addition
Under Covid 19 law the following should of not happened
A bent lawyer put a doctor onto the streets who won awards to help ill children.
All done to help another lawyer who clearly did fraud and involved in hitting, changing the will and murder of the doctors mother.
In the Dec 2019 court there was No defence for the lawyer hitting the doctors mother.
Also the inquest tape of the doctors mother has now gone missing.
With bent cops MA & N in Chester gain from dementia fraud.
Email sent to
From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Parliamentary Candidate
Freeman of the City of London
All correspondences by email,
25/02/2020
To The Rt. Honourable Boris Johnson, MP
Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
BCC
To The Rt. Honourable Boris Johnson
The following is a demonstration of dementia fraud by bent lawyers protected by two bent police detectives MA & N in Chester.
To: James Beresford,
To: The law firm’s compliance team
To: Complaints Department.
To: SRA
Dear James,
I am asking the court to remove you or you can remove yourself.
You failed to answer any of the questions on clear fraud done by Bartlett on many occasions ( Emails to you: Jan 24 2020, Mar 8, 2020, 5/3/2020, 20 February 2020, 21/02/2020, etc).
Bartlett by force became executor of my mother’s will and clearly did many things which are Fraud
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/tax-file/
The Tax office is clear this is fraud and you are a lawyer but you see nothing wrong…explain yourself.
To the court, you look like you are protecting a lawyer who did Fraud. There is no legal defence for Bartlett or you.
If Bartlett had not done wrong you would not be here!
Also, you say you don’t know him but your office is next to theirs.
On top of this, you say nothing new was found after I revealed my mother’s share which Bartlett did not state my mother had. But he should have known about.
And we know there are other shares of my mother and you should have been able to find these.
Once again, you are protecting the mistakes of Bartlett.
I have shares of my mother and you can’t find them.
You can’t do your job. I want our money back. I want you removed and compensation.
On top of this, YOUR accountant says my mother’s guest house property is not Business Property Rates (BPR).
BUT other experts including the Tax office say otherwise.
Name your accountants.
As the TAX Office said my mother’s guest house based on my evidence (council files, insurance, bills, accounts) allows Business Property Rates (BPR).
Once again you are protecting Bartlett’s mistakes.
All the paperwork states to Capital Guest House…on Bartlett’s paperwork, on the council etc….showing my mother’s guest house and therefore BPR valid.
On top of this, you break-in to my mother’s Guest House on Tue 21/4/2020.
Which is the same day Bartlett sent me a letter, you clearly work together.
You changed the locks of my mother’s guest house without telling me & that is breaking and entry and against the law. You tried to make me homeless.
You told the Greek business people on 23/04/2020 that the place is abandoned but is not as my credit card bills etc go there. Also they have been there to see this is a lie.
Also my mother’s shares are sent there and you failed to find out these exist still and you took possession to hide evidence of Barlett hiding this evidence.
The Dec 2019 court order does not say I can not live there.
And the Dec 2019 court knew I lived there and I agreed in the court order I would leave when there had been found a buyer. It is in the court order you have.
And you know I pay the bills there as you were sent emails on this.
Who gave you the right to change the locks knowing I live there.
I have changed them back as I live there.
And you kept asking for the keys but you never answered my questions (see email below & including Fraud).
Also I point out my mother’s will states i have a right to live there. Read the past Will. Also the additions to the past Will that say I can live there and not changed by the Dec 2019 court..
And now due to the new evidence which was not known in the court in Dec 2019 of fraud by Bartlett and the court expert saying my mother was hit by Woodside the lawyer who works for Bartlett.
And you know these people.
People who do fraud to the elderly and you protect them.
I ask now for you to be removed and damage and money to be returned.
I am now using the will (as it states) to let me permanently live at my mother’s guest house and on top of this claiming the debts (N1 you were sent months ago).
I had a right to with the sale to the Greek business people who are now helping me to run my mother’s guest house.
If you fight this I will damage you in the press and ask you to be removed from being a lawyer.
Note: The N1 debts was accepted by the court and the judge only requested alteration for acceptance and saw no reason not to be done.
These debts are real and you ignore them. Once again you failed in your duties of care.
You look like you are involved with a lawyer who did fraud and murder of my mother and I can not work with such a person.
The court expert said and the court did not reject the fact my mother was hit by your lawyer Woodside to change her will and rob her and once again no defence.
In past emails you said you would report Bartlett if you found fault BUT your actions show otherwise.
You failed in your duty to report these crimes and clear fraud.
You are not to remove the Caveat I did to my mother’s estate for the reasons listed above.
You are to take no more actions and wait to be removed by the court if you force this. I seek considerable damages for your actions.
I am back in my mother’s guest house as I have a right to live there and my bills are greater than the estate and under common law I have a right to stay there.
And for the reasons listed above
I hope I never meet you…
You are to send a full list of all your actions to this date with my mother’s guest estate including advertisement for sale.
Regards,
Mark
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <
Subject: PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTI
To: Michelle Johnson
To James and Bartlett,
The property 32 hoole road has been privately sold to clear my debts giants my mothers estate.
All her Will support this action.
I can show to the court what I state below is true and lawyers support this action.
You can contact the Greek Business people on the following email
I am now taking other actions against you doing fraud to my mother and I
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/tax-file/
Regards
mark
Dr Mark Jones FRSM
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Freeman of the City of London
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <>
Date: Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:26 PM
Subject: PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
To: Beresford, James <james.beresford>,
From: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Parliamentary Candidate TBA
Freeman of the City of London
All correspondences by email.
Dear James,
New evidence has been produced to show more corruption on my mother’s estate.
Please let me see the accounts before you submit them to the court or take any actions otherwise it will look like you are part of Fraud and murder.
You are the court-appointed executor of my mother’s will.
Under the law, I can have you removed as I am the only person left alive of my mother’s estate.
My half-sister has died and I am the only person left.
A settlement was done in Dec 2019 to settle out of court but for the following reasons can now change this
1) I have found out 100,000 care bill was done wrong by Bartlett to do a crime and now found also done to the taxman so I never agreed to fraud
2) reasons listed in the email below
3) other issues that were not suggested at that time which are damaging to the other side.
4) more issues See File
The other side of my sister’s estate has a problem in the fact their lawyers Bartlett lied to court etc so they can’t come back to court to stop me being the executor.
In fact my sister and her estate can be shown working with criminal intent with Bartlett and Woodside (Court expert Dec 2019 and others said my mother said he hit my mother for gain. Other evidence backs this up now).
Also, the will states my mother’s guest house goes to me in the past wills see email below.
or I can put a commercial bill that is greater than the estate which all wills says all bills must be paid.
See N1 attached
The buyers of the guest house want to deal with me and my debts as commercial debt on my mother’s guest house and I will sue to get this.
They are Greek business people see email x
If I go to court I can obtain my mother’s home by the payment of my commercial bills which are greater than my mother’s estate and all wills of my mother say must be first.
Our lawyers say this by law will happen.
I will sue Bartlett and others for ignoring this.
Any suggestions welcome
I hope to hear from you soon
Best wishes
Mark
Dr Mark Jones FRSM
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Freeman of the City of London
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:21 PM
Subject: You can use this email and put a yes or no or any other answer to the 30 questions.
To: Beresford, James <>
Dear James
Thank you for your email.
I restate my mother was murdered and this is connected to Bartletts law firm & my sister estate & her son in law MA and others including the court medical experts support this.
You have been sent links to a web site which experts say shows a crime has occurred and this should be reported.
You can use this email and put a yes or no or any other answer to the 30 questions below.
Please answer them as I must move this forward. The buyers of the guest house will contact you this week subject to the lawyers.
Independent estate agents will be giving their views on the price.
The following issues to be addressed and answered:
Issue 1
- Please send evidence that HMRCstill hold the £3,522 as a deposit for the Inheritance Tax due
1.1 send all paperwork from HMRC now…as this is evidence of a crime.
1.2 Barlett did not say after 5 years this 3522 was a deposit in any court papers.
1.3 if you went to the Tax man why did they say to me that it was Fraud but not you?
1.4 you want the name of the TAX man but why?
1.5 where is the file from Barlett?
1.6 if you do not send this soon your credibility is zero.
1.7 as you must need this paperwork
1.8 Please send it now
YOU say in email 6/3/2020
I confirm however, that, if, after I have received the files of papers for Messers Bartletts solicitors, there is evidence of fraud, this will of course be reported to the authorities.
1.6 You must have this file?
Action: please send me all files
Question 1: are you going to do this & when?
Issue 2
You say
I confirm however, that, if, after I have received the files of papers for Messers Bartletts solicitors, there is evidence of fraud, this will of course be reported to the authorities.
BUT see past emails that shows Fraud of 100,000 when 10,000 and it has web links to show this. It list Barlett’s own court papers.
Please see past email Feb 20 Feb 2020 I sent you.
I state:
1 James, you are a lawyer. see Appendix below
1.2 you must know SRA and the case law they use for dishonesty
Please see SRA guide https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/decision-making/guidance/general-dishonesty/
1.3 So you can see Barlett has done Fraud & more. See Exhibits which Bartlett sent to court
see
QUESTION 2 of 1.3 Answer please Yes or no is this Fraud or a crime?
QUESTION 3 of 1.3.1 Did Bartlett do Fraud as lawyers says he has and the tax office too.
QUESTION 4 of 1.4 And as I understand it you should report it, see SRA, Taxman, etc. And your own guidelines of the company you work for.
https://www.blmlaw.com/tax-facilitation-statement
QUESTION 5 of 1.5 Have you reported it?
QUESTION 6 of 1.6 If you don’t report it who do I complain to about you?
BUT you need to take action now to the Fraud police etc and report this to the SRA.
Everything should stop as this effects the court order of Dec 2019 as they did not know about this.
The sale of my mother’s home and business to be stopped OTHERWISE YOU ARE INVOLVED IN A CRIME.
Question 7 are you going to do this?
Issue 3
- Munn’sAccountancy Services Limited say they will do the accounts and are happy there’s more than enough evidence to show it should get full Business Property Rates (BPR).
“Looking at what you have gathered so far, you do have plenty of evidence to show that the property was a business property and not simply residential, so you should pass this on to the solicitor handling your mothers estate”
https://www.munnsaccountingservices.com/about
And from my email of Feb 20 2020
4 Taxman is clear: no payment on my mother’s account, and you can ask them.
4.1 also this is based on Chester council letter saying this is a business
AND YOU WERE SENT THIS
4.1.1 email from Council Tax on 17 Feb 2020 saying my mother’s home is Bed & Breakfast and was Non-Domestic Rate as it was a business for years
4.2 it has business insurance see letter from insurance firm 4 March 2019
4.3 Accountant and lawyers both say
4.3.1 my mother’s property was a business “Bed and Breakfast” therefore entitled to Business Property Rates (BPR) …therefore no Tax
4.3.2 do phone taxman and they said they are happy with this
4.4 Bartlett did this wrong when he was executor
QUESTION 8: DO YOU AGREE TO THIS?
Issue 4
You say
May I please remind you that I need all evidence pertaining to the claim for Business Property Relief by 12 March 2020?
This has to be delayed for Issue 2 & ABOVE ISSUES
QUESTION 9: DO YOU AGREE TO THIS?
Issue 5
You say
After that date, I will be submitting all relevant paperwork to a specialist tax accountant to
But See issue 2
Question 10: Or do I need to go back to court?
Issue 6
Shares. To be sent but you should be able to find this.
Bartlett should have done a search for this
Where is this work done?
Question 11: do you agree Bartlett did not do things right
Question 12: do you think he failed being a executor for my mother?
Issue 7
you say
As I have confirmed previously, until a Grant of Representation has been granted by the Court I cannot access any funds. All proven and due debts of the estate will be paid at that juncture.
Question 13 BUT am I going to be paid first as my debt are commercial and first in place before any others. AND WILLS SAY ALL DEBTS PAID FIRST
Question 14 Do you agree I am entitled to this money….and will be the first one to be paid….
Please answer this
Issue 8
Please send me the Court Order from December 2019 and anything else with this.
Question 15: can you send me this?
Issue 9
You say 6/03/2020
I believe that I have dealt with most of these points in earlier correspondence.
I SAY NO you have not.
PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
Email of 20 February 2020 .
Please answer the following
4 Either way, knowing what we now know due to the court case of Dec 2019
4.1 We know that Bartlett put in in the tax forms (several times from 2015 to 2019) a false price for the guest house 450,000 in 2015 when in fact in 2007 it was 600,000 (see files)
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/20MayCourtNOTRCJdoc2.pdf
and exhibits 038 shows in 24 oct 2007 my mother’s home being forced sold by MA (he said this in the court case Dec 2019) for 600,000 when it worth more & he knew I had put money into it.
See
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/bartletts-solicitors-house-valuations/
shows 71 Hoole road was going for 490,000 in Sep 2018 and it is 10% the size etc of my mother’s home
4.2 Also Bartlett deliberately when he knew my mother’s home was a business and therefore exempted from tax and therefore it should be zero did not do this. IN fact he tried to cause a bill to force a sale he would profit from.
4.3 by Bartlett doing 4.1 & 4.2 Bartlett damaged my mother’s estate.
4.3.1 And Bartlett did this as he knew I had bills from 2015 which should be paid before any other bills for this business. Also all wills say these bills should be paid.
4.3.2 And the RCJ said my bills are greater than the value of my mother’s business. Therefore how can you sell it?
4.4 Then Bartlett put in false care bill of 100,000 to my mother’s estate from 2015 to 2019 when in fact it was 10,000 WHICH WAS FOUND OUT in Dec 2019. Bartlett knew about this from 2015.
4.4.1 He lied saying this bill was my sisters actions but this was a lie done by Barlett on many documents done by him and in court.
4.5 The court medical expert said the 10,000 care bills should not exist due to the level of care issues my mother had and should not have been paid and we want this 10,000 back
4.5.1 Also other care bills which should not have been paid and this money should be returned to my mother’s estate (100?k)
5 Bartlett as executor of my mother’s will should have known about the shares which one alone is worth 4000 but he deliberately hide this.
5.2 Bartlett had the power to find these shares out but did not
5.2.1 My Sister& MA knew about these shares.
5.3 I can now show corrupt inquest of my mother in 2015 has lost tape of this & done to do more coverup of her murder…and you see all this and do nothing?
QUESTION 16 of 5.1 Bartlett became executor of my mother’s will by force to do a crime and you should of reported him?
5.1.1 have you done this as if not you are committing a crime.
6 Bartlett and his Barrister Green went to court seeking damages to me for pay 100,000 care bill that did not exist and other bills which are not valid for a Will case.
7 Bartlett and Barrister Green represented my sister & MA who had advantages of these Crimes in court to cause damage so Bartlett gained by 1) forced selling of my mother’s home cheap 2) disputes etc.
QUESTION 17 of 7.1 Therefore all the court cases are removed as they went to court with dirty hands and knew they were doing a crime but were found out. Do you agree?
The Court was unaware of these above actions; therefore, Bartlett & Green went to Court with dirty hands. They lied about this and other things.
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio.
Question 18 Do you agree a new court case must start due to this crime?
8 And then Bartlett trying out court settlement in Dec 2019 to hide this fraud action which is also Tax fraud against the government when I did not know the facts but they tried to shut me up over this.
9 And MA, my sister’s son in law who is a police detective would have known all of this being wrong but ignored this crime which
10 Like you MA is subject to the following
10.1 There is a common-law offence of misconduct in public office. A police detective and lawyers have a duty to preserve the Queen’s peace & prevent crimes. And not lie in court.
11 I have pointed out the taxman is happy and has said no need for any other accounts.
11.1 Also, my sister took files to make it hard to do the accounts and this can be proved as some files that went missing appeared in my sister’s statements to the court.
11.2 And these files showed I put money into my mother’s business as I was a part owner and investor in it which has been ignored…
12 I have sorted out my mother’s the tax, found shares, sorted out bills etc which is what Bartlett as Executor should have done
12.1 The Dec 2019 lawyers said all the wills were done wrong and you need to sort this out.
QUESTION 19 of 12.2 ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS?
12.3 The Dec 2019 lawyers said I can get money back with damages for 12 & 12.1 etc
QUESTION 20 of 12.4 ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS?
12.1 and why should I pay for Bartlett deliberate damages and also you to be paid, when I have done all the work
12.2 The Dec 2019 court did not know the above points
QUESTION 21 of 12.3 are you going to stop any payment to Bartlett due to this?
QUESTION 22 of 13 I ask for the sale of the guest house to be stopped as also from the above and the fact my mother wanted me to have the guest house and I can prove I put money into it.
My debts are to be paid first and are greater than the value of the guest house.
Do you agree to this?
And I have the right to take legal actions against anyone on this commercial bill.
13.1 And my mother’s Wills were changed by force and the medical expert supports this in the Dec 2019 case which must be investigated and this makes my mother guest house mine and you must do this action as it is a true statement of fact
Email from me Date 21/02/2020 sent to you ….
6 Bartlett is your problem as he has legally damaged my mother’s estate.
6.1 He also damaged me as he was told bills to be paid by me and ignored it.
6.2 Bartlett’s failed to do any of this as executor duties.
It would have been easy to find this out, but they were going to steal everything connected to my mother’s property!
6.3 If you include the 100,000 care bill lies and the undervaluing my mother’s home by 750,000 etc
6.3 listed in Tax forms Bartlett used in Court
6.4 And now the shares are appearing which Bartlett should have done.
6.5 The court medical expert said the UNCUT video was authentic and as it showed me walking into the nursing home
asking my mother questions
- a) My mother saying she was hit byWoodsidewho did her will, changed her will by force to the advantage of Bartlett
- b) and my mother said she wanted me to have my mother’s home which is a business and by constructive trusts is mine
and then I walk out of the nursing home and no way was it set up. My mother was telling the truth.
Other experts back this up.
6.6 That my mother was clearly from the court case murdered to shut her up, but this was not looked at in court case, and barristers avoid this issue.
Video on here
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/
Short video here
QUESTION 23 of 6.7 You should report this Yes or No
If NO THEN YOU ARE PART OF A CRIME.
You do not have to wait for paperwork from Barlett as I list it on the web site OR YOU CAN ASK ME FOR MORE.
6.8 all proceeding should stop as this has new evidence
QUESTION 24 of 6.8.1 Answer please Yes or no?
If NO THEN YOU ARE PART OF A CRIME.
You do not have to wait for paperwork from Barlett as I list it on the web site
7 you agreed that my £14,929.40 bills for guest house insurance should be paid NOW as it is a long term debt for my mother’s business
QUESTION 25 of 7.1 please answer Yes /no
issue 10
As the coroner R has lost my mother’s inquest tapes and other issues, this should pause everything as no urgency to pay any bill but mine
Also the coroner R knew MA (my sister’s son in law who want 180,000 from my mother’s estate).
The coroner R who lost the inquest tape that showed crimes.
And now the Dec 2019 shows new evidence.
QUESTION 26
will you stop payments to my sister estate of 180,000 due to these issues?
if not this I will go to court
and I will say Dec 2019 was done on lies
Issue 11
QUESTION 27
You say you don’t know bartlett
but you must know someone who knows him?
Issue 12
QUESTION 28: do you know anyone in this case?
Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA) or anyone who knows him?
or Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu (N)
or Dr Bland
Barber Dunbavand
or anyone who knows them
etc
Issue 13
QUESTION 29
Have you contacted the Dec 2019 court medical expert Dr Howard who states as he is also a lawyer that my mother’s Wills were done wrong and my mother’s inquest must be reopened due to the new evidence of 1) MA actions, 2) debts 100,000 when 10,000, 3) Ambulance record that shows my mother was nearly murdered in 2013 as she was going to see a lawyer to name that Mr Woodside hit her to change her wills from leaving me her business and home to giving half to my sister so MA could get a cut when they did nothing for my mother etc 3) protecting a Dr Bland who was clinical negligent to my mother but stopped by my sister as he helped in her & Ma crime against my mother 4) who lied at my mother’s inquest 5) who was struck off in 2018 as a pedo
Dec 2019 court medical expert Dr
Issue 14
Issue Subject Access Request
I confirm that your subject access request is being dealt with by my firm’s Data Protection team.
Question 30 : when am I having it?
I hope to hear from you soon.
Mark
Dr Mark Jones FRSM
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Freeman of the City of London
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Beresford, James <>
Date: Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: Response from Nationwide Building Society [
To: Dr Mark Jones
Dear Mark
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely
James
James Beresford
Partner
From: Dr Mark Jones
Sent: 06 March 2020 12:57
To: Beresford, James
Cc: Brian Gerrish; Jarman Brian; Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP Rt Hon Boris Johnson; CORBYN, Jeremy
Subject: Fwd: Response from Nationwide Building Society
This message originated outside your organization
n
Dr M Jones BY EMAIL ONLY
Our Ref: 155372.1 Your Ref:
Confidential – 1 50460461v1
6 March 2020
Dear Mark Mavis Banks – Administration of Estate
Thank you for your email earlier today.
I am still in the process of investigating the estate.
I can however confirm that HMRC still hold the £3,522 as a deposit for the Inheritance Tax due. I have to submit a new Inheritance Tax return to them when I have all the relevant information. Any further inheritance tax will have to be paid at that juncture.
As I have said in earlier correspondence, my Court appointed role is to administer your mother’s estate which I will do.
I note your point 11, please can you provide the contact details of the person at HMRC as this will make the submission of the inheritance tax return simpler. Otherwise, in order to claim Business Property Relief, three years of accounts and tangible evidence have to be provided.
May I please remind you that I need all evidence pertaining to the claim for Business Property Relief by 12 March 2020?
After that date, I will be submitting all relevant paperwork to a specialist tax accountant to
prepare a report for inheritance tax purposes.
You have referred to your mother’s shareholdings, I should be grateful if you would provide details of these so I can make further enquires.
As I have confirmed previously, until a Grant of Representation has been granted by the Court I cannot access any funds. All proven and due debts of the estate will be paid at that juncture.
In previous correspondence, you referred to some proposed buyers of the property, as a matter of courtesy, I confirm that I have not heard from them as yet.
Email of 27 February 2020.
I note your comments regarding HMRC, I should be grateful to receive this evidence that you have in your possession. Furthermore as requested above please provide the contact details of person at HMRC who has told you this so that I may speak to him/her.
In respects of the other points you have raised in this email. As you are aware I am acting pursuant to the Court Order from December 2019. Until the Court directs me otherwise, I am duty bound to follow the terms of this Order.
Email of 20 February 2020.
I believe that I have dealt with most of these points in earlier correspondence.
I confirm however, that, if, after I have received the files of papers for Messers Bartletts solicitors, there is evidence of fraud, this will of course be reported to the authorities.
I confirm that I am investigating the estate with a view to ensuring that the correct figures are declared for inheritance tax purposes. HMRC require the submission of a new inheritance tax return which will be forthcoming.
I confirm that your subject access request is being dealt with by my firm’s Data Protection team.
Finally, to hopefully, alleviate any concerns you may have, I confirm that have never met Mr Bartlett or any of his associates.
I should be grateful if you would let me have all the evidence you have in relation to the claim for Business Property Relief by the Court deadline so that I may proceed with matters.
Yours sincerely
James Beresford Partner BLM
Dementia fraud to be used as an example of a crime done to the elderly.
Dear James,
I hope this email finds you well.
Please find the following attachment.
Questions to be answered for 5/3/2020
1 did the taxman keep that money (see attachment from the Bank) in that account for Mavis Bank for her inheritance tax bill?
2 Therefore was this a final settlement for the Tax man?
3 Or was this amount by tax paid back to Bartlet or associates?
3.1 Has the money from my mother been pocketed when returned from the tax man?
JB I can however confirm that HMRC still hold the £3,522 as a deposit for the Inheritance Tax due. I have to submit a new Inheritance Tax return to them when I have all the relevant information. Any further inheritance tax will have to be paid at that juncture.
4 Either way, knowing what we now know due to the court case of Dec 2019
4.1 We know that Bartlett put in in the tax forms (several times from 2015 to 2019) a false price for the guest house 450,000 in 2015 when in fact in 2007 it was 700,000 (see files)
4.2 Also Bartlett deliberately when he knew my mother’s home was a business and therefor exempted from tax and therefore it should be zero did not do this. IN fact he tried to cause a bill to force a sale he would profit from.
4.3 by Bartlett doing 4.1 & 4.2 Bartlett damaged my mother’s estate.
4.3.1 And Bartlett did this as he knew I had bills from 2015 which should be paid before any other bills for this business. Also all wills say these bills should be paid.
4.3.2 And the RCJ said my bills are greater than the value of my mother’s business. Therefore how can you sell it?
4.4 Then Bartlett put in false care bill of 100,000 to my mother estate from 2015 to 2019 when in fact it was 10,000 in 2019.
4.4.1 He lied saying this bill was my sisters actions but this was a lie done by Barlett on many documents done by him and in court.
4.5 The court medical expert said the 10,000 care bills should not exist due to the level of care issues my mother had and should not have been paid and we want this 10,000 back
4.5.1 Also other care bills which should not have been paid and this money should be returned to my mother’s estate (100?k)
5 Bartlett as executor of my mother’s will should have known about the shares which one alone is worth 4000 but he deliberately hide this.
5.2 Bartlett had the power to find these shares out but did not
5.2.1 My Sister& MA knew about these shares.
5.1 Bartlett became executor of my mother’s will by force to do a crime and you should of reported him?
5.1.1 have you done this as if not you are committing a crime.
6 Bartlett and his Barrister Green went to court seeking damages to me for pay 100,000 care bill that did not exist and other bills which are not valid for a Will case.
7 Bartlett and Barrister Green represented my sister & MA who had advantages of these Crimes in court to cause damage so Bartlett gained the by 1) forced selling of my mother’s home cheap 2) disputes etc.
7.1 Therefore all the court cases are removed as they went to court with dirty hands and knew they were doing a crime but were found out.
8 And then Bartlett trying out court settlement in Dec 2019 to hide this fraud action which is also Tax fraud against the government when I did not know the facts but they tried to shut me up over this.
9 And MA, my sister son in law who is a police detective would have known all of this being wrong but ignored this crime which
10 Like you MA is a subject to the following
10.1 There is a common-law offence of misconduct in public office. A police detective and lawyer have a duty to preserve the Queen’s peace & prevent crimes. And not lie in court.
11 I have pointed out the taxman is happy and has said no need for any other accounts.
11.1 Also, my sister took files to make it hard to do the accounts and this can be proved as some files that went missing appeared in my sister statements to the court.
11.2 And these files showed I put money into my mother’s business as I was a part owner and investor in it which has been ignored…
12 I have sorted out the tax, found shares, sorted out bills etc which is what Bartlett as Executor should have done
12.1 The Dec 2019 lawyers said all the wills were done wrong and you need to sort this out.
12.1 The Dec 2019 lawyers said I can get money back with damages for 12 & 12.1 etc
12.1 and why should I pay for Bartlett deliberate damages and also you to be paid, when I have done all the work
12.2 The Dec 2019 court did not know the above points
12.3 Can you please answer the questions below I sent on 27 and 20 Feb 2020, to you
13 I ask for the sale of the guest house to be stopped as also from the above and the fact my mother wanted me to have the guest house and I can prove I put money into it.
My debts are to be paid first and are greater than the value of the guest house.
And I have the right to take legal actions againt any one on this commerical bill.
13.1 And my mother’s Wills were changed by force and the medical expert supports this in the Dec 2019 case which must be investigated and makes my mother guest house mine and you must do this action as it is a true statement of fact
I hope to hear from you soon listing answer to all these points
And please pay the money now I have asked for including other debts as discussed in the emails of 27 and 20 Feb 2020.
Regards
Mark
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones
Date: Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:36 AM
Subject: Tax Fraud: Mavis Banks Deceased – No.32 Hoole Road, and New Appointed Executor – Our Ref: PNB/BOU44 (in connection with PNB/BAN46 Fwd: 207508787 – 32 Hoole Road
To: Beresford, James
Dear James,
I now have had files from the coroner.
It will be possible to reopen my mother’s inquest due to the new evidence from the Dec 2019 court case.
Can you please answer the questions below I sent on Feb 20, 2020, to you
Also, lawyers and accountants and the HM Revenue and Customs have said
“Looking at what you have gathered so far, you do have plenty of evidence to show that the property was a business property and not simply residential, so you should pass this on to the solicitor handling your mother’s estate.”
So no tax on my mother estate.
Therefore any bill by Bartlett law firm will not be paid as they did everything wrong, see email below.
Also, my sister estate who want 180,000 can also be removed for the above reasons as new evidence shows she and my sister son (MA) in law involved in my mother’s murder and motive for money off her.
I have commercial bills against a commercial business which I want paying now.
Please answer the points below.
Thank you
Mark
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <mark@myvibe.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:04 PM
Subject: URGENT Fwd: Thaav
To: Beresford, James
Cc: <mark.aitken@>, <sarah.hill@>, <patrick.connolly@>, <report@sra.org.uk>, Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP Rt Hon Boris Johnson <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, Greg <handsg@parliament.uk>, Jeremy <jeremy.corbyn.mp@parliament.uk>, Chris Matheson <chris@chrismatheson.co.uk>, Zac Goldsmith <zac@zacgoldsmith.com>, AF Team <contact@actionfraud.pnn.police.uk>,
From Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Parliamentary Candidate
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Freeman of the City of London
Please contact me by this email.
Date 21/02/2020
Dear James,
Thank you for your email.
Please be clear on all of the following points
Please answer the following:
1 James, you are a lawyer. see Appendix below
1.2 you must know SRA and the case law they use
Please see SRA guide https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/decision-making/guidance/general-dishonesty/
1.3 So you can see Barlett has done Fraud. See Exhibits which Bartlett sent to court
see
1.3 Answer please Yes or no is this Fraud or a crime?
1.3.1 Did Bartlett do Fraud as my teacher of law says he has and the tax office too.
1.4 And as I understand it you should report it, see SRA, Taxman, etc. your own guidelines.
https://www.blmlaw.com/tax-facilitation-statement
1.5 Have you reported it?
2 Have you contacted the taxman and got all the files.
2.1 When did you contact the tax office?
2.2 Who did you talk to in the tax office?
2.3 Why did you if not do this?
3.1 If so I want a copy of all files etc
3.2 the 3555 issue…a crime…see …
4 Taxman is clear: no payment on my mother’s account, and you can ask them.
4.1 this is based on Chester council letter saying this is a business
4.1.1 email from Council Tax on 17 Feb 2020 saying my mother home is Bed & Breakfast and was Non-Domestic Rate as it was a business for years
4.2 it has business insurance see letter from insurance firm 4 March 2019
4.3 Accountant and lawyers both say
4.3.1 my mother’s property was a business “Bed and Breakfast” therefore entitled to Business Property Rates (BPR) …therefore no Tax
4.3.2 do phone taxman and they said they are happy with this
4.4 Bartlett did this wrong when he was executor
4.5 Answer please Yes or no?
6 Bartlett is your problem as he has legally damaged my mother’s estate.
6.1 He also damaged me as he was told bills to be paid by me and ignored it.
6.2 Bartlett’s failed to do any of this as executor duties.
It would have been easy to find this out, but they were going to steal everything connected my mother’s property!
6.3 If you include the 100,000 lies and the undervaluing my mother’s home by 750,000 etc
6.3 listed in Tax forms Bartlett used in Court
6.4 And now the shares are appearing which Bartlett should have done.
6.5 The court medical expert said the UNCUT video was authentic and as it showed me walking into the nursing home and then back out and no way it was set up. My mother was telling the truth.
Other experts back this up.
6.6 That my mother was clearly from the court case murdered to shut her up, but this was not looked at in court case, and barristers avoid this issue.
Video on here
http://corruptsolicitors.co.uk/corrupt-solicitors-chester/bartletts-solicitors-chester/
Short video here
6.7 You should report this Yes or No
6.8 all proceeding should stop as this has new evidence
6.8.1 Answer please Yes or no?
7 you agreed that my £14,929.40 bills for guest house insurance should be paid NOW as it is a long term debt for my mother’s business
7.1 please answer Yes /no
8 I now put in
Subject all access request (SAR)
I request all correspondence on my mother and me.
9 Are you sure you did not meet Bartlett or any of his associates due to the following
https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-beresford-a3a766110/?originalSubdomain=uk
it says on the link you are
Individually ranked in Band 1 (Chester) for Chambers HNW 2017
Chambers and Partners
Sep 2017
9.1 as Ballet’s does loads of will
9.2 please answer Yes or no?
I hope to hear from you soon.
Regards
Mark
Appendix
JAMES BERESFORD
https://www.blmlaw.com/people/james-beresford
see Fraud
more at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/introduction
see also
Evictions in the time of Covid-19 – Renters and occupiers and the Coronavirus Act 2020
1. The Coronavirus Act 2020 received Royal Assent on 25th March 2020. It passed swiftly through the law-making process for obvious reasons. Never in recent times has the country faced a global pandemic of this proportion and emergency measures were required.
2. At a time when the collective mantra is stay at home pressure has built such that amendments and further changes have been made to the provisions originally set down.
3. On 18 March 2020 the government promised the following:
a. “The government has announced a radical package of measures to protect renters and landlords affected by coronavirus. As a result, no renter in either social or private accommodation will be forced out of their home during this difficult time.
b. Emergency legislation will be taken forward as an urgent priority so that landlords will not be able to start proceedings to evict tenants for at least a 3 month period. As a result of these measures, no renters in private or social accommodation needs to be concerned about the threat of eviction”.
4. The Bill itself, before Parliament on 23rd March 2020 focused primarily on extensions to required notices for possession across the principal housing statutes until 30th September 2020.
5. A cursory analysis revealed the wholescale inadequacy of the same standing alone in the current crisis. Following immediate pressure from many actors in the sector the Government has moved further to meet its original stated intention.
6. So, from 27th March 2020, the Master of the Rolls with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement has stayed all on-going possession actions brought under CPR 55 and all proceedings seeking to enforce an order for possession by a warrant or writ of possession for a period of 90 days [Practice Direction 51Z(PD) via CPR 51.2]. Claims for injunctive relief are not subject to the stay. The Practice Direction ceases to effect on 30th October 2020.
7. This will enable people to follow the health guidance and to stay in their homes (including not attending court) and covers residential tenancies and mortgagees and those licensees covered by the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.
8. Those provisions of course sit within a context of anxieties of health amidst unprecedented economic uncertainty in recent times and in which the packages of financial support set out remain unclear as to reach and effect.
9. The Government has provided guidance to landlords and tenants as to seeking agreement where arrears accrue as a consequence of Covid-19. It will further amend the pre-action protocol on arrears and extend this to the private rented sector.
10. Furthermore, £500m is to be allocated to assist with hardship for renters alongside increases in April in Universal Credit and Housing Benefit and Local Housing Allowance being available to cover 30% of rent.
11. It is notable that greater protection is given to business tenancies by s.82 as this operates as a block on forfeiture during the relevant period. This is in accordance with the government’s efforts to support small businesses during the virus outbreak. There is no equivalent protection in relation to forfeiture of residential accommodation.
12. Section 81 of the Act is headed “Residential tenancies in England and Wales: protection from eviction” and reference is made to Schedule 29 where the provisions about notice periods are contained.
13. Ordinarily a landlord seeking to recover possession of residential accommodation must give notice to the tenant before they start proceedings. The period varies from case to case. So, a notice to quit (applicable to Rent Act protected tenancies) must be 4 weeks and a notice of intention to bring proceedings for a secure (i.e public sector) tenancy or assured non-shorthold (i.e. private sector post 1988 tenancy) is usually between 2 weeks and 28 days. In cases involving nuisance proceedings can start immediately. 2 month’s notice is needed for an Assured Shorthold tenancy.
14. In the case of an assured tenancy or a secure tenancy the court can dispense with the service of a notice if it is just and equitable to do. For statutory tenancies under the Rent Act 1977 there is no requirement of notice.
15. The proposed changes increase the required notice to 3 months in place of the current, shorter periods. The new notice periods only apply for notices served between now and 30th September 2020 (“The relevant period”) when it is presumably hoped that the virus will have departed, petered out or a vaccine has been found.
16. The amendments only apply to notices served during this “relevant period”. They do not apply to cases where the landlord has already served notice or where the landlord has already started proceedings. This is a serious issue because it often happens that a landlord will issue a notice, or even start proceedings, but then negotiate payment arrangements with the tenant.
17. Tenants are obviously much more likely to fall into arrears and so fail to meet the terms of any such agreement even though they would have been able to comply had they not lost work or income because of Covid–19.
18. The amendments and extensions to the pre-action protocol private renters will materialize, but in due course landlords may of course proceed to start or continue with proceedings against tenants whose arrears have built or been accelerated by Covid-19.
19. In addition the relevant period is 6 months but the notice requirement is only 3 months. The period of 6 months obviously contemplates that special protective measures are needed for the whole of this time. It is therefore difficult to understand the reason for limiting the notice period to 3 months. A landlord will be able fully to comply with this yet tenants will still lose their homes within the period when exceptional protective measures are warranted.
20. Both the 3 month requirement and the relevant period may be extended.
Closer analysis of the amendments
Rent Act 1977
21. S5 of the Act is amended to require during the relevant period a three – week notice period for protected tenancies. This is in place of the four week notice to quit previously.
22. For the relevant period it will now be necessary to serve a notice of intention to commence possession proceedings on a statutory tenant (previously there was no requirement). New sections (4A -F) are inserted into the Act requiring three months, notice to be given in writing. The notice must (4C): <!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>
a) describe the statutory tenancy
b) state the address , name of the tenant, name and address of the landlord
c) state that the landlord intends to start proceedings
d) state the ground/s relied upon and the reasons why
e) state the date on or after which the landlord intends to start proceedings
f) explain that the landlord is prohibited from relying on the notice unless three months, notice is given.
23. The notice can be left at the premises or sent to the address ( 4D). Accordingly proof of receipt is not essential.
24. The landlord will have to satisfy the court that there has been compliance with the notice requirements and only the grounds relied upon in the notice can be pursued unless the court gives permission (4E).
25. As with secure and assured tenancies the court may dispense with the notice requirements for statutory tenancies if it is just and equitable ( 4B). The same established case law will apply in these applications: see for example: Fernandes v Parvardin (1982) 5 H.L.R. 33, CA and Boyle v Verrall [1996] E.G.C.S. 144, (1997) 29 H.L.R. 436 . Landlords may seek to argue that the loss of income alone is a basis for dispensation but this is unlikely to gain traction at a time when the purpose of the new legislation is supposedly to protect tenants from eviction.
26. Although notices served on statutory tenants in the relevant period are likely to be few and far between the fact that the notice is not in a prescribed form may mean that there will be some scope to challenge validity.
Housing Act 1985
27. Section 83 of the Act is amended to require a three – month notice period. This applies equally to cases involving the nuisance ground (Ground 2) where previously no notice was required.
28. Section 83 ZA of the Act which deals with notices in relation to proceedings for possession on absolute ground for anti-social behavior is similarly amended requiring three months, notice.
29. At a time of heightened restrictions on liberty and potential civil unrest it is perhaps surprising that the three month notice period has been applied even in these cases however it is likely that in a serious case the court will dispense with the need for service.
30. Possession of flexible tenancies under section 107D of the Act is also subject to a three month notice period.
Housing Act 1988
31. All of the various notice periods under s.8 are extended to three months including ASB grounds save that there is a dispensation provision as with the HA 1985,s.83.
32. s.21 is amended so that notice given to an AST during the relevant period is three months.
Housing Act 1996
33. Sections 128 and 143E are amended to ensure that introductory tenancies are subject to a three month, notice period.
Prescribed forms
34. The amendments in paragraphs 10-12 of Schedule 29 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 will mean that all of the prescribed forms of notice mentioned will need to be amended. Potentially this will form a basis of challenge if the landlord does not use the new prescribed form particularly in the case of a mandatory ground or s.21 where there is no dispensation.
Conclusion
35. The immediate practical difficulties of possession hearings already listed has been lifted.
36. But in due course housing practitioners will need to hone their arguments in relation to reasonableness in discretionary cases. If rent arrears have arisen as a result of loss of work or illness during the crisis this must surely form the basis of a good reasonableness defence.
37. Cases involving anti-social behaviour might feature conflicts between neighbours accelerated by home confinement. Allegations could arise against vulnerable tenants whose mental health has been affected as a result of restrictions and the inability to access social support and services.
38. Applications for anti-social behaviour injunctions may rise, with the attendant danger for possessions on mandatory grounds and it is likely that unlawful evictions will increase, by landlords reacting to perceived risk from tenants or disputes over arrears related to Covid-19.
39. Aside from the medical crisis, the economic and social effects of Covid-19 will be immediate and ultimately far-reaching. As this extraordinary period is showing, the importance of ensuring legal protection of residence as a fundamental necessity to our society’s functioning has never been greater.
This article was produced by Jim Shepherd and John Hobson, members of our Housing, Social Welfare and Property team.
To contact Jim Shepherd’s and John Hobson’s Practice Manager Rachel Finch, please email r.finch@doughtystreet.co.uk or call 020 7404 1313.