trick to my mother at the same time (Exhibit 119 &121). All done to an elderly person who was also being drugged (see Exhibit DB2). And this would have caused the stroke in 2010 and can show this was done in the past (Exhibit can be shown with other crime but is another case).

1.8. Also, another web site lists all of these events http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/

1.9. Bartlett’s were told about this and have sent many threatening letters to me on 16, 17, 18 and 21 Jan 2019 (Exhibit B1, B2, B3, B4) to remove these statements from this web site but as they are true it will not be removed. And they have taken no actions.

1.10. By doing this there is now a Conflict of interest of Bartlett law being involved and running anything to do with my mother’s Will as 4 emails from them next to each other, each day is harassment (Exhibit B5). Therefore another conflict of interest and should not be half-sister’s lawyer.

1.11. Also, Exhibit T2 about the web site video shows my mother says as a fact they hit my mother to change her will (and did it to others) but then took no action about removing this video which is true.

1.12. An email was sent on 18 Feb 2019 to ask them what was specifically wrong with the web site and still no response from them. Exhibit B6

1.13. How can this law firm and Bartlett is named in these emails be the executor of the Will or involved in any way, therefore, an Injunction on him and his associates. If Mr Bartlett acts this way to hide evidence of manipulation of a Will to gain. The law firm has too many mixed interests in this case and under the law should not be involved. These issues are now public, and Journalists are involved.

Claim 13 Bartlett becomes Executor by force in 2015 and removed in 2019.

In 2015 after my mother’s death Mr Bartlett made out he was the executor (24 June 2015 Exhibit and see also Exhibit A2 25 June 2015 & was not until 2016 and after being told not to for Claim DD) all done So Mr Bartlett wanted to steal 1) put in care bills 100,000 which were not, 2) IHT tax which was lie all done to force the sale of my mother’s family business so he could 3) buy it at under-valued price as he knew I was dealing with bereavement & my mother alleged murder…shocking. And he did this to others.

1.14. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7) by sending a document to court without permission and after I made it clear, my mother, Executor (Mr Fay) & I did not want him by past emails such as April 24 2015 (Exhibit Letter to B 2015 Exhibit B8) and other actions in 2013 (Show court in private as separate case). Note this email was one of many after my mother’s alleged murder which he ignored. It was clear my mother did not want him or Mr Woodside (See Exhibit T2 Evans, Video, etc.). So from the start, he (and had Dirty hands) knew what was wrong and still did it to run up bills which I rejected as he had no right to do this. He ignored the fact I was telling him my mother was hit by Mr Woodside etc. from the start in 2013. This is what he has done to others. As all of this was done deliberately and done as I was dealing with the trauma of my mother’s murder.

1.15 In Bartlett’s letters and any correspondence from his law firm is there any statements to say to my mother that he has taken over her Will. He sent no letter to my mother and we heard what was going on by accident. This cannot be the right way to take over Wills. Therefore no permission or consent was given to Mr Bartlett.

1.16 When my mother found out in 2013 and wanted to see another lawyer (protected) to change this she then nearly died (see ambulance report 2013) when in a nursing home run by Dr Bland who knew Mr Woodside. This all happened at the same time when it was clear mother was being drugged. Expert can show this too Exhibit XX

1.17 Why is MB (mother) Will set up to be given to another law firm? Which is strange as my mother trusted people, not a law firm.

1.18. Therefore I am seeking damages from this law firm like many others as from 2015 Bartlett knew they should not be involved and ignored my letters and others.

1.19 I see compensation for 8 years when the 2006 Will was altered to help him.

Claim 14 In the past Mr Bartlett did this before.

Mr Bartlett is already reported for “Badness” in the March the 6th in 2006 by the Law Society File No 8751-2003 see attachment Bartlett-8751.03.pdf (1,512K). See Exhibit P1 & P2 Only when you read the file do you see the problems this person is and therefore he should not be an Executor of a Will. Start of Law Society File section 167.

NOTE 168 of the Law Society document says “Bartlett sought an order for costs against the Law Society as to some 90% of a total which was put at some £300,000.”

So did Bartlett pay 80% of this? Therefore Lawyers say he should not be allowed near any Will or be an executor due to this report done on him. In fact this was used by someone to remove him in 2016 by the Liverpool probate office.

1.2. On the web site Trustpilot there are other bad reviews of him and his law firm.

These reviews are only used after the company Trustpilot have checked them and they can be used as Evidence in law.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1

And the case of Shirley Pickard in Aug 2018 who states:

“Unacceptable experience. Went to Bartlett’s solicitors, Chester for independent advice against Matthews solicitors when they were operating independently. I found out later that Bartletts knew they would be merging with Matthews, hence they did not give me the sole independent advice which they should have done for me to act on. They have not concluded the requests of a will satisfactorily and are still holding onto £15000.00 which was left by the deceased to be shared equally between 3 beneficiaries. This is since 2008”

Summary: What is clear was Mr B wanted my mother’s home and he helped VB (Claimant) to get half of something she would not have had as in 2002 I started to put my money into my mother’s business (Exhibit Award). Mr B was involved in the force to 1) force mum to sell her home by making her think she had no money a) half-sister hide mother’s money 40000 (Exhibit 120 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down). and b) Mr Woodside told mum had no money on tape and hit her (Exhibit T1 but no money on other tape). After all of this it is clear that Mr Bartlett is the person who would alter Wills for self-gain and others state that the 2006 Will is valid and was signed. My mother was murdered and we have 1913 signatures on this (Exhibit: signatures) and now preparing a court action that states my mother was murder for her business by people who benefit from the 2007 and 2009 wills. We put forward that Dr Bland (who was struck off in 2018) found out in 2007 my mother was being drugged & who my sister protected not to take action against in 2012 (Exhibit S) was drugging my mother to make her forget her son (Defendant) to change the Will by force in 2007 & 2009. Also not sending mother to hospital as then I would come back from London and stop the sale of mother’s business. And in 2013 when they were found out drugging my mother (Exhibit DNA Test, Expert) they tried to kill her to stop her recalling all the lies. What this shows is Mr Bartlett will manipulate Wills which includes 2006 which left the family business to me which many saws signed see (Claim 11). And the whole thing was by design to be traumatic so the son would find it hard to deal with and take to court. In fact Bartlett tried to rush it. I request this is moved to London court as I am the defendant, the claimant is rich & I fear for my safety in the north west. Also I request a disbursement of money as I put 70,000 plus and it is clear all Will say debts must be paid. I want this money now. And doing this does not effect any other debts to be paid. I put forward all my debts (money in & work) are greater than claimants share in the said property and therefore I request to be given the whole property in 28 days from this order. This one action stop all of this case and resolves it.

Claim 15 Mr Bartlett became half-sister Lawyer when he stood down as Executor.

1.1 This is a conflict of interest, as Half-sister knew lawyers who hit Mother to change Will. ETC 6.2 Half-sister kept MB (mother) in a nursing home so she could not change the will back or get help Exhibit COP2014 6/7/2014 Jason Hurst. A trick also used to remove mum wheelchair. 6.3 Half sister took no actions on Claim Mr Bartlett became executor for self-gain even when he damages the value this whole thing.

Claim 16 Half sister helped Mr Bartlett to gain mother’s family business (building) as she would gain in this. Bartlett damages are 100,000 (carebills)+40,000 (IHT)+ 700,000 (under value business building)+Bills

1) I request ALL receipts to show my half sister (VB) is paying to Mr Bartlett and from when?

2) We request Bank statements from VB account to pay Mr Bartlett as there are none!

3) Mr Bartlett has done this for his own personal gain, like he did to others.

4) My half sister is to send a statement that she has read the contents of this letter to stop her becoming involved in this fraud and other crimes.

5) CPS investigates murder of Mavis Banks

Thank you

Mark

 

ISSUES

Claim: 1 Wills of 2007 and 2009 were obtained by coercions AND at times when Mavis Banks was not of sound mind and suffering from dementia or otherwise (I was away but when I was around and half-sister was not there mother did not have dementia as not being drugged by her. So we keep Claim: 7 The Paragraph 9 of the Particulars of Claim. The Will purported to have been executed in 2007 and 2009 were either obtained by coercion or AND at time when Mavis Banks (the deceased) was not of sound mind and suffering from dementia and therefore not in accordance with the provision of section 9 of the Will act 1837. Mr Bartlett only looks at one part of my claim that my mother had dementia when she did the 2007& 2009 wills but this was not the whole picture I say she was being drugged to change Wills & to have a look of dementia.

Also, these Wills were done by force I can show this with Exhibits below. No medical Expert can provide any expert evidence as to the testamentary capacity of Mavis Rebecca Banks (Deceased ) on 29 Nov 2007 and 14 Jan 2009 the respective two dates of the last two wills. As he was not there to see her and there is evidence to show these wills was done by force and by drugs and this is shown up by my mother’s actions listed (speech not clear, etc. Not there when I was back).

All done to force the change of the wills and sell my mother’s home. Also this was done in the past

See Exhibit 038, 039 when mum’s business was attempted sold when son away for 600,000 which makes no sense. Every time the son went away for a few weeks things clearly happened.

What we do have is my mother saying force done to her listed in the Claims below. I request all actions to adjured until the following issues resolved. 1) Mr Bartlett needs to be investigated for fraud and removed for the reasons listed below. Mr Bartlett has a conflict of interest and should be removed from this case and Mr Green who Mr Bartlett is using.

There are clear patterns of people tying to force the sale of my mother’s business, for low price when I am away ignoring the money and time I put into.

Mr Bartlett even sent Dr Gilmore 29 Jan 2009 medical report So it can not be read and is my original as my signatures are on it. But Mr Bartlett darkens it on a Photocopier to make it unread trick, which is what we said he did with the 2006 Will by taking the signatures off them. But everyone says they saw the 2006 Will signed etc. 2) The doctor he suggested is rejected for the reason listed below we do not have any trust in anything Bartlett does and with very good reasons. We have suggested one to our lawyers (email) 3) What is clear was Mr B wanted my mother’s home and he helped VB (Claimant) to get half of something she would not have had as in 2002 I started to put my money into my mother’s business (Exhibit Award). Mr B was involved in the force to 1) force mum to sell her home by making her think she had no money a) half-sister hide mother’s money 40000 (Exhibit 120 in Exhibit 121 and 13 lines down). and b) Mr Woodside told mum had no money on tape and hit her (Exhibit T1 but no money on other tape). After all of this it is clear that Mr Bartlett is the person who would alter Wills for self-gain and others state that the 2006 Will is valid and was signed. My mother was murdered and we have 1910 signatures on this (Exhibit: signatures) and now preparing a court action that states my mother was murder for her business by people who benefit from the 2007 and 2009 wills. We put forward that Dr Bland (who was struck off in 2018) found out in 2007 my mother was being drugged & who my sister protected not to take action against in 2012 (Exhibit S) was drugging my mother to make her forget her son (Defendant) to change the Will by force in 2007 & 2009. Also not sending mother to hospital as then I would come back from London and stop the sale of mother business. And in 2013 when they were found out drugging my mother (Exhibit DNA Test, Expert) they tried to kill her to stop her recalling all the lies. What this shows is Mr Bartlett will manipulate Wills which includes 2006 which left the family business to me which many saws signed see (Claim 11). And the whole thing was by design to be traumatic so the son would find it hard to deal with and take to court. In fact Bartlett tried to rush it. I request this is moved to London court as I am the defendant, the claimant is rich & I fear for my safety in the north west.

Also I request a disbursement of money as I put 70,000 plus and it is clear all Will say debts must be paid. I want this money now. And doing this does not effect any other debts to be paid.

I put forward all my debts (money in & work) are greater than claimants share in the said property and therefore I request to be given the whole property in 28 days from this order.

This one action stop all of this case and resolves it.

 

ADD

the following tried to make me sign a false statement Date: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:52 PM

Marc Thomas Solicitor

Hillyer McKeown LLP

Murlain House | Union Street |Chester | CH1 1QP

 

Exhibits:

20MayCourtNOTRCJdoc2

 

This links to

http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/tax-file/

 

more at

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/introduction