An example of Dementia Fraud.
To be used in Parliamentary meeting as an example of fraud etcFrom: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Freeman of the City of London
Parliamentary Candidate
Scottish Freemason.
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.All correspondence by email as I am travelling and the only way to
reach me is through email.
To be used in Parliamentary meeting as an example of fraud etcFrom: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Freeman of the City of London
Parliamentary Candidate
Scottish Freemason.
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.All correspondence by email as I am travelling and the only way to
reach me is through email.
Please acknowledge this email and its attachments.
To HEAD of SRA & Law Society.
The following will be used as legal action against you for your failure of Duty of Care to my mother and many others. Who were robbed and more
Claim No E30LV485
Exhibits are now on website and books on Amazon.
Exhibits are now on website and books on Amazon.
also on the web site
Journalist and other said it is clear my mother was murdered for her home… that Woodside hit my mother and Bartlett still can not show how 100,000 care bills became 800 or how he undervalued my mother’s home by 700,000 etc or took my mother’s money without any reason…
and we have other saying they had the same issues now sent to politicians & police who are looking into Dementia Fraud.
There is now further evidence that my mother was murdered to steal her business and home, that Woodside her lawyer hit her to change her will by force to the advantage of Mr Bartlett (backed up by Expert witness and other evidence)
That David Green knows all of the below and still works on this case.
NOW
I went to court and Bartlett’s lawyer David Green lied in front of the judge on 27/11/2019, He said he had sent me his court proceeding by email as he should do as set out by the rules of the court but in fact had not See my emails exhibits Emails1of27112019 & Email2of27112019 (see bottom of this page)
Instead he gave it to me in the court with out any notice etc seeing I had no lawyer with me. I am not a lawyer.
(These are on the web site). Then he used this to his unfair advantage to help in a court case I was going to win.
Instead he gave it to me in the court with out any notice etc seeing I had no lawyer with me. I am not a lawyer.
(These are on the web site). Then he used this to his unfair advantage to help in a court case I was going to win.
Therefore from my N244….
I seek the court to appeal the decision of Judge Hodge in Liverpool 28/11/2019 who removed my right to have witnesses at my mother’s probate case.
I state the COP24 witnesses statements are valid & relevant to the case. I was without my lawyer on the 28/11/2019 & the court case was going to be only about pre-trial.
The claimant’s lawyer David Green said I was sent an email about this but my exhibits Emails1of27112019 & Email2of27112019 shows no such emails from them. Therefore he knowing lied & can not be a mistake as it was done to weaken my case. It can not be fair or right this to be allowed and effects my Rights to Fair trial. A transcript of the court case will show David Green’s lie to the court.
I ask for the court case to be delayed until this is sorted out. There is no rush as no payments to be resolved etc. If the case goes ahead It will be seen as corrupt as before this I was going to win and the other side wanted to settle out of court.Background of case
1 With Dr Howard’s report for the court 2019 was clear that I would win my mother’s case on probate.
2 The fact my mother also said Mr Woodside hit her and is backed up by Dr Howard’s report also helps me. There are many support exhibits & witnesses.3 Then on 27 of Nov 2019, I had a pre-trial hearing with the claimants lawyer David Green and the Judge (His Honor Judge Hodge QC). A nice judge but he Exhibit Emails1of28112019does not understand my mother was murdered and this is part of the case of chaining her wills to help criminals.
4 All was going well until the other side said I had not done witnesses statements.
5 This is not true. I am using the COP24s for statements (See Exhibit ReducedEvens &Exhibit 039) which I did in the past for my mother’s case. If the cop24 were suitable for the court of protection and judges in 2014? and with same issues, then why not in this court case.
6 Also I had sent these exhibits to everyone from the start 2018 and used them as exhibits.
The claimant’s lawyer David Green said I was sent an email about this but my exhibits Emails1of27112019 & Email2of27112019 shows no such emails from them. Therefore he knowing lied & can not be a mistake as it was done to weaken my case. It can not be fair or right this to be allowed and effects my Rights to Fair trial. A transcript of the court case will show David Green’s lie to the court.
I ask for the court case to be delayed until this is sorted out. There is no rush as no payments to be resolved etc. If the case goes ahead It will be seen as corrupt as before this I was going to win and the other side wanted to settle out of court.Background of case
1 With Dr Howard’s report for the court 2019 was clear that I would win my mother’s case on probate.
2 The fact my mother also said Mr Woodside hit her and is backed up by Dr Howard’s report also helps me. There are many support exhibits & witnesses.3 Then on 27 of Nov 2019, I had a pre-trial hearing with the claimants lawyer David Green and the Judge (His Honor Judge Hodge QC). A nice judge but he Exhibit Emails1of28112019does not understand my mother was murdered and this is part of the case of chaining her wills to help criminals.
4 All was going well until the other side said I had not done witnesses statements.
5 This is not true. I am using the COP24s for statements (See Exhibit ReducedEvens &Exhibit 039) which I did in the past for my mother’s case. If the cop24 were suitable for the court of protection and judges in 2014? and with same issues, then why not in this court case.
6 Also I had sent these exhibits to everyone from the start 2018 and used them as exhibits.
7 Then the Judge said I had not sent a list of witnesses I was going to call in court, but then I found the email on my phone showing I had done this.
Then the Judge said the COP24 were not related to the case. BUT they are by such issues as:
coercion with people trying to force my mother to sell her home against her wishes instead of leaving it to me.
My mother’s neighbour, who said my mother needed help by me and lacked capacity and show the other side are lying. I also was the one who put money into my mother’s business and mother was always going to leave me her business & home and she told everyone that.
8 The other witnesses supported this and they had nothing to gain by this. Also that they saw my sister try by force the sale of my mother’s home etc (Exhibit 039).
9 In contrast, the other side says my mother had capacity when wills were done, but they gain by this, and more importantly from the point of law they are irrelevant as the Wills were not done right or use MCA2005 etc Also 1) there are medical reports that show my mother did not have mental capacity 2) the wills should reflect the money I had put into my mother’s business.
This action also remove the intent of my mother giving me my mother’s guest house which the Witnesses all support as they saw I put money, time and left pension jobs to run the guest house when my mother was ill.
All backed up by my COP24 and my witnesses.
12 The Judge said I could appeal his decision to remove my witnesses, but that take 21 days and the case starts in 7 days. He did say I could go to the court in London. A judge should of tried to make the court case fair…
14 I am putting in appeal as that is my right by law and the court case can be paused as I am the only person alive from my mother’s will & not the lawyers and the other people who tried to kill and steal from my mother. And it is clear this is being hidden by the removal of my witnesses.
15 Then on the same day at the court case, the Judge went into the cost of the court case which they increased, but I pointed out how could go up if they have removed 4 of my witnesses? The judge smiled.
15.1 I then also pointed out Bartletts cost were very high almost London rates and this too was smiled at. Bartlett is known to over charge.
16 Then I brought up the N244 I sent to the court asking for the Judge to note the many issues in the case such as 1) lawyer Woodside hitting my mother 2|) Bartlett £100,000 care bills that become 800 (from 2015 to 2019 in the court papers) when I investigated and no receipt from the lawyers after year!. 3) The fact money was taken from my mother’s account by the lawyers Bartlett etc. 4) Then in the past the lawyer buying the law firm to be the executor of the will then undervaluing my mother’s business by 700,000, and the list goes on. (see web site for other who had the same issues by these lawyers).
17 The Judge acted like this was funny. But did not send it to the CSP. The judge was told about serious wrongs with evidence but took no actions. I said my mother was murdered…and nothing from him….and this is part of the probate case.
18 What I saw was a court case engineer to give a false result by removing my key witnesses.
19 This can not be fair and must be investigated.
19.1 This is a breach of Art 6 European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) Art 6, Right to Fair Trial.
20 The court case is not in a rush as my sister is the claimant and has died and the case is worth over million, so why the rush? Other than the claimant’s lawyer wants their hands my mother’s business.
20.1 The only bills to pay our 800 care bills according to the lawyers.
16 Then I brought up the N244 I sent to the court asking for the Judge to note the many issues in the case such as 1) lawyer Woodside hitting my mother 2|) Bartlett £100,000 care bills that become 800 (from 2015 to 2019 in the court papers) when I investigated and no receipt from the lawyers after year!. 3) The fact money was taken from my mother’s account by the lawyers Bartlett etc. 4) Then in the past the lawyer buying the law firm to be the executor of the will then undervaluing my mother’s business by 700,000, and the list goes on. (see web site for other who had the same issues by these lawyers).
17 The Judge acted like this was funny. But did not send it to the CSP. The judge was told about serious wrongs with evidence but took no actions. I said my mother was murdered…and nothing from him….and this is part of the probate case.
18 What I saw was a court case engineer to give a false result by removing my key witnesses.
19 This can not be fair and must be investigated.
19.1 This is a breach of Art 6 European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) Art 6, Right to Fair Trial.
20 The court case is not in a rush as my sister is the claimant and has died and the case is worth over million, so why the rush? Other than the claimant’s lawyer wants their hands my mother’s business.
20.1 The only bills to pay our 800 care bills according to the lawyers.
21 Therefore I request that the rights to submit witnesses statements is granted and then for this case to be heard in front of Mr Justice Snowden or someone else like him. He is the best judge we (my friends who were present ever saw).
22. Mr Justice Snowden clearly said the other side to give me documents which they still have not done. I have had not had all the files and request them before the court case starts.
A transcript should show this was said by Justice Snowden.
A transcript should show this was said by Justice Snowden.
23. I want to Avoid the following judges and ask they are not involved in this case. Also how well do they know anyone in this case.
1 Honor Judge Hodge QC due to the above and the way my mother’s murder was no issue to him…this is horrific. I have to watch videos of my mother crying for help trapped in a nursing home where she is punch and being killed. Police detecive MA knew about this and did nothing and he could of (see web site) He clearly gain as he puts in statements to the court to get my mother’s money…
2 District Judge CD allowed Bartlett 6k for non heard case due to it being listed twice 2019, sent appeal for that and no response from the court etc…
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Dr Mark Jones <mark@myvibe.net>
Date: Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM
Subject: Medical expert says in court documents that Lawyer did hit my mother so he could get her home and steal her money. Also my mother was clearly murdered to shut her up
To: CORBYN, Jeremy <jeremy.corbyn.mp@parliament.uk>, <af.contact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>, <report@sra.org.uk>, Parminder Pandaal <Parminder.Pandaal@sra.org.uk>, AF Team <contact@actionfraud.pnn.police.uk>, Public Contact <publiccontact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman <LGO@public.govdelivery.com>, Enquiries <enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>, <general.counsel@legalombudsman.org.uk>, <press@legalombudsman.org.uk>
From: Dr Mark Jones <mark@myvibe.net>
Date: Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM
Subject: Medical expert says in court documents that Lawyer did hit my mother so he could get her home and steal her money. Also my mother was clearly murdered to shut her up
To: CORBYN, Jeremy <jeremy.corbyn.mp@parliament.uk>, <af.contact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>, <report@sra.org.uk>, Parminder Pandaal <Parminder.Pandaal@sra.org.uk>, AF Team <contact@actionfraud.pnn.police.uk>, Public Contact <publiccontact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk>, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman <LGO@public.govdelivery.com>, Enquiries <enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>, <general.counsel@legalombudsman.org.uk>, <press@legalombudsman.org.uk>
An example of Dementia Fraud.
To be used in Parliamentary meeting as an example of fraud etcFrom: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Freeman of the City of London
Parliamentary Candidate
Scottish Freemason.
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Tel (44) 077 355 75 011
All correspondence by email as I am travelling and the only way to
reach me is through email.
Email: mark@myvibe.netPlease acknowledge this email and its attachments.
To be used in Parliamentary meeting as an example of fraud etcFrom: Dr Mark Jones FRSM
Freeman of the City of London
Parliamentary Candidate
Scottish Freemason.
MBA, PhD, Ma, PgDip :.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Tel (44) 077 355 75 011
All correspondence by email as I am travelling and the only way to
reach me is through email.
Email: mark@myvibe.netPlease acknowledge this email and its attachments.
To HEAD of SRA
The following will be used as legal action against you for your failure of Duty of Care to my mother and many others.
Claim No E30LV485
Exhibits are in the attached file
Exhibits are in the attached file
Background.
Bartlett buy law firms to control wills and run up costs. By controlling the Will he buys up elderly homes- cheap.
By force and against everyone wishes he became executor of my mother’s estate.
Claim 1 Bartlett Stealing
1. The SRA claims Bartlett has done nothing wrong yet this solicitor claimed in the Liverpool probate (case no 2018 ) court that he had to pursue costs against me (Dr Jones) because he falsely claimed my late mother (Mavis Banks) had £100,000 of care bill costs from 2016 after her death (see Exhibit BillS2017to2019).
1.2 See also page 2 end paragraph ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf and he tries to use this to force the sale of my mother’s family business (building) in the past after she has died.
2. He also wanted to remove the caveat I had put in place so he could not take money from my mother’s estate.
3. But Bartlett can’t even release actual care bills for the £100,000 he claimed from my mother’s estate.
4. And paperwork we have from him in all the court files does not show this bill.
4.1 But defendant (Dr Jones) asked the council the true cost of the care bills for his mother and waits for a reply see 7 March 2019 Exhibit Bill7March2019
4.3 Then the Chester council contact Dr Jones on 2 May 2019 with official documents that say it now DEFERRED £XXX See Exhibit Council10847.pdf TRUE NUMBER HIDDEN DUE TO FRAUD
4.4 Then Mr Bartlett went to court on 15 March 2019 and said the care bill was now only £871.00 and not £100,000 ExibitBartCareCost15March2019.pdf on page 9. As he knew he was going to be found out.
4.5 If I had Not investigated this 100,000 that became 800 by my actions, then Barlett would have had this 100,000 as never challenged.SRA support these actions! As they did no investigation from 2000 onwards
5 Then Bartlett clear stealing and no alternative explanation
5.1 Over course it gets worse the very same lawyer took £3522 out of my mother’s £60,000 bank account in 15/2/2016 and refuses to say what it was for, refuses to release any details whatsoever! See in all emails to SRA the following 17 May 2016 onwards.
Mr Bartlett cannot explain where money (see 2nd of August email to him “Please explain the 3522.00 paid from Mavis Banks (my dead mother) Nationwide bank (on the 15/2/2016) without permission. And has nothing to do with the funeral as can see that and other bills were paid with receipts) is going. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7 Note it says by TYPED 2015)
Mr Bartlett cannot explain where money (see 2nd of August email to him “Please explain the 3522.00 paid from Mavis Banks (my dead mother) Nationwide bank (on the 15/2/2016) without permission. And has nothing to do with the funeral as can see that and other bills were paid with receipts) is going. Mr Bartlett became executor on Jan 2016 (see Exhibit B7 Note it says by TYPED 2015)
5.2 Also, before my mother died, my sister said my mother had no money. I found my mother’s bank book and my sister was forced to say to the court she had forgotten 40,000 of my mother’s money.
5.3 Then, after my mother’s death, 60,000 appears, and we want to know where this came from?
5.4 this is a serious crime being ignored
5.5 On the website, he is listed as doing this to others. https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.bartlettslaw.co.uk?languages=en&stars=1
6 Barlett can not show who is paying for this court case, and we want to know who is paying for this. As my sister gains by this will change done by Woodside, who works for Barlett.As the Will was going to leave me my mother’s business as I had put significant money into it.
Claim 2 Bartlett contacts and then controls my lawyers (many cases)
7. In 2019 I put an N244 to remove Mr Barlett as executor at the Royal Court of Justice. DATE 5 Feb 2019 RCJ Court Stamp 4 March 20197.1 In my N244 I point out he had become executor by force, he had undervalued my mother’s home by 700,000, he had ignored the fact that my mother said his lawyer Mr Woodside had hit her to change her will and force her to sell her home against her wishes. In fact, the N244 listed many other points which the Joint Expert witness appointed by the court (2019) agreed to as being very wrong. Also, my mother is clearly saying that the truth that Woodside hit her to change her will etc. is backed up by this court expert.
7.1 But as I had put this into a London court, my new lawyers acted strangely and also put this into the Liverpool court case (3rd of April 2019). Note every time Mr Barlett talks to my lawyers; they acted strangely. They try and double-bill me etc. Then they stop working with me.
7.2 Mr Green (lawyer for Bartlett) said it was a duplicate process under the law White book (2019). Under rule 3.4 page 83 Paragraph: 3.4.3.1 Heading Vexatious proceedings. Under half, it is abuse to bring vexatious proceedings.
The Judge said: an abuse to bring two or more cases on the same subject matter, harassment, times and costs.
8. BUT my lawyers added the removal of Barlett at the last minute knowing I had already put this into the London court. Lawyers say, If it was your lawyers that submitted the request knowing about the one you did, then it’s them that are liable to pay, they should have known better.
9. My lawyers knew what they were doing. They were advising me on the Liverpool court case and knew about the N244 for the Royal Court of Justice to remove Mr Barlett as executor with damages against him.
The Judge said: an abuse to bring two or more cases on the same subject matter, harassment, times and costs.
8. BUT my lawyers added the removal of Barlett at the last minute knowing I had already put this into the London court. Lawyers say, If it was your lawyers that submitted the request knowing about the one you did, then it’s them that are liable to pay, they should have known better.
9. My lawyers knew what they were doing. They were advising me on the Liverpool court case and knew about the N244 for the Royal Court of Justice to remove Mr Barlett as executor with damages against him.
10. Then at the Liverpool court hearing (DATE 3 April 2019) in 2019 Barlett stepped down as executor as he knew I could get him for damages against him due to my N244.
11. But then he asked the judge to take action against me as I had done duplication of putting in two cases in two different courts over removing him as executor. NOTE: I did not do this; it was my lawyers! They never said this was wrong.
12. Then without a hearing on this case, he put damages to me for 6000 for the N244 to remove him as executor. The judge let this happen! This is very wrong.
13. But then he stepped down as executor. There was also no reading of my N244 in court, so how can he get 6000? For a judgment! There was no trial.
13.1 This was done to show he could control the court to prove I could not get justice.
14. The duplication of court case was done by my lawyers who then dropped me and said they were told not to help me! I recorded this.
14. I complained to the court about this, but they said they could not process it! It is still an issue of showing corruption to damage me.
Claim 3 Bartlett sent damaging documents about me to people to damage me.
15. Mr Bartlett was found to be sending documents about me to lawyers, witnesses etc. to discredit me. This was found out by the court expert witness see Part 2 from Dr Howard report 2019. This also caused NHS staff & lawyers (who were paid) not to work with me…therefore I seek compensation & damages. This should removes Bartlett & Green from this case due to RSA rules etcDR HOWARD REPORT Part 2.
BARLETT SAYS THE FOLLOWING in private to the expert:
39. In relation to Order of the Court of Protection, does this information help you understand Mark’s conduct towards his mother? DR HOWARD REPLIES: The Court Order was dated 2nd March 2015, which is over five years after the events in question. I do not feel that it helps to determine the issues in November 2007 and January 2009. I ask where is this report?????
BARLETT SAYS THE FOLLOWING in private to the expert:
39. In relation to Order of the Court of Protection, does this information help you understand Mark’s conduct towards his mother? DR HOWARD REPLIES: The Court Order was dated 2nd March 2015, which is over five years after the events in question. I do not feel that it helps to determine the issues in November 2007 and January 2009. I ask where is this report?????
Claim 4 Bartlett ignored the Judge orders
16. Then Bartlett was ordered by Judge Hogworth on the (23 October 2019 ) to hand over and release all said documents which he has yet to fulfil.
16.1 A subject Access request was also done but still no evidence from Barlett as he knows he has done wrong.
17. So Bartlett, a lawyer, regulated by the SRA, has failed in his duty of care and broken many issues of SRA conduct.
18. This law firm handles thousands of other probates yet took a claimant to court for 100,000 in costs when he now freely admits it was only £800 when he had access to £60,000 held in my mother bank account as cash that could have paid any care bill costs.
Claim 5 Bartlett undervalued my mother’s home
19. Bartlett unvalued my mother family business by 700,000 for self gain he became Executor to rob my mother estate.
19.1 Mr Bartlett said on 7th September 2015 (Exhibit X) (or Exhibit B7) and 2019 Exhibit Bills 2007to2019) my mother’s family business (building) is worth only 450,000 (undervalued) and this number has not changed.
19.2 I can now show by other professionals it is worth more. In fact, my mother’s family business (building) on Zoopla is 1,060,000 (Exhibit Value Part 1) and on “Property data” it is 1,150,000 (Exhibit Value Part 2).
19.3 It has been pointed out that “strange 2 UK property experts can come up with similar valuations but Bartletts somehow manages to miss it by a whopping £700,000 plus. Now some might say ah but if they are doing the probate they might give you the bottom valuation and shift the house to an offshore company so no-one knows who actually bought it and sell later on to make 200% profit, how else can any reasonable person think?”
19.4 Many who are too scared say they did this to others and the investigation of the land reg should be done to find out if this is true? But Mr Bartlett was found out by me.
Claim 5 Bartlett has a history of these types of actions.
20. Therefore he is guilty of running up costs, lying etc. something the Law Society has already ruled against him and fined him £300,000 (Law Society File No 8751-2003 )
21. So the question has to be asked why the SRA is protecting this firm and not protecting many more unsuspecting clients under his firm at this precise time?
22. You have a duty of care not only to my case but all other Bartlett’s law firm clients if this is the norm of running up huge costs against clients interest.
23. Also making court cases against him difficult by him making large amounts of documents and getting lawyers to sabotage any help to them.
24. This email is copied to Bartletts in the hope they furnish you with the correct dated Chester care bills and where my mother £3522 went to, but we both know it will never transpire.
25. Therefore Barlett is found to not only be found for legal fraud.
26. But also for doing wills incorrectly because if they did them correctly, the courts would NOT have to ask for Bartletts to turn over care bill evidence. The care bills are 4 years after probate started.
27. The SRA really has to ask why Bartletts thinks and says the current costs for the case is at £40,000+? when the court case was never ADR. The fact I have a Claim that from 2015 shows I can put debts against my mother’s estate greater than her estate. That the wills are done wrong to let Barlett get my mother’s home, to force its sale, this is what he does to many. In the past and was trying to do next store when he did it to them when he ran there father’s will.
28. David Green of Atlantic Chambers knew all about this from 2018!
I WANT TO SEE THE CPS, SRA TO TAKE ACTION NOW.
History
History
1. SRA contacted on 17 May 2016. Note Paviter Dhaddy Team Leader did nothing knowing my mother on video said she was hit and money gone missing.
No investigation with a known lawyer who had a history of trouble listed on websites etc.
1.2 The SRA code of conduct And The law Society broken by Barlett’s and Greens actions.
2. Office for legal complaints legal ombudsman told about the case on 5 April 2016 and took no actions as waiting to hear from Bartlett CMP-034223 ABC:00521556
3. And Chief ombudsman And Legal service boardS1(1) Legal services act 2007
4. And Office of legal complaints
2. Office for legal complaints legal ombudsman told about the case on 5 April 2016 and took no actions as waiting to hear from Bartlett CMP-034223 ABC:00521556
3. And Chief ombudsman And Legal service boardS1(1) Legal services act 2007
4. And Office of legal complaints
5. Action Fraud RE: (NFRC190302836567) knew about this from 27 March 2019 then sent it to Chester police with no actions taken.email: af.contact@cheshire.pnn.police.uk
But can show Police detective Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA) gained by this case and knew Woodside & Dr Bland struck off in 2018 & lied about knowing Dr Nicklson saying did not know him but he signed the cremation document together and did Dols on Mother. Dr Nicklson gave mother morphine for no clinical reason that leads to hearing death… Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu lied at mother’s inquest.
But can show Police detective Police Detectives Michael Anklers (MA) gained by this case and knew Woodside & Dr Bland struck off in 2018 & lied about knowing Dr Nicklson saying did not know him but he signed the cremation document together and did Dols on Mother. Dr Nicklson gave mother morphine for no clinical reason that leads to hearing death… Police Detective: DS Nomdedeu lied at mother’s inquest.
5. There are many videos of my mother saying she was hit by Woodside her lawyer who did her Wills to force her against her will to sell her home, change her wills etc. The joint court expert says these videos are real and of my mother recalling true events.
see
https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M
see also
https://youtu.be/fav1xnCD4cQ
see
https://youtu.be/gdZJGBY5q_M
see also
https://youtu.be/fav1xnCD4cQ
5.1 For more videos of my mother see the website which was put up at the start of the year.
https://corruptsolicitors.co.
https://corruptsolicitors.co.
Barlett and Woodside then in January 2019 threatened to use legal actions to shut me up due to the website but then did nothing as the site is based on truth. In November 2019 still no actions by them after me asking them what is wrong with me saying my mother was hit by Woodside to by force change her wills and sell her business to Bartlett.
Dr Mark Jones FRSM
